T
TheEndHasNoEnd
No avi halo
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2020
- Posts
- 6,547
- Reputation
- 12,979
Disclaimer: I don't claim to know everything, this is just a theory of mine. Not going to put up with redditor-tier arguements.
The Familiarity TheoryI'm not going to put fancy graphs, studies, pictures, etc. because this is so much that I just wanna put it out there as fast as possible, I don't have the willpower to put in all the effort to make it beautifully formatted. l'll make it as short and simple as I can. I hope you guys can look past the lack of formatting and appreciate the raw ideas. This might be the best thread I've ever made. Let's start.
1. The Basis of Attraction:
We see the world through patterns, a basic one would be a one step association like seeing a cat and recalling from memory that it's a cat. A slightly more complex one would be figuring out a simple pattern like 2,4,6,8... etc. But there's one thing that all of us here at geniuses at, and that's faces. And by "we" I mean literally everyone. We constantly look at faces everyday since the day we were out of the womb. Nobody has a photographic memory, so to cope with this, we average out all the faces we've ever seen. Remember the cat example I used? Some of you might've thought of a cat from some recognizable breed, but it most likely didn't look exactly like your neighbor's cat with all his flaws and such, but rather, just any other cat. An averaged cat. So when we average out all the faces, it forms a face with the ideal ratios that we all know. A person who's closest to the averaged midface ratio, fwhr, es ratio, bizygo to bigonial ratio, etc will be seen as attractive. If you aren't aware of the averageness pill, just search up threads here. There are many studies showing that averaged faces and ratios are considered to be the most attractive. This isn't just for ratios btw, but features too, it's also why meds are considered the most gling because tan skin is literally inbetween black and white. But there's more to attractiveness than just being averaged.
2. Learning by Association
Picture a 6/10 darkskin African American (in b4 "they don't exist" stfu lmfao). Looks decent right, ok now give him straight hair and change the undertone a bit. Boom, a 4/10 or lower Dravidian Indian. But why does this happen? It's because darkskin blacks have a favorable representation in the media as cool rappers with status. Meanwhile Dravidians have little to no representation and if they do, its being the nerd in tv shows. So when you first were imagining the black, word associations like "cool" "hip" "gangster" "badass" came to your mind and when it transformed to the Dravidian it became "dirty" "unclean" "poor" etc. This is called learning by association, and very in your face, repetitive association in this case with the media etc. Even though African Americans (mostly west african phenotype) and Dravidians have extremely similar features like wide cartigalous noses, big lips, non deep set eyes, etc. taking away the curly hair and undertone that DEFINE Africans completely transformed it into a Dravidian and knocked it down 2 pts. This is also why you see here many people talking about how Dravidians should BBCmaxx. This goes much farther than this too btw. This is also how gling people are considered gling. People who deny the averageness theory will say "well clearly someone with a bigger jaw will be more attractive so this is cope." And this is because the guy with the jawline is portrayed in movies and shows to be the jock who gets all the girls and this seeps into everyones brain as objectively more attractive, because its literally portrayed as more attractive. It just has to not sway too far off an averaged person to make sure it can be identified as a person. What makes someone ugly is someone too far off averageness and/or not given favorable representation in media and other things. This also explains "harmony." This is also why people like Ryan Gosling are considered so gling is because of the roles he played in movies. This leads me to some lifefuel for yall.
3. How to Get a Stacy LTR
Again, I have to emphasize this, this is only a theory of mine and I'm not certain it will work out. But anyways:
We've all seen it here. The ugly/normie with the stacy and not someone who's rich, huge dick, etc. So the only thing left to explain it is simply luck, right? I don't think so. I like to think that the dude was genuinely a close friend/childhood friend of the girl. How does someone become a close friend? They have traits worthy to that person to be considered a close friend. They're unironically personalitymaxxed, but unintentionally. So to get a stacy ltr, you must try to have a good personality with the sole intention of becoming her friend at first so that it seems genuine. The reason why this would be effective is because it will force positive associations to your face making you literally more sexually attractive to her. Sexual attraction part doesnt make sense? Think about body trends throughout decades, centuries, etc. Even just the past 2-ish decades we went from a majority tit society to a majority ass society. If sexual attraction was so objective, how was this possible? It's because of the media forcing positive associations to the new body trend. This is why I believe it's possible to literally trick a girl into thinking you're gling and worthy enough of an ltr. Of course, you must still looksmax to make the process faster and easier, but you get what I mean.
With everything you read just now, it's all up to you in how you interpret it. Thanks for reading.
