The Truth About Eugenics (And Pro-Nazi Sentiments)

dreamcake1mo

dreamcake1mo

Mistral
Joined
May 12, 2022
Posts
2,228
Reputation
3,352
I personally do not think if Hitler had high IQ in todays age he would be a current Nazi. One thing to ask- is past Hitler smarter than current you and me? In a world of internet technology and LLMs? This is the limitus test.

You are not smarter than a LLM

We live in a world full of LLMs, where stupid shit like eugenics theory as well as those other basement theory's can easily be refuted. You better believe the smartest men in todays time is way smarter than eugenics( Sir Francis Galton), and knows way more than Einstein let alone a smart guy with a LLM. Matter of fact, im likely smarter than both of them combined since i grew up understanding their functions.

Most lower functioning ecospheres (which are the least common denominator thought) do not realize that LLMs have reached a point where they are benching full marks on the hardest tests in the world. And were not even mentioning the speed at which it can preform as an oracle, as well as the infinite solutions it can provide for one question asked.

Genetic diversity is quite literally a common sense in nature. You cannot have all "white" people or the world will fail. Look at China, with how they take all of your shit then work and remanufacture it (ex deepseek). You need creativity, ideas, social intelligence (philosophy( (which some early black nations likely evolved to have an abundance of)) etc. You need a ECOSYSTEM to improve.

Without this ecosystem, your bloodline and imprint dies off or just become retarded overtime. But most importantly, you lose the creative edge in your society-as well as world. Dont believe me? Try to plant anything in soil that was not properly irrigated, inoculated and fertilized. Your shit will either give you weak fruit, or small/barren ones. This should be painfully obvious to anyone who understands nature.

But, there is one element of eugenics which is real and that is that different prepositions and traits combine to create potential plasticity elements in a child. But even then, its a very miniscule factor because you have to attribe for autism(mental variants), environment, family, culture and generally other things which are FAR more impactful and can make any race produce a 0.1% of a person in mathematics, literature etc. regardless of race. This is important because from a mathmatics and data perspetice, enviromental factors by itself are extremely complex, and this is largely credited by LLMs and 0.1s to be the main factor of "iq" heditary elements. Add this with diversity within races (europeans are not the same as germans, black americans not the same as nigerians),
and factors become extremely complex than what the majority of basement dwellers can understand.

Genetics AFTER all of that is like 40% or less of the equation. People largely underestimate fetal development.

Also, what about the shit with India? We claimed sub 75 IQ, but how can a nation with "less" than dog average be capable of procuring l1 development workspaces on such the scale, that took all of the outsourced work young guys would be doing in USA? This is no claim to quality work done, but seeing as this was before LLM automation, they should have just be incapable for that type of work on average (even on a lower quality level). This disproves the modern concept of IQ heavilty, which is the founding root of pro NAZI beliefs.


The truth is, there is no global iq average

The whole idea is baked and pushed into society because of resource management. This is the truth. You have land and countries whom need resources, land, food, space etc. Its a matter of convince as well. For example, does the worlds people trust African nations with prominent nuclear power? Have u seen the shithole situation of politics which is the Congo? For one, Its scientifically proven that the faces of black men light up areas in peoples brain associated with fear. And we have global corruption being exposed, which is only the tip of the iceberg. Get the picture?

I think personally think "white" people in America have faced discrimination, and while i think black men in America have simply faced it for far longer (to this very hour) - BUT, this is all done in a way that leaves room for radicalization. First, europeans globally have leaders and positive propaganda for a majority, so they can expat when shit hits the fan and its easier to find work globally. On the other hand, black people are monolith'd and only a handful of dangerous revenge-seeking african puppetlords (at best). This causes radicalization. (v)

Because of this era of mass corruption; in this period young white men have disproportionately suffered beyond their predecessors, and with the media overrepresenting the outliers of specific token minorities, they radicalized on online forums and spaces like these, growing sentiments about anti-black and anti-ethnic ideals due to that mass propaganda from media and the government. Now radicalized, the right learning (or perhaps both) came to provide their promise and solution. One which requires you to ignore the harsh reality of resource management. This causes radicalization from the minorities, which also personally faced the same oppressive regimes. Its a recipe for a global civil war.


