There is actually a bit more of subjectivity to looks than I thought.

Deleted member 15748

Deleted member 15748

Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2021
Posts
1,556
Reputation
1,684
I often find such different girls attractive to ones posted on this forum, or ones discussed with friends irl.

If it is the same for women, it is kinda life fuel tbh

This only applies to the normie to chadlite range. everything else is objective
 
  • +1
Reactions: russwestbrook
I often find such different girls attractive to ones posted on this forum, or ones discussed with friends irl.

If it is the same for women, it is kinda life fuel tbh

This only applies to the normie to chadlite range. everything else is objective

The fact that everyone here obsessively posts "Chico" (and that he's even referred to mononymously because he's so often invoked) and Gigachad as archtypical examples of what a 'slayer' looks like, despite no actual women IRL ever even thirsting after such dudes (and on top of that, calling actual dudes that women worship like Harry Styles and Ed Sheeran "cucks"), should give you the first real sign that this place is a wee tad off base with what women want and desire, let alone what is actually attractive to other men (this place all seems to be on the pathway to outing themselves as Twinks in search of some sort of grizzly daddy dom to play the caboose)
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thegoat, Deleted member 16369, Deleted member 15748 and 1 other person
I think men have lower standards than women, that's why we can find a lot of females attractive. Women seem to all like the exact same features.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8165 and alriodai
The fact that everyone here obsessively posts "Chico" (and that he's even referred to mononymously because he's so often invoked) and Gigachad as archtypical examples of what a 'slayer' looks like, despite no actual women IRL ever even thirsting after such dudes (and on top of that, calling actual dudes that women worship like Harry Styles and Ed Sheeran "cucks"), should give you the first real sign that this place is a wee tad off base with what women want and desire, let alone what is actually attractive to other men (this place all seems to be on the pathway to outing themselves as Twinks in search of some sort of grizzly daddy dom to play the caboose)
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: metagross and Callooh_Calais


The fact that you can see that these are all ugly fat dumpy girls (almost all who are coloured, the sort who fetishise White men and turn us into their objets d'amour while pinning the blame on us for their sexual proclivities in hashtag denouncement campaigns) who are the only ones stanning him really should be a red flag larger than China that Chico isn't quite the chad this whole forum made him out to be.

You ever notice you never see pretty girls doing this sorta thing? While there is certainly power in their media influence, Only ugly and/or autistic spectrum girls will stan for a celebrity like Chico or Jimin this bad (which I suppose makes sense, since I feel like most people here want an autistic 'AveRaGe gAmER GuRL' as their match), since real women don't need to treat a man like a holy object of worship in order to feel non-sexually threatened by one
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: thegoat, alriodai and Deleted member 17694
yea it’s subjective to what their friends or social media has brainwashed them into being attracted to
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16369
I often find such different girls attractive to ones posted on this forum, or ones discussed with friends irl.

If it is the same for women, it is kinda life fuel tbh

This only applies to the normie to chadlite range. everything else is objective
in face? kinda, that why people who just claims face is the king....are right but it depends on many things
In height and good physiqye os always de same. Thats why being tall and jacked is the best thing u can be
 
The fact that you can't see that these are all ugly fat dumpy girls (almost all who are coloured, the sort who fetishise White men and turn us into their objets d'amour while pinning the blame on us for their sexual proclivities in hashtag denouncement campaigns) are the only ones stanning him really should be a red flag larger than China that Chico isn't quite the chad this whole forum made him out to be.

You ever notice you never see pretty girls doing this sorta thing? While there is certainly power in their media influence, Only ugly and/or autistic spectrum girls will stan for a celebrity like Chico or Jimin this bad (which I suppose makes sense, since I feel like most people here want an autistic 'AveRaGe gAmER GuRL' as their match), since real women don't need to treat a man like a holy object of worship in order to feel non-sexually threatened by one
And I don't really disagree. All I'm saying is that if Chico and Harry Styles were two random non famous guys and you asked a sample of 10k College aged women who is more attractive, the majority would choose Chico.
 
And I don't really disagree. All I'm saying is that if Chico and Harry Styles were two random non famous guys and you asked a sample of 10k College aged women who is more attractive, the majority would choose Chico.

