The oddest issue in the Bible

[Jamaldickjavontus]

Why did Jesus not allow women who committed adulteration to not be stoned in the New Testament but in the Old Testament in the law it was said to the Israelites to stone women who commuted such acts.Jesus later says he came not to change the law but to fulfill it ,But there was a clear change here? @PrinceLuenLeoncur @marshadow

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Why did Jesus not allow women who committed adulteration to not be stoned in the New Testament but in the Old Testament in the law it was said to the Israelites to stone women who commuted such acts.Jesus later says he came not to change the law but to fulfill it ,But there was a clear change here? @PrinceLuenLeoncur @marshadow

Because it was a trap

The plot was to get Jesus to kill her then the Jews who wanted him dead can go to the Roman authorities and claim that he carried out a death penalty which was illegal in Roman occupied lands by non Roman authorities

But if he let her go they could also accuse him of not carried out the law of Moses


So what did Jesus do?

He ignored them and then said “let him without sin cast the first stone” this was a check mate and the rest of the men left her with jesus. God saw her deep regret for her sin and this Jesus do what he said he would “I have not come do condemn the world but to free it” and so he told her “Go and sin no more”

 

[Aladin]

There wasn’t a change in the law. It’s not clear you’re just retarded.

 

[Regressive]

post and pre coom moods

 

[NEET_Emperor]

the jewish 'god' and christian god are different

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

There wasn’t a change in the law. It’s not clear you’re just retarded.

Buddy nobody tagged you

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

Because it was a trap

The plot was to get Jesus to kill her then the Jews who wanted him dead can go to the Roman authorities and claim that he carried out a death penalty which was illegal in Roman occupied lands by non Roman authorities

But if he let her go they could also accuse him of not carried out the law of Moses


So what did Jesus do?

He ignored them and then said “let him without sin cast the first stone” this was a check mate and the rest of the men left her with jesus.

Alr makes sense

 

[Aladin]

Buddy nobody tagged you

What’s your point here?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Alr makes sense

I added more to it go back and re read it

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

What’s your point here?

I tagged an actual intelligent Christian not someone who just gonna call you retarded for a question

 

[Aladin]

I tagged an actual intelligent Christian not someone who just gonna call you retarded for a question

I can respond to the thread even if I don’t get tagged.

Also I called you retard not for asking a question but for making a retarded assertion, retard.

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

I can respond to the thread even if I don’t get tagged.

Also I called you retard not for asking a question but for making a retarded assertion, retard.

It was a clear question if it wasn’t I wouldn’t tag anyone and ask for a answer,Gtfo

 

[Aladin]

It was a clear question if it wasn’t I wouldn’t tag anyone and ask for a answer

You could have used PMs.

Gtfo

No

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

You could have used PMs.

No

your actually right I should’ve used pms I thought of it a couple seconds after posting it

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

Because it was a trap

The plot was to get Jesus to kill her then the Jews who wanted him dead can go to the Roman authorities and claim that he carried out a death penalty which was illegal in Roman occupied lands by non Roman authorities

But if he let her go they could also accuse him of not carried out the law of Moses


So what did Jesus do?

He ignored them and then said “let him without sin cast the first stone” this was a check mate and the rest of the men left her with jesus. God saw her deep regret for her sin and this Jesus do what he said he would “I have not come do condemn the world but to free it” and so he told her “Go and sin no more”

I lowkey sounded like the Pharisees asking a question like that,The Pharisees remind me of lost Christians or Jews that only try to contradict the New Testament

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I lowkey sounded like the Pharisees asking a question like that,The Pharisees remind me of lost Christians or Jews that only try to contradict the New Testament

It’s ok to have questions, Jesus asks you to ask questions that’s what makes our belief the one of the true god


Heb1:1
1 Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. 1 Faith is the confidence that what we hope for will actually happen; it gives us assurance about things we cannot see.

Peter 3:15, the apostle Peter commands Christians to “honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you.”

 

[nuisance]

Why did Jesus not allow women who committed adulteration to not be stoned in the New Testament but in the Old Testament in the law it was said to the Israelites to stone women who commuted such acts.Jesus later says he came not to change the law but to fulfill it ,But there was a clear change here? @PrinceLuenLeoncur @marshadow

god can do whatever he wants

he who without sin cast the first stone is the ultimate checkmate they tried to entrap him

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

god can do whatever he wants

he who without sin cast the first stone is the ultimate checkmate they tried to entrap him

Nice but already found a answer

 

[mrdouchebag]

Old Testament was written by Alpha Chads,
New Testament was written by Beyta Cucks.
That's the difference.

 

[standardcel]

When Jesus comes back he will judge all evil. At that time he came to save, not kill.

 

[Aladin]

your actually right I should’ve used pms I thought of it a couple seconds after posting it

It’s okay bro.

 

[Gengar]

Why did Jesus not allow women who committed adulteration to not be stoned in the New Testament but in the Old Testament in the law it was said to the Israelites to stone women who commuted such acts.Jesus later says he came not to change the law but to fulfill it ,But there was a clear change here? @PrinceLuenLeoncur @marshadow

Because he died for their sins, or something.

 

[gymceltard]

Why did Jesus not allow women who committed adulteration to not be stoned in the New Testament but in the Old Testament in the law it was said to the Israelites to stone women who commuted such acts.Jesus later says he came not to change the law but to fulfill it ,But there was a clear change here? @PrinceLuenLeoncur @marshadow

The apparent discrepancy between Jesus’ actions in the New Testament and the Old Testament law regarding adultery can be understood within the context of the broader themes of grace, mercy, and the fulfillment of the law that Jesus brought.

1. The Old Testament Law: In the Old Testament, specifically in Leviticus 20:10 and Deuteronomy 22:22, the law prescribed that both the man and woman involved in adultery should be stoned. This was part of the Mosaic law given to the Israelites, intended to preserve the holiness and purity of the community.
2. Jesus’ Response to Adultery (John 8:1-11): In the New Testament, we see a situation where a woman caught in adultery is brought before Jesus by the Pharisees and teachers of the law. They want to test Jesus by asking whether the woman should be stoned according to the law. Jesus responds, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." One by one, the accusers leave, and Jesus tells the woman, "Neither do I condemn you. Go and sin no more."
   Jesus' response is not a direct contradiction of the law but a demonstration of mercy and a call to personal transformation. His actions reflect the spirit of the law, which was not merely about punishment but also about repentance and restoration. Jesus did not deny the seriousness of sin, but he emphasized forgiveness and the opportunity for change.
3. Fulfillment of the Law: Jesus says in Matthew 5:17 that he did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it. This means that Jesus came to complete the law’s purpose, which was not only about external compliance but also about the internal transformation of the heart. In this case, rather than focusing solely on legalistic judgment, Jesus highlights the importance of compassion, self-reflection, and repentance. The law’s ultimate aim was to bring people to a place of right relationship with God, which Jesus came to fulfill by offering grace and the possibility of redemption.
4. The Context of the Time: Jesus' act of mercy also sheds light on the way the law was being applied. By the time of Jesus, the Pharisees and religious leaders had often distorted the law and used it as a means of self-righteousness and condemnation, rather than a tool for justice and mercy. Jesus corrected this imbalance by showing that while sin must be taken seriously, there is also room for forgiveness and restoration.

In summary, the change you observe is not a contradiction, but a deeper fulfillment of the law’s original purpose. Jesus came to reveal the full heart of the law, emphasizing mercy, grace, and repentance, and showing that God’s justice is always tempered with love and a desire for restoration.

 

[Jamaldickjavontus]

The apparent discrepancy between Jesus’ actions in the New Testament and the Old Testament law regarding adultery can be understood within the context of the broader themes of grace, mercy, and the fulfillment of the law that Jesus brought.

1. The Old Testament Law: In the Old Testament, specifically in Leviticus 20:10 and Deuteronomy 22:22, the law prescribed that both the man and woman involved in adultery should be stoned. This was part of the Mosaic law given to the Israelites, intended to preserve the holiness and purity of the community.
2. Jesus’ Response to Adultery (John 8:1-11): In the New Testament, we see a situation where a woman caught in adultery is brought before Jesus by the Pharisees and teachers of the law. They want to test Jesus by asking whether the woman should be stoned according to the law. Jesus responds, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." One by one, the accusers leave, and Jesus tells the woman, "Neither do I condemn you. Go and sin no more."
   Jesus' response is not a direct contradiction of the law but a demonstration of mercy and a call to personal transformation. His actions reflect the spirit of the law, which was not merely about punishment but also about repentance and restoration. Jesus did not deny the seriousness of sin, but he emphasized forgiveness and the opportunity for change.
3. Fulfillment of the Law: Jesus says in Matthew 5:17 that he did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it. This means that Jesus came to complete the law’s purpose, which was not only about external compliance but also about the internal transformation of the heart. In this case, rather than focusing solely on legalistic judgment, Jesus highlights the importance of compassion, self-reflection, and repentance. The law’s ultimate aim was to bring people to a place of right relationship with God, which Jesus came to fulfill by offering grace and the possibility of redemption.
4. The Context of the Time: Jesus' act of mercy also sheds light on the way the law was being applied. By the time of Jesus, the Pharisees and religious leaders had often distorted the law and used it as a means of self-righteousness and condemnation, rather than a tool for justice and mercy. Jesus corrected this imbalance by showing that while sin must be taken seriously, there is also room for forgiveness and restoration.

In summary, the change you observe is not a contradiction, but a deeper fulfillment of the law’s original purpose. Jesus came to reveal the full heart of the law, emphasizing mercy, grace, and repentance, and showing that God’s justice is always tempered with love and a desire for restoration.

Nice even tho it’s Ai but I love it

 

[gymceltard]

Because it was a trap

The plot was to get Jesus to kill her then the Jews who wanted him dead can go to the Roman authorities and claim that he carried out a death penalty which was illegal in Roman occupied lands by non Roman authorities

But if he let her go they could also accuse him of not carried out the law of Moses


So what did Jesus do?

He ignored them and then said “let him without sin cast the first stone” this was a check mate and the rest of the men left her with jesus. God saw her deep regret for her sin and this Jesus do what he said he would “I have not come do condemn the world but to free it” and so he told her “Go and sin no more”

False. see my earlier post

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

The apparent discrepancy between Jesus’ actions in the New Testament and the Old Testament law regarding adultery can be understood within the context of the broader themes of grace, mercy, and the fulfillment of the law that Jesus brought.

1. The Old Testament Law: In the Old Testament, specifically in Leviticus 20:10 and Deuteronomy 22:22, the law prescribed that both the man and woman involved in adultery should be stoned. This was part of the Mosaic law given to the Israelites, intended to preserve the holiness and purity of the community.
2. Jesus’ Response to Adultery (John 8:1-11): In the New Testament, we see a situation where a woman caught in adultery is brought before Jesus by the Pharisees and teachers of the law. They want to test Jesus by asking whether the woman should be stoned according to the law. Jesus responds, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." One by one, the accusers leave, and Jesus tells the woman, "Neither do I condemn you. Go and sin no more."
   Jesus' response is not a direct contradiction of the law but a demonstration of mercy and a call to personal transformation. His actions reflect the spirit of the law, which was not merely about punishment but also about repentance and restoration. Jesus did not deny the seriousness of sin, but he emphasized forgiveness and the opportunity for change.
3. Fulfillment of the Law: Jesus says in Matthew 5:17 that he did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it. This means that Jesus came to complete the law’s purpose, which was not only about external compliance but also about the internal transformation of the heart. In this case, rather than focusing solely on legalistic judgment, Jesus highlights the importance of compassion, self-reflection, and repentance. The law’s ultimate aim was to bring people to a place of right relationship with God, which Jesus came to fulfill by offering grace and the possibility of redemption.
4. The Context of the Time: Jesus' act of mercy also sheds light on the way the law was being applied. By the time of Jesus, the Pharisees and religious leaders had often distorted the law and used it as a means of self-righteousness and condemnation, rather than a tool for justice and mercy. Jesus corrected this imbalance by showing that while sin must be taken seriously, there is also room for forgiveness and restoration.

In summary, the change you observe is not a contradiction, but a deeper fulfillment of the law’s original purpose. Jesus came to reveal the full heart of the law, emphasizing mercy, grace, and repentance, and showing that God’s justice is always tempered with love and a desire for restoration.

This is chat GPT generated but yes this is correct I said the same thing

However the CONTEXT of the situation is what @Jamaldickjavontus wanted and the context is that the Jews brought her there so Jesus would kil her so theh could get him arrested or him to not stone her so he would be called out for not obeying the law of Moses.

I did mention that Jesus is the fulfilment of the law and that entisils him correcting the interpretations of the law that the Pharasies had perverted as this is shown with the “Eye for an eye” verse.

Point is though Jesus as you said is the new covenant and that covenants goal isn’t the same as the Mosaic covenant’s goal hence no murder for such a crime. This doesn’t mean he’s not following the law it means he is correctly rectifying the pharasaic interpretation of the law which he did many times mentioned in Matthew how they were more focused on the law than on God and how the LAW WAS MADE FOR MAN not vice versa

So yes I was correct, what you posted just focused on jseus’s message of fulfilment of the Law as opposed to me giving an holistic contextual as well as spiritual understanding of the exegesis.

 

[JasGews69x]

'He is without sin cast the first stone'
why didnt he do it himself?