There is nothing hotter than fucking a woman who is taller than you.

[Poopless One]

Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me.

 

[dad]

are you a virgin?

 

[motiascension]

This guy knows ball holy fuck

 

[uksucks]

I'd have to move to Netherlands if I wanted that to happen. Rarely see a taller woman

Also im not agreeing with you, but never done it so idk

 

[motiascension]

I‘ve been saying ts I need a slim and tall women it adds infinite status

 

[Poopless One]

are you a virgin?

Are you a nigger serf?

 

[StarvedEpi]

not if there not at least you looks match facially

 

[Brus Wane]

I got a 5'11 white escort once.

I'm 5'9

Felt nice but nothing special.

 

[watah]

are you a virgin?

He def is

 

[uksucks]

I got a 5'11 white escort once.

I'm 5'9

Felt nice but nothing special.

Did you mention her height or did she say wow I'm tallee??

 

[Poopless One]

I got a 5'11 white escort once.

I'm 5'9

Felt nice but nothing special.

 

[Samiscool234]

Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me.

I can tell youre 14 years old.

 

[dad]

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me.

btw

if you say something, that does not automatically make it true. your remark is a prime example of a multifaceted logical misstep, specifically the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy. this fallacy arises when, instead of engaging substantively with an opposing viewpoint, one seeks to delegitimize it by attacking the character or purported motivations of the interlocutor. in this case, the underlying implication that disagreement is inherently tied to the personal traits you derogatorily referenced serves as a preemptive defense mechanism against genuine intellectual scrutiny.

your argument also encapsulates the erroneous cognitive trap known as a false dichotomy, where you erroneously posit two exclusive and oppositional outcomes: agreement with your position or succumbing to the vile category you've outlined. by reducing the complexity of discourse to such a binary, you create an artificial sense of epistemic closure, wherein you subtly suggest that no reasonable position exists outside of these two extremes. this type of rhetorical constriction is not only fallacious but also betrays a deep misunderstanding of the spectrum of rational dissent.

moreover, your insistence on framing disagreement in such pejorative terms relies on an implicit assumption of ipse dixit, a type of argument from authority whereby the mere act of asserting something is treated as sufficient justification for its truth. however, epistemological integrity demands that propositions be evaluated based on their logical coherence and evidentiary support, not on the presumed inviolability of the one making the claim.

by conflating ad hominem attacks with a false dichotomy, and adding the additional weight of an ipse dixit fallacy, you effectively barricade your position from legitimate critique. not through dialectical fortitude, but by constructing an intellectually vacuous fortress of rhetorical artifice. such tactics, while perhaps emotionally satisfying, are inimical to the pursuit of truth, as they shift the focus from the argument itself to the irrelevant domain of personal insult and rhetorical bravado.

ultimately, discourse is not advanced through the deployment of logical fallacies masquerading as argumentation. if anything, your reliance on such fallacies merely underscores the weakness of the substantive position you claim to defend. a truly robust argument is one that can withstand dissent, not one that seeks to pathologize it in advance.

 

[sportsmogger]

- manlet

 

[Poopless One]

I like em 14 years old.

 

[Poopless One]

btw

if you say something, that does not automatically make it true. your remark is a prime example of a multifaceted logical misstep, specifically the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy. this fallacy arises when, instead of engaging substantively with an opposing viewpoint, one seeks to delegitimize it by attacking the character or purported motivations of the interlocutor. in this case, the underlying implication that disagreement is inherently tied to the personal traits you derogatorily referenced serves as a preemptive defense mechanism against genuine intellectual scrutiny.

your argument also encapsulates the erroneous cognitive trap known as a false dichotomy, where you erroneously posit two exclusive and oppositional outcomes: agreement with your position or succumbing to the vile category you've outlined. by reducing the complexity of discourse to such a binary, you create an artificial sense of epistemic closure, wherein you subtly suggest that no reasonable position exists outside of these two extremes. this type of rhetorical constriction is not only fallacious but also betrays a deep misunderstanding of the spectrum of rational dissent.

moreover, your insistence on framing disagreement in such pejorative terms relies on an implicit assumption of ipse dixit, a type of argument from authority whereby the mere act of asserting something is treated as sufficient justification for its truth. however, epistemological integrity demands that propositions be evaluated based on their logical coherence and evidentiary support, not on the presumed inviolability of the one making the claim.

