thecel
morph king
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 24,389
- Reputation
- 51,623
I don't agree with the argument I make in this post. This is just a parody of these posts by @Selinity:
@Selinity
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
The [length]×[girth] inches/centimeters system that we have been using is heavily flawed. In this post I will be going over my main criticisms of this manner of appraising male genitalia and in the end offering a better way of evaluating your penis size.
Inconsistent Differences In “Size Appeal” Between Numbers
You would assume that the in/cm scale would have equal jumps in appeal from each number to the next. In other words, each numerical jump on the scale would be an equal a constant amount increase in dick attractiveness. Ideally, the increase in looks from each inch of penis length would look like this:
However, in reality the jumps in cock attractiveness on the penis size inches scale goes something like this:
1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-inch penises are all "small dicks" that no women ever find appealing. The jump from 4 inches to 5 inches is MASSIVE: you're moving from the "tiny dick" tier to the average tier. The jump from 5 to 6 inches is MASSIVE too: you're moving from unappealing and mediocre (5 inches) to a good size (6 inches) that's fairly attractive to women. When you get to 8 inches and beyond, there's very little difference in how much women want your dick because it's big enough to satisfy basically all women.
Ego-Bolstering
Men lie about their penis size way too much. They pretend that their dicks are bigger than they actually are. The 2 most common ways people do this:
Context
Highly relevant contextual info is excluded from the final number.
Things like hip width and body height can effect the apparent size of your penis and thus your success in bed.
looksmax.org
Ball size, thigh circumference, torso length, foreskin presence/absence, pubic hair bushiness, and a myriad of other factors affect the appeal and perceived size of men's genitals. The inches/centimeters [length]×[girth] scale doesn't take any of that into account.
Subjectivity
Dick size preferences vary.
Of course some things have more appeal and whatever but people still have “types” and “preferences.”
This can skew the results again.
What if the women who's having sex with you is very small? This preference will make 6 inches for her equivalent in appeal to 8 inches for typical women.
Furthermore, length is more important for some women whereas others deem girth more important.
Of course the disparity caused by preference is not very big, but on a scale as wonky as this one which in practice essentially works like this,
Alternative
I propose we use a three-point-scale.
This scale will have only three ratings: Big, Medium, and Small.
Rather than using obscure measurements and shit distribution like the inches/centimeters scale, this scale will be more accurate by using your female attention and treatment as the measuring stick for dick size and dick appeal.
@Selinity
The Problem With Rating Male Attractiveness | Why The 1-10 'Looks Scale' Is Flawed
-Wheat Waffles YT The 1-10 scale that we have been using in heavily flawed. In this post I will be going over my main critisisms of this manner of appraising male aesthetics, and in the end offering a better way of measuring your attractiveness. Inconsistent Numbers 🔢 You would assume that the...
looksmax.org
The Problem With Rating Male Attractiveness | Why The 'PSL Scale' Is Flawed
The 'PSL system' is the widely used rating system on looksmaxxing forums in appraising male attractiveness. This model of rating beauty is based on the 'population distribution model,' which if you haven't seen before, looks something like this: This model of appraising attractiveness--although...
looksmax.org
The [length]×[girth] inches/centimeters system that we have been using is heavily flawed. In this post I will be going over my main criticisms of this manner of appraising male genitalia and in the end offering a better way of evaluating your penis size.
Inconsistent Differences In “Size Appeal” Between Numbers
You would assume that the in/cm scale would have equal jumps in appeal from each number to the next. In other words, each numerical jump on the scale would be an equal a constant amount increase in dick attractiveness. Ideally, the increase in looks from each inch of penis length would look like this:
1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> 6 -> 7 -> 8 -> 9 -> 10
However, in reality the jumps in cock attractiveness on the penis size inches scale goes something like this:
1 = 2 = 3 -> 4 ---> 5 ---> 6 -> 7 -> 8 = 9 = 10
1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-inch penises are all "small dicks" that no women ever find appealing. The jump from 4 inches to 5 inches is MASSIVE: you're moving from the "tiny dick" tier to the average tier. The jump from 5 to 6 inches is MASSIVE too: you're moving from unappealing and mediocre (5 inches) to a good size (6 inches) that's fairly attractive to women. When you get to 8 inches and beyond, there's very little difference in how much women want your dick because it's big enough to satisfy basically all women.
Ego-Bolstering
Men lie about their penis size way too much. They pretend that their dicks are bigger than they actually are. The 2 most common ways people do this:
- measuring incorrectly on purpose to maximize the result
- rounding up to the nearest inch
Context
Highly relevant contextual info is excluded from the final number.
Things like hip width and body height can effect the apparent size of your penis and thus your success in bed.
Dick Length to Body Height Ratio
The linked page ranks countries by their average penis sizes divided by their average body heights: https://www.worlddata.info/average-penissize.php Dick length to body height ratio guide: Dick length percentage (p) of height: Classification: Successful with women? 10% ≤ p Excellent Yes...
looksmax.org
Ball size, thigh circumference, torso length, foreskin presence/absence, pubic hair bushiness, and a myriad of other factors affect the appeal and perceived size of men's genitals. The inches/centimeters [length]×[girth] scale doesn't take any of that into account.
Subjectivity
Dick size preferences vary.
Of course some things have more appeal and whatever but people still have “types” and “preferences.”
This can skew the results again.
What if the women who's having sex with you is very small? This preference will make 6 inches for her equivalent in appeal to 8 inches for typical women.
Furthermore, length is more important for some women whereas others deem girth more important.
Of course the disparity caused by preference is not very big, but on a scale as wonky as this one which in practice essentially works like this,
5, 6, 7 —> 8/9
That slight change will throw an even bigger wrench into things.
Alternative
I propose we use a three-point-scale.
This scale will have only three ratings: Big, Medium, and Small.
Rather than using obscure measurements and shit distribution like the inches/centimeters scale, this scale will be more accurate by using your female attention and treatment as the measuring stick for dick size and dick appeal.
| Big Characteristics:
|
| Medium Characteristics:
|
| Small Characteristics:
|
Last edited:
