the truth about PSL in regards to race[simple]

MrGlutton

MrGlutton

interesting.....
Joined
May 24, 2019
Posts
10,604
Reputation
19,085
it doesn't matter if you're black, white, an ethnic or an Asian.

as long as you're good looking or have a high PSL then you possess the ability to slay any type of woman you want.

simple concept everybody should know, but refuse to accept or acknowledge.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Looks234, Deleted member 6723, ( ( ( d[-_-]b ) ) ) and 9 others
Water is not dry
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6723, Warlow and sytyl
just be goodlooking theory strikes again
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copemaxxing, Deleted member 6723, ( ( ( d[-_-]b ) ) ) and 9 others
just be goodlooking theory strikes again
people waste their time arguing about which race mogs who.

in one instance they'll show a good looking white man, then the other side retaliates with showing a good looking black man or ethnic.

this is absolute insanity, and it's completely pointless to argue about.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'8manlet, Salludon, SadnessWYJ and 3 others
Well duh. Your race limits you somewhat tho. Like some girls don't want to date you, no matter how good looking you are, if you're not their preferred race. Also some races are on average better looking than others.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EckhartTollemaxx, Deleted member 6723, ( ( ( d[-_-]b ) ) ) and 6 others
people waste their time arguing about which race mogs who.

in one instance they'll show a good looking white man, then the other side retaliates with showing a good looking black man or ethnic.

this is absolute insanity, and it's completely pointless to argue about.
the only thing is that whites are on average better looking but girls would still pick a gigachad black over chad white
 
  • +1
Reactions: Warlow, lordgandy2000, Danish_Retard and 1 other person
Water is not dry
Dry water

Dry water' could be used to store carbon dioxide
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: EckhartTollemaxx, Deleted member 6723, ( ( ( d[-_-]b ) ) ) and 4 others
You think attraction exists as some objective concept? Attraction is eurocentric due to europeans dominating recently. However, now they're getting cucked. The only reason a smaller nose for example is considered nice is because of that. If blacks ruled the world, wide noses would be worshipped. Unfortunately, you guys haven't understood this yet.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Looks234, EckhartTollemaxx, Deleted member 6723 and 7 others
I’ve seen Known racist girls date good looking black or ethnic dudes even though they are racist as hell

they can’t control themselves when they see a dude with good genes all the social programming goes ouy the window when biology comes into play
 
  • +1
Reactions: ( ( ( d[-_-]b ) ) ), Deleted member 9779, Looks234 and 6 others
You think attraction exists as some objective concept? Attraction is eurocentric due to europeans dominating recently. However, now they're getting cucked. The only reason a smaller nose for example is considered nice is because of that. If blacks ruled the world, wide noses would be worshipped. Unfortunately, you guys haven't understood this yet.
haha obviously not it's all in the dopamine a brain triggers when a person sees a face and white features release more dopamine in the brain
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723 and Danish_Retard
haha obviously not it's all in the dopamine a brain triggers when a person sees a face and white features release more dopamine in the brain
Keep coping. Babies don't find white faces more attractive than others, and actually prefer same race faces. Infants don't even prefer those. That's all the proof I need for my point.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
Keep coping. Babies don't find white faces more attractive than others, and actually prefer same race faces. Infants don't even prefer those. That's all the proof I need for my point.
absolute cope very small children associate white features/skin more friendlier then black skin/features
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723, goat2x and Danish_Retard
absolute cope very small children associate white features/skin more friendlier then black skin/features
Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces

Don't show off your giga retard IQ for everyone to see next time.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6723, JizzFarmer, Warlow and 5 others
Cope
You think attraction exists as some objective concept? Attraction is eurocentric due to europeans dominating recently. However, now they're getting cucked. The only reason a smaller nose for example is considered nice is because of that. If blacks ruled the world, wide noses would be worshipped. Unfortunately, you guys haven't understood this yet.
Cope, some features like thin nose are eurocentric, but most markers of beauty like jawline are universal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723, Warlow and SadnessWYJ
Cope

Cope, some features like thin nose are eurocentric, but most markers of beauty like jawline are universal.
Your nose is still important and there are many other eurocentric features. If anything, wide noses are more dimorphic and advantageous.
 
Cope

Cope, some features like thin nose are eurocentric, but most markers of beauty like jawline are universal.
You're the one coping. I linked stats. You linked nothing. You're a retard.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Copeful
Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces

Don't show off your giga retard IQ for everyone to see next time.
keep coping bro blacks or asians will never be considered more attractive then whites even when they would make white slaves and you know it
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ArgentineOmicron and goat2x
Your nose is still important and there are many other eurocentric features. If anything, wide noses are more dimorphic and advantageous.
No what we primarily discuss here are universal metrics of beauty.
 
keep coping bro blacks or asians will never be considered more attractive then whites even when they would make white slaves and you know it
Restating your giga retard IQ argument without evidence doesn't change anything. I showed you unequivocal proof that infants don't prefer white faces meaning they're not objectively more attractive. They are considered to be due to nurture. not nature.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Warlow and Copeful
You're the one coping. I linked stats. You linked nothing. You're a retard.
Youre literally so fuckibg stupid. Your link has nothing to do with my point.

A sharp jawline and hunter eyes are not eurocentric features you fucking idiot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723
Youre literally so fuckimg stupid. Your link has nothing to do with my point
My point is that white faces are not on average more objectively attractive than others as shown in my study. You did not counter my original point. Thus, you're a retard.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Copeful
Restating your giga retard IQ argument without evidence doesn't change anything. I showed you unequivocal proof that infants don't prefer white faces meaning they're not objectively more attractive. They are considered to be due to nurture. not nature.
just date infants theory while at 6months they would be white baby chad only
https://www.utoronto.ca/news/racial-bias-may-begin-babies-six-months-u-t-research-reveals

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-05/yu-smc051418.php
 
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x
Restating your giga retard IQ argument without evidence doesn't change anything. I showed you unequivocal proof that infants don't prefer white faces meaning they're not objectively more attractive. They are considered to be due to nurture. not nature.

Brutal indeed wtf don't bully him off the site bhai
 
That's racial bias towards their same race, not the white race. The racial bias for white faces occurs much later. Thanks for proving my point you retard. If a hammer hit your head, it wouldn't hurt since there's nothing inside.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Looks234, Warlow, JizzFarmer and 1 other person
Restating your giga retard IQ argument without evidence doesn't change anything. I showed you unequivocal proof that infants don't prefer white faces meaning they're not objectively more attractive. They are considered to be due to nurture. not nature.
also racial prefence among infants doesnt show because they arent exposed to other races as the article shows keep coping
 
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x
My point is that white faces are not on average more objectively attractive than others as shown in my study. You did not counter my original point. Thus, you're a retard.
No you fucking idiot you said beauty is not objective when it is. There are markers of genetic fitness that all cultures respond to. Off yourself cretin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6217
also racial prefence among infants doesnt show because they arent exposed to other races as the article shows keep coping
That proves his point, because we are exposed to european features we find white ppl more attractivs.
 
also racial prefence among infants doesnt show because they arent exposed to other races as the article shows keep coping
You make no sense I unequivocally showed you that infants do not prefer white faces, and if they prefer anything, it's same race faces due to familiarity reasons. Bias for white faces occurs later when you grow up in a culture where white = attractive. You can keep saying "Cope" like the frothing retarded cucked subhuman you are but that doesn't change anything.

By the way, I've been looking for a new house. Can I occupy the space inside your hollow head?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Stackz, Looks234, JizzFarmer and 3 others
different race have different ideal face. psl standard is catered to white people
 
You can keep saying "Cope" like the frothing retarded cucked subhuman you are but that doesn't change anything.

By the way, I've been looking for a new house. Can I occupy the space inside your hollow head?

BruisedLinearBettong-size_restricted.gif
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Looks234, Warlow, JizzFarmer and 4 others
No you fucking idiot you said beauty is not objective when it is. There are markers of genetic fitness that all cultures respond to. Off yourself cretin.
No one denied this you absolute retarded subhuman. My original point was that white faces are not considered objectively more attractive on average which is what I showed. Your response has nothing to do with my argument.

By the way, as mentioned earlier, I'm looking for a new house. If I can't find one in late bloomer's head, can I use yours?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Warlow, JizzFarmer and Copeful
@Mirin2234 has the ideal light brown face
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723
That proves his point, because we are exposed to european features we find white ppl more attractivs.
no that doesnt prove his point its the same as when before tinder it was easier because girls werent exposed to the goodlooking options. same happens if you only know black faces but when you grow up you see what is out there and start seeing white faces which look better you get a preference to them
 
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x and tyronelite
no that doesnt prove his point its the same as when before tinder it was easier because girls werent exposed to the goodlooking options. same happens if you only know black faces but when you grow up you see what is out there and start seeing white faces which look better you get a preference to them
Again, in the study that showed infants prefer same race faces or no preference, they were shown FACES OF ALL RACES. So in that experiment, they were shown WHITE FACES but did not PREFER THEM.

