The sydney sweeney should be controversial because of its degeneracy

trvechud

trvechud

Kraken
Joined
May 25, 2025
Posts
3,319
Reputation
4,524

Yes I find it revolting, not because of muh genes. But because of its disgusting sexualization. Muh boobs and muhass, nigga you fucking evil fucking jews have done so much to corrupt our culture and you still have to rub it in our faces fuck man. Also jfl at the normies cortisol spiking, the ad never mentions anything about jbw, it jsut makes a nod to the BP.
@Mainlander @greycel @Hernan @jaaba
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep, Hernan, grilldaddy❤️ and 11 others
Also jfl her uee is horrendous. She's saved by tit halo and blue eyes unironically
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Hernan, grilldaddy❤️ and 3 others

Yes I find it revolting, not because of muh genes. But because of its disgusting sexualization. Muh boobs and muhass, nigga you fucking evil fucking jews have done so much to corrupt our culture and you still have to rub it in our faces fuck man. Also jfl at the normies cortisol spiking, the ad never mentions anything about jbw, it jsut makes a nod to the BP.
@Mainlander @greycel @Hernan @jaaba

She is dalit food
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: trvechud
She's a whore who should be punished by an inquisition
Dalit food regardless. Just like you. Or would you rather be an eunuch slave?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Mainlander and trvechud
Dalit food regardless. Just like you. Or would you rather be an eunuch slave?
She'd commit suicide before even hugging a dalit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mainlander and DRACOX

Yes I find it revolting, not because of muh genes. But because of its disgusting sexualization. Muh boobs and muhass, nigga you fucking evil fucking jews have done so much to corrupt our culture and you still have to rub it in our faces fuck man. Also jfl at the normies cortisol spiking, the ad never mentions anything about jbw, it jsut makes a nod to the BP.
@Mainlander @greycel @Hernan @jaaba

i was trying to watch it to see what was so controversial but it disgusted me so much i just gave up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mainlander and trvechud
where's the fascism? i was promised fascism, jews lying and projecting once again.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Random_Person561 and trvechud
where's the fascism? i was promised fascism, jews lying and projecting once again.
From what I've heard its because she says I have blue jeans which somehow means blue eyes=better. Blue eyes are objectively better but jfl that's a fucking huge stretch especially when mainstream media promotes non whites so much
 
From what I've heard its because she says I have blue jeans which somehow means blue eyes=better. Blue eyes are objectively better but jfl that's a fucking huge stretch especially when mainstream media promotes non whites so much
normies are absolute schizos :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mainlander and trvechud
If it wasn’t for her great body, she would’ve been on the TEA app barking at men. Her face is terrible.

Shouldn’t picked a more facially attractive chick for this genetics allegory
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: aladdinmaxxer, Chadeep, PoopyFaceTomatoNose and 4 others
She is very ugly tbh

Make-up fraud

And Body halo

Jewish whore
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, PoopyFaceTomatoNose and trvechud
If it wasn’t for her great body, she would’ve been on the TEA app barking at men. Her face is terrible.

Shouldn’t picked a more facially attractive chick for this genetics allegory
im going to say it, she has a average fucking body, she has the same body as a average college slut, she just wears more revealing clothes
 
  • +1
Reactions: trvechud

Yes I find it revolting, not because of muh genes. But because of its disgusting sexualization. Muh boobs and muhass, nigga you fucking evil fucking jews have done so much to corrupt our culture and you still have to rub it in our faces fuck man. Also jfl at the normies cortisol spiking, the ad never mentions anything about jbw, it jsut makes a nod to the BP.
@Mainlander @greycel @Hernan @jaaba

I find it insane that nowadays you cannot even imply that genes have an impact on you life at all, if you do it’s “eugenics” and your some kind of derailed psychopath. The backlash is just a shit ton of subhumans coping not wanting to acknowledge that they are genetically inferior.

Also why the fuck would you not rather have parents that are blonde+blueeyed+attractive as opposed to parents that are jeets+ugly+short; you could argue it’s far more ethical to control the genes passed on to next generations because it has such a huge impact on their quality of life.

This all just shows how fucked normies brains are they’re so brainwashed they simply cannot comprehend anything we talk about on here.

Btw the adds not even original pretty sure Brooke shields did the exact same add for Calvin Kline in the 80s. Brooke fogs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Mainlander, trvechud and 1 other person
I find it insane that nowadays you cannot even imply that genes have an impact on you life at all, if you do it’s “eugenics” and your some kind of derailed psychopath. The backlash is just a shit ton of subhumans coping not wanting to acknowledge that they are genetically inferior.

Also why the fuck would you not rather have parents that are blonde+blueeyed+attractive as opposed to parents that are jeets+ugly+short; you could argue it’s far more ethical to control the genes passed on to next generations because it has such a huge impact on their quality of life.

This all just shows how fucked normies brains are they’re so brainwashed they simply cannot comprehend anything we talk about on here.

Btw the adds not even original pretty sure Brooke shields did the exact same add for Calvin Kline in the 80s. Brooke fogs
@ascension
 
  • +1
Reactions: trvechud and ascension
Saw people saying the got creeped out by the word offspring ?! Lmao
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, PoopyFaceTomatoNose, jaaba and 1 other person
I find it insane that nowadays you cannot even imply that genes have an impact on you life at all, if you do it’s “eugenics” and your some kind of derailed psychopath. The backlash is just a shit ton of subhumans coping not wanting to acknowledge that they are genetically inferior.

