The way we rate attraction is honestly stupid.

[emo-ogre666]

So, to start I think that black pill and looks maxing as a whole are pretty based with good points. But I have noticed something while going through ratings. Also seeing the grey TikTok videos on rating and there is a list with different male faces that goes from sub 5 to Chad. But honestly this method of rating is brain dead and most of you giving ratings are pretty smooth brained and should IQ max before anything. Why would we rate all male attraction on models, and bone mass. I saw a guy who I deadass look at as attractive; in the real world he would have good attraction and could easily get a girl. Well, I go to the comments and see people calling him sub 5 because his ramus wasn't ideal. This whole rating method needs to be updated, and we need to get actual real-world averages for how normal civilians look and rate based off of that. Ideas in replies.

 

[sln]

ok weird way of admitting you find men attractive

 

[MakinItHappen]

Who rated you a LTN bro? Just say.

 

[TheRopeisHope]

no fucking org user is doing those retarded ratings on tiktok or considering that sub 5 to chad ai slop chart

 

[emo-ogre666]

Who rated you a LTN bro? Just say.

Then there's a fucking retard here like you who says some stupid shit like this. If you disagree with my take, say that, rather than saying some 85 IQ bullshit like this.

 

[rj_0616]

ok weird way of admitting you find men attractive

youre projecting, he's just talking about ratings

 

[emo-ogre666]

no fucking org user is doing those retarded ratings on tiktok or considering that sub 5 to chad ai slop chart

Yeah, the chart is slop as fuck. My point is that the rating we used is usually off of bone mass, or comparing someone's looks to models. Or am I wrong? I don't think many people in here do actual face analyses.

 

[emo-ogre666]

ok weird way of admitting you find men attractive

Where in this did you find any fucking correlation to me finding men attractive?

 

[sln]

youre projecting, he's just talking about ratings

"I saw a guy who I deadass look at as attractive"

 

[TheRopeisHope]

Yeah, the chart is slop as fuck. My point is that the rating we used is usually off of bone mass, or comparing someone's looks to models. Or am I wrong? I don't think many people in here do actual face analyses.

nah bro for facial ratings most people consider ratios, facial harmony, bones yea, health indicators, i havent personally seen people comparing to models or rating purely of bonemass

 

[emo-ogre666]

"I saw a guy who I deadass look at as attractive"

Wait what? So, if I look at a guy's physique and say it looks good am I gay as well. You absolute idiot.

 

[sln]

Wait what? So, if I look at a guy's physique and say it looks good am I gay as well. You absolute idiot.

it was the phrasing nigga

 

[emo-ogre666]

nah bro for facial ratings most people consider ratios, facial harmony, bones yea, health indicators, i havent personally seen people comparing to models or rating purely of bonemass

No not purely, but no one in here actually does analysis. I'm saying the most common tip of the iceberg ratings that you get if you post in the ratings forums are dudes who; look at the picture, think of some attractive dude- see if you even compared to them and then go sub-5, ltn, mtn etc.

 

[emo-ogre666]

it was the phrasing nigga

Hop off my cock.

 

[rj_0616]

"I saw a guy who I deadass look at as attractive"

i think hes not trying to say he finds someone attractive, but rather acknowledges their attractiveness

 

[WAOS]

Non psl autistic people wont analize each feature of your face unless its something very extreme like very close set eyes or a huge nose, they see the whole package all togheter including your height and body

 

[Moosemilk56]

So, to start I think that black pill and looks maxing as a whole are pretty based with good points. But I have noticed something while going through ratings. Also seeing the grey TikTok videos on rating and there is a list with different male faces that goes from sub 5 to Chad. But honestly this method of rating is brain dead and most of you giving ratings are pretty smooth brained and should IQ max before anything. Why would we rate all male attraction on models, and bone mass. I saw a guy who I deadass look at as attractive; in the real world he would have good attraction and could easily get a girl. Well, I go to the comments and see people calling him sub 5 because his ramus wasn't ideal. This whole rating method needs to be updated, and we need to get actual real-world averages for how normal civilians look and rate based off of that. Ideas in replies.