Divide and conquer.

Its like eugenics theory. It was not a belief driven out of science, because they needed a reason to slave those (local) "niggas" without remorse. Now the question is, are you a nigga to the elite?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: StupidHedonist_INTP, cooldude1231, johnypvpgod and 3 others
Eugenics? Cope
Nazism? Cope
Punjabi vegans mog
 
  • +1
Reactions: StupidHedonist_INTP, dreamcake1mo and Onewithmoss
I personally dont even think if Hitler had a high iq - in todays age would be a Nazi. One thing to ask, is Hitler smarter than you and me? In a world of internet technology and LLMs? This is the limitus test.

You are not smarter than a LLM

We live in a world full of LLMs, where stupid shit like eugenics theory as well as those other basement theory's can easily be refuted. You better believe the smartest men in todays time is way smarter than eugenics( Sir Francis Galton), and knows way more than Einstein let alone a smart guy with a LLM. Matter of fact, im likely smarter than both of them combined since i grew up understanding their functions.

Most lower functioning ecospheres (which are the least common denominator thought) do not realize that LLMs have reached a point where they are benching full marks on the hardest tests in the world. And were not even mentioning the speed at which it can preform as an oracle, as well as the infinite solutions it can provide for one question asked.

Genetic diversity is quite literally a common sense in nature. You cannot have all "white" people or the world will fail. Look at China, with how they take all of your shit then work and remanufacture it (ex deepseek). You need creativity, ideas, social intelligence (philosophy( (which some early black nations likely evolved to have an abundance of)) etc. You need a ECOSYSTEM to improve.

Without this ecosystem, your bloodline and imprint dies off or just become retarded overtime. But most importantly, you lose the creative edge in your society-as well as world. Dont believe me? Try to plant anything in soil that was not properly irrigated, inoculated and fertilized. Your shit will either give you weak fruit, or small/barren ones. This should be painfully obvious to anyone who understands nature.

But, there is one element of eugenics which is real and that is that different prepositions and traits combine to create potential plasticity elements in a child. But even then, its a very miniscule factor because you have to attribe for autism(mental variants), environment, family, culture and generally other things which are FAR more impactful and can make any race produce a 0.1% of a person in mathematics, literature etc. regardless of race. This is important because from a mathmatics and data perspetice, enviromental factors by itself are extremely complex, and this is largely credited by LLMs and 0.1s to be the main factor of "iq" heditary elements. Add this with diversity within races (europeans are not the same as germans, black americans not the same as nigerians),
and factors become extremely complex than what the majority of basement dwellers can understand.

Genetics AFTER all of that is like 40% or less of the equation. People largely underestimate fetal development.

Also, what about the shit with India? We claimed sub 75 IQ, but how can a nation with "less" than dog average be capable of procuring l1 development workspaces on such the scale, that took all of the outsourced work young guys would be doing in USA? This is no claim to quality work done, but seeing as this was before LLM automation, they should have just be incapable for that type of work on average (even on a lower quality level). This disproves the modern concept of IQ heavilty, which is the founding root of pro NAZI beliefs.



The whole idea is baked and pushed into society because of resource management. This is the truth. You have land and countries whom need resources, land, food, space etc. Its a matter of convince as well. For example, does the worlds people trust African nations with prominent nuclear power? Have u seen the shithole situation of politics which is the Congo? For one, Its scientifically proven that the faces of black men light up areas in peoples brain associated with fear. And we have global corruption being exposed, which is only the tip of the iceberg. Get the picture?

I think personally think "white" people in America have faced discrimination, and while i think black men in America have simply faced it for far longer (to this very hour) - BUT, this is all done in a way that leaves room for radicalization. First, europeans globally have leaders and positive propaganda for a majority, so they can expat when shit hits the fan and its easier to find work globally. On the other hand, black people are monolith'd and only a handful of dangerous revenge-seeking african puppetlords (at best). This causes radicalization. (v)

Because of this era of mass corruption; in this period young white men have disproportionately suffered beyond their predecessors, and with the media overrepresenting the outliers of specific token minorities, they radicalized on online forums and spaces like these, growing sentiments about anti-black and anti-ethnic ideals due to that mass propaganda from media and the government. Now radicalized, the right learning (or perhaps both) came to provide their promise and solution. One which requires you to ignore the harsh reality of resource management. This causes radicalization from the minorities, which also personally faced the same oppressive regimes. Its a recipe for a global civil war.


