There are only SOME universal beauty standards

Uglybrazilian

Uglybrazilian

Communism will win in the end
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
7,797
Reputation
14,836
Shoulder to waist ratio
Hip to waist ratio
Blue eyes(I think)
Tall height(for men)
Symmetry
Fair skin(for women)
Blonde hair(for women)

for the others, im not sure cause I have a question: if, lets say, a proeminent browridge is a universally attractive trait for men, then why not all races have it? I mean, females of all races would have selected this trait but it didnt happen so it must not be universal
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, mulattomaxxer, 6ft7Mogger and 1 other person
Shoulder to waist ratio
Hip to waist ratio
Blue eyes(I think)
Tall height(for men)
Symmetry
Fair skin(for women)
Blonde hair(for women)

for the others, im not sure cause I have a question: if, lets say, a proeminent browridge is a universally attractive trait for men, then why not all races have it? I mean, females of all races would have selected this trait but it didnt happen so it must not be universal
Brilliant logic sherlock
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AscendingHero, Deleted member 9344, BigBoy and 6 others
Shoulder to waist ratio
Hip to waist ratio
Blue eyes(I think)
Tall height(for men)
Symmetry
Fair skin(for women)
Blonde hair(for women)

for the others, im not sure cause I have a question: if, lets say, a proeminent browridge is a universally attractive trait for men, then why not all races have it? I mean, females of all races would have selected this trait but it didnt happen so it must not be universal
bro. go to sleep you're posting ramblings
 
  • +1
Reactions: SadnessWYJ, Deleted member 5969 and Deleted member 2214
Coloring isnt universal. Body isnt universal.
Tbh only thing universal are ratios for the head.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, RoundHouse, Chadrapist and 1 other person
Coloring isnt universal. Body isnt universal.
Tbh only thing universal are ratios for the head.
body seems universal tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy
Brilliant logic sherlock
unironically perfect logic
If forward growth is universally attractive then wtf asian females selected flat maxilas
 
body seems universal tbh
Do u think this is ideal? Cuz that is ideal for me.
9A1042DE 7F33 4A85 9D9D 8145C2A18CF3
568296CC AC66 4C48 B197 C466B06CBD4A
1CF8A1EA 57B9 4087 A633 31489455DB62
8C2B8347 473F 40C9 AA54 D7559FC12966

If no, not universal
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • Ugh..
Reactions: RoundHouse, Deleted member 8856, BigBoy and 4 others
Shoulder to waist ratio
Hip to waist ratio
Blue eyes(I think)
Tall height(for men)
Symmetry
Fair skin(for women)
Blonde hair(for women)

for the others, im not sure cause I have a question: if, lets say, a proeminent browridge is a universally attractive trait for men, then why not all races have it? I mean, females of all races would have selected this trait but it didnt happen so it must not be universal
lower third?
 
Shoulder to waist ratio
Hip to waist ratio
Blue eyes(I think)
Tall height(for men)
Symmetry
Fair skin(for women)
Blonde hair(for women)

for the others, im not sure cause I have a question: if, lets say, a proeminent browridge is a universally attractive trait for men, then why not all races have it? I mean, females of all races would have selected this trait but it didnt happen so it must not be universal
Beauty is subjective & objective imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SadnessWYJ
Agreed. Anything to do with specific facial features is almost entirely eurocentric and learned, not some beauty standard you're born with. Studies with babies have shown this. I'm not sure if blue eyes is universal, it also seems eurocentric to me.
 
Also, not sure if blonde is universal either.
 
lower third?
does not seem universal to me
if that was the case then almost all races would have similar lower thirds but thats not the case
 
>only some reaces
>blone hair
>blue eyes

take your meds shizo
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy and Deleted member 1751
yo bro maybe aesthetics is purely objective.

Sex appeal obviously is subjective like some ppl have yellow fever and shit. Also need to remove emotional attachments to shit since ppl who are self-hating will have different shit cuz status and shit.

For that to happen though we need to remove sexual attraction and emotional attachments.
 
  • +1
Reactions: RoundHouse
Shoulder to waist ratio
Hip to waist ratio
Blue eyes(I think)
Tall height(for men)
Symmetry
Fair skin(for women)
Blonde hair(for women)

for the others, im not sure cause I have a question: if, lets say, a proeminent browridge is a universally attractive trait for men, then why not all races have it? I mean, females of all races would have selected this trait but it didnt happen so it must not be universal
Hunter eyes + chiselled square Jaw
And I've said all
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy
Shoulder to waist ratio
Hip to waist ratio
Blue eyes(I think)
Tall height(for men)
Symmetry
Fair skin(for women)
Blonde hair(for women)

for the others, im not sure cause I have a question: if, lets say, a proeminent browridge is a universally attractive trait for men, then why not all races have it? I mean, females of all races would have selected this trait but it didnt happen so it must not be universal


You forgot to include forward growth. Also height is attractive in both men and women. Nearly every attractive, successful man wants an above-average height girlfriend.
 
