The reasons why Humans only cares about looks and why its a product of evolution.

L

Lebgfinal

User
Joined
Jul 21, 2022
Posts
18,857
Reputation
27,606
While some incels dont believe in evolution because of theological beliefs, the current state of incels and male celibacy can be perfectly explained with it. Evolution is a concept that has no morals, no rules. Its about what works, and what assure the survival of the specie. Evolution is not always going in a direction that makes a specie better. In some way evolution can worsen the condition of a specie and might favour it as long as the thing is "good enough" that the genes can be passed on the offsprings. This concept is present in animals in the idea of sexual selection. Sexual selection is the idea that the giver of life (woman) will select a genetic giver (men) based on phenotypes and physiology. In human, this means that women usually select better looking males. While this is caused by hormones made to assure the survival of the specie, its shallow in the sense that this sexual selection is not necessarily very deep in the selection of a high genetic makeup partner. Sexual selection in some way can select objectively worse genetics on the name of beauty. When a sexual selection is very strong in a specie, it will usually go in a decrease in genotypes that are not represented in the sexually selected phenotypes. What that means is that when looks become the main factor for selecting a partner, intelligence and everything else is no longer a factor in selecting a partner. Meaning realistically men are not gonna inherit intelligence or other traits. Men became taller in the 21st century because of that, women selected taller genomes for their children that made taller genetics spread more and more that resulted in humans being taller. Its also the reason why humans looks the way we do, why humans looks so different than every other specie. The existence of humans is a proof that looks are the identity of our specie. The simple fact is that we are weak, without any fur, and generally have flaws that go agaisnt our survival in a way. The perfect genetic specimen for survival would be a ugly ogre brute with insane muscles and shorter height. It is biologically true that shorter man live longer, the reason humans are so tall is because women selected men that way, not because its good to be tall. If natural evolution mattered in modern history, you wouldve seen human get shorter due to women choosing short men because its genetically better for a longer live, but this didnt happen. Human became taller when it is not advantageous for survival. But maybe at your surprise, I believe that natural selection was still important for most of our evolution. In a way the human brain didnt grow because of sexual selection. It grew because of natural selection. 200k years ago, humans were selected depending on survival. Ressources were sparse, rare and the men who were able to reproduce were the one who survived. But the more we progressed in that way, our brain grew stronger because of needs. Humans that were smarter were chosen because they were able to adapt and survive in their environment. At some point we became smart and that intelligence slowly made humans care about beauty. We started to value art, and appreciate things in a non practical way. A piece of art doesnt have a use, but humans started to care about it even if its useless. I believe that once this happened human evolution changed in a different way. The needs of beauty made it so women started to care about it, because perception of beauty was now a important thing in our specie. Women started to care about beauty as a factor, they started to want more than just a man who can survive. They wanted something with beauty. What you can find with humans is that with time we became better and better looking. Our skulls grew more proportionates and better to look at. We developed traits such as good looking muscles insertions and generally well proportioned body. Our jaw became weaker but better to look at. All of this is result of women deciding to choose men with these characteristics. It explains all of modern human history and why we are not smarter than we were 1000 years ago. The only difference we have with our ancestor is beauty. They were shorter and generally had less beautiful traits. All of this is caused by women caring about looks. If women didnt care about looks, this wouldn’t have happened.

The simple fact is that if beauty didnt matter, we would be all ugly. If height didnt matter, we would be all short. If personality mattered, domestic violence would go down. The truth is that if selection of partner was based on a theological morality meaning women would choose men depending on their genetic thinking. What would happen is that the specie would go that way. The more and more hypergamy grows with dating apps, the more human greatness will fade. The shallow sexual selection that women have been doing is the reason of so many problems. Current societies sees a decline in morality and rise in degeneracy because women do not care about it. Simple fact is that if feminism was true, and women wanted non violent and kind men, they wouldve chosen them for their offsprings. Meaning with time, such aggressive behaviour would not be there because such genetics causing would be chosen, and as a result domestic violence would decline to very low stades. The more and more our society grows into a hypergamy based on shallow phenotypes, the more the non shallow things will disappear. I believe that humans will grow dumber, more violent but better looking with time. At some point if that hypergamy never stops, humans will end up looking so good that survival will be hard and painful. Life expectancy will lower, and I see that humans might simply go extinct because of it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aromaricecooker, Moggkrates, auitistsurvior and 6 others
1731514249317
 
  • +1
Reactions: angst and itzyaboyJJ
this is why going ER is pointless
the inconsiderate and unwavering laws of nature that have dictated me to be an ugly piece of shit will not suddenly change their course once i take out my bickERing on an ultimately replaceable few
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: Moggkrates, auitistsurvior, itzyaboyJJ and 2 others
this is why going ER is pointless
the inconsiderate and unwavering laws of nature that have dictated me to be an ugly piece of shit will not suddenly change their course once i take out my bickERing on an ultimately replaceable few
I believe that women have the power to make looks not a factor anymore, but their biological nature makes it hard for me to believe that would happen.
Going ER is not fixing anything, its just gonna reinforce the narrative that your point of view doesnt matter.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Moggkrates, itzyaboyJJ and silently_said
Abolish women's rights. That's all you need.
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ and CookieGuy
While some incels dont believe in evolution because of theological beliefs, the current state of incels and male celibacy can be perfectly explained with it. Evolution is a concept that has no morals, no rules. Its about what works, and what assure the survival of the specie. Evolution is not always going in a direction that makes a specie better. In some way evolution can worsen the condition of a specie and might favour it as long as the thing is "good enough" that the genes can be passed on the offsprings. This concept is present in animals in the idea of sexual selection. Sexual selection is the idea that the giver of life (woman) will select a genetic giver (men) based on phenotypes and physiology. In human, this means that women usually select better looking males. While this is caused by hormones made to assure the survival of the specie, its shallow in the sense that this sexual selection is not necessarily very deep in the selection of a high genetic makeup partner. Sexual selection in some way can select objectively worse genetics on the name of beauty. When a sexual selection is very strong in a specie, it will usually go in a decrease in genotypes that are not represented in the sexually selected phenotypes. What that means is that when looks become the main factor for selecting a partner, intelligence and everything else is no longer a factor in selecting a partner. Meaning realistically men are not gonna inherit intelligence or other traits. Men became taller in the 21st century because of that, women selected taller genomes for their children that made taller genetics spread more and more that resulted in humans being taller. Its also the reason why humans looks the way we do, why humans looks so different than every other specie. The existence of humans is a proof that looks are the identity of our specie. The simple fact is that we are weak, without any fur, and generally have flaws that go agaisnt our survival in a way. The perfect genetic specimen for survival would be a ugly ogre brute with insane muscles and shorter height. It is biologically true that shorter man live longer, the reason humans are so tall is because women selected men that way, not because its good to be tall. If natural evolution mattered in modern history, you wouldve seen human get shorter due to women choosing short men because its genetically better for a longer live, but this didnt happen. Human became taller when it is not advantageous for survival. But maybe at your surprise, I believe that natural selection was still important for most of our evolution. In a way the human brain didnt grow because of sexual selection. It grew because of natural selection. 200k years ago, humans were selected depending on survival. Ressources were sparse, rare and the men who were able to reproduce were the one who survived. But the more we progressed in that way, our brain grew stronger because of needs. Humans that were smarter were chosen because they were able to adapt and survive in their environment. At some point we became smart and that intelligence slowly made humans care about beauty. We started to value art, and appreciate things in a non practical way. A piece of art doesnt have a use, but humans started to care about it even if its useless. I believe that once this happened human evolution changed in a different way. The needs of beauty made it so women started to care about it, because perception of beauty was now a important thing in our specie. Women started to care about beauty as a factor, they started to want more than just a man who can survive. They wanted something with beauty. What you can find with humans is that with time we became better and better looking. Our skulls grew more proportionates and better to look at. We developed traits such as good looking muscles insertions and generally well proportioned body. Our jaw became weaker but better to look at. All of this is result of women deciding to choose men with these characteristics. It explains all of modern human history and why we are not smarter than we were 1000 years ago. The only difference we have with our ancestor is beauty. They were shorter and generally had less beautiful traits. All of this is caused by women caring about looks. If women didnt care about looks, this wouldn’t have happened.

