The final dogpill

[incel-at-heart]

South Dakota. The next report is from the Mitchell Capital (Jul. 30, 1897, p. 1, cols. 3-4), a newspaper published in Mitchell, South Dakota. The story originated with the Watertown Public Opinion, a newspaper published in Watertown, South Dakota.

A Freak of Nature
Watertown Public Opinion: Public Opinion secures this piece of information from sources that warrant the vouching for its accuracy, although names are suppressed for obvious reasons: There reside in the reservation country, northwest of Watertown, among others, a man and wife who command the respect of their neighbors. Recently the woman in question gave birth to a child whose face and general features were those of a dog. Its ears were likewise shaped like a dog’s, while its hands were more like claws than like hands. Its crying was an imitation of the bark of a dog. Otherwise the child was properly formed. It survived but a comparatively short time. Our informant says that the woman was frightened on account of a dog fight several months ago, and this incident is presumed to have wrought the deformity of her child.

 

[brownmutt42]

 

[incel-at-heart]

Illinois. The next article is from the Dodge City Times (Aug. 8, 1890, p. 1, col. 1), a newspaper published in Dodge City, Kansas:

A Baby With a Dog’s Head
Cairo, Ill., Aug. 4.—A lady named McLaughlin, residing on Twenty-first street, this city, recently gave birth to a child whose face and head was the image of a bulldog, the rest of the monstrosity retaining the normal condition and appearance of a healthy child. Sometime past the father of the child purchased a large bulldog, whose care he entrusted to the wife. About ten days ago the dog became vicious and frightened the woman so much so that she took to her bed. Yesterday the monstrosity was born. The child died a few hours after birth.

 

[superpsycho]

brutal speciespill

 

[AdamsHere]

[IMG alt="incel-at-heart"]https://looksmax.org/data/avatars/l/100/100722.jpg?1738620670[/IMG]

incel-at-heart​

 

[incel-at-heart]

Bavaria. And the German physician Christian Franz Paullini (1688, p. 49) describes a case of a Bavarian woman who, in the year of 1635, gave birth to a stillborn “child,” supposedly having a head entirely like that of a dog, but hairless, a lolling tongue, the legs of a dog in the place of arms, and a short tail; the remainder of the body being like that of a human.

 

[incel-at-heart]

Messina. A separate case was reported that same year far to the south of Bavaria. In a letter appearing in an appendix of Paul Zacchias’ Quaestiones medico-legales, the Italian physician and botanist Pietro Castelli (1574-1662) gives the following account of an ostensible human-dog hybrid born to a woman in the city of Messina on December 26, 1635 (translated in de Ceglia 2014):

It was shaped like a dog and its sacrum seemed very wide and full, but without a tail. The skin or, better, the cutis, was completely hairless, ruddy and highly tenuous, only in this was it similar to a human. Instead, its head, considering its shape and the position of the eyes, could be more easily compared to that of a bird than to that of a dog, although the ears were canine, the right one more oblong than the left one, sticking straight up. In place of the nose it had a wide, pendulous membrane, which, once dried, remained erect. It had a small, round mouth with the two lower incisors. Its front feet were reminiscent of those of a dog, but without nails; instead, the rear feet were truly monstrous: they were made of four oblong fistulas, of equal size and empty, but osseous, some of which had a sort of round plug at the end. Its abdomen was swollen and livid. I immediately eviscerated it, but, since the entrails were putrid and very fetid, I could not study them carefully. I only observed that the left kidney was very large, but I did not see the right one: I was not surprised since I was investigating amidst decay and nauseating stench. Likewise, I was not able to recognize its sex, but it seemed to me to be a female. The length of the cadaver from its clavicle to the coccyx was a handbreadth, and from head to toe a hand-breadth and a half. Then, with proper care, I dried the body, which I keep in my museum, complete and displayable.
A change of opinion

It’s of interest that de Ceglia 2014, p. 133 says that over the years, Zacchias, who at one time had some doubts about whether human-animal hybrids were possible, “would become more and more convinced and finally he would declare: ‘I was previously of that opinion, and now, I persevere much more in the [opinion] that nothing can prevent it that from the mixture of human seed with beastly seed some generation can follow.’” (de Ceglia’s translation of a passage in Quaestiones, Vol. III, Cons. XXII, p. 28).
Zacchias, who was a teacher of medical science and forensic medicine, had been consulted by judges in Messina regarding whether the birth could have been the result of hybridization between the woman in question and a dog. In addition, Castelli commented that

the cadaver with its occiput broken was brought to me two days after the birth. The father said that while it was emerging from the uterus the mother herself had pulled its head, and that it had broken. But, for my part, I suspect that it was deliberately crushed because it was a monster. [Translated in de Ceglia 2014.]

 

[anthony111553]

good foward growth

 

[brownmutt42]

good foward growth

Agreed

 

[incel-at-heart]

@ElySioNs gtfih women have been fucking dogs forever and they regularly give birth to mutant hybrids

what do you guys think for modern times, since dogfucking is normalized and w*men think they cannot get pregnant ... will we see the rise of a new species?

 

[incel-at-heart]

bump