thats normies rating tho

 

[anthrocellogy]

If you disagree with my take, say that, rather than saying some 85 IQ bullshit like this.

youre the jit talking about iqmaxing

iq≠intelligence
we should all intelligencemax instead.

iq basicly tell you how fast you can learn/comprehend information but a guy with 120 iq could have the same knowledge as a guy with 100, and it only gets worse when it goes to niche stuff like this.
for all you know you have a 90 iq jeet explaining facial analysis to you whilst you have an iq of 120.

 

[emo-ogre666]

youre the jit talking about iqmaxing

iq≠intelligence
we should all intelligencemax instead.

iq basicly tell you how fast you can learn/comprehend information but a guy with 120 iq could have the same knowledge as a guy with 100, and it only gets worse when it goes to niche stuff like this.
for all you know you have a 90 iq jeet explaining facial analysis to you whilst you have an iq of 120.

I know IQ is not intelligence. I just enjoy pissing off incels.

 

[Yuno101]

Yes .org ratings are retarded. However, they are less retarded than ratings you’d get from other websites like Reddit

 

[CookieGuy]

We highly overestimate how rare a HTN is. Most HTNs on here get rated MTN

 

[emo-ogre666]

Yes .org ratings are retarded. However, they are less retarded than ratings you’d get from other websites like Reddit

Yes this is true.

 

[emo-ogre666]

We highly overestimate how rare a HTN is. Most HTNs on here get rated MTN

Seriously and then they make it seem like your life is over if your ltn. But outside of org ltn is pretty much mtn at this point.

 

[CookieGuy]

Seriously and then they make it seem like your life is over if your ltn. But outside of org ltn is pretty much mtn at this point.

Ok nigga too far

 

[speak]

because this forum does not count appeal only PSL they only do bones and PSL like zeta and Jordan but will rate people like chico and claV LTN because they have appeal and not PSL

Even tho people should know by know appeal is more than PSL

 

[realityislemons]

ok weird way of admitting you find men attractive

terrible take, nothing he said here even hints at him being gay. since you're probably joking, ill just assume its satire

 

[realityislemons]

We highly overestimate how rare a HTN is. Most HTNs on here get rated MTN

to be honest, actual MTN is an uncommon rating. Many "looksmaxxers" are below mtn unfrauded

 

[sln]

terrible take, nothing he said here even hints at him being gay. since you're probably joking, ill just assume its satire

didn't require a reply its obvious I was kidding retard

 

[CookieGuy]

to be honest, actual MTN is an uncommon rating. Many "looksmaxxers" are below mtn unfrauded

I am referring to Looksmax.org MTN not TikTok MTN nigga. It’s average on Org. MTN on TikTok is equivalent to HTN on org

 

[Sandriguez]

in the real world he would have good attraction and could easily get a girl. Well, I go to the comments and see people calling him sub 5 because his ramus wasn't ideal. This whole rating method needs to be updated,

ye that’s called appeal and psl

we have a system for one but not the other

 

[vivex]

So, to start I think that black pill and looks maxing as a whole are pretty based with good points. But I have noticed something while going through ratings. Also seeing the grey TikTok videos on rating and there is a list with different male faces that goes from sub 5 to Chad. But honestly this method of rating is brain dead and most of you giving ratings are pretty smooth brained and should IQ max before anything. Why would we rate all male attraction on models, and bone mass. I saw a guy who I deadass look at as attractive; in the real world he would have good attraction and could easily get a girl. Well, I go to the comments and see people calling him sub 5 because his ramus wasn't ideal. This whole rating method needs to be updated, and we need to get actual real-world averages for how normal civilians look and rate based off of that. Ideas in replies.

They’re way too focused on angularity