Divide and conquer.

Its like eugenics theory. It was not a belief driven out of science, because they needed a reason to slave those (local) "niggas" without remorse. Now the question is, are you a nigga to the elite?
Dnr and wont later
 
  • +1
Reactions: dreamcake1mo
He was a screaming loud retard that believed in some ZOG conspiracy shit and most of his war success is simply luck (At least in the defeat of France he was simply lucky).
 
He was a screaming loud retard that believed in some ZOG conspiracy shit and most of his war success is simply luck (At least in the defeat of France he was simply lucky).
I personally think he was a retard
 
Agreed it‘s more nurture and building blocks of the environment, social field, and general people you interact and grew up with, especially in younger and adolescent years, which shape the person itself.

But Eugenics (in term of birth defects, genetic problems, intersex conditions, health problems, potential development problems) are not always a bad thing unlike Eugenics with a racist/nationalistic lens.

This could eliminate a lot of unnecessary suffering in the future.
Though I’m not saying sick or disabled people shouldn't have the right to live.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dreamcake1mo
As a whole I agree with this but saying you're smarter than Einstein (because you know more) is pretty flawed as an idea.

Not comparable.

Einstein with the resources available to you might not create anything, just the same you wouldn't make anything with the ones that were available to him.

We have no true way to measure intelligence, IQ is flawed but seeing as we have no alternative we use it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser
Agreed it‘s more nurture and building blocks of the environment, social field, and general people you interact and grew up with, especially in younger and adolescent years, which shape the person itself.

But Eugenics (in term of birth defects, genetic problems, intersex conditions, health problems, potential development problems) are not always a bad thing unlike Eugenics with a racist/nationalistic lens.

This could eliminate a lot of unnecessary suffering in the future.
Though I’m not saying sick or disabled people shouldn't have the right to live.
You are 100% correct.

But honestly the term should be antiquated and replaced. It does not represent these true values.

It is a huge shame because its such a great concept that can save so many bloodlines and races- ultimately used for political and resource management through radicalization and racism(on all sides).

Humanity will come back to proper eugenics but only after they completely denounce previous fallacies. LLMs (agi) i think will be the thing that solves this if done correctly. You need a absolute medium (artificial "oracle") and a culture shift that will socially shame fallacy. When people realize their peers do not see eye to eye in pseudo beliefs because LLMs will become standard for every field, every job, every argument.

Its already started but not nearly on the scale. The prerequisites are being set up globally in the west (project 2030 etc)

The technocrats here worry greatly about this because of possible filters (centralization-which is BAD) and what this will mean for us (since many parts about our comfort today are built on lies)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: LancasteR
btw i strongly believe eugenics to be inherently bad and dont support it, even if i dont really know much about the history and the concept itself. i think its pretty inhumane and a society that grows from it must be a sick and contorted one, but at the same time i believe it got some similarities with natural selection. life itself is cruel anyway.

genes being only 40% of the equation? its exremenly oversimplified and i dont think there is even data to demonstrate it.

but i do really like your idea, i prefer to believe that spontaneity can create a better world
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnypvpgod
As a whole I agree with this but saying you're smarter than Einstein (because you know more) is pretty flawed as an idea.

Not comparable.

Einstein with the resources available to you might not create anything, just the same you wouldn't make anything with the ones that were available to him.

We have no true way to measure intelligence, IQ is flawed but seeing as we have no alternative we use it.
There is a better way to measure intelligence but its based on the model that iq is not linear. It should look more like stat distribution. A personalized report.

I should have rephrased though. You are correct to say this.

I do not think i am more or less intelligent than Einstein. I am just confident that i have objectively better tools for knowing more than Einstein. There was no internet and instantons communication, there was no compacted infinite solution machines(oracles) such as advanced LLMs. Misinformation is a thing, but science has objectively advanced past his formula. Granted einstein does not exist, and i were to screenshot his peak- i think its a very high chance a smart person in todays time + modern tools can outs Einstein in any knowledge based field

Kinda unrelated-I believe technology to be a direct extension of the human nervous system. A projection of who we are fundamentally. Its not a degradation, if so, its because we as a species are failing to integrate and still see our natural behavior as foreign.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: johnypvpgod
I personally do not think if Hitler had high IQ in todays age he would be a current Nazi. One thing to ask- is past Hitler smarter than current you and me? In a world of internet technology and LLMs? This is the limitus test.