by conflating ad hominem attacks with a false dichotomy, and adding the additional weight of an ipse dixit fallacy, you effectively barricade your position from legitimate critique. not through dialectical fortitude, but by constructing an intellectually vacuous fortress of rhetorical artifice. such tactics, while perhaps emotionally satisfying, are inimical to the pursuit of truth, as they shift the focus from the argument itself to the irrelevant domain of personal insult and rhetorical bravado.

ultimately, discourse is not advanced through the deployment of logical fallacies masquerading as argumentation. If anything, your reliance on such fallacies merely underscores the weakness of the substantive position you claim to defend. A truly robust argument is one that can withstand dissent, not one that seeks to pathologize it in advance.

dnr

 

[Samiscool234]

@Poopless One im going to rape you oil up no diddy

 

[Brus Wane]

Did you mention her height or did she say wow I'm tallee??

Neither of us did.

It was back in 2022 I was nervous as fuck because it was the first time I was gonna have sex since before covid.

She knew herself that she was tall. It was expected that all her clients would be shorter because this was in Asia and she was visiting from Europe.

 

[uksucks]

Neither of us did.

It was back in 2022 I was nervous as fuck because it was the first time I was gonna have sex since before covid.

She knew herself that she was tall. It was expected that all her clients would be shorter because this was in Asia and she was visiting from Europe.


View attachment 3210653

Where was she from

 

[Poopless One]

@Poopless One im going to rape you oil up no diddy

Not if I rape you first.

 

[Samiscool234]

Neither of us did.

It was back in 2022 I was nervous as fuck because it was the first time I was gonna have sex since before covid.

She knew herself that she was tall. It was expected that all her clients would be shorter because this was in Asia and she was visiting from Europe.


View attachment 3210653

A fellow october2022cel whats up champ

 

[Brus Wane]

Where was she from

She was a Belgian that lives in Switzerland.

A fellow october2022cel whats up champ

Ayyy gang gang

 

[Angutoid]

Did you mention her height or did she say wow I'm tallee??

"wow im taller!"

 

[uksucks]

She was a Belgian that lives in Switzerland.


Ayyy gang gang

How much do you talk to them?

Also Jfl are you actually from Blackpill, Wales?

 

[Brus Wane]

How much do you talk to them?

Quite a bit. She was by far the most expensive I ever paid for. 1000 Singapore dollars. Most of her work would involve talking to married old ceo types. Some of these erectile dysfunction fucks need conversation stimulation, not just a bimbo who sucks them off.

I remember the exact day I went to fuck her. It was exactly one day after Putin invaded because I mentioned it and we talked about it. This was February 2022.

She really tried to keep the conversation flowing and tried to make me feel good about myself and stuff.

I could tell most men who talk to her want their egos pumped up and shit.
I didn't need any of that I just wanted to fuck and hug someone.

It was a nice GFE service.

Also Jfl are you actually from Blackpill, Wales?

Fuck no. I put that there for shits and giggles. Most appropriate location if you ask me.

 

[uksucks]

Most appropriate location if you ask me

Haha I've been there.
It's an outdoor small scale water park/pool near a beach. Full of kids, idk why they named it that lol

 

[Brus Wane]

Haha I've been there.
It's an outdoor small scale water park/pool near a beach. Full of kids, idk why they named it that lol

Are you Welsh or English?

It's really an odd name.

There are places in Britain called 'something pool' but never 'pill'

Those Welsh be wildin innit.

If ever there is a meetup, it should be at that water park.

 

[Poopless One]

 

[uksucks]

There are places in Britain called 'something pool' but never 'pill'

Yes I was quite surprised when I found out about that place

Are you Welsh or English?

I'm English and Persian but I live in Wales

 

[StarvedEpi]

btw

if you say something, that does not automatically make it true. your remark is a prime example of a multifaceted logical misstep, specifically the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy. this fallacy arises when, instead of engaging substantively with an opposing viewpoint, one seeks to delegitimize it by attacking the character or purported motivations of the interlocutor. in this case, the underlying implication that disagreement is inherently tied to the personal traits you derogatorily referenced serves as a preemptive defense mechanism against genuine intellectual scrutiny.

your argument also encapsulates the erroneous cognitive trap known as a false dichotomy, where you erroneously posit two exclusive and oppositional outcomes: agreement with your position or succumbing to the vile category you've outlined. by reducing the complexity of discourse to such a binary, you create an artificial sense of epistemic closure, wherein you subtly suggest that no reasonable position exists outside of these two extremes. this type of rhetorical constriction is not only fallacious but also betrays a deep misunderstanding of the spectrum of rational dissent.