Step 1: Get this through your head
Step 2: Kill yourself
Step 3: Live stream it so I can jack off to it. I'm trying to stay away from porn
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Stackz, Looks234, Warlow and 2 others
You think attraction exists as some objective concept? Attraction is eurocentric due to europeans dominating recently. However, now they're getting cucked. The only reason a smaller nose for example is considered nice is because of that. If blacks ruled the world, wide noses would be worshipped. Unfortunately, you guys haven't understood this yet.
No one denied this you absolute retarded subhuman. My original point was that white faces are not considered objectively more attractive on average which is what I showed. Your response has nothing to do with my argument.

By the way, as mentioned earlier, I'm looking for a new house. If I can't find one in late bloomer's head, can I use yours?
Holy shit youre fucking stupid. You said attraction is subjective and the features people find attractive today are only because of media exposure.

Fucking idiot bluecel cant come up with a cpherent argument. You literally even rebutted my argument that markers of beauty are universal.

Answer me honestly do you have dementia?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723 and Deleted member 6217
No one denied this you absolute retarded subhuman. My original point was that white faces are not considered objectively more attractive on average which is what I showed. Your response has nothing to do with my argument.

By the way, as mentioned earlier, I'm looking for a new house. If I can't find one in late bloomer's head, can I use yours?

Bhai I'll keep you at my house you're a mogger tbh
 
  • JFL
Reactions: brutal_blackpill
Holy shit youre fucking stupid. You said attraction is subjective and the features people find attractive today are only because of media exposure.

Fucking idiot bluecel cant come up with a cpherent argument. You literally even rebutted my argument that markers of beauty are universal.

Answer me honestly do you have dementia?
I said that attraction is eurocentric, not that it's entirely eurocentric. If eurocentrism, diet, and equal upbringing was controlled for, white people would not be "on average more attractive". Of course there are certain genetic markers that are universally attractive, height being one for example. Note that those markers like height are related to upbringing and diet as well, which is why surprise surprise, countries with the best conditions and diet produce the tallest people. Race just happens to be correlated because countries with majority white populations are more developed.

Your "counter argument" was a strawman. Get this through your head.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Warlow, JizzFarmer, SubhumanCurrycel and 2 others


brutal_blackpillbtw
 
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x
I said that attraction is eurocentric, not that it's entirely eurocentric. If eurocentrism, diet, and equal upbringing was controlled for, white people would not be "on average more attractive". Of course there are certain genetic markers that are universally attractive, height being one for example. Note that those markers like height are related to upbringing and diet as well, which is why surprise surprise, countries with the best conditions and diet produce the tallest people. Race just happens to be correlated because countries with majority white populations are more developed.

Your "counter argument" was a strawman. Get this through your head.
Youre fucking retarded. Genetics accounts for most of height and looks. If what you say was the case then curries and asians in the US would be as tall as whites and have developed features as whites. But they are 5'8" on average ans ugly. Its not only a correlation but a causation factor. Because different parts of Europe have different average heights.

Shit rebuttal
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MrGlutton
Youre fucking retarded. Genetics accounts for most of height and looks. If what you say was the case then curries and asians in the US would be as tall as whites and have developed features as whites. But they are 5'8" on average ans ugly. Its not only a correlation but a causation factor. Because different parts of Europe have different average heights.

Shit rebuttal
:lul: I haven't caged this hard in a while. First of all, about 20-40% of height is reliant upon your diet. Secondly, yes, most of your height is reliant upon genetics. But how do you think genetics work you coping subhuman? It's a process that takes time. European countries have been developed for far longer than other countries. Your diet changes your DNA over time you coping utter subhuman. Africa, India, and China are still not fully developed areas.

.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Warlow, JizzFarmer, MrGlutton and 1 other person
:lul: I haven't caged this hard in a while. First of all, about 20-40% of height is reliant upon your diet. Secondly, yes, most of your height is reliant upon genetics. But how do you think genetics work you coping subhuman? It's a process that takes time. European countries have been developed for far longer than other countries. Your diet changes your DNA over time you coping utter subhuman. Africa, India, and China are still not fully developed areas.