You are not smarter than a LLM

We live in a world full of LLMs, where stupid shit like eugenics theory as well as those other basement theory's can easily be refuted. You better believe the smartest men in todays time is way smarter than eugenics( Sir Francis Galton), and knows way more than Einstein let alone a smart guy with a LLM. Matter of fact, im likely smarter than both of them combined since i grew up understanding their functions.

Most lower functioning ecospheres (which are the least common denominator thought) do not realize that LLMs have reached a point where they are benching full marks on the hardest tests in the world. And were not even mentioning the speed at which it can preform as an oracle, as well as the infinite solutions it can provide for one question asked.

Genetic diversity is quite literally a common sense in nature. You cannot have all "white" people or the world will fail. Look at China, with how they take all of your shit then work and remanufacture it (ex deepseek). You need creativity, ideas, social intelligence (philosophy( (which some early black nations likely evolved to have an abundance of)) etc. You need a ECOSYSTEM to improve.

Without this ecosystem, your bloodline and imprint dies off or just become retarded overtime. But most importantly, you lose the creative edge in your society-as well as world. Dont believe me? Try to plant anything in soil that was not properly irrigated, inoculated and fertilized. Your shit will either give you weak fruit, or small/barren ones. This should be painfully obvious to anyone who understands nature.

But, there is one element of eugenics which is real and that is that different prepositions and traits combine to create potential plasticity elements in a child. But even then, its a very miniscule factor because you have to attribe for autism(mental variants), environment, family, culture and generally other things which are FAR more impactful and can make any race produce a 0.1% of a person in mathematics, literature etc. regardless of race. This is important because from a mathmatics and data perspetice, enviromental factors by itself are extremely complex, and this is largely credited by LLMs and 0.1s to be the main factor of "iq" heditary elements. Add this with diversity within races (europeans are not the same as germans, black americans not the same as nigerians),
and factors become extremely complex than what the majority of basement dwellers can understand.

Genetics AFTER all of that is like 40% or less of the equation. People largely underestimate fetal development.

Also, what about the shit with India? We claimed sub 75 IQ, but how can a nation with "less" than dog average be capable of procuring l1 development workspaces on such the scale, that took all of the outsourced work young guys would be doing in USA? This is no claim to quality work done, but seeing as this was before LLM automation, they should have just be incapable for that type of work on average (even on a lower quality level). This disproves the modern concept of IQ heavilty, which is the founding root of pro NAZI beliefs.



The whole idea is baked and pushed into society because of resource management. This is the truth. You have land and countries whom need resources, land, food, space etc. Its a matter of convince as well. For example, does the worlds people trust African nations with prominent nuclear power? Have u seen the shithole situation of politics which is the Congo? For one, Its scientifically proven that the faces of black men light up areas in peoples brain associated with fear. And we have global corruption being exposed, which is only the tip of the iceberg. Get the picture?

I think personally think "white" people in America have faced discrimination, and while i think black men in America have simply faced it for far longer (to this very hour) - BUT, this is all done in a way that leaves room for radicalization. First, europeans globally have leaders and positive propaganda for a majority, so they can expat when shit hits the fan and its easier to find work globally. On the other hand, black people are monolith'd and only a handful of dangerous revenge-seeking african puppetlords (at best). This causes radicalization. (v)

Because of this era of mass corruption; in this period young white men have disproportionately suffered beyond their predecessors, and with the media overrepresenting the outliers of specific token minorities, they radicalized on online forums and spaces like these, growing sentiments about anti-black and anti-ethnic ideals due to that mass propaganda from media and the government. Now radicalized, the right learning (or perhaps both) came to provide their promise and solution. One which requires you to ignore the harsh reality of resource management. This causes radicalization from the minorities, which also personally faced the same oppressive regimes. Its a recipe for a global civil war.


Divide and conquer.