moreover, your insistence on framing disagreement in such pejorative terms relies on an implicit assumption of ipse dixit, a type of argument from authority whereby the mere act of asserting something is treated as sufficient justification for its truth. however, epistemological integrity demands that propositions be evaluated based on their logical coherence and evidentiary support, not on the presumed inviolability of the one making the claim.

by conflating ad hominem attacks with a false dichotomy, and adding the additional weight of an ipse dixit fallacy, you effectively barricade your position from legitimate critique. not through dialectical fortitude, but by constructing an intellectually vacuous fortress of rhetorical artifice. such tactics, while perhaps emotionally satisfying, are inimical to the pursuit of truth, as they shift the focus from the argument itself to the irrelevant domain of personal insult and rhetorical bravado.

ultimately, discourse is not advanced through the deployment of logical fallacies masquerading as argumentation. if anything, your reliance on such fallacies merely underscores the weakness of the substantive position you claim to defend. a truly robust argument is one that can withstand dissent, not one that seeks to pathologize it in advance.

 

[BeanletMogger]

water.
Tall women are made for manlets we belong together Literally the highest display of T levels is walking with a girl taller than you

 

[Brus Wane]

Yes I was quite surprised when I found out about that place


I'm English and Persian but I live in Wales

Is Wales a very "dead" place? I presume all the action is in England, specifically the big cities

 

[Poopless One]

water.
Tall women are made for manlets we belong together Literally the highest display of T levels is walking with a girl taller than you

Finally someone who understands. Also Buu is my favorite DB villain

 

[uksucks]

water.
Tall women are made for manlets we belong together Literally the highest display of T levels is walking with a girl taller than you

Yes but only because it makes the offspring taller

 

[janet]

Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me.

Short girls are better imo imagine a girl being taller than you

 

[uksucks]

Is Wales a very "dead" place? I presume all the action is in England, specifically the big cities

Yeh nightlife is pretty crap
Only time it was ever good was on new years eve

Boring place really but low crime where I am. Decent geomaxing base but that's all

 

[ihearvoices]

I need 190 cm stacey

 

[Poopless One]

Short girls are better imo

 

[Brus Wane]

Yeh nightlife is pretty crap
Only time it was ever good was on new years eve

Boring place really but low crime where I am. Decent geomaxing base but that's all

actually its perfect if the cost of living is reasonable relative to other parts

city life is really bad and if youre not getting full value from the city (best paying job, fucking the best women, eating at the best restaurants) its better to just live in a quiet place

 

[uksucks]

actually its perfect if the cost of living is reasonable relative to other parts

city life is really bad and if youre not getting full value from the city (best paying job, fucking the best women, eating at the best restaurants) its better to just live in a quiet place

That's very true and I had a great childhood in the countryside

 

[Brus Wane]

That's very true and I had a great childhood in the countryside

have you seen this thread?

Why the UK is the best society in the world, and why liberalism is superior when done right

Note: This is a decently long and high IQ post. If you consider yourself a bad reader, a senseless tribalist/racist/fetishist, or a childish sperg who can't possibly accept a conflicting worldview, feel free to leave now. Disclaimer: These points could also somewhat apply to Australia. However...

looksmax.org

very patrioticcontradicts the fuck outta your username

 

[betrayed by 5‘8]

Good Dad to be 5‘7

 

[thecel]

If ever there is a meetup, it should be at that water park.

lots of British .org users:

Are .org Users Near You? Looksmax.org WORLD MAP from NonCuckMeetUp Location Data

Where are your fellow blackpillers? Here they are: Right now the sample size is tiny. Future versions of the world map will be better. See how many .org-dwellers are near you...

looksmax.org

Non-Cuck Meet-Up

a place for blackpillers to find based people

noncuckmeetup.vercel.app

 

[The Grinch]

But you never had sex

 

[Deleted member 87360]

keep dreamin'

 

[Shahnameh]

keep dreamin'

 

[Deleted member 64864]

Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me.

why?

 

[Deleted member 87360]

View attachment 3210839

betabuxxing as I said, keep dreamin' boyo

 

[Deleted member 87360]

View attachment 3210839

Also what is the 6'9 woman going to do? Find a 7'0 tall husband? She's obviously going to settle down with someone shorter.

 

[Primalsplit]

View attachment 3210839

Imagine making that giraffe scream in bed.