the sounds of HEAVEN.you can't tell me Christianity isnt the most BEAUTIFUL religion

[Anyanglover]

 

[Deleted member 16648]

and this is the sound of hell

 

[Deleted member 16648]

your Church is the rehab for the wicked who's in necessity of a moral compass

your creed's expertise is reverencing death, as is seen by your mascot symbol lapidated and exsanguinated crucifixion

die Demiurge worshipper!

 

[Anyanglover]

your Church is the rehab for the wicked who's in necessity of a moral compass

your creed's expertise is reverencing death, as is seen by your mascot symbol lapidated and exsanguinated crucifixion

die Demiurge worshipper!

 

[Anyanglover]

lol debunked.there HAS to be a being who's essence is its existance or everything is created.either you have your essence as your existance(A one GOD) or you derive your being from other.this explains

Social Trinitarianism and the Catholic Faith | Called to Communion

In his chapter titled "Social Trinity and Tritheism," in the book Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement, (University of Notre Dame Press, 1989), Cornelius Plantinga Jr., the current president of Calvin Theological Seminary, argues in support of what is known as 'social trinitarianism.' This...

www.calledtocommunion.com

only a divinely simple GOD who is his attributes can be that.and the trinity is logically derived in that set up even the neoplatonists believed in it.

there is ONE GOD with one numerical intellect in three different persons wich are self subsisting relations in the one numerical intellect!the trinity is NOT polytheism.

 

[Deleted member 6695]

your Church is the rehab for the wicked who's in necessity of a moral compass

your creed's expertise is reverencing death, as is seen by your mascot symbol lapidated and exsanguinated crucifixion

die Demiurge worshipper!

True Christians pray alone not in the Church

 

[Deleted member 6695]

Orthodoxy is not it bro.Most idolatrous denomination there is

 

[Anyanglover]

Orthodoxy is not it bro.Most idolatrous denomination there is

They have good too.....charismatic is the best but even they err with female pastors.icons are okay if you dont worship them and use them only for decoration,priesthood,bishops,sacraments are okay imo that seems to be the original form of the church according to saint ignatius

praying to angels and saints is def not okay nor veneration of icons.orthodox have more beauty and order in the church worship and structure wich is what protestants should follow.anglicans done good on this but have rejected tongues and the gifts of the spirit.

 

[Deleted member 6695]

True Christianity is non denominational

 

[CFW432]

What you will actually hear when you pass the "pearly white gates":

 

[thegoat]

How am i meant to turn up to this shit nigga? Mogged by playboi carti

 

[Anyanglover]

True Christianity is non denominational

charismatic nondenoninational.cessationism is apostacy.

 

[Anyanglover]

What you will actually hear when you pass the "pearly white gates":

SISTER RYE OF IVORY COAST 1

JESUS SHOWED ME THE PRINCIPALITY OF ISLAM IN MECCA In 1990, the Lord revealed Himself to me and told me, “I'm taking you to a place to...

spiritreports.blogspot.com

PASTOR BO RA CHOI OF SOUTH KOREA 1

I SAW MOHAMMAD IN HELL Pastor Bo Ra Choi has been pastoring a small church in South Korea whose members have been praying daily for 7 ...

spiritreports.blogspot.com

 

[CFW432]

SISTER RYE OF IVORY COAST 1

JESUS SHOWED ME THE PRINCIPALITY OF ISLAM IN MECCA In 1990, the Lord revealed Himself to me and told me, “I'm taking you to a place to...

spiritreports.blogspot.com

PASTOR BO RA CHOI OF SOUTH KOREA 1

I SAW MOHAMMAD IN HELL Pastor Bo Ra Choi has been pastoring a small church in South Korea whose members have been praying daily for 7 ...

spiritreports.blogspot.com

 

[Vermilioncore]

Meanwhile in hell it’s filled with vomit and unending pain

 

[Anyanglover]

 

[Anyanglover]

john ramirez knew the principality of islam as aa satanic priest

 

[Deleted member 7725]

Orthodoxy is not it bro.Most idolatrous denomination there is

 

[Anyanglover]

 

[Anyanglover]

charismatics are the most conservative overall.orthodox women still wear makeup,lotions,jewelry,pants etc all against the scripture

 

[Deleted member 6695]

Orthodoxy is very idolatrous which goes against the bible!