Its like eugenics theory. It was not a belief driven out of science, because they needed a reason to slave those (local) "niggas" without remorse. Now the question is, are you a nigga to the elite?
I love black people, and tanned people. but not people without hygiene
 
You are 100% correct.

But honestly the term should be antiquated and replaced. It does not represent these true values.

It is a huge shame because its such a great concept that can save so many bloodlines and races- ultimately used for political and resource management through radicalization and racism(on all sides).

Humanity will come back to proper eugenics but only after they completely denounce previous fallacies. LLMs (agi) i think will be the thing that solves this if done correctly. You need a absolute medium (artificial "oracle") and a culture shift that will socially shame fallacy. When people realize their peers do not see eye to eye in pseudo beliefs because LLMs will become standard for every field, every job, every argument.

Its already started but not nearly on the scale. The prerequisites are being set up globally in the west (project 2030 etc)

The technocrats here worry greatly about this because of possible filters (centralization-which is BAD) and what this will mean for us (since many parts about our comfort today are built on lies)
Do you mean that LLM will become the source of our objective truth and that from which majority of the population can infer "correct" opinions?
 
btw i strongly believe eugenics to be inherently bad and dont support it, even if i dont really know much about the history and the concept itself. i think its pretty inhumane and a society that grows from it must be a sick and contorted one, but at the same time i believe it got some similarities with natural selection. life itself is cruel anyway.

genes being only 40% of the equation? its exremenly oversimplified and i dont think there is even data to demonstrate it.

but i do really like your idea, i prefer to believe that spontaneity can create a better world
Personally i don't believe we should actively intervene in reproductive selection etc.
The system does fuck up many people daily who have subhuman parents. But the most one should advocate for is personal antinatalism rather than general, just because you don't know what some lunatic could twist the regulations for, and besides a chud and chudette on rare occasions improve via epigenetics so its not strictly over, especially if we develop easily availaible surgeries and gene modification, If you don't believe in that and think its over for the generations to come you're free to make a personal choice to abstain, that's what i did.
 
Last edited:
Why do people always conflate eugenics with xenophobia or racism. You can have genetic diversity and still practice Eugenics
 
  • +1
Reactions: Michelangelo
Personally i don't believe we should actively intervene in reproductive selection etc.
The system does fuck up many people daily who have subhuman parents. But the most one should advocate for is personal antinatalism rather than general, just because you don't know what some lunatic could twist the regulations for, and besides a chud and chudette on rare occasions improve via epigenetics so its not strictly over, especially if we develop easily availaible surgeries and gene modification
just the idea of being the product of a genetic "experiment" doesn't sound great, i would probably feel pretty bad myself, unless i turn out to be a 10/10 chad
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnypvpgod
Why do people always conflate eugenics with xenophobia or racism. You can have genetic diversity and still practice Eugenics
but then again i dont think you would have xenophobia or racism with a wide genetic diversity, or maybe you wouldnt have so much of it like today. but yeah i think you are right about still practicing eugenics despite having diversity. also we can still have diversity even within the same "race", the question is just how large the gene pool needs to be?

we dont even really understand genes that much anyway yet
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnypvpgod
just the idea of being the product of a genetic "experiment" doesn't sound great, i would probably feel pretty bad myself, unless i turn out to be a 10/10 chad
That shit would feel like being told "you're adopted"

Instead we gotta improve food and shit so everyone develops properly. soo called "ltns" would be chadlites with proper maxilla growth and jaw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Michelangelo
That shit would feel like being told "you're adopted"

Instead we gotta improve food and shit so everyone develops properly. soo called "ltns" would be chadlites with proper maxilla growth and jaw
being underdeveloped is the ugliest trait someone could have 100%. btw the more i read threads about orthodontists the more i hate them, 90% of them only want to align your teeth and leave you with a subhuman jaw
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnypvpgod

Similar threads

dreamcake1mo
Replies
9
Views
99
dreamcake1mo
dreamcake1mo
Klasik616
Replies
6
Views
274
LTNUser
L
D
Replies
5
Views
169
Killtera___
Killtera___
Roquefort
Replies
13
Views
277
LancasteR
LancasteR
TalesFromTheSlums
Replies
63
Views
625
disillusioned
disillusioned

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top