Also why the fuck would you not rather have parents that are blonde+blueeyed+attractive as opposed to parents that are jeets+ugly+short; you could argue it’s far more ethical to control the genes passed on to next generations because it has such a huge impact on their quality of life.

This all just shows how fucked normies brains are they’re so brainwashed they simply cannot comprehend anything we talk about on here.

Btw the adds not even original pretty sure Brooke shields did the exact same add for Calvin Kline in the 80s. Brooke fogs

The idea that genes determine a large part of your life is one that everyone knows deep down, but they fight it, to try and convince themselves that they have a large degree of control over their lives. The elites also don't want subhumans to realise that they're fucked, they need productive, satisfied worker bees to keep society moving and paying their taxes.

That's why the media have paired eugenics with Nazism, using that to negatively brand anyone who believes in genetic superiority. But it's funny how normies worship the Chad Hollywood A-listers and celebrities subconsciously while still spouting the "looks don't matter" trope.

Where normies have a point though, is that physical genetics aren't the be all and end all, you can still lead a good life despite your looks, you do have some control over your destiny but it's a more uphill battle the worse your genes are.
 
  • +1
Reactions: trvechud and jaaba
The idea that genes determine a large part of your life is one that everyone knows deep down, but they fight it, to try and convince themselves that they have a large degree of control over their lives. The elites also don't want subhumans to realise that they're fucked, they need productive, satisfied worker bees to keep society moving and paying their taxes.

That's why the media have paired eugenics with Nazism, using that to negatively brand anyone who believes in genetic superiority. But it's funny how normies worship the Chad Hollywood A-listers and celebrities subconsciously while still spouting the "looks don't matter" trope.

Where normies have a point though, is that physical genetics aren't the be all and end all, you can still lead a good life despite your looks, you do have some control over your destiny but it's a more uphill battle the worse your genes are.
Yeah it’s a very hard thing to accept, you can tell because of how angry they get when you mention genetics at all. I suppose it feels pretty defeatist to acknowledge that you are far less in control of your life than you once believed.

And yes I totally agree with you, the media paired eugenics with nazism tactically so we’d immediately think it was bad. It was intentional. It’s strange how much people morally oppose eugenics really, because when you think about it it’s just a controlled and more efficient form of evolution
 
  • +1
Reactions: trvechud and ascension
Yeah it’s a very hard thing to accept, you can tell because of how angry they get when you mention genetics at all. I suppose it feels pretty defeatist to acknowledge that you are far less in control of your life than you once believed.

And yes I totally agree with you, the media paired eugenics with nazism tactically so we’d immediately think it was bad. It was intentional. It’s strange how much people morally oppose eugenics really, because when you think about it it’s just a controlled and more efficient form of evolution

Personally I think stupid people shouldn't reproduce, mainly because they're the ones having the most children. The smartest of society are actually abstaining from having children, and this isn't good for the planet. Looks-based eugenics I'm not in favour of because it's intelligence that has advanced civilisation to this point, not looks. We need smarter people, not "better-looking" people, I'd rather have a scientist born every minute that can find the cure to my future cancer diagnosis than a Chad kid with blue eyes :ROFLMAO:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: jaaba
Personally I think stupid people shouldn't reproduce, mainly because they're the ones having the most children. The smartest of society are actually abstaining from having children, and this isn't good for the planet. Looks-based eugenics I'm not in favour of because it's intelligence that has advanced civilisation to this point, not looks. We need smarter people, not "better-looking" people, I'd rather have a scientist born every minute that can find the cure to my future cancer diagnosis than a Chad kid with blue eyes :ROFLMAO:
Yeah fair point lol, I’m sure we could eventually have both tho if we actually had scientist working on it rather than wasting their time doing whatever the fuck they do atm
 
This ad is great

And clearly worked very well

People who hate this are low testosterone
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: jaaba and trvechud
Personally I think stupid people shouldn't reproduce, mainly because they're the ones having the most children. The smartest of society are actually abstaining from having children, and this isn't good for the planet. Looks-based eugenics I'm not in favour of because it's intelligence that has advanced civilisation to this point, not looks. We need smarter people, not "better-looking" people, I'd rather have a scientist born every minute that can find the cure to my future cancer diagnosis than a Chad kid with blue eyes :ROFLMAO:
Smarter people will be better looking due to being well developed. The reason fields we tend to associate with i tellegience are filled with ugly people is because the smart good looki good ones found an easier job with more pay and humans take the although of least resistance
 
  • +1
Reactions: jaaba
Yes I find it revolting, not because of muh genes. But because of its disgusting sexualization.
Lol, it's nothing new, ads like these have been around for decades, including the word play jeans/genes, btw Brooke Shields was 15 here, but you didn't hear people complaining.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, PoopyFaceTomatoNose, trvechud and 1 other person
Smarter people will be better looking due to being well developed. The reason fields we tend to associate with i tellegience are filled with ugly people is because the smart good looki good ones found an easier job with more pay and humans take the although of least resistance
Yeah that’s a good point actually. All favourable traits kinda link together

Ultimately were attracted to signals of health, if you’re smart you are probably healthy
 
  • +1
Reactions: trvechud
Lol, it's nothing new, ads like these have been around for decades, including the word play jeans/genes, btw Brooke Shields was 15 here, but you didn't hear people complaining.

Different times, people weren’t so idiotic as they are now
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose, trvechud and Gonthar
Lol, it's nothing new, ads like these have been around for decades, including the word play jeans/genes, btw Brooke Shields was 15 here, but you didn't hear people complaining.

A lot less sexual than the current one
 
  • +1
Reactions: jaaba and Gonthar
those baggy lesbo jeans are a war crime
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top