.
European countries only developed around 500 years ago, dna cant change in such a short period.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723 and Copeful
:lul: I haven't caged this hard in a while. First of all, about 20-40% of height is reliant upon your diet. Secondly, yes, most of your height is reliant upon genetics. But how do you think genetics work you coping subhuman? It's a process that takes time. European countries have been developed for far longer than other countries. Your diet changes your DNA over time you coping utter subhuman. Africa, India, and China are still not fully developed areas.

.
European countries only developed around 500 years ago, dna cant change in such a short period.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Copeful and BigBoy
European countries only developed around 500 years ago, dna cant change in such a short period.
Did you even read the article you low IQ rat or do you just echo other beliefs like the white supremacist or white dick sucking ethnic that you are? Here is an example from the article that occurred within ONE GENERATION.

"One famous example is the Dutch Hunger Winter. In 1944, a famine struck the western Netherlands, forcing inhabitants—including pregnant mothers—to live on between 400 and 800 calories a day. When scientists later studied the babies conceived, carried, or delivered during this period, they found elevated rates of obesity, altered lipid profiles and cardiovascular disease in adulthood. "

Time is ticking by the way. Please let me know the availability of the space in your head. I have a deadline to follow before I get the house.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Stackz, Warlow, 5'8manlet and 4 others
@BigBoy Here's another insightful study that you won't read of course since people like you merely parrot other opinions thinking you're smart. You are nothing but a rat who follows others. A copycat. When you were conceived, you were destined to never be a leader.


"Low protein quality can explain the unexpectedly short height means in the highly developed countries of East Asia and wealthy Asian oil superpowers."

@TheCopefulCurry Caging at these fools. This man probably wakes up every day thinking he's a genius yet got utterly humiliated source after source and comment after comment by me today :lul: :lul:.

P.S. If you need the suicide helpline number and you're from the US: 1-800-273-8255. I prefer you don't call them though since I would enjoy the idea and sight of you killing yourself.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Stackz, Warlow, 5'8manlet and 4 others
@BigBoy Here's another insightful study that you won't read of course since people like you merely parrot other opinions thinking you're smart. You are nothing but a rat who follows others. A copycat. When you were conceived, you were destined to never be a leader.


"Low protein quality can explain the unexpectedly short height means in the highly developed countries of East Asia and wealthy Asian oil superpowers."

@TheCopefulCurry Caging at these fools. This man probably wakes up every day thinking he's a genius yet got utterly humiliated source after source and comment after comment by me today :lul: :lul:.

P.S. If you need the suicide helpline number and you're from the US: 1-800-273-8255. I prefer you don't call them though since I would enjoy the idea and sight of you killing yourself.

No response. I am indeed mirin' the destruction you gave this guy
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Warlow, MrGlutton, 6485b025t and 1 other person
No response. I am indeed mirin' the destruction you gave this guy

[IMG alt="BigBoy"]https://looksmax.org/data/avatars/m/2/2100.jpg?1601498949[/IMG]
BigBoy
Movie · From South Korea
Joined Jun 18, 2019
Last seen 6 minutes ago
Time Online 1914:40


Posts15,675 Reputation14,823 Points98

I thought I had enough cage fuel for today but this man just can't stop supplying me with more. If I die today, I died from laughter.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Stackz, Warlow, JizzFarmer and 2 others
[IMG alt="BigBoy"]https://looksmax.org/data/avatars/m/2/2100.jpg?1601498949[/IMG]
BigBoy
Movie · From South Korea
Joined Jun 18, 2019
Last seen 6 minutes ago
Time Online 1914:40


Posts15,675 Reputation14,823 Points98

I thought I had enough cage fuel for today but this man just can't stop supplying me with more. If I die today, I died from laughter.

Brutal negative P/R ratio pill

Over
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6723
keep coping bro blacks or asians will never be considered more attractive then whites even when they would make white slaves and you know it

White people status-maxxed so hard over the past few centuries. People don't actually take in how long and brutal colonial brainwashing was. You think blacks are starting to be seen as more attractive now because of media halo? Colonization is like media halo x9000 lmao.

Not just European features but pretty much everything European was seen as more appealing for like half a millenia.

Yes, if another ethnicity ruled the world for hundreds of years they would be seen as more attractive than whites.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Warlow, MrGlutton and Deleted member 4123

Similar threads

gymislife
Replies
12
Views
432
aestheticsrespecter
A
DarkAscender
Replies
8
Views
181
Daddy's Home
Daddy's Home
6ft4
Replies
9
Views
291
NZb6Air
NZb6Air
TAChipmunk
Replies
15
Views
209
_THMST
_THMST

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top