You forgot to include forward growth. Also height is attractive in both men and women. Nearly every attractive, successful man wants an above-average height girlfriend.
I dont think forward growth is universally attractive, if it was then asian females would have selected forward growth instead of flat maxillas, there's also evidence that flat faces were considered ideal in ancient asian times

I dont know about tall height being attractive in females, its very unlikely since height is a dimorphic trait in all cultures and races

its like thinking a broad shouldered female would be attractive
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft7Mogger
>only some reaces
>blone hair
>blue eyes

take your meds shizo
I only cited those cause apparently there is research saying it is universally attractive, but yeah, it doesnt make any sense
 
Also, not sure if blonde is universal either.
yeah its not. Brunettes look better for me tbh, blonde looks basic/bland. This is ideal tbh for me, btw Eva didnt make it ideal for me it was ideal ever since.
0D6C2FBC 4C5C 499F 8A7D 2133A75BE8C4

You forgot to include forward growth. Also height is attractive in both men and women. Nearly every attractive, successful man wants an above-average height girlfriend.
cope height is subjective. Some want tall, some want short, for me I want it to be slightly taller than average girl
White girls with their flat pancake asses. Bitches need to do more squats.
Ideal for me tbh, Its perky and has nice shape. I think its ideal in shape, but for most ppl they would want it to be bigger. Idk anyone who likes a different shape so that might be objective
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: RoundHouse
fair skin isnt really universal the main reason people say white people are beutiful because of the morphological and craniofacial diffrences

skin colour is irrelevant
 
I dont think forward growth is universally attractive, if it was then asian females would have selected forward growth instead of flat maxillas, there's also evidence that flat faces were considered ideal in ancient asian times

I dont know about tall height being attractive in females, its very unlikely since height is a dimorphic trait in all cultures and races

its like thinking a broad shouldered female would be attractive

Forward growth is attractive and desirable to any race. We know that average white person has more forward growth than the average Asian person and that's one of the reasons stereotypical white facial features are preferred over stereotypical Asian features.

Height is important for women. Literally most female models like Adriana Lima are tall and models are the epitome of female beauty. Normie men say they prefer shorter girls because tall hot models are out of their league. Models jaw, height and eye mog them so it's too brutal they would rather date subhuman short girl because she is more attainable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723
Symmetry
Averageness
Sexual dimorphism

These are universal standards found in almost if not all human groups
 
Forward growth is attractive and desirable to any race. We know that average white person has more forward growth than the average Asian person and that's one of the reasons stereotypical white facial features are preferred over stereotypical Asian features.

Height is important for women. Literally most female models like Adriana Lima are tall and models are the epitome of female beauty. Normie men say they prefer shorter girls because tall hot models are out of their league. Models jaw, height and eye mog them so it's too brutal they would rather date subhuman short girl because she is more attainable.
I dont think so
if forward growth were universally attractive then asians wouldnt have flat maxillas
about height: its the same thing, it doesnt make sense that height would be attractive in women since its a dimorphic trait
 
I dont think so
if forward growth were universally attractive then asians wouldnt have flat maxillas
about height: its the same thing, it doesnt make sense that height would be attractive in women since its a dimorphic trait

Basically your argument is that if feature X were universally attractive, then everyone would have X. Your argument doesn't hold up because ugly people with unattractive features exist and they reproduce.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy and Deleted member 6723
Basically your argument is that if feature X were universally attractive, then everyone would have X. Your argument doesn't hold up because ugly people with unattractive features exist and they reproduce.
not thats not my argument
if you take a look at asians you'll see that they have abnormally flat maxilas in abnormally high rates, which means that flat maxilas were probably sexually selected by ancient asian females for some unknown reason
 
Basically your argument is that if feature X were universally attractive, then everyone would have X. Your argument doesn't hold up because ugly people with unattractive features exist and they reproduce.
true bro. Im sure though that there were features that if were still here and not bred out, they would make someone look extremely subhuman.

Maybe a flat maxilla was one of the least worries back then and they probably had features that were worse that were bred out.

Same for other features too, his argument is shit since if feature X were bred out, there would be another feature, probably less important that would have to be bred out, and so on.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: RoundHouse and Deleted member 6341
true bro. Im sure though that there were features that if were still here and not bred out, they would make someone look extremely subhuman.

Maybe a flat maxilla was one of the least worries back then and they probably had features that were worse that were bred out.
it cant be the case
considering that we evolved from apes and that blacks are probably the oldest of all races its very unlikely that flat maxilas were somehow very present in ancient human times

the fact that asians are pan faced indicates that flat maxilas were probably actively selected
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723
Only thing that is universal is stuff that people develop due to Proper horomones. Like jaw and frame etc
 

Similar threads

Birdcell
Replies
15
Views
692
Haseeb
Haseeb
can’t relate
Replies
49
Views
2K
Nochills
Nochills
BinPanda
Replies
26
Views
1K
BinPanda
BinPanda

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top