Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,340
- Reputation
- 47,619
Introduction
This is a political blackpill thread. I’ve not made a political thread in a few months on here so I may be a bit rusty.
Part 1: The hypocrisy of western liberalism and striking similarities to pre 21st century colonialism
Western liberals will love to talk about how colonization as an immoral and barbaric practice that should of never happened. Meanwhile I do agree to an extent, their entire world view is built Ontop of foundations held together by hypocrisy and sleight of hand.
To further explain, western liberalism builds its economic worldview off of a concept called neoliberalism.
Neo-liberalism (at least in my interpretation) is completely laissez faire or “hands off” economics. Economic deregulation, lower taxes and less barriers to trade are the core tenets of neoliberalism. An ideology that comes alongside it often is globalism, however not every neo-liberal is a globalist (the vast majority at this point are though).
This ideology rose after the death of colonization, socialism and American paleoconservatism, around the 70’s-80’s.
To get straight to the point, western liberals almost always subscribe to some view of neoliberal economics, some more than others. But they all tend to be globalist. Globalism naturally brings international cooperation and international organizations alongside it. This may seem harmless at the start, but this is just a Trojan horse.
These international organizations, as many know here, are quite literally controlled by western governments, who then turn and use these organizations as a means to exert pressure on developing nations. See the IMF and their history of attaching retarded stipulations to loans, such as increasing taxes, deregulating economy, lowering spending, etc.
and it’s not like these nations can necessairly just deny these loans, because due to neo-liberalism, we have a completely global economic system. And a completely global economic system allows for corporations, often state backed to subvert governments, contribute to local issues (as a means to cause conflict) and extract resources for cheap, which then emboldens the economic system of the west to continue on its path. At the expense of everyone else. Which results in these richer western nations profiting off the backs of the 3rd world and having a safety cushion during a crisis, economic or otherwise while the nations they intentionally fuck over have to starve or depend on loans, which as stated before, have these conditions. And the cycle continues, and continues, and continues.
But liberals will tell you that this is fine or they will side step the issue and say “that’s sad but oh well”. They will screech and cry when you tell them that this system is no different from colonialism that we see in history books or watch on film. I’ll put out reasons, bullet point by bullet point, just for you.
16th-20th century colonialism
- Western nations subverted the governments of the foreign world and assumed direct control
- Extracted resources for cheap
- imposed quotas and standards for governance among the natives
- Suppressed the native culture or replaced it due to it being “savage and barbaric”
- suppressed the native religions or outright replaced them due to them being “savage and barbaric”
- Pretence of “educating the uneducated” was used
- using the native population as cheap labour
- Slave grade (Abolished by the time africa and parts of the middle east were truly annexed as territory for the Europeans)
21st century neoliberalism
- western nations subvert the national governments of foreign nations by fuelling corruption and buying off politicians
- Extract resources for cheap through unbalanced contracts
- Impose quotas and standards through loans by the IMF for example
- Attempts to “export” western culture to these nations and completely bombard them with it, drowning out the native culture and replacing it with a hypercapitalistic vain mess that is “better” due to the native culture being seen as “barbaric and backwards” by western natives
- Attempts to suppress the native religions of these countries by exporting western secularism/atheism to them and ridicule their native religions as a “violation of human rights” and “savage” (see secularists describing Islam and how they suck off the Late iranian theocracy who were degen and tried to be as western as possible)
The only difference is the slave trade, which was abolished before the 1st period of colonization ended, and also applied to one group (africans). In general, there are not much differences. Because neo liberalism is a direct evolution of colonization. You can’t run a foreign country with a standing military anymore. But you can run their economy, resources and maybe even put a major military base there so they don’t try anything. That’s neoliberalism, thats globalism. At this point, they are connected.
Yet liberals hear this and put their fingers in their ears, ignoring you, refusing to listen.
Part 2: Moral inferiority of white liberals
White liberals will preach to you from their ivory tower about how we are ought to accept mass amounts of migrants because we “owe it to them” and that “it’s a basic human gesture”. If it’s a leddit user, they’ll typically add some swearing as a means to “get their point across better”.
They’ll tell you, a conservative, that your ideology is immoral and theirs is moral. Because they wanna let everyone in for diversity. There’s 2 problems with this.
Firstly, as stated before, their entire world view is built on hypocrisy. What they are quite literally doing and advocating for is immoral. They support a system that fucks over poorer countries and then on top of that open the flood gates for mass migration, draining these nations of their skilled labour. The most famous example? Nigeria. Medical brain drain. Now they have roughly 1 doctor per 6000 people assuming you take their figure of 180 million people seriously (probably closer to 200-300)
They want to suck everything out of everywhere like a succubus.
The 2nd problem is that there is absolutely nothing immoral about people going to their homeland or living where they’re from. It’s how it should be. The high migration rate is only evidence of a global inequality, exacerbated by neoliberal economics. Africa for Africans, Europe for Europeans, Asia for Asians, etc is an infinitely more Just and moral system compared to all the resources of the world for western nations and all the high skilled migrants fleeing poverty for the west.
These white liberals tend to be racist too. If ethnics move into their areas they subconsciously end up moving anyway. They just happen to always end up living in 90% white areas despite preaching for diversity.
If you are a conservative debating a liberal, press them on this issue specifically. They will crack like a wall with 1 billion holes.
