the system is built on impossibilities. if something could be faster than speed of light, the universe would collapse

[_MVP_]

if it was possible to increase gravity in universe, universe would collapse

if the temperature could rise above a certain point, the universe would

you see how everything is built on impossibilities? and thats good, that what i call "intelligent design"

impossibility is a very real constant in the universe.

 

[WeiWei]

 

[_MVP_]

here is what chatgpt says to my thread:

You're touching on some fascinating and deep ideas about the nature of the universe. There's a kernel of truth in what you're saying, but it's worth unpacking a bit. You're considering the universe as a finely tuned system, where certain limits—such as the speed of light, gravity, and temperature—seem to serve as constraints or boundaries that keep everything stable.

Let's break it down:

1. Speed of Light:According to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light in a vacuum is the maximum speed at which information or matter can travel. If anything could exceed this limit, it would lead to paradoxes like time travel, causality violations, or the breakdown of fundamental physical laws. The universe might not "collapse" per se if the speed of light were exceeded, but it would violate the structure of spacetime as we understand it. So, yes, the speed of light as a universal constant helps maintain the "order" of the universe.
2. Gravity:Gravity is one of the four fundamental forces of nature, and it plays a crucial role in the structure of the universe, from the formation of galaxies to the behavior of stars. If gravity were stronger or weaker, the balance of forces in the universe would be radically different. A change in gravity could disrupt planetary orbits, star formation, and even the fundamental constants of physics (like the speed of light and the fine structure constant). If gravity were too strong, everything might collapse into black holes; if it were too weak, matter wouldn't form stable structures like planets or stars. But, again, this doesn’t necessarily lead to the collapse of the universe as a whole; it just means the universe would be radically different.
3. Temperature:The idea that temperature has an upper limit relates to the concept of "Planck temperature"—the theoretical highest temperature, beyond which our understanding of physics breaks down (around 10^32 Kelvin). If the temperature of the universe were higher than this, quantum effects would dominate in a way that current physics cannot describe. Similarly, if the universe were too cold, atoms wouldn't form, and the universe would essentially be lifeless. In this sense, temperature does play a crucial role in the "design" of the universe, but it's not necessarily about collapsing—it’s about maintaining a balance where the forces and conditions are suitable for life and structure.

"Intelligent Design" and Impossibilities​

The concept of "intelligent design" suggests that the universe's fine-tuning might be a result of deliberate planning. Some see these constraints as evidence that the universe has been "designed" in a way that allows for life, complexity, and order. However, the scientific community generally views these constraints as natural consequences of the fundamental laws of physics. These constants may seem "impossible" or "designed" because we can’t easily imagine a universe where they’re different, but that doesn't necessarily imply intentional design—just that these laws happen to be the ones that emerge from the fundamental properties of space, time, and energy.

Impossibility as a Constant​

You're right in saying that "impossibility" is a feature of the universe—there are limits, and they shape the way everything behaves. But the idea of impossibility in physics is not necessarily a final barrier; rather, it represents the limits of our current understanding or technology. For example, faster-than-light travel may seem impossible now, but that doesn't rule out the possibility of new discoveries that might alter our understanding of physics in the future.

In a sense, the laws of the universe set up "boundaries" within which everything operates. But whether those boundaries are "impossible" or just "currently unknown" is a subtle difference. It’s true that life and structure in the universe seem to require certain conditions to exist, and it’s that delicate balance that makes the universe so remarkable.

Final Thoughts​

So, in a way, yes, the universe is built on constraints or limits, but whether that’s evidence of intelligent design or just a result of natural laws is still an open question. The "impossibilities" you mention help define the nature of the universe as we know it, but they don’t necessarily mean that everything is set in stone. Science is always evolving, and there may be more to discover about these "impossible" limits in the future.

 

[WeiWei]