Deleted member 6908
Looks, Charisma, Masculine Virtues
- Joined
- May 12, 2020
- Posts
- 11,509
- Reputation
- 17,176
Pictures are so misleading. Focal length, lighting, background, solo vs. group shot, pixel density, proximity to lens all drastically change how you rate someone. You can take photos of any normie and make then look 4.5 or 6.5. If you're in the 4-7 range (which 90% of psl is), then it's impossible to rate you based on pics. You can make yourself look anywhere in that range depending on how you take the pic.
I was looking for pics of James Deen for a previous thread and I could take pics that put him anywhere in that 4-7 range. Here's a solo pic with good even lighting and taken at angle that highlights his angularity. It makes him look 6/10:
But then I can put him a group shot where he's further away from the camera so it looks like he's getting sizemogged by a woman. Now he's 5/10:
What if we backlight him and give him a soft focus background in a close up shot? Now he's back up to 6+
But, wait, now he's shot from below at an unflattering angle. He's clearly 4/10:
So wtf is his rating? No one can tell. It all depends on what pics you take. Rating people based on a few pics is pointless. All you can say is whether someone is truly subhuman, normie tier, or Chad. I can clearly tell a Chad and a subhuman. Banger looks like a subhuman in every pic. Orb looks like a Chad in every pic. But normies look like totally different people based on their pics. Fuck trying to say someone is 5/10 or 6.25/10. I'm done trying to rate people on pics. I need to see people irl to make any sort of estimate.
I was looking for pics of James Deen for a previous thread and I could take pics that put him anywhere in that 4-7 range. Here's a solo pic with good even lighting and taken at angle that highlights his angularity. It makes him look 6/10:
But then I can put him a group shot where he's further away from the camera so it looks like he's getting sizemogged by a woman. Now he's 5/10:
What if we backlight him and give him a soft focus background in a close up shot? Now he's back up to 6+
But, wait, now he's shot from below at an unflattering angle. He's clearly 4/10:
So wtf is his rating? No one can tell. It all depends on what pics you take. Rating people based on a few pics is pointless. All you can say is whether someone is truly subhuman, normie tier, or Chad. I can clearly tell a Chad and a subhuman. Banger looks like a subhuman in every pic. Orb looks like a Chad in every pic. But normies look like totally different people based on their pics. Fuck trying to say someone is 5/10 or 6.25/10. I'm done trying to rate people on pics. I need to see people irl to make any sort of estimate.