If that were true, Chico would be as famous as Harry Styles is, wouldn't he? Let's be honest, these girls weren't exactly fans of One Direction for the music
 
If that were true, Chico would be as famous as Harry Styles is, wouldn't he? Let's be honest, these girls weren't exactly fans of One Direction for the music
Chico is Brazilian he also can't sing and he is literally only famous for being good looking. Harry Styles can sing and perform and he isn't even that bad of a songwriter. It's like you're trying to imply that every famous person who didn't get there purely because of talent is there only because of their appearance.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Callooh_Calais
I think men have lower standards than women, that's why we can find a lot of females attractive. Women seem to all like the exact same features.

I strongly disagree, considering Gerardo Ortiz is one of the most popular singers in Mexico and is universally considered a heartthrob by women of all ages despite being short and fat and looking like this:



(If you can read Spanish, read the comments on his insta from his younger fans, they're wild af)

What I always assumed is that men set the trends of what is considered powerful, and correspondingly, women set the trends of what is attractive. In Mexico for example, they love humble-yet-masculine rags-to-riches stories and thus have a lot of characters in both television and music who are lionised this way: There is a reason why El Chapo hit such a resounding note with so many Mexicans (and has massive merchandising power with companies selling shit with his face on it), and not nearly because of the power of his outfit.
 
Last edited:
It's like you're trying to imply that every famous person who didn't get there purely because of talent is there only because of their appearance.

Why else would they be there? If they were talentless and ugly, they'd be called normal
 
Why else would they be there? If they were talentless and ugly, they'd be called normal
Money and connections. Many artists lack great talent but entered the industry through connections and got huge industry backing which made them popular.
 
Money and connections. Many artists lack great talent but entered the industry through connections and got huge industry backing which made them popular.

Money comes from talent (cunning being a form of talent) or attractiveness, and when it doesn't? Well, people tend to no longer respect the elites who run society (like right now, when every other famous actress seems to be some Lena Dunham-esque media legacy), and things begin to fall apart.
 
Nah.

Men find different types of women attractive.

Women find all the same types of men attractive. Chad.

To a man a 6/10 girl can be an 8+/10

To a woman a 6/10 guy is a 6/10 guy

There is only one variation with women. Pretty boy when they are insecure and Chad when they are horny and ovulating.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: metagross, alriodai, Deleted member 15309 and 2 others
@

Nah.

Men find different types of women attractive.

Women find all the same types of men attractive. Chad.

To a man a 6/10 girl can be an 8+/10

To a woman a 6/10 guy is a 6/10 guy

See:


 


26e3611d064753be85a0c5137fd0158f
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Callooh_Calais
There is only one variation with women. Pretty boy when they are insecure and Chad when they are horny and ovulating.

Which is why you have a lot of pretty boys on this forum, because they need a neurotypical personality and either their IQ is too high for that or they aspie.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15309 and Callooh_Calais
Beauty is cultural
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: alriodai and Deleted member 15309
Nah.

Men find different types of women attractive.

Women find all the same types of men attractive. Chad.

To a man a 6/10 girl can be an 8+/10

To a woman a 6/10 guy is a 6/10 guy

There is only one variation with women. Pretty boy when they are insecure and Chad when they are horny and ovulating.
1644842339634
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrestIsBest
Top 2%of guys get 50% of the matches, so I don't think is that subjective
 
  • +1
Reactions: TopzCat1, TrestIsBest, metagross and 1 other person
I often find such different girls attractive to ones posted on this forum, or ones discussed with friends irl.
If it is the same for women, it is kinda life fuel tbh
Of course it's the same for women, they all like different niches and type of guys, but the catch is that just like for guys, they ALL like attractive guys. A guy can be "Just their type" and that makes him more attractive, but at the end of the day, an attractive guy is an attractive guy no matter his style.

Like for example in your group of friends you could have one guy who likes skater girls, one who likes goths, one who likes tomboys, and one who likes bookish girls. Do you really think that if they met a 8/10 girl that isn't their "type" they wouldn't be attracted to her?
Of course they would be attracted to her. Style preferences influence whether or not you find a girl attractive just a little bit, but it doesn't turn an ugly girl into a hot girl or an hot girl into an ugly girl.

This very same mechanism applies to how women see men; they may wish to change something about the guy, but if he's attractive, they'll find him attractive as long as he doesn't present himself in a ridiculously outlandish way (like, idk, a blue mohawk).

