The idea of a permanent self-sufficient 'God'is just absurd,so is the blackpill for the exact same reasons,blackpill=theism skydaddy

[yandex99]

A cause is dependant on it's effect to be a cause,a conditioner is dependant on it's condition to be a conditioner,this is basic 1st grade logic.

If there were anything that were ultimate,it would be compounded and in time the moment it creates.if God desires to create a particular thing,he is swayed by his desire(which comes and goes out of existance,so is not inherent to him),what then of his self-sufficiency and omnipotence?

Furthermore,if the essence of this 'God'is permanent(so he would not go out of existance,nor would he be originated by something else),then his emotional states,cognitions and actions would be unchanging and permanent and he would be totally incapable of any change whatsoever,how then could he interact with changing things?

the idea of God is so absurd,but it seems many people just believe in it out of a fantasy that there is some sky momma or daddy that will take care of them if they're good little boys or girls.

the same goes for a permanent soul,If the soul is permanent, how could it ever be said to meet with new factors and assimilate them?

if he has impermanent and permanent parts,how can he be a unitary,self-same and coherent being?he would be compounded and thus not self-sufficient.

would the permanent part(or nature) create the impermanent parts?how can it?how can something permanent create new things and make things go in and out of existance?he would be a walking contradiction and he would also not be a self-same unitary being.

furthermore and lastly,a lamp cannot illuminate itself without fuel,self-knowledge is the only non-dependant knowledge(and it cannot exist) as all other knowledge involves some correspondance or concept to cognize said thing,if god has cognitions of other things at all he would be dependant on those things to have a certain knowledge of something.he would not be 'independant'.

if his cognitions are changing,he wouldn't be self-sufficient because he is dependant on changing things to have knowledge,and he would not have a uncompounded and thus self-sufficient essence,seeing that he has congitions which go in and out of existance and thus would make him made up of parts.

nothing inherent,permanent or self-sufficient exists,which is also why this site is bollocks,seeing that beauty is not inherent in a object or shape,but rather is just a projection of attachment by each individual mind,otherwise everyone would find the exact same thing attractive,there would be no heterosexuals,homosexuals etc

 

[raleqtambrobret]

 

[hunkymonkey69]

can you rewrite your question i dont understand it

 

[Entschuldigung]

It's impossible to understand god

 

[vaseqmoherad]

every argument for existence and non existence of god leads to contradiction.

if you could prove god's existence then faith in god would've been meaningless.

 

[Deleted member 39145]

Christ is king

 

[vrilmaxxer]

rope and let me know what happens after death

 

[looksmaxxed]

existence is absurd. god is superfluous. it's just an extra step from the idea of a permanent recycling universe. most people believe in god not because it makes so much sense, but because they are afraid of death and want to go to heaven. the idea of permanence is completely unfamiliar to how humans think because death and impermanence is the primary motivator behind most human activities.

the most current understanding of the universe is that it keeps popping in and out of existence and there are an infinite number of multiverses all doing the same thing. purpose and design do not exist outside of the human mind. there does not have to be a purpose or meaning behind anything that happens in the universe

 

[noobs]

A cause is dependant on it's effect to be a cause,a conditioner is dependant on it's condition to be a conditioner,this is basic 1st grade logic.

If there were anything that were ultimate,it would be compounded and in time the moment it creates.if God desires to create a particular thing,he is swayed by his desire(which comes and goes out of existance,so is not inherent to him),what then of his self-sufficiency and omnipotence?

Furthermore,if the essence of this 'God'is permanent(so he would not go out of existance,nor would he be originated by something else),then his emotional states,cognitions and actions would be unchanging and permanent and he would be totally incapable of any change whatsoever,how then could he interact with changing things?

the idea of God is so absurd,but it seems many people just believe in it out of a fantasy that there is some sky momma or daddy that will take care of them if they're good little boys or girls.

the same goes for a permanent soul,If the soul is permanent, how could it ever be said to meet with new factors and assimilate them?

a person on a computer can understand everything on the computer, the person using the computer is omnipotent of everything on the computer

you cannot expect an ai that wasn’t trained on info that it wasn’t given to know anything about how it works, and you can make cognitive restraints on the ai to the point where you can’t understand the creator

the creator can have completely different rules in the simulation than the creators psychical space so it’s impossible to use any worldly logic to disprove god

 

[yandex99]

a person on a computer can understand everything on the computer, the person using the computer is omnipotent of everything on the computer

you cannot expect an ai that wasn’t trained on info that it wasn’t given to know anything about how it works, and you can make cognitive restraints on the ai to the point where you can’t understand the creator

the creator can have completely different rules in the simulation than the creators psychical space so it’s impossible to use any worldly logic to disprove god

logic is applicable in all worlds.if this world were not coherent it could not manifest.

 

[noobs]

logic is applicable in all worlds.

it’s possible to have different inherent rules in a computer than the real world

 

[yandex99]

it’s possible to have different inherent rules in a computer than the real world

two opposing ultimate concepts can never be coherent both.

 

[yandex99]

rope and let me know what happens after death

you reincarnate,but the jewish reptilians('seraphim')according to multiple remote viewers have a astral grid locked on this planet so anyone that doesn't follow the buddhist path and is saved by going to a pureland,could be trapped in the various 'hells'that these evil beings have created in the astral plane for not being a complete slave to them.

 

[vrilmaxxer]

you reincarnate,but the jewish reptilians('seraphim')according to multiple remote viewers have a astral grid locked on this planet so anyone that doesn't follow the buddhist path and is saved by going to a pureland,could be trapped in the various 'hells'that these evil beings have created in the astral plane for not being a complete slave to them.

What are the options for reincarnation?

 

[Deleted member 70955]

A cause is dependant on it's effect to be a cause,a conditioner is dependant on it's condition to be a conditioner,this is basic 1st grade logic.

If there were anything that were ultimate,it would be compounded and in time the moment it creates.if God desires to create a particular thing,he is swayed by his desire(which comes and goes out of existance,so is not inherent to him),what then of his self-sufficiency and omnipotence?

Furthermore,if the essence of this 'God'is permanent(so he would not go out of existance,nor would he be originated by something else),then his emotional states,cognitions and actions would be unchanging and permanent and he would be totally incapable of any change whatsoever,how then could he interact with changing things?

the idea of God is so absurd,but it seems many people just believe in it out of a fantasy that there is some sky momma or daddy that will take care of them if they're good little boys or girls.

the same goes for a permanent soul,If the soul is permanent, how could it ever be said to meet with new factors and assimilate them?

if he has impermanent and permanent parts,how can he be a unitary,self-same and coherent being?he would be compounded and thus not self-sufficient.

would the permanent part(or nature) create the impermanent parts?how can it?how can something permanent create new things and make things go in and out of existance?he would be a walking contradiction and he would also not be a self-same unitary being.

furthermore and lastly,a lamp cannot illuminate itself without fuel,self-knowledge is the only non-dependant knowledge(and it cannot exist) as all other knowledge involves some correspondance or concept to cognize said thing,if god has cognitions of other things at all he would be dependant on those things to have a certain knowledge of something.he would not be 'independant'.

if his cognitions are changing,he wouldn't be self-sufficient because he is dependant on changing things to have knowledge,and he would not have a uncompounded and thus self-sufficient essence,seeing that he has congitions which go in and out of existance and thus would make him made up of parts.

nothing inherent,permanent or self-sufficient exists,which is also why this site is bollocks,seeing that beauty is not inherent in a object or shape,but rather is just a projection of attachment by each individual mind,otherwise everyone would find the exact same thing attractive,there would be no heterosexuals,homosexuals etc

 

[yandex99]

What are the options for reincarnation?

it's kinda scary because these seraphim(seraph means fiery serpent in biblical hebrew aka reptilians)have a prison planet here where they CAN throw you into one of their hells on the astral plane for disobeying them and not profusely apologizing, even minutely .

however,there are many success stories of people that went to amitabha's eternal buddha mind created paradise known as Sukhavati.you don't reincarnate ever again once you go there,and it is pure paradise and you will become a buddha yourself once you go there after some gazillions of trillions of aeons.

noone has access to these realms nor can hinder you,because they are from a buddha's essence.

 

[vrilmaxxer]

it's kinda scary because these seraphim|(seraph means fiery serpent in biblical hebrew aka reptilians)have a prison planet here where they CAN throw you into one of their hells on the astral plane for disobeying them and not profusely apologizing, even minutely .

however,there are many success stories of people that went to amitabha's eternal buddha mind created paradise known as Sukhavati.you don't reincarnate ever again once you go there,and it is pure paradise and you will become a buddha yourself once you go there after some gazillions of trillions of aeons.

Very interesting!

 

[yandex99]

Very interesting!

just do phowa before you die,but don't smoke anything as a habit during your life or beforehand because it will make phowa ineffective according to top tibetan masters.

 

[Deleted member 64829]

existence is absurd. god is superfluous. it's just an extra step from the idea of a permanent recycling universe. most people believe in god not because it makes so much sense, but because they are afraid of death and want to go to heaven. the idea of permanence is completely unfamiliar to how humans think because death and impermanence is the primary motivator behind most human activities.

the most current understanding of the universe is that it keeps popping in and out of existence and there are an infinite number of multiverses all doing the same thing. purpose and design do not exist outside of the human mind. there does not have to be a purpose or meaning behind anything that happens in the universe

How tall are you

 

[yandex99]

What are the options for reincarnation?

Chinese Pureland Rebirth Stories In English - Dharma Wheel

Records of Home Coming to the Pure Land – Story 1

I’ve been wanting to share some real Pure Land Buddhism stories with you guys for years now. There is an extremely rare book that can’t be found on the internet (because I’ve trie…

essenceofbuddhism.wordpress.com

 

[yandex99]

Christ is king

what kind of benevolent king decieves his own subjects?(Mark 4:12)

 

[yandex99]

@Veganist

 

[Samuel Jackson]

A cause is dependant on it's effect to be a cause,a conditioner is dependant on it's condition to be a conditioner,this is basic 1st grade logic.

If there were anything that were ultimate,it would be compounded and in time the moment it creates.if God desires to create a particular thing,he is swayed by his desire(which comes and goes out of existance,so is not inherent to him),what then of his self-sufficiency and omnipotence?

Furthermore,if the essence of this 'God'is permanent(so he would not go out of existance,nor would he be originated by something else),then his emotional states,cognitions and actions would be unchanging and permanent and he would be totally incapable of any change whatsoever,how then could he interact with changing things?

the idea of God is so absurd,but it seems many people just believe in it out of a fantasy that there is some sky momma or daddy that will take care of them if they're good little boys or girls.

the same goes for a permanent soul,If the soul is permanent, how could it ever be said to meet with new factors and assimilate them?

if he has impermanent and permanent parts,how can he be a unitary,self-same and coherent being?he would be compounded and thus not self-sufficient.

would the permanent part(or nature) create the impermanent parts?how can it?how can something permanent create new things and make things go in and out of existance?he would be a walking contradiction and he would also not be a self-same unitary being.

furthermore and lastly,a lamp cannot illuminate itself without fuel,self-knowledge is the only non-dependant knowledge(and it cannot exist) as all other knowledge involves some correspondance or concept to cognize said thing,if god has cognitions of other things at all he would be dependant on those things to have a certain knowledge of something.he would not be 'independant'.

if his cognitions are changing,he wouldn't be self-sufficient because he is dependant on changing things to have knowledge,and he would not have a uncompounded and thus self-sufficient essence,seeing that he has congitions which go in and out of existance and thus would make him made up of parts.

nothing inherent,permanent or self-sufficient exists,which is also why this site is bollocks,seeing that beauty is not inherent in a object or shape,but rather is just a projection of attachment by each individual mind,otherwise everyone would find the exact same thing attractive,there would be no heterosexuals,homosexuals etc

Am either too low iq to understand what you wrote or either your retarded asf

 

[MA_ascender]

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

you reincarnate,but the jewish reptilians('seraphim')according to multiple remote viewers have a astral grid locked on this planet so anyone that doesn't follow the buddhist path and is saved by going to a pureland,could be trapped in the various 'hells'that these evil beings have created in the astral plane for not being a complete slave to them.

ascending sounds boring i want to keep reincarnating

 

[foreverlawmaxxing]

A cause is dependant on it's effect to be a cause,a conditioner is dependant on it's condition to be a conditioner,this is basic 1st grade logic.

If there were anything that were ultimate,it would be compounded and in time the moment it creates.if God desires to create a particular thing,he is swayed by his desire(which comes and goes out of existance,so is not inherent to him),what then of his self-sufficiency and omnipotence?

Furthermore,if the essence of this 'God'is permanent(so he would not go out of existance,nor would he be originated by something else),then his emotional states,cognitions and actions would be unchanging and permanent and he would be totally incapable of any change whatsoever,how then could he interact with changing things?

the idea of God is so absurd,but it seems many people just believe in it out of a fantasy that there is some sky momma or daddy that will take care of them if they're good little boys or girls.

the same goes for a permanent soul,If the soul is permanent, how could it ever be said to meet with new factors and assimilate them?

if he has impermanent and permanent parts,how can he be a unitary,self-same and coherent being?he would be compounded and thus not self-sufficient.

would the permanent part(or nature) create the impermanent parts?how can it?how can something permanent create new things and make things go in and out of existance?he would be a walking contradiction and he would also not be a self-same unitary being.

furthermore and lastly,a lamp cannot illuminate itself without fuel,self-knowledge is the only non-dependant knowledge(and it cannot exist) as all other knowledge involves some correspondance or concept to cognize said thing,if god has cognitions of other things at all he would be dependant on those things to have a certain knowledge of something.he would not be 'independant'.

if his cognitions are changing,he wouldn't be self-sufficient because he is dependant on changing things to have knowledge,and he would not have a uncompounded and thus self-sufficient essence,seeing that he has congitions which go in and out of existance and thus would make him made up of parts.

nothing inherent,permanent or self-sufficient exists,which is also why this site is bollocks,seeing that beauty is not inherent in a object or shape,but rather is just a projection of attachment by each individual mind,otherwise everyone would find the exact same thing attractive,there would be no heterosexuals,homosexuals etc

I don’t believe in god but if he was real he’d probably be beyond the concept of time and space meaning he is outside of dimensions meaning he wouldn’t be bounded by our laws