Crayola CØck
You Will Never Be What A Man Should Be
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2023
- Posts
- 828
- Reputation
- 1,368
Based on science and my experiences it's time I made a short checklist of what makes a -cel vs. a sexhaver (most of this should be obvious to you idiots):
1. Skin color (ethnicity, background, locationceldom, etc.)
Outside of gross Pajeets and sandniggercels, in the Western world, what separates the robust dudes from the losers? SKIN TONE (and ethnicity). Spics & Nigs are almost universally ousted from the virginity class by design. Look at how many BMWF couples you see out in the streets in 2023. Black IS IN. Latino IS IN. White boy? Better be really hot if you're pale, otherwise you're disadvantaged in the Western World. Niggers and Latinos are bonafide sex havers by habit -- good luck finding someone Latin or Black, on average, who's "too nerdy" or "not cool enough." Blacks and Latinos are also often NT, friendhavers, normshits/normiemaxxed, and much more extroverted/outspoken than introverted/very shy. For all these reasons it's obvious -- skin color (but maybe more so ETHNICITY/PHENO) is the major player in determining what road you'll take. If you're tan and in the West and look either part-spic or part-monkey, you're unlikely to be incel BY FAR. Plain ol' whiteys are twiddling their thumbs and getting scraps, meanwhile 0/10 niggers are sleeping with rich Stacies. It is a BEHAVIORAL SINK, & seemingly whites are going out while spics/nigs coming in hard, taking over ALL women/your women and not even necessarily needing super good looks.
2. Your VOICE & INSERTIONS+STYLE (demeanor, attitude, niche, etc.)
By this I DO NOT solely mean things like height or frame, although they do matter. What I mean is things like demeanor, voice, style, hair, manner of speaking, body language, tattoos/"unique symbols" or other things that make you stand out. It should be known that a pale, shy, tattoo-less, niche-less Chad is still bound to be much less favorable than his slightly uglier but much more unique-footed Chadlite downgrade, AKA muscly, tats, piercings, style, etc. A plain, dry Chad out of the current trends is far more disadvantaged than even a Chadlite who is super-nichemaxxed. So what sets out the difference between the normies who do better, and the ones who don't? The FOLLOWERS tend to do better because they are ACCEPTED more places socially, so they are more "on the radar." These normshits, as a result, appear more sexual and "qualified" to hang out around girls by way of their demeanor and fitting looks of course, but style, tats, muscle, voice, etc. help too.
3. Whether you DO DRUGS OR TAKE CHANCES/RISKS
They're called "bad boys" for a reason. Being too clean and proper will lower sex appeal more than being the dude who isn't afraid to drink some, or smoke some, or try some wild stunt, or walk alone in a dark alley, or etc. Sometimes the problem is not the looks, but that some guys are too RESTRAINED. They are too AFRAID sometimes of "stepping out of line" so they're always stuck between a rock and a happy place. If you're afraid of taking chances, who can take a chance for you? NO ONE. Sometimes you gotta take chances, otherwise you will be incel even if PSL 10. Looks are KING, but if you can't take on any visible opportunity to ACT you will always end up being the lower-classman in life. This isn't about muh pick-up artistry or cold approach, but just LIFE IN GENERAL.
4. If you have any friends or social circle of place you belong
It should be known that even Chad struggles with no social place. If Chad is unable to socially insert himself or get picked up and carried on, Chad will have it hard too (not as hard as a normie but still struggle if a true lonercel). If a guy has friends it's like saying he's accepted to be around people, and this alone says he has value. If a gl dude is not fit in anywhere, he can still have value but it will work out poorly vs. having a normal social life, outings, parties, etc. So really, from my experience, what often sets guys about here? Guys with friends, a circle, connections, etc. are often NEVER incel if they're at least MTN+. Guys of the same looks with no friends? DEFINITE incels. So ultimately one big key thing in determining what makes you have some girls/sex interested often vs. NOT is whether you are socially inserted in the right places and circumstances -- and if no, RIP even if you have good looks as it will be hard still. There is a reason why most guys you know with girls AREN'T socially isolated hermits -- because being such OBVIOUSLY makes it harder to get girls, especially if sub 7.
