The real reason black men experience racism in Asia - Inferiority complex - Studies

Blkpill Godfather

Blkpill Godfather

Female gaze and blackpill extremism.
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Posts
1,144
Reputation
1,144
1662856447046


Asians have the most feminine face, Blacks have the most masculine face, whites in the middle

But the reason whites have the highest SMV to asian girls is because - race>height>face - whites are taller. whites also have more money and money is important in asia. and asia adheres to eurocentric beauty standards which is the polar opposite of asia.

Thats why you get so many men hating on black men. Because their women are biologically more attracted to blacks and whites, but blacks arent datable cos social status and reproducing cos they're the polar opposite of the beauty standards which is just socially conditioned. and by them hating, they're reinforcing the social conditioning, it comes from an inferiority complex.

This study was not replicated and other studies showed asian women found whites more attractive facially then blacks then asians. but still makes for a good discussion and observation
 
  • +1
Reactions: GetShrekt, Deleted member 21336, SubhumanCurrycel and 1 other person
Poor interpretation. Dark skin is unattractive
Whites have masculine sharp face. Blacks have round features and bug eyes
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 20370, Bipedal Dog, BucketCrab and 7 others
They hate us cuz we got the biggest dicks
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21297, reptiles, Ultravisionary Bism and 5 others
Did predeterminism make a new account?
 
  • +1
Reactions: varbrah, incel194012940, thereallegend and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend, Deleted member 21052 and Cheesyrumble
Just ask @AlexBrown84 if he thinks he would slay more as white or black or mulatto in Asia

IDK what he would say
 
Just ask @AlexBrown84 if he thinks he would slay more as white or black or mulatto in Asia

IDK what he would say
Its white, it's not debatable
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend and John124
have these studies been posted on here before or something
 
Ur a retard if u think blacks are even thought about in Asia anywhere.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lasnt and Deleted member 21052
have these studies been posted on here before or something
That screenshot has been posted a trillion times by retards like u for hundreds of different arguments and beliefs. There is no correlation
 
niggers experience racism everywhere because they're ugly and black. stop spouting ur resentful nonsense and delete
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: BucketCrab, varbrah, bedes and 3 others
have these studies been posted on here before or something
This study was not replicated
Also you don't know what these guys actually looked like so it's impossible. You would need to ask them to rate composite morphs or something for it to tease out the racial aspect.
 
al pacino film GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: Cheesyrumble
niggers experience racism everywhere because they're ugly and black. stop spouting ur resentful nonsense and delete
Hes a selfhating SEA. It only makes sense he shits on Asians.
 
This study was not replicated and other studies showed asian women found whites more attractive facially then blacks then asians. but still makes for a good discussion and observation

Lewis (2010), Lewis (2011) and Lewis (2012) all use a poor methodology.
  1. The pictures they rate are taken from facebook pages, by a "naive research assistant who selected images according to a set of criteria"(Lewis 2012). Random pictures from Facebook can differ in many ways from lighting, camera angles, fashion etc... that are not controlled for. Who knows if the "naive research assistant" unknowingly gave a certain race an advantage when selecting those pictures. This is not like they were judging perfectly front facing pictures all taken with the same exact lightening and same camera.
  2. Then those pictures were judged by a small number of British participants. Lewis (2010) uses 20 participants of unspecified gender, Lewis (2011) uses 10 females and 8 males who are all white British, and Lewis (2012) is a little better but still not that good, uses 40 undergraduates, 15 white males, 2 black males, 3 Asian males, 14 white females, 3 black females, and 3 Asian females.

Another thing I will criticize is the theory they use to explain their results.
Lewis talks about sexual dimorphism while focusing on skin color, but there are MANY other features that contribute to male sexual dimorphism other than skin color, some of which are more common among men of other races.
I find it lazy for those researchers to focus so much on skin color and use it as an easy explanation for their theory that black men are seen as more attractive. The argument is basically "darker skin is a male sexual dimorphism. Blacks are darker. So blacks are the most attractive".
what about "hairyness is a male sexual dimorphism. Meds are hairy. Therefore meds are the most attractive" or "prominent frontal bones are a male sexual dimorphism. Abos tend to have prominent frontal bones. Therefore Abos are the most attractive"
 
  • +1
Reactions: varbrah, NT Master and Cheesyrumble
Lewis (2010), Lewis (2011) and Lewis (2012) all use a poor methodology.
  1. The pictures they rate are taken from facebook pages, by a "naive research assistant who selected images according to a set of criteria"(Lewis 2012). Random pictures from Facebook can differ in many ways from lighting, camera angles, fashion etc... that are not controlled for. Who knows if the "naive research assistant" unknowingly gave a certain race an advantage when selecting those pictures. This is not like they were judging perfectly front facing pictures all taken with the same exact lightening and same camera.
  2. Then those pictures were judged by a small number of British participants. Lewis (2010) uses 20 participants of unspecified gender, Lewis (2011) uses 10 females and 8 males who are all white British, and Lewis (2012) is a little better but still not that good, uses 40 undergraduates, 15 white males, 2 black males, 3 Asian males, 14 white females, 3 black females, and 3 Asian females.

