The smaller the better: Size of a man's testicles is linked to his parenting skills

jefferson
 
retarded pop psychology as per usual where they associate traits such as passivity and agreeableness as "better parent", or even dumber, a preference or tolerance for changing nappies, what the fuck???

You've already met the ultimate reddit father several times in your life. Ask yourself how his kids turned out. I guarantee they are fuckups. Pop psychology is always trying to seed this "pathetic males are better husbands and fathers", almost like wish fulfilment for the pathetic males who work in these fields (e,g i cant compete sexually or economically, but I'm a b-better d-dad! my kids love me more!).

Total nonsense. The exact characteristics that make a male attractive to woman or highly competitive are the exact same ones who make a good father for boys, because so much of their ability to thrive in life is going to depend on how they model themselves after the closest male in their life.

How much do you want to bet these morons also consider the self-report happiness of a child to be indicative of how well they are being raised? Thats nice, good luck with your happy fat kid you let walk all over you, watch him grow up into a listless depressed faggot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13994, wateriswet and supercilious_knowall
roiding makes you a better father confirmed

nattycels on suicide watch
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: jefferson and Demir
the bigger the better this is a rule to everything
what a cope study
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Cretinous
>Although the study found a link between parenting and testes volume in 53 of the men who had agreed to have their testes measured, the association was not absolute, with some men bucking the trend, Dr Rilling said.

translation: there was no link whatsoever, but they wouldn't get published otherwise so they massaged the numbers until it kind of sort looked like there was an association.
 
>Although the study found a link between parenting and testes volume in 53 of the men who had agreed to have their testes measured, the association was not absolute, with some men bucking the trend, Dr Rilling said.

translation: there was no link whatsoever, but they wouldn't get published otherwise so they massaged the numbers until it kind of sort looked like there was an association.

its a funny study cmon bro

btw 53 is way bigger sample size then the 3 siblings mike mew uses as proof for his theories
 
its a funny study cmon bro

btw 53 is way bigger sample size then the 3 siblings mike mew uses as proof for his theories

the sample size was 70 not 53.

> The study involved 70 men who lived with their partners and were fathers to children aged between one and two. They were asked about details of their parenting as well being analysed for brain activity when shown photographs of their children - a measure of parenting
> A key part of the study was to use an MRI scanner to assess the mens’ brain activity in an region called the ventral tegmental area, a part of the brain associated with reward and parental motivation, said Jennifer Mascaro, a research student at Emory University.

Its shit. A questionnaire and an MRI correlated to physical measurements. Brain activity is the same same nonsense where they tell you that a nigger in jail for raping 5 kids and then beheading them is the same type of person as a special forces veteran just because their amygdalas dont really light up when you show them violent imagery.

next month in publish-or-perish nonsense: men with larger ring fingers are closet homosexuals! and republicans! and liars!
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 206

Similar threads

Vermilioncore
Replies
13
Views
201
vermillioncorefan
vermillioncorefan
atlantean
Replies
22
Views
543
Themanletauticel123
Themanletauticel123
proibitio
Replies
40
Views
348
widdi
widdi
Biebercel
Replies
32
Views
1K
human304
human304
noodlelover
Replies
4
Views
564
JohnDoe
JohnDoe

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top