This is a political blackpill thread. I’ve not made a political thread in a few months on here so I may be a bit rusty.
Part 1: The hypocrisy of western liberalism and striking similarities to pre 21st century colonialism
Western liberals will love to talk about how colonization as an immoral and barbaric practice that should of never happened. Meanwhile I do agree to an extent, their entire world view is built Ontop of foundations held together by hypocrisy and sleight of hand.
To further explain, western liberalism builds its economic worldview off of a concept called neoliberalism.
Neo-liberalism (at least in my interpretation) is completely laissez faire or “hands off” economics. Economic deregulation, lower taxes and less barriers to trade are the core tenets of neoliberalism. An ideology that comes alongside it often is globalism, however not every neo-liberal is a globalist (the vast majority at this point are though).
This ideology rose after the death of colonization, socialism and American paleoconservatism, around the 70’s-80’s.
To get straight to the point, western liberals almost always subscribe to some view of neoliberal economics, some more than others. But they all tend to be globalist. Globalism naturally brings international cooperation and international organizations alongside it. This may seem harmless at the start, but this is just a Trojan horse.
These international organizations, as many know here, are quite literally controlled by western governments, who then turn and use these organizations as a means to exert pressure on developing nations. See the IMF and their history of attaching retarded stipulations to loans, such as increasing taxes, deregulating economy, lowering spending, etc.
and it’s not like these nations can necessairly just deny these loans, because due to neo-liberalism, we have a completely global economic system. And a completely global economic system allows for corporations, often state backed to subvert governments, contribute to local issues (as a means to cause conflict) and extract resources for cheap, which then emboldens the economic system of the west to continue on its path. At the expense of everyone else. Which results in these richer western nations profiting off the backs of the 3rd world and having a safety cushion during a crisis, economic or otherwise while the nations they intentionally fuck over have to starve or depend on loans, which as stated before, have these conditions. And the cycle continues, and continues, and continues.
But liberals will tell you that this is fine or they will side step the issue and say “that’s sad but oh well”. They will screech and cry when you tell them that this system is no different from colonialism that we see in history books or watch on film. I’ll put out reasons, bullet point by bullet point, just for you.
16th-20th century colonialism
- Western nations subverted the governments of the foreign world and assumed direct control
- Extracted resources for cheap
- imposed quotas and standards for governance among the natives
- Suppressed the native culture or replaced it due to it being “savage and barbaric”
- suppressed the native religions or outright replaced them due to them being “savage and barbaric”
- Pretence of “educating the uneducated” was used
- using the native population as cheap labour
- Slave grade (Abolished by the time africa and parts of the middle east were truly annexed as territory for the Europeans)
21st century neoliberalism
- western nations subvert the national governments of foreign nations by fuelling corruption and buying off politicians
- Extract resources for cheap through unbalanced contracts
- Impose quotas and standards through loans by the IMF for example
- Attempts to “export” western culture to these nations and completely bombard them with it, drowning out the native culture and replacing it with a hypercapitalistic vain mess that is “better” due to the native culture being seen as “barbaric and backwards” by western natives
- Attempts to suppress the native religions of these countries by exporting western secularism/atheism to them and ridicule their native religions as a “violation of human rights” and “savage” (see secularists describing Islam and how they suck off the Late iranian theocracy who were degen and tried to be as western as possible)
The only difference is the slave trade, which was abolished before the 1st period of colonization ended, and also applied to one group (africans). In general, there are not much differences. Because neo liberalism is a direct evolution of colonization. You can’t run a foreign country with a standing military anymore. But you can run their economy, resources and maybe even put a major military base there so they don’t try anything. That’s neoliberalism, thats globalism. At this point, they are connected.
Yet liberals hear this and put their fingers in their ears, ignoring you, refusing to listen.
Part 2: Moral inferiority of white liberals
White liberals will preach to you from their ivory tower about how we are ought to accept mass amounts of migrants because we “owe it to them” and that “it’s a basic human gesture”. If it’s a leddit user, they’ll typically add some swearing as a means to “get their point across better”.
They’ll tell you, a conservative, that your ideology is immoral and theirs is moral. Because they wanna let everyone in for diversity. There’s 2 problems with this.
Firstly, as stated before, their entire world view is built on hypocrisy. What they are quite literally doing and advocating for is immoral. They support a system that fucks over poorer countries and then on top of that open the flood gates for mass migration, draining these nations of their skilled labour. The most famous example? Nigeria. Medical brain drain. Now they have roughly 1 doctor per 6000 people assuming you take their figure of 180 million people seriously (probably closer to 200-300)
They want to suck everything out of everywhere like a succubus.
The 2nd problem is that there is absolutely nothing immoral about people going to their homeland or living where they’re from. It’s how it should be. The high migration rate is only evidence of a global inequality, exacerbated by neoliberal economics. Africa for Africans, Europe for Europeans, Asia for Asians, etc is an infinitely more Just and moral system compared to all the resources of the world for western nations and all the high skilled migrants fleeing poverty for the west.
These white liberals tend to be racist too. If ethnics move into their areas they subconsciously end up moving anyway. They just happen to always end up living in 90% white areas despite preaching for diversity.
If you are a conservative debating a liberal, press them on this issue specifically. They will crack like a wall with 1 billion holes.
