The moon landing was probably fake

enriquecuador

enriquecuador

Mistral
Joined
Jan 9, 2025
Posts
2,144
Reputation
2,643
nobody can really say for certain

I bet in like 200 years they will admit that it was fake though
 
  • +1
Reactions: crazyguy, looks>books, jaaba and 1 other person
idgaf nigger
Why would I care if we left rocks and sand to step on grey rocks and sand
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: looks>books, joshuaofnavi, True truecel and 1 other person
its real

either that or the US, Russia, China, India and Japan have manufactured a lie
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Wexilarious
its real

either that or the US, Russia, China, India and Japan have manufactured a lie
You really are just programmed about everything arent you
 
  • +1
Reactions: HTNcutecel and Aladin
You really are just programmed about everything arent you
im not the conspiracy theorist you are :lul: if you make a claim then prove it

i too can say random things and call established facts 'muh jewish propoganda bro!'
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wexilarious
im not the conspiracy theorist you are :lul: if you make a claim then prove it

i too can say random things and call established facts 'muh jewish propoganda bro!'
Ok sure here’s a fact for you, Neil Armstrong refused to swear on the bible that he landed on the moon, why would he do that? Especially when he was offered money to do it
 
Ok sure here’s a fact for you, Neil Armstrong refused to swear on the bible that he landed on the moon, why would he do that? Especially when he was offered money to do it
Probably tired of the press, he was the first man to step on the moon:forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: True truecel
Ok sure here’s a fact for you, Neil Armstrong refused to swear on the bible that he landed on the moon, why would he do that? Especially when he was offered money to do it
pretty significant thing to swear in the name of a religion. Do you have any proof that is related to science in any way shape or form?
 
pretty significant thing to swear in the name of a religion. Do you have any proof that is related to science in any way shape or form?
Well the fact that we have never been back since, and scientists say we don’t have the technology to do it now, but we somehow did in the 60s, look I’m not writing it off but I am sceptical about certain things. It makes a lot of sense to why it would have been faked
 

Similar threads

enriquecuador
Replies
2
Views
44
batman1997
batman1997
Jaynoyn523
Replies
7
Views
117
Jaynoyn523
Jaynoyn523
swt
Replies
2
Views
48
superpsycho
superpsycho
subhumanslayer193
Venting Feeling fake
Replies
8
Views
139
maybeinthenextlife
M

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top