meltmylungs_
absolutely blackpilled
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2025
- Posts
- 590
- Reputation
- 286
I was very surprised that all the participants rate others, but we do not have a PSL scale with a correspondence of points to ratings that does not raise questions for me.
I tried to develop my own mapping:
— It doesn't contain any other autistic ratings and consists of 8 points, all according to the canons of PSL;
— It's completely consistent with the normal distribution (I've seen scales where the middle MTN doesn't correspond exactly to 4 points, but is shifted upward, although a person with such a rating is essentially as average as possible);
— All ratings are equally spaced;
— It's very convenient for evaluation;
— No questions remain.
Some clarifications:
1.
2. Essentially, everything in the range
3. If, for example, a person states a rating of
Now everything falls into place.
I tried to develop my own mapping:
— It doesn't contain any other autistic ratings and consists of 8 points, all according to the canons of PSL;
— It's completely consistent with the normal distribution (I've seen scales where the middle MTN doesn't correspond exactly to 4 points, but is shifted upward, although a person with such a rating is essentially as average as possible);
— All ratings are equally spaced;
— It's very convenient for evaluation;
— No questions remain.
Some clarifications:
1.
[ and ] — the number is not included in the range;( and ) — the number is included in the range;[num] — a specific number;(num) — an incomprehensible ideal.2. Essentially, everything in the range
[7.50—8.00) is Adamlite, since Adam is an incomprehensible ideal. Accordingly, everything below is Adamlite only.3. If, for example, a person states a rating of
[4.15], this would apply to the MTN–HMTN range. The verbal rating will be the same.Now everything falls into place.
Last edited:
