The Red Army of 1944-1945 is still the strongest land army in history

Manchild_v2

Manchild_v2

He/Him | Muslim | Zionist | Latinx | Black ✊🏿
Joined
Feb 5, 2025
Posts
3,647
Reputation
5,402
imagine a pitched battled in a small terrain between the US armed forces and the red army at its peak.

the red army would win.

better generals and more people, more tanks, more experience, more logistics, etc
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, watah, Sonneillon and 1 other person
Where tf do you think they got their tanks and weapons from :feelskek:
They built them themselves lol. JFL over 90% Of their equipment was their own, only 10% was from UK and USA.

Not only that if americans managed to destroy a lot of it they could easily manufactur more.

they made like 130k T34 tanks alone lol
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Sonneillon
Modern usa would wipe them out no question asked
 
Because the US and UK pumped an infinite amount of resources into the USSR which would have collapsed without Lend-Lease
 
  • +1
Reactions: spongebob
Because the US and UK pumped an infinite amount of resources into the USSR which would have collapsed without Lend-Lease
Average sfcel understanding of history.

92% of soviet material and weapons were their own
 
based thread
 
Average sfcel understanding of history.

92% of soviet material and weapons were their own
Your beloved commies agree with me
Schermafbeelding 2025 04 22 223722
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: spongebob and watah
just throw villagers against artillery theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: spongebob
based strain but is also true that only 8-10% of material was american or british
Most of the Lend Lease arrived after the Germans were already effectively beaten too lol
 
They were depended on British and American money to fight Nazi germany
 
New Model Army under command of Sir Thomas Fairfax and Sir Oliver Cromwell would have wiped them of the map of the known world
 
imagine a pitched battled in a small terrain between the US armed forces and the red army at its peak.

the red army would win.

better generals and more people, more tanks, more experience, more logistics, etc
Of course. Is this even controversial?
The Red Army consisted of 20 million, dwarfing the combined forces of the rest of the allies combined

In history is a more controversial point though because there are so many different metrics to measure it by
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

incelhunter
Replies
32
Views
3K
Bleachbooru.org
Bleachbooru.org
RapeAllFemales
Replies
31
Views
2K
¿Nero
¿Nero
got.daim
Replies
22
Views
2K
iblamejames
iblamejames
got.daim
Replies
45
Views
2K
TiktokUser
TiktokUser
0hMan
Replies
62
Views
3K
Haseeb
Haseeb

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top