Another thing I will criticize is the theory they use to explain their results.
Lewis talks about sexual dimorphism while focusing on skin color, but there are MANY other features that contribute to male sexual dimorphism other than skin color, some of which are more common among men of other races.
I find it lazy for those researchers to focus so much on skin color and use it as an easy explanation for their theory that black men are seen as more attractive. The argument is basically "darker skin is a male sexual dimorphism. Blacks are darker. So blacks are the most attractive".
what about "hairyness is a male sexual dimorphism. Meds are hairy. Therefore meds are the most attractive" or "prominent frontal bones are a male sexual dimorphism. Abos tend to have prominent frontal bones. Therefore Abos are the most attractive"
"British participants", that can explain some things. Where studies are conducted is hugely overlooked on here. Regardless of race, the culture of what people grow up in matters the most
Edit: it doesn't matter the most, but it greatly affects the outcome of polls
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Racky
Predeterminism we know it’s you dawg why are you larping as 6’4 when your 5’3.5
 
  • +1
Reactions: Cheesyrumble
Poor interpretation. Dark skin is unattractive
Whites have masculine sharp face. Blacks have round features and bug eyes

Lol they don't have bug eyes and they don't have round faces.

This is sheer selectivity bias. Same as saying all Indians and Pakistanis experience major ethnic failo when it's nowhere near as bad as you think. Black man attractiveness is niche because of colouring, but when a woman buys that phenotype, they absolutely go crazy for them. The thing that failos the black man is cultural stereotypes. Same as what failos the Indian and Pakistani man.

They don't have bug eyes and they don't have round faces, caucasian men just have better eyes and more angular faces, ON AVERAGE. You are falling for a fallacy because you're either 1) Trying to be cool, 2) Just an actual fool or 3) Trying to light the gas
 
  • +1
Reactions: GetShrekt
LOL high iq post. asians are so self hating it’s sad. just admit that blacks have an increasing advantage over there
 
not agreeing with this or denying this because I don't care what foids think and you shouldn't either
very true but I'm just putting it in perspective, it's race>cock size
 
You need somewhat high level facial aesthetics if you're white as well. At least in Japan I've even seen girls refer to some white guys as "Losers back home" or something. Korean guys are really the hot shit here lately, but no matter what race you are you need a fairly good degree of attractiveness to pull anything other than a slob who'll fuck anybody.
 
LOL high iq post. asians are so self hating it’s sad. just admit that blacks have an increasing advantage over there
Buddy what asian chang cucked you? ure posting resentful all of a sudden
 
Buddy what asian chang cucked you? ure posting resentful all of a sudden
huh? check my other post, i said asians aren’t really slaying in the west, but that doesn’t make them inferior necessarily. all races are chill with me but self hate and projection is never cool
 
What are you talking about :feelsuhh:
if you can’t understand what i just typed, you may be a lost cause bro

im not even sure what you mean by “resentful”? what did i say that was resentful?
 
if you can’t understand what i just typed, you may be a lost cause bro

im not even sure what you mean by “resentful”? what did i say that was resentful?
you're saying nonsense about asians that isnt true at all on a incel forum. what isnt resentful other than doing that lmao
 
you're saying nonsense about asians that isnt true at all on a incel forum. what isnt resentful other than doing that lmao
it isn’t hard to see that many asians are self hating or markedly insecure, i’m not sure how thats “nonsense” but alright. i dont think you know what "resentful" means. is english your first language or nah

also this isn’t really an incel forum. plenty of sex havers here. that’s why there’s incels.is
 
it isn’t hard to see that many asians are self hating or markedly insecure, i’m not sure how thats “nonsense” but alright. i dont think you know what "resentful" means. is english your first language or nah

also this isn’t really an incel forum. plenty of sex havers here. that’s why there’s incels.is
you know exactly what I mean and youre dodging it. some korean chang cucked you in real life so you spew out resentful on a incel forum
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AscensionMan98 and güss
also this isn’t really an incel forum. plenty of sex havers here.
cope. this is a incel forum youre delusional if you think otherwise
 
I agree. BBC we up
 
Extreme cope

Typically they have buggish eyes and rounded faces but they have better maxillas than gooks and much much much better muscle builiding genes than even whites and bigger dicks statically.

Although NGL IN 2022 every 1 should be dick maxing with the phallosan or some shit. But objectively these are traits blacks have on average.
 
Typically they have buggish eyes and rounded faces but they have better maxillas than gooks and much much much better muscle builiding genes than even whites and bigger dicks statically.

Although NGL IN 2022 every 1 should be dick maxing with the phallosan or some shit. But objectively these are traits blacks have on average.
Blackcels can gymaxx very ez and depending on ur tribe u will have a round face

Yoruba per exemple doesnt have round faces
 
Lewis (2010), Lewis (2011) and Lewis (2012) all use a poor methodology.
  1. The pictures they rate are taken from facebook pages, by a "naive research assistant who selected images according to a set of criteria"(Lewis 2012). Random pictures from Facebook can differ in many ways from lighting, camera angles, fashion etc... that are not controlled for. Who knows if the "naive research assistant" unknowingly gave a certain race an advantage when selecting those pictures. This is not like they were judging perfectly front facing pictures all taken with the same exact lightening and same camera.
  2. Then those pictures were judged by a small number of British participants. Lewis (2010) uses 20 participants of unspecified gender, Lewis (2011) uses 10 females and 8 males who are all white British, and Lewis (2012) is a little better but still not that good, uses 40 undergraduates, 15 white males, 2 black males, 3 Asian males, 14 white females, 3 black females, and 3 Asian females.

Another thing I will criticize is the theory they use to explain their results.
Lewis talks about sexual dimorphism while focusing on skin color, but there are MANY other features that contribute to male sexual dimorphism other than skin color, some of which are more common among men of other races.
I find it lazy for those researchers to focus so much on skin color and use it as an easy explanation for their theory that black men are seen as more attractive. The argument is basically "darker skin is a male sexual dimorphism. Blacks are darker. So blacks are the most attractive".
what about "hairyness is a male sexual dimorphism. Meds are hairy. Therefore meds are the most attractive" or "prominent frontal bones are a male sexual dimorphism. Abos tend to have prominent frontal bones. Therefore Abos are the most attractive"
Rare PSL user who is able to read the entirety of a research paper and has a high enough IQ to call out bullshit when he sees it.

The author almost definitely has a sexual race fixation and is probably an actual cuckold too. I wouldn't be surprised if he gets off on his wife getting drilled by nigs because nothing else can explain the level of mental gymnastics and hoops this freak repeatedly jumps through in order to push the same spurious conclusion across many papers other than those three.

Here is another more recent study of his, plus a snippet from the abstract:

Challenges to both reliability and validity of masculinity-preference measures in menstrual cycle-effects research'

In the current experiment, fertility shifts in preferences for masculinised faces (and Africanised faces) were explored using both
attractiveness ratings and a 2afc method over 80 pairs.

Can you guess what bulletproof conclusion he came to for the 100th time?

Here are his supplementary materials if you're curious. Facial images (lmfao) in the Stim.zip file.

The facial CG software is also comically bad (CGa)
1664945682585
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Racky
Gooks jealous of our BBC, kangz can slay gook pussy better white bois.
 
Poor interpretation. Dark skin is unattractive
Whites have masculine sharp face. Blacks have round features and bug eyes
Couldn’t have said it better myself. I would further add that whites have sharp bodies that are hard all over, whereas blacks have softer bodies with more fat
 
whites have sharp bodies that are hard all over, whereas blacks have softer bodies with more fat
Literally the opposite. Coping hard af right now.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Bipedal Dog
Literally the opposite. Coping hard af right now.
He’s probably right.

BF% for blacks is more than likely systematically underestimated since existing models were developed based on decades of data concerning somatotype, body composition, fat patterning, etc. derived primarily from whites. Racial differences in the aforementioned and utilization of generalized estimation methodology produces fairly large errors in measures of body composition in other ethnicities.
 
Literally the opposite. Coping hard af right now.
these are literally the traits. white guys usually have bony and sinewy limbs and torso, which gives them a more gracile and slim look, whereas black guys are always more heavyset
 
these are literally the traits. white guys usually have bony and sinewy limbs and torso, which gives them a more gracile and slim look, whereas black guys are always more heavyset
He’s probably right.

BF% for blacks is more than likely systematically underestimated since existing models were developed based on decades of data concerning somatotype, body composition, fat patterning, etc. derived primarily from whites. Racial differences in the aforementioned and utilization of generalized estimation methodology produces fairly large errors in measures of body composition in other ethnicities.
Maybe for the general population blacks are heavier and fatter. In terms of actual athletes and people who hit the gym, blacks mog whites by far. Most white guys have soft flabby bulky bodies while blacks are chiseled and lean. Obviously darker skin helps with the slimming effect but there's a reason they dominate athletics and having "soft fat bodies" is definitely not the case there.

Also it's common fact that blacks have longer legs and arms on average to the point where medical diagnoses that involve limb proportions are adjusted for black people.
 
Also it's common fact that blacks have longer legs and arms on average to the point where medical diagnoses that involve limb proportions are adjusted for black people.
yeah this true but it’s not related to my point. also it’s not a large difference by any means
Maybe for the general population blacks are heavier and fatter. In terms of actual athletes and people who hit the gym, blacks mog whites by far. Most white guys have soft flabby bulky bodies while blacks are chiseled and lean. Obviously darker skin helps with the slimming effect but there's a reason they dominate athletics and having "soft fat bodies" is definitely not the case there.
swumming, powerlifting?
 
yeah this true but it’s not related to my point. also it’s not a large difference by any means

swumming, powerlifting?
Swimming and powerlifting aren't sports. They're copes for pussies who can't play real sports like football and basketball.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Bipedal Dog

Similar threads

disillusioned
Replies
59
Views
865
ElTruecel
ElTruecel
Jonnyboi
Replies
8
Views
443
Jonnyboi
Jonnyboi
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
22
Views
5K
6foot3Mediterranean
6foot3Mediterranean
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
19
Views
3K
Jay_Arya
Jay_Arya

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top