 

[Anyanglover]

Orthodoxy is very idolatrous which goes against the bible!

Orthodoxy is very idolatrous which goes against the bible!

Orthodoxy is very idolatrous which goes against the bible!

they are also immodest from a biblical pov.and let women wear men clothes and cut their hair.they allow divorce even if one partner didnt cheat.church dictates override the bible in their ecclesiology.

 

[Anyanglover]

their priests etc wear jewelry when bible says dont do it.even cross jewelry will bring you to hell,let alone gold and silver.

 

[Marsiere214]

Orthodoxy is not it bro.Most idolatrous denomination there is

Oh yeah catholic is better, especially with that child molesting jew pope.

 

[Anyanglover]

1 Timothy 2:9-10​

I also want the women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, adorning themselves, not with elaborate hairstyles or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, 10 but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God.

1 Peter 3:3-4
Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as elaborate hairstyles and the wearing of gold jewelry or fine clothes. 4 Rather, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God’s sight.

I Corinthians 11:15 that "if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her, for her hair is given to her for a covering.

Is it clear Scripture does not leave ambiguous whether a woman’s hair is okay to trim if it’s still technically long? Girl with her hair down

This is one of our key biblical distinctions from the Apostle’s doctrine addressing the distinction in sexes. A fascinating thing is while some Apostolics are picking up “studied ambiguity” from non-Apostolic sources on this subject, scholarship outside our movement are revealing some amazingly plain admissions.

One claim is 1 Corinthians 11 is just addressing a local Corinthian custom. But, Dr. R.C. Sproul (chancellor of Ligonier Academy and Reformation Bible College) says, “If Paul merely told women in Corinth to cover their heads and gave no rationale for such instruction, we would be strongly inclined to supply it via our cultural knowledge. In this case, however, Paul provides a rationale which is based on an appeal to creation not to the custom of Corinthian harlots.” He goes on to push interpreters by stating emphatically, “We must be careful not to let our zeal for knowledge of the culture obscure what is actually said.” His point is that this is not a cultural issue but a command for all times and places.

What should we Apostolics say? Amen!

Another common attempt to move away from this biblical prescription is by saying the words or concepts in 1 Corinthians 11 are so far distant from us that we cannot be sure of the correct meaning or reading. This claim suggests we cannot be sure of what is or isn’t on a man or woman’s head. However, again, cutting edge research flies in the face of this claim.

For instance, Dr. A. Philip Brown II (Associate Prof. of Language, Bible, & Theology at God’s Bible School & College) points out that although “long hair” (κομάω) can be used with various metaphorical senses, the normal meaning of the word throughout Koine literature is “to allow the hair to grow long by not cutting it, wear long hair.” He further takes on the counterarguments of both Ben Witherington III (Prof. of NT Interpretation at Asbury Theological Seminary) and Preston T. Massey (Prof. at Indiana Wesleyan University) proving them wrong.



Dr. Brown points out that while the word “long hair” kóme (κόμη) occurs in the NT only in 1 Cor. 11:15, that “hurdle” does not leave the meaning ambiguous. He points out the early church’s interpretation regarding Paul’s use of komáo (κομάω) and kóme (κόμη) is uniform! He proves, citing example after example, there is simply no case historically where Paul’s words are taken to refer to hair that is long and yet cut. The consistent understanding from all the existing records is that “. . . men are not to have uncut hair and women are to have uncut hair.”

What is an Apostolic response? Amen!

Brown shows all the writing in the Greek of the New Testament (Koine Greek), and even all of classical Greek does not support a distinction between cutting hair and trimming it. Further, he shows Paul did not intend to make a “long and yet cut” distinction in 1 Cor. 11. He states emphatically, “Since I can find no such distinction in Koine literature, in the early church’s understanding of this passage, or in Paul, I conclude that the argument is not legitimate. Paul’s expectation was that women would have uncut hair that grows however long nature has determined, and that men would have cut hair that did not ‘cover’ their heads and thus is distinctly masculine.”

Isn’t it fascinating when even non-Apostolic authors make incredible admissions rooted in the facts of the Scripture? What a powerful day to be on the side of truth! Can I get an “Amen?”

 

[Deleted member 6695]

Oh yeah catholic is better, especially with that child molesting jew pope.

Im not catholic i hate catholicism I hate labels on christianity

 

[AllesScheiße]