There is nothing hotter than fucking a woman who is taller than you.

Poopless One

Poopless One

Blackcel with Euro and Scot blood
Joined
Sep 27, 2024
Posts
1,412
Reputation
1,557
Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me. :owo:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: aryan mogger, PseudoMaxxer, deepfuckingvalue and 20 others
are you a virgin?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: deepfuckingvalue, lain34, Aero and 4 others
This guy knows ball holy fuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: BeanletMogger and \/orman
I'd have to move to Netherlands if I wanted that to happen. Rarely see a taller woman

Also im not agreeing with you, but never done it so idk
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Poopless One
I‘ve been saying ts I need a slim and tall women it adds infinite status
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 92913
not if there not at least you looks match facially
 
  • +1
Reactions: \/orman and Poopless One
I got a 5'11 white escort once.

I'm 5'9

Felt nice but nothing special.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer, Deleted member 46404 and uksucks
Poopless One said:
Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me. :owo:
Click to expand...
I can tell youre 14 years old.
 
Poopless One said:
Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me. :owo:
Click to expand...
btw

if you say something, that does not automatically make it true. your remark is a prime example of a multifaceted logical misstep, specifically the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy. this fallacy arises when, instead of engaging substantively with an opposing viewpoint, one seeks to delegitimize it by attacking the character or purported motivations of the interlocutor. in this case, the underlying implication that disagreement is inherently tied to the personal traits you derogatorily referenced serves as a preemptive defense mechanism against genuine intellectual scrutiny.

your argument also encapsulates the erroneous cognitive trap known as a false dichotomy, where you erroneously posit two exclusive and oppositional outcomes: agreement with your position or succumbing to the vile category you've outlined. by reducing the complexity of discourse to such a binary, you create an artificial sense of epistemic closure, wherein you subtly suggest that no reasonable position exists outside of these two extremes. this type of rhetorical constriction is not only fallacious but also betrays a deep misunderstanding of the spectrum of rational dissent.

moreover, your insistence on framing disagreement in such pejorative terms relies on an implicit assumption of ipse dixit, a type of argument from authority whereby the mere act of asserting something is treated as sufficient justification for its truth. however, epistemological integrity demands that propositions be evaluated based on their logical coherence and evidentiary support, not on the presumed inviolability of the one making the claim.

by conflating ad hominem attacks with a false dichotomy, and adding the additional weight of an ipse dixit fallacy, you effectively barricade your position from legitimate critique. not through dialectical fortitude, but by constructing an intellectually vacuous fortress of rhetorical artifice. such tactics, while perhaps emotionally satisfying, are inimical to the pursuit of truth, as they shift the focus from the argument itself to the irrelevant domain of personal insult and rhetorical bravado.

ultimately, discourse is not advanced through the deployment of logical fallacies masquerading as argumentation. if anything, your reliance on such fallacies merely underscores the weakness of the substantive position you claim to defend. a truly robust argument is one that can withstand dissent, not one that seeks to pathologize it in advance.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Catawampus, t20cel, sluttysuzy420 and 3 others
- manlet
 
dad said:
btw

if you say something, that does not automatically make it true. your remark is a prime example of a multifaceted logical misstep, specifically the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy. this fallacy arises when, instead of engaging substantively with an opposing viewpoint, one seeks to delegitimize it by attacking the character or purported motivations of the interlocutor. in this case, the underlying implication that disagreement is inherently tied to the personal traits you derogatorily referenced serves as a preemptive defense mechanism against genuine intellectual scrutiny.

your argument also encapsulates the erroneous cognitive trap known as a false dichotomy, where you erroneously posit two exclusive and oppositional outcomes: agreement with your position or succumbing to the vile category you've outlined. by reducing the complexity of discourse to such a binary, you create an artificial sense of epistemic closure, wherein you subtly suggest that no reasonable position exists outside of these two extremes. this type of rhetorical constriction is not only fallacious but also betrays a deep misunderstanding of the spectrum of rational dissent.

moreover, your insistence on framing disagreement in such pejorative terms relies on an implicit assumption of ipse dixit, a type of argument from authority whereby the mere act of asserting something is treated as sufficient justification for its truth. however, epistemological integrity demands that propositions be evaluated based on their logical coherence and evidentiary support, not on the presumed inviolability of the one making the claim.