Although they will always be attracted to good looking guys, this doesn't mean the overall "vibe" you project can't resonate strongly with certain girls. In this way I feel girls are a bit more obsessive compared to men: for example if you embody a certain type of guy that she's into, she will consider you a bit more attractive than if she weren't into that type of guys.

Certain things are also a lot more polarizing (beards, long hair, piercings, coloured hair), while others have broader appeal - going for a riskier style can turn off many girls, but those who are into it will be REALLY into it since there are few guys with that type of style.
For example, I've often noticed that very beautiful girls that are really into music will sometimes date guys that are quite average-looking simply because they fit their "type" a lot better than guys who are more attractive but look "normal". Same applies to most other subcultures.

TL;DR All girls are into Chads, but you can be considered more Chad-ish if you fit a girl's ideal type; thus, nichemaxx if you can. Find your unique style, be memorable.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: TrestIsBest, alriodai and Yerico7
apparently im gigachad to asians because staceylite + keep matching with me and asking me out, and asking for second dates. but no other grp is interested :p
 
most women are in the range of looking good

there is no big variety in chads
 
How many semi-fat men do women find attractive?

How many semi-fat women do men find attractive?
Just be big boned and big framed and 22-25% body fat, that's what they mean by "dadbod". That's fat to women, not some estrogenic soyboy with love handles; invisible
 
There is only one variation with women. Pretty boy when they are insecure and Chad when they are horny and ovulating.

Which is why you have a lot of pretty boys on this forum, because they need a neurotypical personality and either their IQ is too high for that or they aspie.

In Mexico, (Who I think we can all universally agree have attractive, non-autistic women), they always joke that this man will steal your girlfriend from right under your nose:

Gerardo Ortiz

Gerardo Ortiz 2
 
i brainstormed this

for men : can be idolised / worshipped = 3 out of 10 men
can make it = 4 or 5 out of 10 men

for women: can be idolised / worshipped = 7 out of 10 women
can make it = 9 out of 10 women

semms legit
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Callooh_Calais
Just be big boned and big framed and 22-25% body fat, that's what they mean by "dadbod". That's fat to women, not some estrogenic soyboy with love handles; invisible

Yeah and how many dudes are 6'2 and above to mean it can allow them to have a dad-bod and be hunky dorey for women whilst not intimidating them like Chad does?

3.9% of adult men in the USA are 6'2 and over.

You can't be shorter than 6'2 and rock a dad-bod and even at 6'2, as you said, you have to be big-boned, meaning in other words wide shoulder-framed.

While women don't have a height requirement as long as their fat distribution around their body isn't totally awful. So more semi-fat women are attractive to men than semi-fat men. Dad-bod works on 3.9% of the male population and then you have to take into account the 6'2+ guys that are Chads, the 6'2+ guys that have narrow frames and the 6'2+ guys that are aspie or have a high IQ and can't deal with women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrestIsBest
Of course it's the same for women, they all like different niches and type of guys, but the catch is that just like for guys, they ALL like attractive guys. A guy can be "Just their type" and that makes him more attractive, but at the end of the day, an attractive guy is an attractive guy no matter his style.

Like for example in your group of friends you could have one guy who likes skater girls, one who likes goths, one who likes tomboys, and one who likes bookish girls. Do you really think that if they met a 8/10 girl that isn't their "type" they wouldn't be attracted to her?
Of course they would be attracted to her. Style preferences influence whether or not you find a girl attractive just a little bit, but it doesn't turn an ugly girl into a hot girl or an hot girl into an ugly girl.

This very same mechanism applies to how women see men; they may wish to change something about the guy, but if he's attractive, they'll find him attractive as long as he doesn't present himself in a ridiculously outlandish way (like, idk, a blue mohawk).

Although they will always be attracted to good looking guys, this doesn't mean the overall "vibe" you project can't resonate strongly with certain girls. In this way I feel girls are a bit more obsessive compared to men: for example if you embody a certain type of guy that she's into, she will consider you a bit more attractive than if she weren't into that type of guys.

Certain things are also a lot more polarizing (beards, long hair, piercings, coloured hair), while others have broader appeal - going for a riskier style can turn off many girls, but those who are into it will be REALLY into it since there are few guys with that type of style.
For example, I've often noticed that very beautiful girls that are really into music will sometimes date guys that are quite average-looking simply because they fit their "type" a lot better than guys who are more attractive but look "normal". Same applies to most other subcultures.

TL;DR All girls are into Chads, but you can be considered more Chad-ish if you fit a girl's ideal type; thus, nichemaxx if you can. Find your unique style, be memorable.

You're wrong because the catch is not that lol

Women don't have to be attractive for a guy to like her.

She can be average. It's just that men BOTH find average women attractive and they have less options.

Women do not find average men attractive AND they have more options.

It's a double wammie on both sides.

Women go for a particular look but it just so happens that it's easier to pull that look off (Style etc) if you are good looking or tall and average. It's still possible as an average looking dude or even a below and sometimes even kinda ugly looking but requires finesse and a lot of NT behaviour.

It's just that unlike previous generations, including mine, the Millennials, Zoomer guys that are average and/or below aren't willing to make those adjustments and improvisations because of what they see online. But not only that, the market is drying up with a female's options being far greater. So another double wammie. It's harder and guys are saying what's the point because she's gonna reject me, make me orbit her, or cheat on me anyway .
 
  • +1
Reactions: metagross, thegoat and Deleted member 3946
The fact that everyone here obsessively posts "Chico" (and that he's even referred to mononymously because he's so often invoked) and Gigachad as archtypical examples of what a 'slayer' looks like, despite no actual women IRL ever even thirsting after such dudes (and on top of that, calling actual dudes that women worship like Harry Styles and Ed Sheeran "cucks"), should give you the first real sign that this place is a wee tad off base with what women want and desire, let alone what is actually attractive to other men (this place all seems to be on the pathway to outing themselves as Twinks in search of some sort of grizzly daddy dom to play the caboose)
I always thought of PSL/SMV/irl to be 3 different ways to gauge this. PSL is just face, SMV contains height,frame,maybe tattoos etc, irl can contain status.
 
ofc it is subjective a bit. you can have 2 chads with completely different looks, f.e. brad Pitt vs johnny depp. light vs dark Features. so, many girls dont find brad pitt attractive that means you cant be objectively good looking for all:y'all:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
The fact that you can see that these are all ugly fat dumpy girls (almost all who are coloured, the sort who fetishise White men and turn us into their objets d'amour while pinning the blame on us for their sexual proclivities in hashtag denouncement campaigns) who are the only ones stanning him really should be a red flag larger than China that Chico isn't quite the chad this whole forum made him out to be.

You ever notice you never see pretty girls doing this sorta thing? While there is certainly power in their media influence, Only ugly and/or autistic spectrum girls will stan for a celebrity like Chico or Jimin this bad (which I suppose makes sense, since I feel like most people here want an autistic 'AveRaGe gAmER GuRL' as their match), since real women don't need to treat a man like a holy object of worship in order to feel non-sexually threatened by one
You are coping very hard. Most girls find him very attractive in his prime. The most popular and hottest looking girl in my class used to post pictures of him on her timeline all the time.
She always said that she wanted a guy like Chico. That is how I even got to know Chico in the first place. Before I even knew about the blackpill.
 
theres also things like, some girls have a higher pathogen disgust response, so acne may matter more for 1 girl than another.

ALso colouring, i'm not sure if we are programmed to seek out similar phenotypic traits, or opposite, e.g do med women prefer blonde scand men? because north euro women seem to prefer med dark feature white guys

obviously different girls prefer different levels of masculinity, Its usually believed that women prefer more masculine more they age, i.e 30 year old women will find prettyboy much less appealing than 18yo
 
but even so, sometimes a friend and I won't agree that a girl is attractive JUST on the face, even if you remove any other variable like body type, race whatever. which makes me think even that is subjective to some degree.

Maybe if you have strong jaw, it matters less to you on girls, because you arleady have those genes to pass (if they are dominant)? Maybe eye area matters to you more

I have no clue tbh
 

Similar threads

14yearoldpslmogger
Replies
32
Views
1K
Elias144
E
Sloppyseconds
Replies
64
Views
2K
UMIRINBRAH?
UMIRINBRAH?
hardest_driver
Replies
4
Views
686
Tenzen Thenziro
Tenzen Thenziro

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top