Theory of women. Chapter [II]

[A23ghskung]

With women things must happen without friction. Let’s define friction it’s resistance between things and objects and it creates energy..

Postulates
the more friction between objects the more it creates energy!!
So the equation is something like outcome = energy - friction


Meaning if you was an object with momentum going in one direction the more friction the more your velocity is reduced..

Meaning if you had intended to go at a certain speed in a certain direction you will have to account for friction in your initial calculations..

But where is the parallel with women??

Well what is your objective when you interact with potential romantic partners ??
You want to get laid with the less effort possible right, well that’s where friction comes in the equation..
Certain factors such as looks, height, voice help minimize the effort you have to put in to get laid..

Meaning if there were two different versions of you :
one 6’5 Chad blue eyes blond hair

Another 5’5 brown eyes, brown skin

The first version will have to put in 5% of he effort that the other version will have to put in to get laid with a Swedish stacy.


Let’s go back to our equation

what we are focused on are the outcomes..
This is why we are focused on the LHS what we want is for delta K to be ideally a specific value not by increasing K_initial our effort but by reducing friction that’s W_F

Meaning you don’t want to put in more work what you want is to maximize efficiency.. let’s take a closer look at W_f

Here is d your coefficient of overall failos all your shortcomings for exemple if your short, ugly, weak voice, poor etc.
d is the coefficient for the dating standards of your potential romantical partner. What d represents is what your potential romantic partner values in a man; for exemple a 19 year old girl won’t expect you to rich. A 50 year old woman won’t expect you not to have grey hairs.. a beauty influencer with 2 million instagram followers won’t expect less than a good looking man etc..
how these two coefficient relate is if a romantic partner does not consider your failo an issue than it cancels out in the equation, for example if girl thinks dating a short guy is not an issue and you happen to be short then in your case it cancels out effort..


Now ideally you want W_f to be minimal because you want certain outcomes without having to work harder..

 

[JohnDoe]

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......

The first version will have to put in 5% of he effort that the other version will have to put in to get laid with a Swedish stacy.

 

[BideltMaxer]

Dnr

I don’t need a 3 page book to know that women are evil subhumans

 

[cc_7373]

The fuck?

 

[cc_7373]

Basic biology explains women better

 

[cc_7373]

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......


View attachment 3090765

Women love pajeets you didn't know? Thats also the reason they get piercings to appeal to pajeets as cows

 

[bululu_87]

With women things must happen without friction. Let’s define friction it’s resistance between things and objects and it creates energy..

Postulates
the more friction between objects the more it creates energy!!
So the equation is something like outcome = energy - friction


Meaning if you was an object with momentum going in one direction the more friction the more your velocity is reduced..

Meaning if you had intended to go at a certain speed in a certain direction you will have to account for friction in your initial calculations..

But where is the parallel with women??

Well what is your objective when you interact with potential romantic partners ??
You want to get laid with the less effort possible right, well that’s where friction comes in the equation..
Certain factors such as looks, height, voice help minimize the effort you have to put in to get laid..

Meaning if there were two different versions of you :
one 6’5 Chad blue eyes blond hair

Another 5’5 brown eyes, brown skin

The first version will have to put in 5% of he effort that the other version will have to put in to get laid with a Swedish stacy.


Let’s go back to our equation View attachment 3090705
what we are focused on are the outcomes..
This is why we are focused on the LHS what we want is for delta K to be ideally a specific value not by increasing K_initial our effort but by reducing friction that’s W_F

Meaning you don’t want to put in more work what you want is to maximize efficiency.. let’s take a closer look at W_f



View attachment 3090732
Here is d your coefficient of overall failos all your shortcomings for exemple if your short, ugly, weak voice, poor etc.
d is the coefficient for the dating standards of your potential romantical partner. What d represents is what your potential romantic partner values in a man; for exemple a 19 year old girl won’t expect you to rich. A 50 year old woman won’t expect you not to have grey hairs.. a beauty influencer with 2 million instagram followers won’t expect less than a good looking man etc..
how these two coefficient relate is if a romantic partner does not consider your failo an issue than it cancels out in the equation, for example if girl thinks dating a short guy is not an issue and you happen to be short then in your case it cancels out effort..


Now ideally you want W_f to be minimal because you want certain outcomes without having to work harder..

It's so beyond over if you have to use physics and formulas for women

 

[noonespecial]

Jfl i live here and can confirm I've never seen an Indian guy with a white girl ever rajeesh is never getting a Swedish Stacy no matter how little friction there are. Just stick to your own kind not that hard. (This applies to all ethnics)

 

[richpilled]

With women things must happen without friction. Let’s define friction it’s resistance between things and objects and it creates energy..

Postulates
the more friction between objects the more it creates energy!!
So the equation is something like outcome = energy - friction


Meaning if you was an object with momentum going in one direction the more friction the more your velocity is reduced..

Meaning if you had intended to go at a certain speed in a certain direction you will have to account for friction in your initial calculations..

But where is the parallel with women??

Well what is your objective when you interact with potential romantic partners ??
You want to get laid with the less effort possible right, well that’s where friction comes in the equation..
Certain factors such as looks, height, voice help minimize the effort you have to put in to get laid..

Meaning if there were two different versions of you :
one 6’5 Chad blue eyes blond hair

Another 5’5 brown eyes, brown skin

The first version will have to put in 5% of he effort that the other version will have to put in to get laid with a Swedish stacy.


Let’s go back to our equation View attachment 3090705
what we are focused on are the outcomes..
This is why we are focused on the LHS what we want is for delta K to be ideally a specific value not by increasing K_initial our effort but by reducing friction that’s W_F

Meaning you don’t want to put in more work what you want is to maximize efficiency.. let’s take a closer look at W_f



View attachment 3090732
Here is d your coefficient of overall failos all your shortcomings for exemple if your short, ugly, weak voice, poor etc.
d is the coefficient for the dating standards of your potential romantical partner. What d represents is what your potential romantic partner values in a man; for exemple a 19 year old girl won’t expect you to rich. A 50 year old woman won’t expect you not to have grey hairs.. a beauty influencer with 2 million instagram followers won’t expect less than a good looking man etc..
how these two coefficient relate is if a romantic partner does not consider your failo an issue than it cancels out in the equation, for example if girl thinks dating a short guy is not an issue and you happen to be short then in your case it cancels out effort..


Now ideally you want W_f to be minimal because you want certain outcomes without having to work harder..

Did read. Realistically, this information is useless. 5'5 indian dudes aren't getting laid with swedish stacies. The best advice for women is just to look better, increase your wealth, and/or become more charismatic.