The term 'harmony' is a baseless term used to describe facial aesthetics.

[john2]

There is no such thing as harmony. Nobody has been able to define it yet.

There are only good ratios, good proportions and symmetry. These are the terms you should be using, anything else is faggotry.

Since a lot of you guys define harmony as 'which features go well together', let me tell you this.

There is no such thing as 'which features go well together?' or 'certain features don't go well together and look good on a certain face'... a slim nose looks good on everyone, regardless of his/her race, skin color or existing phenotype. Hunter eyes look good on all men of all races. It won't look 'odd'.

 

[Bashan]

There is.

 

[Deleted member 18522]

it has to do with ratios. IDK why people here say harmony which doesn't even make sense.

It's basically just a magical term for a gl face you are too low IQ to understand

99% of the time just say ratios of your face and how its divided up by 3rds and the symmetry of the horizontal halves

 

[sub5inchcel]

its about averageness, whoiich is based on phenomenon calle koinophilia

 

[Suimaxxer]

Chad has harmony, ur just too ugly and retarded to realize

 

[germanlooks]

Harmony is how the individual features work together as a whole. Also including ratios and symmetry

That’s why someone with objectively worse indivudal features which harmonize well together can look better than someone who has objectively better individual features which don’t harmonize well together

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Hunter eyes look good on all men of all races. It won't look 'odd'.

It won't. On Men like Cavill, hunter eyes would decrease his appeal which because it would make him hypermasculine.

 

[Deleted member 25715]

There is no such thing as harmony. Nobody has been able to define it yet.

There are only good ratios, good proportions and symmetry. These are the terms you should be using, anything else is faggotry.

Since a lot of you guys define harmony as 'which features go well together', let me tell you this.

There is no such thing as 'which features go well together?' or 'certain features don't go well together and look good on a certain face'... a slim nose looks good on everyone, regardless of his/her race, skin color or existing phenotype. Hunter eyes look good on all men of all races. It won't look 'odd'.

harmony has to do with ratios, it's just that they are usually ratios that are very specific and uncommon that people don't have time to hyper-analyze each time. Also of course very specific halos.

 

[Yliaster]

this entire thread is basically potato potahto

like sometimes people legit just say stuff to seem edgy and intelligent

 

[john2]

Chad has harmony, ur just too ugly and retarded to realize

Oh well.

this entire thread is basically potato potahto

like sometimes people legit just say stuff to seem edgy and intelligent

No it isn't. I'm not saying this just to sound smart, I have held my current opinion for a long time now. Do you remember OwlGod? He was a user on this forum with a join date before 2020 and he was possibly the first to state that there is no such thing as harmony. And I agree with him, people use this word and it sounds so retarded because it has no proper definition. Go through the threads in 2018 and 2019 and especially through OwlGod's posts if you want to know what I am talking about. He got pretty much everything right about facial aesthetics.

 

[john2]

It won't. On Men like Cavill, hunter eyes would decrease his appeal which because it would make him hypermasculine.

Hunter eyes would increase his appeal. The ideal male is "hyper-masculine" (not ogre-tier and bloated though).

harmony has to do with ratios, it's just that they are usually ratios that are very specific and uncommon that people don't have time to hyper-analyze each time. Also of course very specific halos.

Every single little ratio you talk about has its specific name, and these names have already circulated on this forum. No point in calling it harmony, if it already has a name, i.e., 'ratios'. For example the two terms - ES ratio, or chin-to-philtrum ratio.

Harmony is how the individual features work together as a whole. Also including ratios and symmetry

That’s why someone with objectively worse indivudal features which harmonize well together can look better than someone who has objectively better individual features which don’t harmonize well together

A wide nose no matter what works terribly on any face. Likewise, a slim nose works well on any face, if you morph a truecel with a slim nose, he would look better. If you morph a chadlite with a slimmer nose, he will look better and ascend to chadhood.

When you say "someone with objectively worse indivudal features which harmonize well together can look better than someone who has objectively better individual features which don’t harmonize well together", you're talking about where the facial features are positioned on the face, which is exactly what the terms 'ratio' and 'proportion' would describe.

Obviously a person with top tier facial features positioned asymmetrically would be a subhuman, not denying this.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Hunter eyes would increase his appeal. The ideal male is "hyper-masculine" (not ogre-tier and bloated though).

Maybe in your homosexual fantasy. Not in reality though.

 

[john2]

Maybe in your homosexual fantasy. Not in reality though.

Can you ever debate like a normal person without using one of your typical ad hominems, Jewish person?
I put hypermasculine in quotations on purpose because what this forum considers hypermasculine is actually the objective ideal. Men are supposed to look like men, not twink, non-low-trust-faced fags. Hunter eyes are what every man should have. Mark my words, Cavill will look better with proper hunter eyes that are proportionate to his face and skull.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Can you ever debate like a normal person without using one of your typical ad hominems, Jewish person?
I put hypermasculine in quotations on purpose because what this forum considers hypermasculine is actually the objective ideal. Men are supposed to look like men, not twink, non-low-trust-faced fags. Hunter eyes are what every man should have. Mark my words, Cavill will look better with proper hunter eyes that are proportionate to his face and skull.

Cavill's level of masculinity is ideal.

Dimorphism is secondary to averageness which is a better indicator of physical fitness.

Girls with high disgust don't like hypermasculine faces. They only like moderately masculine faces.

Over for prettyboy copers - only ugly degenerate bisexual women like prettyboys

Clickbait title but Masesthetic to masculine faces are ideal for attracting HQNP women compared to women who were exclusively attracted to men, women who were also somewhat attracted to women rated masculine faces less attractive and feminine faces more attractive. earlier studies revealed...

looksmax.org

 

[User49]

Cavill's level of masculinity is ideal.

Dimorphism is secondary to averageness which is a better indicator of physical fitness.

Girls with high disgust don't like hypermasculine faces. They only like moderately masculine faces.

Over for prettyboy copers - only ugly degenerate bisexual women like prettyboys

Clickbait title but Masesthetic to masculine faces are ideal for attracting HQNP women compared to women who were exclusively attracted to men, women who were also somewhat attracted to women rated masculine faces less attractive and feminine faces more attractive. earlier studies revealed...

looksmax.org

What features are allowed to slightly more feminized in the ideal male? Eyes and nose?

 

[Deleted member 17872]

What features are allowed to slightly more feminized in the ideal male? Eyes and nose?

Autism

 

[mogger123]

harmony is just a very general way of referring to the limitations of models of facial attractiveness (of which there are many)

i.e. it's exogenous variables we do not have models to capture

 

[Deleted member 17159]

harmony is just proportions that look good. this forum has a bunch of misused buzzwords ie harmony phenotype male gaze female gaze

 

[stamaster21]

Harmony is how the individual features work together as a whole. Also including ratios and symmetry

That’s why someone with objectively worse indivudal features which harmonize well together can look better than someone who has objectively better individual features which don’t harmonize well together

The top one has better features but the bottom one looks better because her worse features look better together.





vs

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

harmony = ratios and averageness imo

 

[stamaster21]

harmony is just proportions that look good. this forum has a bunch of misused buzzwords ie harmony phenotype male gaze female gaze

basically how well different features go together, and balance each other. You can have two people one objectively has better features but another person who has slightly worse features looks better overall because those features harmonize better together.


Jade ramsey has better features but the women below has better harmony her feature go better together and compliment her face better.






vs