There is no race tax for ethnics or blacks in America

[Deleted member 75224]

Some people here think (mostly coping curries and white sfcels) that there is a race tax for non-whites . A 8/10 curry is basically the equivalent of a 5/10 white guy under this theory.

This is not how it works though. If you are ethnic you get excluded from the dating pool based on your race alone regardless of looks. There’s race exclusion, not a tax.

No matter how good looking you are as an Indian you are hard capped at being able to date 3.8% of white American women as 96.2% exclude Indian men.

In practical terms what does this mean? Take an Indian and a White male with exactly the same stats in every aspect. Mathematically, the White’s daring pool is 25 times larger.

It’s not that the Indian chad is cleaning up with all the LTBs like the race tax theory suggests. In actuality the Indian chad is cleaning up with 3.8% of women (which has a normal distribution of LTB/MTB/HTB) and not matching at all with 96.2% regardless of looks.

 

[Deleted member 75224]

This partially explains why ethnics do horribly on Tinder but better on Hinge.

On Tinder every left swipe affects your ELO and you get ranked further down the stack. Since even a chad curry gets left swiped 96.2% of the time, their elo gets destroyed to incel tier and that 3.8% of women will basically never see them.

Hinge on the other hand with its race filters side steps this issue entirely. An Indian’s profile will only be shown to women who are open to Indians (thus your ELO isn’t impacted if you’re a good looking ethnic and you can get more matches).

 

[Scarface756]

There is a tax when it comes to White women since the majority of women are drawn to their own but it's nowhere near as brutal as Racepillers make it seem.

If anything, I've attracted more White women than Black women irl.

 

[Deleted member 75224]

There is a tax when it comes to White women since the majority of women are drawn to their own but it's nowhere near as brutal as Racepillers make it seem.

If anything, I've attracted more White women than Black women irl.

You didn’t read what I wrote at all.

 

[Deleted member 90941]

Some people here think (mostly coping curries and white sfcels) that there is a race tax for non-whites . A 8/10 curry is basically the equivalent of a 5/10 white guy under this theory.

This is not how it works though. If you are ethnic you get excluded from the dating pool based on your race alone regardless of looks. There’s race exclusion, not a tax.

No matter how good looking you are as an Indian you are hard capped at being able to date 3.8% of white American women as 96.2% exclude Indian men.

In practical terms what does this mean? Take an Indian and a White male with exactly the same stats in every aspect. Mathematically, the White’s daring pool is 25 times larger.

It’s not that the Indian chad is cleaning up with all the LTBs like the race tax theory suggests. In actuality the Indian chad is cleaning up with 3.8% of women (which has a normal distribution of LTB/MTB/HTB) and not matching at all with 96.2% regardless of looks.

View attachment 3160312

White women prefering their own men and rejecting indian males isn't proof of anything. Every racial group prefers their own.

 

[Deleted member 30959]

 

[klip11]

I just dropped a load in the toilet. It's that liquid, runny kind of doo doo.

 

[ElTruecel]

Who cares this forum is majority ethnic im whiter than a good amount of 85% of this forum. Legit all coal skins on here who will gaslight into thinking you’re more ethnic

 

[Deleted member 30521]

Why not be normal in the head and just date within your race/ethnicity? That's what most normies DO.
Being appealing to all girls from all the races is for people who are above HTN.

 

[axttt_]

this doesnt take into account nuances where a woman who would usually not go for an ethnic may see an ethnic that she finds attractive
most white women think of an indian and think of a fat curry munching scammer
if they see an actual GL ethnic they may give them a chance