The simple fact is that if beauty didnt matter, we would be all ugly. If height didnt matter, we would be all short. If personality mattered, domestic violence would go down. The truth is that if selection of partner was based on a theological morality meaning women would choose men depending on their genetic thinking. What would happen is that the specie would go that way. The more and more hypergamy grows with dating apps, the more human greatness will fade. The shallow sexual selection that women have been doing is the reason of so many problems. Current societies sees a decline in morality and rise in degeneracy because women do not care about it. Simple fact is that if feminism was true, and women wanted non violent and kind men, they wouldve chosen them for their offsprings. Meaning with time, such aggressive behaviour would not be there because such genetics causing would be chosen, and as a result domestic violence would decline to very low stades. The more and more our society grows into a hypergamy based on shallow phenotypes, the more the non shallow things will disappear. I believe that humans will grow dumber, more violent but better looking with time. At some point if that hypergamy never stops, humans will end up looking so good that survival will be hard and painful. Life expectancy will lower, and I see that humans might simply go extinct because of it.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: tall0ner, itzyaboyJJ and Deleted member 25571
4483534 p0gn6sgd 3


4483533 Screenshot 20241029 001012 Samsung Internet



I am definitely a Chad. I am only going for good looking women. I ONLY approach Stacie's ONLY. She has to be a minimum 7/10 for me to date her MINIMUM which is a 5.5-6/10 on gantstars scale.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ey88 and itzyaboyJJ
Good thread but this water
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ, 134applesauce456 and silently_said
Fr? Jfl at him. How is he not caught?
The bbc knocked at his door because he is running suicide forums. He is on every federal list probably.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
Hwah
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
so much words to say water is wet
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
Gjrj
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
Ive proven a concept with evolution. Can you link a post with exactly the same thing as i argued ?
ngl i didnt read it thoroughly but my bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
shit thread and obviously wrong
we lost our body hair because we're a highly dopaminergic species and to balance that out you need to have higher serotonin levels which is positively generated from sunlight hitting the skin. if looks were the primary way under which sexual selection operated then male pattern baldness wouldve been selected against and left in the abyss 200k years ago
also the way in which the human body looks isnt based exclusively on sexual selection. one reason why we're upright is because it aids in digestion which is important for a brain that relies constantly on high energy needs.
also, in the original humans black men are generally considered better looking than black women, but the opposite is true for east asians where the men are less attractive, suggesting that something other than looks guided the men being positively selected for.
feels like the person who wrote the op is 15
 
  • +1
Reactions: itzyaboyJJ
shit thread and obviously wrong
we lost our body hair because we're a highly dopaminergic species and to balance that out you need to have higher serotonin levels which is positively generated from sunlight hitting the skin. if looks were the primary way under which sexual selection operated then male pattern baldness wouldve been selected against and left in the abyss 200k years ago
also the way in which the human body looks isnt based exclusively on sexual selection. one reason why we're upright is because it aids in digestion which is important for a brain that relies constantly on high energy needs.
also, in the original humans black men are generally considered better looking than black women, but the opposite is true for east asians where the men are less attractive, suggesting that something other than looks guided the men being positively selected for.
feels like the person who wrote the op is 15
So yes we lost hair due to natural selection. That is true. I never argued that. Depending on where you are on earth your skin will have more melanin because of the environment etc..
Male pattern baldness is still present because in current society because the genes transmitting such things dont seem to be much of a factor. Male pattern baldness usually appear at later ages, when men already had kids. Meaning that men that have or dont have risk of male pattern baldness are not getting chosen differently. Its not a factor. Almost every human on earth probably has a bald relative in the family. Male pattern baldness is widely spread because of that: people with the genetics causing it generally are not gonna be not chosen because hairloss is usually a symptom of old age. If women actively chose the men that had genetics that made them never lose hair during their life, the human male would most likely not have hairloss anymore. You fail to understand that aspect of selection.
Your point about human standing upright fails to ignore that yes, its a product of natural selection. I explained that i believe that caring about looks is a generally recent thing in our background.
Human currently are only being selected on looks in society where they have basic needs fullfilled. Modern human has slowly removed the natural selection meaning nowadays it is mostly about sexual selection. Every argument agaisnt my point fails to understand that im talking about evolution of a pretty recent human. Meaning we already were standing upright, and we had less fur. Not arguing about that.
My argument is that nowadays sexual selection is the only factor and this essay is mostly focused on the future.
Call me a 15yo if you want but thats a retarded insult.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aromaricecooker
Niggers should just become extinct already
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
Not reading all that, also just sounds like common sense
 
