Aladin
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2022
- Posts
- 9,777
- Reputation
- 11,015
Because there is no such thing as "needing" to bully. People on this forum will engage in just world fallacy by saying it's mostly ugly normies that bully others.
This is incorrect for a few reasons:
1. it assumes chads are naturally more logical and less insecure than the average person (which is not true, obviously not from all the stories of chads being cocky and delusional)
2. it assumes chads make a conscious decision to bully others unlike other normies that do it on instinct
Chad is not special. The only thing chad has is looks and nothing else. It doesn't make them more dark triad or mature. That's more the halo effect and only having fleeting glimpses of chads in their best moments that is speaking. Chad will make fun of you, mock you and pick on your weaknesses as much as anyone else would. Just because they have a good jawline, eye area, nose shape, skin tone and body frame does not change this.
Chad doesn't make laser focused robotic value judgements. He talks shit and bullies easy targets just like anyone else.
3. it is inconclusive
Incels and low tier normies mostly report getting bullied by other incels and low tier normies. Why? That's not necessarily because chad doesn't do it is often. It's because chad doesn't run in the same social circles as incels and low tier normies. Why does it seem like the uglier someone is the more they bully you? It's because ugly people are around ugly people more often than not. If you were to ask a chadlite or chad they'd probably claim that at some point they got bullied but if you were to see who bullied them it would likely be another chadlite, chad or gigachad, because chadlites and above travel in different social circles than low tier normies and incels.
Chad isn't better when it comes to bullying at all. In fact looksmaxxed chads that experience a "glow up" during puberty can often be the biggest bullies.
Your looks or relationship status don't determine whether you are a more moral person to start with. That's just world fallacy reddit tier bullshit.
This is incorrect for a few reasons:
1. it assumes chads are naturally more logical and less insecure than the average person (which is not true, obviously not from all the stories of chads being cocky and delusional)
2. it assumes chads make a conscious decision to bully others unlike other normies that do it on instinct
Chad is not special. The only thing chad has is looks and nothing else. It doesn't make them more dark triad or mature. That's more the halo effect and only having fleeting glimpses of chads in their best moments that is speaking. Chad will make fun of you, mock you and pick on your weaknesses as much as anyone else would. Just because they have a good jawline, eye area, nose shape, skin tone and body frame does not change this.
Chad doesn't make laser focused robotic value judgements. He talks shit and bullies easy targets just like anyone else.
3. it is inconclusive
Incels and low tier normies mostly report getting bullied by other incels and low tier normies. Why? That's not necessarily because chad doesn't do it is often. It's because chad doesn't run in the same social circles as incels and low tier normies. Why does it seem like the uglier someone is the more they bully you? It's because ugly people are around ugly people more often than not. If you were to ask a chadlite or chad they'd probably claim that at some point they got bullied but if you were to see who bullied them it would likely be another chadlite, chad or gigachad, because chadlites and above travel in different social circles than low tier normies and incels.
Chad isn't better when it comes to bullying at all. In fact looksmaxxed chads that experience a "glow up" during puberty can often be the biggest bullies.
Your looks or relationship status don't determine whether you are a more moral person to start with. That's just world fallacy reddit tier bullshit.
