D
Deleted member 5522
dont be jealous asshole
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2020
- Posts
- 10,961
- Reputation
- 17,828
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc737/fc737846802de49557e169006c8b3ed9800a0f1b" alt="1596899029186 1596899029186"
Roman nose
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Cope most of them were grain fed peasantsNo they were not semetics, back then white people had more testosterone and growth hormone which grows the nose.
The Joestars are truly giants among menRomans me
Just lol @ saying they had more growth hormone. They were like 5’4 avgNo they were not semetics, back then white people had more testosterone and growth hormone which grows the nose.
Look it up, they were about the same height as we are now also GH after puberty grows nose/hands/ears without getting taller.Just lol @ saying they had more growth hormone. They were like 5’4 avg
Roman military was 5’7 avg until like 500 AD. This is revisionist historyLook it up, they were about the same height as we are now also GH after puberty grows nose/hands/ears without getting taller.
So were about the same height as we are now also GH after puberty grows nose/hands/ears without getting taller.Roman military was 5’7 avg until like 500 AD. This is revisionist history
That’s because they selected for that height militarily and it was easier to mass produce weapons/ defend for people that tall.Roman military was 5’7 avg until like 500 AD. This is revisionist history
Producing shit before the industrial revolution must have been a pain in the ass. Im amazed how the Roman state could equip such a huge army.That’s because they selected for that height militarily and it was easier to mass produce weapons/ defend for people that tall.
Spartans hoplites were like 5-10 on average because they made their equipment for that height, while their skirmishers and auxiliaries were taller or shorter usually