by conflating ad hominem attacks with a false dichotomy, and adding the additional weight of an ipse dixit fallacy, you effectively barricade your position from legitimate critique. not through dialectical fortitude, but by constructing an intellectually vacuous fortress of rhetorical artifice. such tactics, while perhaps emotionally satisfying, are inimical to the pursuit of truth, as they shift the focus from the argument itself to the irrelevant domain of personal insult and rhetorical bravado.

ultimately, discourse is not advanced through the deployment of logical fallacies masquerading as argumentation. If anything, your reliance on such fallacies merely underscores the weakness of the substantive position you claim to defend. A truly robust argument is one that can withstand dissent, not one that seeks to pathologize it in advance.
Click to expand...
dnr
 
@Poopless One im going to rape you oil up no diddy
 
uksucks said:
Did you mention her height or did she say wow I'm tallee??
Click to expand...

Neither of us did.

It was back in 2022 I was nervous as fuck because it was the first time I was gonna have sex since before covid.

She knew herself that she was tall. It was expected that all her clients would be shorter because this was in Asia and she was visiting from Europe.

Poopless One said:
:feelsuhh:
Click to expand...
Giphy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit and uksucks
Brus Wane said:
Neither of us did.

It was back in 2022 I was nervous as fuck because it was the first time I was gonna have sex since before covid.

She knew herself that she was tall. It was expected that all her clients would be shorter because this was in Asia and she was visiting from Europe.


View attachment 3210653
Click to expand...
Where was she from
 
  • +1
Reactions: Brus Wane
Brus Wane said:
Neither of us did.

It was back in 2022 I was nervous as fuck because it was the first time I was gonna have sex since before covid.

She knew herself that she was tall. It was expected that all her clients would be shorter because this was in Asia and she was visiting from Europe.


View attachment 3210653
Click to expand...
A fellow october2022cel whats up champ
 
  • +1
Reactions: Brus Wane
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, Suns9999, uksucks and 1 other person
uksucks said:
How much do you talk to them?
Click to expand...
Quite a bit. She was by far the most expensive I ever paid for. 1000 Singapore dollars. Most of her work would involve talking to married old ceo types. Some of these erectile dysfunction fucks need conversation stimulation, not just a bimbo who sucks them off.

I remember the exact day I went to fuck her. It was exactly one day after Putin invaded because I mentioned it and we talked about it. This was February 2022.

She really tried to keep the conversation flowing and tried to make me feel good about myself and stuff.

I could tell most men who talk to her want their egos pumped up and shit.
I didn't need any of that I just wanted to fuck and hug someone.

It was a nice GFE service.
uksucks said:
Also Jfl are you actually from Blackpill, Wales?
Click to expand...
Fuck no.:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: I put that there for shits and giggles. Most appropriate location if you ask me. :lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Primalsplit, watah and uksucks
Brus Wane said:
Most appropriate location if you ask me
Click to expand...
Haha I've been there.
It's an outdoor small scale water park/pool near a beach. Full of kids, idk why they named it that lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Brus Wane
uksucks said:
Haha I've been there.
It's an outdoor small scale water park/pool near a beach. Full of kids, idk why they named it that lol
Click to expand...
Are you Welsh or English?

It's really an odd name.

There are places in Britain called 'something pool' but never 'pill'

Those Welsh be wildin innit.

If ever there is a meetup, it should be at that water park.
 
  • +1
Reactions: uksucks
wonder woman superhero GIF
 
dad said:
btw

if you say something, that does not automatically make it true. your remark is a prime example of a multifaceted logical misstep, specifically the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy. this fallacy arises when, instead of engaging substantively with an opposing viewpoint, one seeks to delegitimize it by attacking the character or purported motivations of the interlocutor. in this case, the underlying implication that disagreement is inherently tied to the personal traits you derogatorily referenced serves as a preemptive defense mechanism against genuine intellectual scrutiny.

your argument also encapsulates the erroneous cognitive trap known as a false dichotomy, where you erroneously posit two exclusive and oppositional outcomes: agreement with your position or succumbing to the vile category you've outlined. by reducing the complexity of discourse to such a binary, you create an artificial sense of epistemic closure, wherein you subtly suggest that no reasonable position exists outside of these two extremes. this type of rhetorical constriction is not only fallacious but also betrays a deep misunderstanding of the spectrum of rational dissent.

moreover, your insistence on framing disagreement in such pejorative terms relies on an implicit assumption of ipse dixit, a type of argument from authority whereby the mere act of asserting something is treated as sufficient justification for its truth. however, epistemological integrity demands that propositions be evaluated based on their logical coherence and evidentiary support, not on the presumed inviolability of the one making the claim.

by conflating ad hominem attacks with a false dichotomy, and adding the additional weight of an ipse dixit fallacy, you effectively barricade your position from legitimate critique. not through dialectical fortitude, but by constructing an intellectually vacuous fortress of rhetorical artifice. such tactics, while perhaps emotionally satisfying, are inimical to the pursuit of truth, as they shift the focus from the argument itself to the irrelevant domain of personal insult and rhetorical bravado.

ultimately, discourse is not advanced through the deployment of logical fallacies masquerading as argumentation. if anything, your reliance on such fallacies merely underscores the weakness of the substantive position you claim to defend. a truly robust argument is one that can withstand dissent, not one that seeks to pathologize it in advance.
Click to expand...

 
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: Eren and BeanletMogger
water.
Tall women are made for manlets :love: we belong together :Comfy::aheago: Literally the highest display of T levels is walking with a girl taller than you
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies, Deleted member 77575, Deleted member 91257 and 2 others
uksucks said:
Yes I was quite surprised when I found out about that place


I'm English and Persian but I live in Wales
Click to expand...

Is Wales a very "dead" place? I presume all the action is in England, specifically the big cities
 
BeanletMogger said:
water.
Tall women are made for manlets :love: we belong together :Comfy::aheago: Literally the highest display of T levels is walking with a girl taller than you
Click to expand...
Finally someone who understands. Also Buu is my favorite DB villain
 
  • Love it
Reactions: BeanletMogger
BeanletMogger said:
water.
Tall women are made for manlets :love: we belong together :Comfy::aheago: Literally the highest display of T levels is walking with a girl taller than you
Click to expand...
Yes but only because it makes the offspring taller
 
  • Love it
Reactions: BeanletMogger
Poopless One said:
Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me. :owo:
Click to expand...
Short girls are better imo imagine a girl being taller than you
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 92913, BeanletMogger and Poopless One
Brus Wane said:
Is Wales a very "dead" place? I presume all the action is in England, specifically the big cities
Click to expand...
Yeh nightlife is pretty crap
Only time it was ever good was on new years eve

Boring place really but low crime where I am. Decent geomaxing base but that's all
 
I need 190 cm stacey
 
  • Love it
Reactions: BeanletMogger
uksucks said:
Yeh nightlife is pretty crap
Only time it was ever good was on new years eve

Boring place really but low crime where I am. Decent geomaxing base but that's all
Click to expand...
actually its perfect if the cost of living is reasonable relative to other parts

city life is really bad and if youre not getting full value from the city (best paying job, fucking the best women, eating at the best restaurants) its better to just live in a quiet place
 
  • +1
Reactions: uksucks
Brus Wane said:
actually its perfect if the cost of living is reasonable relative to other parts

city life is really bad and if youre not getting full value from the city (best paying job, fucking the best women, eating at the best restaurants) its better to just live in a quiet place
Click to expand...
That's very true and I had a great childhood in the countryside
 
  • +1
Reactions: Brus Wane
uksucks said:
That's very true and I had a great childhood in the countryside
Click to expand...


have you seen this thread?

looksmax.org

Why the UK is the best society in the world, and why liberalism is superior when done right

Note: This is a decently long and high IQ post. If you consider yourself a bad reader, a senseless tribalist/racist/fetishist, or a childish sperg who can't possibly accept a conflicting worldview, feel free to leave now. Disclaimer: These points could also somewhat apply to Australia. However...
looksmax.org looksmax.org

very patriotic:feelskek:contradicts the fuck outta your username
 
  • JFL
Reactions: uksucks
Good Dad to be 5‘7
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Brus Wane and uksucks
But you never had sex
 
keep dreamin'
 
Poopless One said:
Managing to dom a tall woman is the most alpha move. Visually it is akin to conquering a giant which is one of the most High T things you can possibly accomplish.

Only faggot retard cuck kike cocksucking motherfucking nigger serfs will disagree with me. :owo:
Click to expand...
why?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

thecel
Redpill The Rational Male by Rollo Tomassi
2
Replies
78
Views
22K
thecel
thecel
chaddyboi66
Over EVISCEMOGGING THE ABSOLUTE FUCK OUT OF THE ABUSED SUBHUMAN KIKE LOVING COMMIE DOG AbuSAF
2
Replies
65
Views
13K
abdullah23k
abdullah23k
Kingkellz
Guide SEX APPEAL MAXXING {Official Guide}
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
609
Views
271K
justthem
J

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top