TAGGING THE BROS AND PEOPLE WHO ASKED TO BE TAGGED (no particular order): @brbbrah @xefo69 @Bromose @16tyo @thecel @GigaAscender @hairyballscel @goat2x @EreptileDysfunction @TraumatisedOgre @Proex @FastBananaCEO @Maesthetic @RoBobaFett999 @Boneless Weirdo @Xen @Original @kjsbdfiusdf @datboijj @Acnno @austrianvirgin @Chad1212 @itis123 @SubhumanCurrycel @MedMaxxing
The Familiarity Theory
1. The Basis of Attraction:
We see the world through patterns, a basic one would be a one step association like seeing a cat and recalling from memory that it's a cat. A slightly more complex one would be figuring out a simple pattern like 2,4,6,8... etc. But there's one thing that all of us here at geniuses at, and that's faces. And by "we" I mean literally everyone. We constantly look at faces everyday since the day we were out of the womb. Nobody has a photographic memory, so to cope with this, we average out all the faces we've ever seen. Remember the cat example I used? Some of you might've thought of a cat from some recognizable breed, but it most likely didn't look exactly like your neighbor's cat with all his flaws and such, but rather, just any other cat. An averaged cat. So when we average out all the faces, it forms a face with the ideal ratios that we all know. A person who's closest to the averaged midface ratio, fwhr, es ratio, bizygo to bigonial ratio, etc will be seen as attractive. If you aren't aware of the averageness pill, just search up threads here. There are many studies showing that averaged faces and ratios are considered to be the most attractive. This isn't just for ratios btw, but features too, it's also why meds are considered the most gling because tan skin is literally inbetween black and white. But there's more to attractiveness than just being averaged.
2. Learning by Association
Picture a 6/10 darkskin African American (in b4 "they don't exist" stfu lmfao). Looks decent right, ok now give him straight hair and change the undertone a bit. Boom, a 4/10 or lower Dravidian Indian. But why does this happen? It's because darkskin blacks have a favorable representation in the media as cool rappers with status. Meanwhile Dravidians have little to no representation and if they do, its being the nerd in tv shows. So when you first were imagining the black, word associations like "cool" "hip" "gangster" "badass" came to your mind and when it transformed to the Dravidian it became "dirty" "unclean" "poor" etc. This is called learning by association, and very in your face, repetitive association in this case with the media etc. Even though African Americans (mostly west african phenotype) and Dravidians have extremely similar features like wide cartigalous noses, big lips, non deep set eyes, etc. taking away the curly hair and undertone that DEFINE Africans completely transformed it into a Dravidian and knocked it down 2 pts. This is also why you see here many people talking about how Dravidians should BBCmaxx. This goes much farther than this too btw. This is also how gling people are considered gling. People who deny the averageness theory will say "well clearly someone with a bigger jaw will be more attractive so this is cope." And this is because the guy with the jawline is portrayed in movies and shows to be the jock who gets all the girls and this seeps into everyones brain as objectively more attractive, because its literally portrayed as more attractive. It just has to not sway too far off an averaged person to make sure it can be identified as a person. What makes someone ugly is someone too far off averageness and/or not given favorable representation in media and other things. This also explains "harmony." This is also why people like Ryan Gosling are considered so gling is because of the roles he played in movies. This leads me to some lifefuel for yall.
3. How to Get a Stacy LTR
Again, I have to emphasize this, this is only a theory of mine and I'm not certain it will work out. But anyways:
We've all seen it here. The ugly/normie with the stacy and not someone who's rich, huge dick, etc. So the only thing left to explain it is simply luck, right? I don't think so. I like to think that the dude was genuinely a close friend/childhood friend of the girl. How does someone become a close friend? They have traits worthy to that person to be considered a close friend. They're unironically personalitymaxxed, but unintentionally. So to get a stacy ltr, you must try to have a good personality with the sole intention of becoming her friend at first so that it seems genuine. The reason why this would be effective is because it will force positive associations to your face making you literally more sexually attractive to her. Sexual attraction part doesnt make sense? Think about body trends throughout decades, centuries, etc. Even just the past 2-ish decades we went from a majority tit society to a majority ass society. If sexual attraction was so objective, how was this possible? It's because of the media forcing positive associations to the new body trend. This is why I believe it's possible to literally trick a girl into thinking you're gling and worthy enough of an ltr. Of course, you must still looksmax to make the process faster and easier, but you get what I mean.
With everything you read just now, it's all up to you in how you interpret it. Thanks for reading.
TAGGING THE BROS AND PEOPLE WHO ASKED TO BE TAGGED (no particular order): @brbbrah @xefo69 @Bromose @16tyo @thecel @GigaAscender @hairyballscel @goat2x @EreptileDysfunction @TraumatisedOgre @Proex @FastBananaCEO @Maesthetic @RoBobaFett999 @Boneless Weirdo @Xen @Original @kjsbdfiusdf @datboijj @Acnno @austrianvirgin @Chad1212 @itis123 @SubhumanCurrycel @MedMaxxing
Last edited:
