The only Positive to Racemixing in society

[greycel]

It's preferable there's no racemixing of course. The cons heavily outweigh the pros.
I've made countless threads why.

Why is Racemixing bad?

It destroys everything all of our respective ancestors have worked hard for To stay to their own Imagine that. For thousands of years, majority of your ancestors, if not all, bred with somebody of the same race All of a sudden, worldwide, this chaos is resulting in people disbanding all the hard...

looksmax.org

You should always stick to your race, now you aren't under the elites spell.
Consider yourself lucky you aren't a normie, who was unfortunate to not be blessed with this knowledge.

That being said, there is a singular advantage that people overlook to all this racemixing.
Specifically, racemixing in society that you don't engage in

See, women who engage in racemixing are the low class. This is in a way, a blessing in disguise..
You can separate yourself from the gutter filth/ low IQ/ low sentient.. that you would've maybe gotten married to otherwise.
Imagine spending your entire life on a girl, that if she had been raised in today's modern society would've slept around and whored herself to a different race

Think of it as a purification system.
They're helping us find the ones who possess all the good qualities

There's currently a sufficient number of women who possess these good qualities, that allow for racemixing in society to be a personal benefit for

 

[greycel]

Spoiler: Tags

@Eltrē @Daddy's Home @uksucks @SecularIslamist @Debetro @itzyaboyJJ

 

[Eltrē]

Genetics matter, not race itself.
It just so happens to be that some races are more subhuman than the other, that's all.

 

[greycel]

Genetics matter, not race itself.
It just so happens to be that some races are more subhuman than the other, that's all.

Genes will regress back to the average of their race.
It's the largest contributing factor to quality of genes

Race matters most

But this post is about staying within the boundaries of your race, because the pros from finding a good race mother (good genes) for your child, don't outweigh the cons I listed in the thread linked.

I see a lot of guys get defensive when others (usually negros) try to "cuck" them by saying they have their race women in a rotation.
This thread was to say it doesn't matter.. it's actually somewhat beneficial

 

[ToryToad]

It's preferable there's no racemixing of course. The cons heavily outweigh the pros.
I've made countless threads why.

Why is Racemixing bad?

It destroys everything all of our respective ancestors have worked hard for To stay to their own Imagine that. For thousands of years, majority of your ancestors, if not all, bred with somebody of the same race All of a sudden, worldwide, this chaos is resulting in people disbanding all the hard...

looksmax.org

You should always stick to your race, now you aren't under the elites spell.
Consider yourself lucky you aren't a normie, who was unfortunate to not be blessed with this knowledge.

That being said, there is a singular advantage that people overlook to all this racemixing.
Specifically, racemixing in society that you don't engage in

See, women who engage in racemixing are the low class. This is in a way, a blessing in disguise..
You can separate yourself from the gutter filth/ low IQ/ low sentient.. that you would've maybe gotten married to otherwise.
Imagine spending your entire life on a girl, that if she had been raised in today's modern society would've slept around and whored herself to a different race

Think of it as a purification system.
They're helping us find the ones who possess all the good qualities

There's currently a sufficient number of women who possess these good qualities, that allow for racemixing in society to be a personal benefit for

high iq

 

[Eltrē]

Genes will regress back to the average of their race.
It's the largest contributing factor to quality of genes

What do you mean by this?
How can genes regress back to the average of a race when there is no such thing as a pure race in the modern world.
I think I know what you mean by some racial genes being more dominant than others but it still doesn't seem clear to me.

Race matters most

Why and how so?
Genetic diversity is really important.
For the purest race you idealise wouldn't it be ideal for inbreeding then? And we both know how that ends.

But this post is about staying within the boundaries of your race, because the pros from finding a good race mother (good genes) for your child, don't outweigh the cons I listed in the thread linked.

But what are the cons?
I skimmed through your thread and the only ones I saw were getting further away from god (really now?) and losing their culture, as if society stays completely stagnated.
If you find your ancestors culture so important why don't you start running around naked and slinging shit around like a caveman?

I see a lot of guys get defensive when others (usually negros) try to "cuck" them by saying they have their race women in a rotation.
This thread was to say it doesn't matter.. it's actually somewhat beneficial

I mean those are the bottom of the bottom tier people you speak of in your thread (low IQ low sentiency) that do stuff like this.
Race matters because of genetic differences but superior genetics will always be superior regardless of race.

 

[Andremln]

Bookmarked will read later

 

[javen1384]

White people marrying the gutter ends of ethnics, we rid ourselves of undesirables while we keep high quality for ourselves while destroying the white race by feeding them JBW crap. The more white people mix with a billion chinks, means one less competition for white women

 

[greycel]

What do you mean by this?
How can genes regress back to the average of a race when there is no such thing as a pure race in the modern world.

You're being pedantic dude. Of course the idea of race is a gradient and is in constant (generational) flux

That being said, there's a sufficient gap in genetic quality between one "race" and another.
It’s intuitive that walking down a completely different path for thousands of years (different races) would result in a completely different tier of genes that is not comparable to that of another race.
Reason why is because there were sufficiently tight constraints/bounds, in terms of genetic difference between every man and woman who procreated (due to it being harder to relocate to a far enough location + stronger cultural ties), every generation, across the last 100s of generations..
This reinforces the idea of grouping

Where different tiers are made

"Race matters the most for genes". What I mean by this is say we have a white LTB and an ethnic Stacy who benefitted from genetic recombination (average of white foid would be relatively higher). The child will not get the genes solely from the parent, as it’ll inherit any ancestor’s genes from that (relatively) dysgenic bloodline.
This is what I mean when I say the genetic ceiling of a race is higher than another's.

Also, not to mention, that certain races genes also show less dominance for heritability.

All of this has to do with looks only. But (inter-racially relative) "good" genes come in packages too, with respect to others. So it goes far beyond just one factor. What this means is, that the genetic recombination to be comparable with that of another race (even whilst carrying dormant genes from ancestors that will show up in descendants), is still much rarer than you think - for it to be across the board.

But what are the cons?
I skimmed through your thread and the only ones I saw were getting further away from god (really now?) and losing their culture, as if society stays completely stagnated.
If you find your ancestors culture so important why don't you start running around naked and slinging shit around like a caveman?

Again with the pedantry about stagnation..
I've mentioned the cons in that thread and you're doubting stuff such as reduced levels of theism, but yes it does exist. There is a strong correlation between the two. It's all do with correlations and if they are sufficient, which I don't have statistics for (can do), but it's pointless because you should intuitively see this to be enough.
Think about it logically. It's not just the fact that two races (further the cultures and everything entailing such) will clash with their conteasting religious beliefs, causing the child to have a higher likelihood of being raised in a household where he adopts neither; or adopts one but to an insufficient degree (won't be passed down to future kin)... but also the parents themselves are more likely to procreate across race, if one or more aren't particularly religious (theres a strong correlation between respect for religion and respect for your own culture [to find somebody of it]), leading to a net loss in % of people who believe in God in society. If one, the loss will be direct. If two, will be indirect.
This is just one factor I've gone into detail. There's many

Last part about slinging shit is a strawman and reductio ad absurdum.

Finally, this wasn't mentioned but you liked secularIslamist and Newday's posts. From what I remember, they were also critiquing the idea of a "race" and both mentioned how there was intermixing in history.
As mentioned above, it wasn't sufficient in recent history.
Also, after groups are made, the only times groups are broken or mixed would have been at very rare rates that didn’t see the decline of the entire initial groups (would be a smaller subset such as a town or village) that would occur due to when one population raids and physically forces themselves on the women (women don’t like this), or very rarely when a nobleman or royalty would mix families with another’s to strengthen relations.
It's not evolutionarily normal.

 

[Eltrē]

You're being pedantic dude. Of course the idea of race is a gradient and is in constant (generational) flux

That being said, there's a sufficient gap in genetic quality between one "race" and another.
It’s intuitive that walking down a completely different path for thousands of years (different races) would result in a completely different tier of genes that is not comparable to that of another race.
Reason why is because there were sufficiently tight constraints/bounds, in terms of genetic difference between every man and woman who procreated (due to it being harder to relocate to a far enough location + stronger cultural ties), every generation, across the last 100s of generations..
This reinforces the idea of grouping

Where different tiers are made

"Race matters the most for genes". What I mean by this is say we have a white LTB and an ethnic Stacy who benefitted from genetic recombination (average of white foid would be relatively higher). The child will not get the genes solely from the parent, as it’ll inherit any ancestor’s genes from that (relatively) dysgenic bloodline.
This is what I mean when I say the genetic ceiling of a race is higher than another's.

I agree with you here but not wholly.
A point I want you to understand beforehand though is that I myself believe that not all race-mixes are equal, it's just like you said that some races truly are subhuman compared to others and those shouldn't be mixed with at all, they'd just completely corrupt the other parents genes and ruin the child.

But what I want to point out is that while an ethnics bloodline can be completely dysgenic, like you said, and potentially fuck the child over, a bloodline of good genetic quality mixed with another race of also good genetic quality doesn't end up in some mutt rapebaby that looks completely deformed.
This is what I meant when I said genetics > race.

With the genetic diversity and a pool of two genetically healthy bloodlines it just allows for a much higher chance of an elite child.
All the PSL gods you see are mixed (not in the sense of african+european) but they are not homogenous.
I remember you pointing out Native American DNA is really strong when talking about some PSL gods and well, if they were purely European then they wouldn't be who they are today, would they now?

Also, not to mention, that certain races genes also show less dominance for heritability.

All of this has to do with looks only. But (inter-racially relative) "good" genes come in packages too, with respect to others. So it goes far beyond just one factor. What this means is, that the genetic recombination to be comparable with that of another race (even whilst carrying dormant genes from ancestors that will show up in descendants), is still much rarer than you think - for it to be across the board.

I understand what you mean, but this is the aspect where the genetic quality of someone matters much more than their race.
Of course, some races are on average more dysgenic than others but this does not mean you can simply ignore the fact there are still quality people from other races.

Also, just to make it clear, when you're talking about mixed races you are mainly thinking about niggers, right?
I don't condone mixing with niggers if that helps you read my ramblings.

Again with the pedantry about stagnation..
I've mentioned the cons in that thread and you're doubting stuff such as reduced levels of theism, but yes it does exist. There is a strong correlation between the two. It's all do with correlations and if they are sufficient, which I don't have statistics for (can do), but it's pointless because you should intuitively see this to be enough.
Think about it logically. It's not just the fact that two races (further the cultures and everything entailing such) will clash with their conteasting religious beliefs, causing the child to have a higher likelihood of being raised in a household where he adopts neither; or adopts one but to an insufficient degree (won't be passed down to future kin)... but also the parents themselves are more likely to procreate across race, if one or more aren't particularly religious (theres a strong correlation between respect for religion and respect for your own culture [to find somebody of it]), leading to a net loss in % of people who believe in God in society. If one, the loss will be direct. If two, will be indirect.
This is just one factor I've gone into detail. There's many

I can see your point but religion was something of the past, as society has progressed it has started to fall out for obvious reasons.
The more educated a population gets the less they believe in religion.

There is zero reason to want religion in the modern world other than maintaining your ancestor's 'culture'.
It provides zero benefit today. It was a good cope in the olden times because they had such shit lives that this was the only way for them to stay sane.

Last part about slinging shit is a strawman and reductio ad absurdum.

Finally, this wasn't mentioned but you liked secularIslamist and Newday's posts. From what I remember, they were also critiquing the idea of a "race" and both mentioned how there was intermixing in history.
As mentioned above, it wasn't sufficient in recent history.
Also, after groups are made, the only times groups are broken or mixed would have been at very rare rates that didn’t see the decline of the entire initial groups (would be a smaller subset such as a town or village) that would occur due to when one population raids and physically forces themselves on the women (women don’t like this), or very rarely when a nobleman or royalty would mix families with another’s to strengthen relations.
It's not evolutionarily normal.

Like you said it wasn't sufficient in recent history because it was simply not possible for the average person.
They'd be stuck in whatever shithole they were born in and would stay that way until they died, literally zero chances for race mixing to happen.

And again just like you said, when it did happen on a rare occasion, it'd mostly be the nobles/royalty who would mix with each other because they had the privilege to do so.
Doesn't this completely shut down your earlier point of race-mixing only being the scum of the scum low IQ low sentiency tendencies?
If you like history so much then history points to the opposite direction.


Obviously this does NOT consider rapebabies but only actual consensual mixing.

 

[neurosis]

Genes will regress back to the average of their race.

regression to the mean completely contradicts sexual selection. organisms wouldnt select nor care for xyz genes if the eventual offspring would just regress to the mean of whatever population they originated from

 

[greycel]

some races truly are subhuman compared to others and those shouldn't be mixed with at all

Also, just to make it clear, when you're talking about mixed races you are mainly thinking about niggers, right?

worst to best (bottom 5)
0. Abo
1. South Asian
2. Black African
3. East Asian
4. Middle Eastern
5. North African
Anything better than these, I can somewhat understand, if you personally don't care for the negatives (/care too much for looks genes).. including Native Americans yeah. Terrabonemass mothers

I can see your point but religion was something of the past, as society has progressed it has started to fall out for obvious reasons.
The more educated a population gets the less they believe in religion.

You shouldn't conflate this with it being the right call.. if you meant society is getting smarter, so the correct decision has to be stepping away from religion (/ "abandoning copes")

The direct cause for people falling out of religon can exist indirectly through another unfavourable correlation.. people become more learned --> society develops better forms of pleasure --> higher rates of hedonism --> negative correlation with people being religious

There is zero reason to want religion in the modern world other than maintaining your ancestor's 'culture'.
It provides zero benefit today. It was a good cope in the olden times because they had such shit lives that this was the only way for them to stay sane.

This is tunnel vision dude.
I'd be happy to discuss this with you (maybe you got more reasons why), but in a different thread

Doesn't this completely shut down your earlier point of race-mixing only being the scum of the scum low IQ low sentiency tendencies?

Time period and everything it contains (mentality of avg person, etc), frequency of people engaging in it relative to respective societies, and cause (coalition between nations vs lust from jewpilled social media brainwashing)..

@Eltrē I think we agree with most of this bro..
The main difference I feel is with what we constitute as "beneficial" racemixing.. and what we define as "beneficial" due to our differing priorities. You prioritise looks more than I do and/or I prioritise culture/religion more than you do.. both of which have a stacking effect
But at the end of the day, the objective difference between what you and I allow for racemixing is marginal; given I don't really condone it, and you are pretty harsh with your requirements too

regression to the mean completely contradicts sexual selection. organisms wouldnt select nor care for xyz genes if they eventual offspring would just regress to the mean of whatever population they originated from

The mean is always moving (no shit or else how did it end up where it currently is), but it's heavily dominated by the rigid foundation that's already been laid by all your ancestors.
You're pushing a heavy boulder

 

[neurosis]

The mean is always moving (no shit or else how did it end up where it currently is), but it's heavily dominated by the rigid foundation that's already been laid by all your ancestors.

how lol, what traits regress to the mean. are there any studies on this? genuinely curious

for example iq.

 

[greycel]

how lol, what traits regress to the mean. are there any studies on this? genuinely curious

Use intuition dude
You inherit from all your ancestors

Even if how much they provide the higher up you go becomes less and less from rarer chance of gene activation, you're pretty much entirely the result of them.
Even your direct parents are the result of them
And their direct parents, and so on..

That's genetic consistency outweighing a random spike your immediate parents might have with recomb

 

[neurosis]

Use intuition dude
You inherit from all your ancestors

Even if how much they provide the higher up you go becomes less and less from rarer chance of gene activation, you're pretty much entirely the result of them.
Even your direct parents are the result of them
And their direct parents, and so on..

That's genetic consistency outweighing a random spike your immediate parents might have with recomb

oh yeah that makes sense actually

how volatile is the regression, are there any stats on this

 

[Eltrē]

worst to best (bottom 5)
0. Abo
1. South Asian
2. Black African
3. East Asian
4. Middle Eastern
5. North African
Anything better than these, I can somewhat understand, if you personally don't care for the negatives (/care too much for looks genes).. including Native Americans yeah. Terrabonemass mothers

It's hard to generalise mixes like that but I won't argue with you about the fact that the MAJORITY of race mixes are utterly subhuman.
You're 100% correct in that regard but it does not shoot down my points that a genetic elite can be reached.

You shouldn't conflate this with it being the right call.. if you meant society is getting smarter, so the correct decision has to be stepping away from religion (/ "abandoning copes")

The direct cause for people falling out of religon can exist indirectly through another unfavourable correlation.. people become more learned --> society develops better forms of pleasure --> higher rates of hedonism --> negative correlation with people being religious

I wouldn't say the decline of religion stems from a development of higher rates of hedonism BUT due to people becoming more rebellious against this wretched system we have in place.
Religion keeps people complacent, the believers let themselves get walked all over on because if they retaliate (let alone act on their own) they will get punished one way or another, going to eternal hellfire or whatever else.

All meaningful changes in humanity can be seen as the complete anti-thesis of the base beliefs of ALL religions.

This is tunnel vision dude.
I'd be happy to discuss this with you (maybe you got more reasons why), but in a different thread

Sure, tag me in it.

Time period and everything it contains (mentality of avg person, etc), frequency of people engaging in it relative to respective societies, and cause (coalition between nations vs lust from jewpilled social media brainwashing)..

@Eltrē I think we agree with most of this bro..
The main difference I feel is with what we constitute as "beneficial" racemixing.. and what we define as "beneficial" due to our differing priorities. You prioritise looks more than I do and/or I prioritise culture/religion more than you do.. both of which have a stacking effect
But at the end of the day, the objective difference between what you and I allow for racemixing is marginal; given I don't really condone it, and you are pretty harsh with your requirements too

That's true.
We have our different reasons like you mentioned earlier and both of our thoughts are correct for reaching our different goals.
I believe in genetical superiority and to reach this race-mixing is actually quite optimal (although this requires HARD eugenics as most people are SUBHUMAN especially when we talk about modern race-mixing) and you believe in the maintenance of culture which requires racial homogeneity.

But also, superior genetics come in a package as you've mentioned earlier so my point here is not for looks only but everything from health to intelligence.

 

[SilverStCloud]

This is a high IQ post that won t be liked by the ethnic coper squad which quite ironically makes it more true. If your race was so good why not stick to it jfl, race mixing rarely produces a GL person(Jeremy Meeks and other are an exception to the rule plus Meeks mom carried hard with her white genetics) and often only benefits the ethnic side.
Best case scenario the child has GL parents and ends up being GL as well but very rarely will you see two normies race mixing and ending up producing someone GL, compare that to non mixed couples of normies who still have a high chance of producing GL people as seen in Jordan Barrett s and Chico s case, both of which have normie parents.

TLDR: You have a better chance at having GL children with your own race

 

[greycel]

oh yeah that makes sense actually

how volatile is the regression, are there any stats on this

I don't think there's stats.. I can see it start to become an ethical issue (--> eugenics) if ppl talk about genetic consistency + (((they))) have probably blacklisted that entirely, so people intermix

I'm personally guessing, the rate at which you regress back to the average will be dependent on the following factors:
1. their racial composition
2. how "far" a person's recomb is from their direct parents + grandparents
3. how "far" a person's recomb is from the average of whatever sufficiently defines their race

Maybe a few more but they won't contribute much. I don't know the breakdown, but you can guess which will have higher priority

 

[Eärendil]

i dont think the race of the parents matter, but looks, height, aging genes, etc

 

[hopecel]

White people marrying the gutter ends of ethnics, we rid ourselves of undesirables while we keep high quality for ourselves while destroying the white race by feeding them JBW crap. The more white people mix with a billion chinks, means one less competition for white women

Asian women in general (not only Southeast/East Asians) are BETTER than European women by most criteria

and no it's actually the opposite, ethnics go for white whores while whites go for HQ ethnic girls who aren't like white whores that being said, it's only East Asians who get actual HQ white girls, but these girls are... not very fertile

I'd rather marry a fertile feminine Arab LTB than some Russian 'Stacy' with childish personality and inexistent curves...

 

[greycel]

Asian women in general (not only Southeast/East Asians) are BETTER than European women by most criteria

and no it's actually the opposite, ethnics go for white whores while whites go for HQ ethnic girls who aren't like white whores that being said, it's only East Asians who get actual HQ white girls, but these girls are... not very fertile

I'd rather marry a fertile feminine Arab LTB than some Russian 'Stacy' with childish personality and inexistent curves...

There isn't much going on in your head so no wonder
But keep your opinions to yourself, because you don't understand importance of good genes

I don't support racemixing at all, but going out of your way for dysgenics is stupid af

 

[hopecel]

There isn't much going on in your head so no wonder
But keep your opinions to yourself, because you don't understand importance of good genes

looks = genes

I'm ugly so my genes are subpar... many such cases in all races and the polar opposite cases in all races as well

I don't support racemixing at all, but going out of your way for dysgenics is stupid af

you're talking to a truecel

even LTB's of any race are above me but I don't really think a white LTB is better than an ethnic LTB, in fact it's usually the opposite

you're just a white-worshipper and I'm a chocolate-worshipper

 

[greycel]

looks = genes

I'm ugly so my genes are subpar... many such cases in all races and the polar opposite cases in all races as well

you're talking to a truecel

even LTB's of any race are above me but I don't really think a white LTB is better than an ethnic LTB, in fact it's usually the opposite

you're just a white-worshipper and I'm a chocolate-worshipper

They are above you in appeal relative to society
Which is how good looking somebody is

But you could've suffered more than the average person in terms of environment + you could've suffered more from genetic recombination and/or others benefitted from it

But your genes are better than people from dygenic races.
Because your children will inherit genes from ALL your ancestors
And you possess dormant genes from your ancestors too

You'll average out back to the average of your race

 

[Eltrē]

Asian women in general (not only Southeast/East Asians) are BETTER than European women by most criteria

and no it's actually the opposite, ethnics go for white whores while whites go for HQ ethnic girls who aren't like white whores that being said, it's only East Asians who get actual HQ white girls, but these girls are... not very fertile

I'd rather marry a fertile feminine Arab LTB than some Russian 'Stacy' with childish personality and inexistent curves...

Kalergi was a WMAF hapa

 

[hopecel]

They are above you in appeal relative to society
Which is how good looking somebody is

But you could've suffered more than the average person in terms of environment + you could've suffered more from genetic recombination and/or others benefitted from it

But your genes are better than people from dygenic races.
Because your children will inherit genes from ALL your ancestors
And you possess dormant genes from your ancestors too

You'll average out back to the average of your race

all races of humans have dysgenic individuals... but yeah I'd agree that some races of humans are UGLIER than others, like Abos, Amerindians etc, but in general all other races have GL people... why do you think whites have the best genes?

as for the ancestors, why do you think the genes of the non-white ancestors 'ruin' you? it really makes no sense, what do you think, that white ancestors are some superhumans or what?

 

[hopecel]

View attachment 3820463
Kalergi was a WMAF hapa

based him and based pairing

WMAF is the future

 

[greycel]

what do you think, that white ancestors are some superhumans or what?

Their  average is higher, and it doesn't matter if you're a white Chad or a a white Truecel, you'll eventually fall back into your average
Also this extends beyond just looks, but everything - on average is higher

why do you think the genes of the non-white ancestors 'ruin' you?

Lowers your average, not to mention shit social environment for kid

all races of humans have dysgenic individuals.

Dysgenics is to do with the races themselves, not what's inside the races