Changmentum
The Next Chang
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2024
- Posts
- 1,017
- Reputation
- 1,690
In this forum, guys think of Chads as this near mythical male that has perfect facial proportions. The thing is, why then create a category of men that is near impossible to reach. The IQ equivalent of a Chad, would be like a 145-150+ IQ (1 in 741) MIT physics major, who mogs even those at his top Ivy league school. Do we then only classify people as being geniuses or smart, only if they meet a threshold that only around 1 in 1000 can meet. I feel like being more realistic/pragmatic with the standards of what normies consider good-looking, a better classification/definition of a Chad would be a good-looking guy (say 1 in 21 or the equivalent of having an IQ of 125), who has a good record of getting women. Even then, what we first think about when we hear the name Chad, is a tall, good-looking outgoing White male. I would consider the White frat guys at my college that have a roster of girls to be Chads, as they have a proven record of being able to attract women, even if they don't fit the criteria of Chad on this forum (as most of them would be rated MTN-HTN by users).
Last edited:
