The ugliest men usually have the most toxic personalities

[disillusioned]

It's because men who are incels or semi-incel or betabucks have the biggest sexual insecurities, and this will generally translate into toxic copes and behavior, redpill, religion, sjw, alt-right, etc.

 

[vermillioncorefan]

blackpills the only cure

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

people treat u like shit u will treat others like shit, water

 

[Aladin]

Religious people have more children than atheists that’s a cope that religion is for ugly men.

 

[Mewton]

Ugly people just can't win

 

[LancasteR]

Not to insult you, but if you seriously think this, then this applies to you too.

 

[disillusioned]

Religious people have more children than atheists that’s a cope that religion is for ugly men.

That's only became religion turns women into breeding cattle.

 

[Deleted member 33112]

Nope chads and Stacie’s are just as bad they just hide it some may not if they are extreme mentalcels uglier people just have less to lose so they are more likley to act out like what your saying

 

[Deleted member 52405]

Not quite. Some chads turn out to be bullies and abusers due to having too much social power and being worshipped, thus they often get away with shit. Ugly guys being toxic is a result of being treated like shit while chads being toxic is a result of being corrupted by social power.

 

[Deleted member 62515]

No shit

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Which is why I have such a great personality

 

[Latinus]

Women as well. I swear, all the girls that mocked, disliked me with no reason were ugly. Meanwhile... the hot/cute ones never had a problem with me.

The diference is that women, regardless of their looks, have inherent value to society, so they'll rarely turn into outcasts, so there's no need for them to cope with these far right and sjw shit.

Now going back to the OP, uglier men will gravitate to these extremist ideologies simply for not having a vibrant social and sexual life.

Red Pill: while in theory the Red Pill seems good, it attracts the most pathetic men I've ever seen. They cope with "muh masculinity and muscles", everything is gay to them... meanwhile the "gay" pretty boys they bash don't even need to lift or pretend to be Clint Eastwood in order to bang any female.

Religion: yeah, when you're an ugly outcast, you cope with religion because in a very religious society you would be guaranteed of having a wife, while in our more liberal ones women do whatever they want. I find it funny to see so many religious otakus and gamers, rockers, for example, when their same parents, grandparents... saw these medias as a thing of the devil, lol.

SJW: since they are mostly ugly neckbeards and friendzoned, they'll cope with acting like simps, thinking that way women will give them their pussy. These are the same guys that will always defend women, regardless if they are wrong or not.

Alt right: mostly ugly and receded dudes. Since they can't have sex, they'll cope with "muh, my race" in order to feel special, when the acomplishments of a minority of members of their own race doesn't belong to them, only to it's authors and no one else.

 

[Aladin]

That's only became religion turns women into breeding cattle.

This is leftist soycuck language.

 

[disillusioned]

Alt right: mostly ugly and receded dudes. Since they can't have sex, they'll cope with "muh, my race" in order to feel special, when the acomplishments of a minority of members of their own race doesn't belong to them, only to it's authors and no one else.

This one is not entirely true. Yes there are losers who are only into the racism shit because of sexual insecurities, but there are still legitimate reasons to be against the current globo-homo mass immigration bullshit. The alt-right is arguably the only radical faction that is actually correct about many of its conspiracy theories whereas the other radicals (sjws, communists, etc) are mostly just pure bonafide copers.

 

[CreepyJewel1]

It's because men who are incels or semi-incel or betabucks have the biggest sexual insecurities, and this will generally translate into toxic copes and behavior, redpill, religion, sjw, alt-right, etc.

because this society didn't build for us, it forced us to behave like this, do you really think people born f'ing evil?

 

[HTN_Mentalcel]

Not quite. Some chads turn out to be bullies and abusers due to having too much social power and being worshipped, thus they often get away with shit. Ugly guys being toxic is a result of being treated like shit while chads being toxic is a result of being corrupted by social power.

Its more like a HTN is narcy, not a chad.

 

[Latinus]

This one is not entirely true. Yes there are losers who are only into the racism shit because of sexual insecurities, but there are still legitimate reasons to be against the current globo-homo mass immigration bullshit. The alt-right is arguably the only radical faction that is actually correct about many of its conspiracy theories whereas the other radicals (sjws, communists, etc) are mostly just pure bonafide copers.

There should be a control in immigration, with preference for hard working and assimilable immigrants, that's the point.

The problem is that many insecure alt right dudes bash the immigrants (mainly non-whites) in their countries, when these immigrants are just looking for a better place to try to succeed in life, not much diferent from the Euro immigrants to the Americas in the later XIX and early XX centuries. (In Brazil, for example, many Euro immigrants were giving prefential treatment to access to lands in contrast with the freed black slaves who were left to their own will, creating the famous Brazilian favelas, because they didn't have anywhere else to go).

If you want to be against immigration, then bash the elites that support them, not the immigrants themselves, they are just doing what every other people did throught human history: migrating somewhere that offers them better quality of live.

And most conspiracy theories by the alt right are dumb and illogical.

While leftists deny the beauty pill, while they are white knights, they are actually more educated than alt rights on average, they don't believe in Flat Earth, Chinese virus, they understand that even if Jews ceased to exist it's not like the Euro elites would side with their low class "racial brothers", they don't believe in meritocracy, nope, they are actually blackpilled in these aspects.

 

[Sven]

I've heard a cope that the popular aka good looking kids in school all have toxic friendgroups

Not true. It's just a cope the same way people say all the popular kids end up working in McDonalds when in reality most of them are as rich as they are good looking, as wealth is mostly synonymous with looks, they become athletes, estate agents, work for their parents, etc. Meanwhile the ugly bully victims end up working as cleaners or at mcdonalds. And even if the gl/popular kids get bad grades (again ppl cope and say they get all bad grades which isn't the case) they still find a way or are given a way because society cares about them.

It's usually the popular kids who normies are so obsessed with out of jealousy, and even more obsessed with trying to paint them as bad to cope with how bad they and the people around them are.

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

First human-tier iq thread youve had in a while

 

[Deleted member 18066]

Majority people have shitty personalities. Ugly men just have less to lose by being upfront

 

[looksmaxxed]

toxic is just code for masculine. toxic masculinity is a pleonasm

people see christian crusader worship as toxic because they have been selectively bred to be soft and have bought into the adage that "violence doesn't solve anything"

we SHOULD be toxic and focused on vanquishing evil, and other noble human pursuits. moral relativism, egalitarianism, and tolerance are cancers. and people who promote that are the enemies of civilization

 

[looksmaxxed]

That's only became religion turns women into breeding cattle.

secularism turns them into non breeding slave cattle.