Theory on bone smashing regarding density changes

st_max

st_max

“it might not be over yet”
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Posts
104
Reputation
86
Everybody says bonesmashing adds density, but we all agree that some tennis players, boxers, kickboxers have noticeably had bone formation over long periods of conditioning (many years)

Some examples can be:

Tennis player who plays right handed
8A87D4FA CF37 47A1 A896 48DC0CE5ED69




Sean Strickland kickboxer
9BDF4A48 A400 418F A263 2DC18CA57368





So each of these came from 5-7 years of solid conditioning

This is where everybody says “To actually see bonesmashing results, you need to smash for many many years!!! :rage::rage::rage:

Well, maybe these athletes results have only results in that long period because they don’t supplement high doses of bone conditioning nutrients such as vitamin d, magnesium, iron, etc?

Could we speed up these conditioning elements by megadosing some supplements?

After all, if we truely apply enough blows and force to the bone, our body should definitely make up for it in a short period of time, instead of letting itself be vulnerable to such blows.


TLDR: Athletes bone conditioning long term results have had small bone growth over many many sessions because of lacking nutrients, that you can supplement as a bonesmasher

What do you guys think?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: dookielooksmaxxer
You really think professional athletes don't take in bone conditioning suppliments? JFL at the cope.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 3arsa

Similar threads

S
Replies
10
Views
1K
yayatourer
yayatourer
yeahyux21
Replies
7
Views
386
asdvek
asdvek
majesticincel
Replies
71
Views
8K
SARMCONSUMER
S
Xangsane
Replies
73
Views
2K
Xangsane
Xangsane

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top