The job market is analogous to the dating market

[TheLastLaugh]

A good resume is just like having LMS...its great on paper but doesn't get your foot in the door because you need connections for that. When there are 400+ applicants for 3 positions you need a good connection to get you to the front of the line. Close proximity is everything, as in the employer will almost always overlook the highly qualified stranger in order to hire their friend's son if he can do the absolute bare minimum. Sound familiar yet?

Job interviews are like dates. An employer is looking for a specific type of personality who can give the right answers, even though both parties know its bullshit. The same can be said about dates, where if they meet you then clearly you're good enough on paper (resume). The real purpose of the date is to gauge your level of interest and whether you're an abusive narcissist who they will feel a spark for, or a good guy who will give them the ick. If you're the former it will quickly move forward, but if you're the latter you won't hear back no matter what fake formalities were exchanged in the end.

When someone gets a job by having the right connection the resume isn't even necessary. Likewise if you are in a woman's close proximity there are no LMS requirements to fuck them. This is how women fuck broke & ugly guys with nothing going on so easily. The resume/LMS requirement only applies to outsiders.

All these men complaining about women's requirements in 2024 are just exposing themselves as having no real experience and not understanding them at all. I will say it once again, your behavior and environment matter exponentially more than LMS ever could. Proximity, not value, is what will actually get your foot in the door, and it's only abusive behavior that will get the best out of her.

@Whatever
@6ft4

 

[MaghrebGator]

The only analogus i know is the playstation controller button

 

[watah]

Nigga think he Socrates

 

[6ft4]

Legit thread

 

[Whatever]

Banger of a thread, I’d say that there’s a lot that you can do with this metaphor. For instance overqualification. I’m far along enough in my career that I would now raise eyebrows if I went out for certain entry level positions. They want rookies, illegal immigrants, someone who can be taken advantage of. A lot of foids out there have this same attitude subconsciously, a guy who is both good looking and has his shit together is overqualified for them, because he can no longer be on the bottom of their superiority complex so they would have to set that aside for him, which they usually don’t.

I remember reading that so many people have been in and out of Amazon delivery jobs that Amazon is now on pace to run out of people in the population to hire for them. Even in a massive population, that kind of thing can happen. The dating “market” (non-proximity) is burning out in a similar way. So many people have had such negative experiences with the apps that the overall meta is shifting back to proximity. And this explains both the 2024 “why aren’t I getting any dates” and “why do I see so many mismatched couples”. That dating as a marketplace between strangers is collapsing and the lottery of right time right place is back on.

With both my first and second girl I saw this very up close, guys in a girl’s proximity are her real options. There was a shitload of guys in their DMs but it was easier for them to just have me over after work/class. That’s your real competition, not guys on apps better looking or taller than you. Guys like her coworker she works the same hours as, her housemate’s ex who she heard fucking through the walls, some guy she’s trying to steal off a girl she hates. That’s what goes on in the real world, not just looks.

 

[pig_face]

The only LMS that applies is that the man should be taller than her and whiter the skin the better