Not reading all that, also just sounds like common sense
Yet billions of people think god is real and care about them
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
So yes we lost hair due to natural selection. That is true. I never argued that. Depending on where you are on earth your skin will have more melanin because of the environment etc..
Male pattern baldness is still present because in current society because the genes transmitting such things dont seem to be much of a factor. Male pattern baldness usually appear at later ages, when men already had kids. Meaning that men that have or dont have risk of male pattern baldness are not getting chosen differently. Its not a factor. Almost every human on earth probably has a bald relative in the family. Male pattern baldness is widely spread because of that: people with the genetics causing it generally are not gonna be not chosen because hairloss is usually a symptom of old age. If women actively chose the men that had genetics that made them never lose hair during their life, the human male would most likely not have hairloss anymore. You fail to understand that aspect of selection.
Your point about human standing upright fails to ignore that yes, its a product of natural selection. I explained that i believe that caring about looks is a generally recent thing in our background.
Human currently are only being selected on looks in society where they have basic needs fullfilled. Modern human has slowly removed the natural selection meaning nowadays it is mostly about sexual selection. Every argument agaisnt my point fails to understand that im talking about evolution of a pretty recent human. Meaning we already were standing upright, and we had less fur. Not arguing about that.
My argument is that nowadays sexual selection is the only factor and this essay is mostly focused on the future.
Call me a 15yo if you want but thats a retarded insult.
men can still have kids by the time they show signs of mpb. it can manifest anytime between the ages of 18 to 50, which would give the men without those genes opportunities to out breed the bald guys, generally knocking it out of competition and essentially weeding it out of the gene pool, which never happened.
status is also something that is sexually selected for, even if we were just talking about modern day sexual selection most girls are hunting for men on instagram, not dating apps like tinder or hinge which are sausage fests. if it were only looks and status meant zero youd see more girls on apps that focus on looks and less that focus on status, which obviously isnt true.
 
men can still have kids by the time they show signs of mpb. it can manifest anytime between the ages of 18 to 50, which would give the men without those genes opportunities to out breed the bald guys, generally knocking it out of competition and essentially weeding it out of the gene pool, which never happened.
status is also something that is sexually selected for, even if we were just talking about modern day sexual selection most girls are hunting for men on instagram, not dating apps like tinder or hinge which are sausage fests. if it were only looks and status meant zero youd see more girls on apps that focus on looks and less that focus on status, which obviously isnt true.
My point is that male pattern baldness is a vague genetic problem that can be caused by multiples type of genotypes and that sexual selection has proven that women do not select men with more or less genes with that. It never knocked out of the gene pool because its not a factor like some people may think and that having a genetic prone to baldness is not correlated to reproductive success.
Also my point is that sexual selection is everything, and you simply associate with looks and attraction. While i put a misleading title i mainly mean that our current society put looks before everything and that currently women only choose men on shallow factors. Status is the same as looks in my book, a shallow factor that is being selected that isnt intelligence or what i think makes a human great. My point is that personality is not a factor, and the reason human greatness is decreasing is because women choose men that are not great. Many women make children with horrible men, and these children spread horrible genetics that slowly makes a nation worse.
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
21
Views
443
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
S
Replies
4
Views
150
Sidewalk_knights
S
Y
Replies
11
Views
297
Samiscool234
Samiscool234
wishIwasSalludon
Replies
9
Views
233
flippasav
flippasav

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top