data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ce1b/2ce1b93c3ef44c62f81d49d5e542b7c51a123d46" alt="Avertion"
Avertion
Sphinx
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2024
- Posts
- 2,930
- Reputation
- 4,324
Five hundred years ago, the beauty standard was entirely different. Being fat was seen as attractive because it symbolized wealth and prosperity in a world where food scarcity was common. On top of that, historical studies suggest that most people back then had more recessed features, yet it wasn’t seen as a flaw—it was simply the norm.
Fast forward to today, and the standard has completely flipped. If you’re fat or have recessed features, society deems it unattractive. You can rationalize why certain bone structures are perceived as “better,” but there’s no real, objective explanation.
The truth is, it’s all fabricated. There’s no scientific basis for why prominent features are inherently “more attractive” than recessed ones. We’re not biologically programmed to prefer certain traits. Instead, we’re subconsciously conditioned by societal trends. People don’t form opinions independently—they adopt the preferences of the majority. In the end, attraction is less about instinct and more about conformity.
Fast forward to today, and the standard has completely flipped. If you’re fat or have recessed features, society deems it unattractive. You can rationalize why certain bone structures are perceived as “better,” but there’s no real, objective explanation.
The truth is, it’s all fabricated. There’s no scientific basis for why prominent features are inherently “more attractive” than recessed ones. We’re not biologically programmed to prefer certain traits. Instead, we’re subconsciously conditioned by societal trends. People don’t form opinions independently—they adopt the preferences of the majority. In the end, attraction is less about instinct and more about conformity.