5. If you are facially average or not too facially deviated from average.
This doesn't mean you look average, but rather your PHENO is fitting/typical vs. many other guys in your area. IF YOU LOOK TOO "DIFFERENT" from most guys, it might be very much OVER FOR YOU. Girls in liking guys is almost purely phenotypical and thus morphological -- so if you have a far too deviated look or pheno from most typical guys in your area -- and you aren't extremely good looking or such -- then you will probably be incel as a result of this ALONE. You don't even necessarily have to be ugly but just too DIFFERENT looking vs. most other guys in your area/country/etc. So really, the best thing? LOOK SIMILAR. Most of those guys' you see and their pheno? Yeah, well those are the "average" ones -- so that's why they have the girls/etc. and you don't (assuming you are incel and the reasoning behind it is your DISsimilar looking phenotype/morphology). This is why Asian dudes can do bad in mostly tall, White HTN+ areas; this is why Indians do bad everywhere; this is why white boys fall short in the hood with black niggas and their ghetto/nichemaxx/thugmaxx/etc. It's all about BEING PART OF THE NORM or AT LEAST WELL PAST IT. If you're just "different" but not ASTOUNDING appealing despite such, then you're different IN A BAD WAY AKA INCEL. @5.5psl @Blackgymmax @the BULL @Amnesia @Gaygymmaxx @Salludon @vinn98 @Bonesbonesbonesbone @tyronelite @MakinItHappen @enchanted_elixir @whatever it takes @assymetricel @MaestheticMaso @bradpittshairline @Ai Impact @NarrowBones @Copeful @BrahminBoss
1. Skin color (ethnicity, background, locationceldom, etc.) Outside of gross Pajeets and sandniggercels, in the Western world, what separates the robust dudes from the losers? SKIN TONE (and ethnicity). Spics & Nigs are almost universally ousted from the virginity class by design. Look at how many BMWF couples you see out in the streets in 2023. Black IS IN. Latino IS IN. White boy? Better be really hot if you're pale, otherwise you're disadvantaged in the Western World. Niggers and Latinos are bonafide sex havers by habit -- good luck finding someone Latin or Black, on average, who's "too nerdy" or "not cool enough." Blacks and Latinos are also often NT, friendhavers, normshits/normiemaxxed, and much more extroverted/outspoken than introverted/very shy. For all these reasons it's obvious -- skin color (but maybe more so ETHNICITY/PHENO) is the major player in determining what road you'll take. If you're tan and in the West and look either part-spic or part-monkey, you're unlikely to be incel BY FAR. Plain ol' whiteys are twiddling their thumbs and getting scraps, meanwhile 0/10 niggers are sleeping with rich Stacies. It is a BEHAVIORAL SINK, & seemingly whites are going out while spics/nigs coming in hard, taking over ALL women/your women and not even necessarily needing super good looks.
2. Your VOICE & INSERTIONS+STYLE (demeanor, attitude, niche, etc.) By this I DO NOT solely mean things like height or frame, although they do matter. What I mean is things like demeanor, voice, style, hair, manner of speaking, body language, tattoos/"unique symbols" or other things that make you stand out. It should be known that a pale, shy, tattoo-less, niche-less Chad is still bound to be much less favorable than his slightly uglier but much more unique-footed Chadlite downgrade, AKA muscly, tats, piercings, style, etc. A plain, dry Chad out of the current trends is far more disadvantaged than even a Chadlite who is super-nichemaxxed. So what sets out the difference between the normies who do better, and the ones who don't? The FOLLOWERS tend to do better because they are ACCEPTED more places socially, so they are more "on the radar." These normshits, as a result, appear more sexual and "qualified" to hang out around girls by way of their demeanor and fitting looks of course, but style, tats, muscle, voice, etc. help too.
3. Whether you DO DRUGS OR TAKE CHANCES/RISKS They're called "bad boys" for a reason. Being too clean and proper will lower sex appeal more than being the dude who isn't afraid to drink some, or smoke some, or try some wild stunt, or walk alone in a dark alley, or etc. Sometimes the problem is not the looks, but that some guys are too RESTRAINED. They are too AFRAID sometimes of "stepping out of line" so they're always stuck between a rock and a happy place. If you're afraid of taking chances, who can take a chance for you? NO ONE. Sometimes you gotta take chances, otherwise you will be incel even if PSL 10. Looks are KING, but if you can't take on any visible opportunity to ACT you will always end up being the lower-classman in life. This isn't about muh pick-up artistry or cold approach, but just LIFE IN GENERAL.
4. If you have any friends or social circle of place you belong It should be known that even Chad struggles with no social place. If Chad is unable to socially insert himself or get picked up and carried on, Chad will have it hard too (not as hard as a normie but still struggle if a true lonercel). If a guy has friends it's like saying he's accepted to be around people, and this alone says he has value. If a gl dude is not fit in anywhere, he can still have value but it will work out poorly vs. having a normal social life, outings, parties, etc. So really, from my experience, what often sets guys about here? Guys with friends, a circle, connections, etc. are often NEVER incel if they're at least MTN+. Guys of the same looks with no friends? DEFINITE incels. So ultimately one big key thing in determining what makes you have some girls/sex interested often vs. NOT is whether you are socially inserted in the right places and circumstances -- and if no, RIP even if you have good looks as it will be hard still. There is a reason why most guys you know with girls AREN'T socially isolated hermits -- because being such OBVIOUSLY makes it harder to get girls, especially if sub 7.
5. If you are facially average or not too facially deviated from average. This doesn't mean you look average, but rather your PHENO is fitting/typical vs. many other guys in your area. IF YOU LOOK TOO "DIFFERENT" from most guys, it might be very much OVER FOR YOU. Girls in liking guys is almost purely phenotypical and thus morphological -- so if you have a far too deviated look or pheno from most typical guys in your area -- and you aren't extremely good looking or such -- then you will probably be incel as a result of this ALONE. You don't even necessarily have to be ugly but just too DIFFERENT looking vs. most other guys in your area/country/etc. So really, the best thing? LOOK SIMILAR. Most of those guys' you see and their pheno? Yeah, well those are the "average" ones -- so that's why they have the girls/etc. and you don't (assuming you are incel and the reasoning behind it is your DISsimilar looking phenotype/morphology). This is why Asian dudes can do bad in mostly tall, White HTN+ areas; this is why Indians do bad everywhere; this is why white boys fall short in the hood with black niggas and their ghetto/nichemaxx/thugmaxx/etc. It's all about BEING PART OF THE NORM or AT LEAST WELL PAST IT. If you're just "different" but not ASTOUNDING appealing despite such, then you're different IN A BAD WAY AKA INCEL. @5.5psl @Blackgymmax @the BULL @Amnesia @Gaygymmaxx @Salludon @vinn98 @Bonesbonesbonesbone @tyronelite @MakinItHappen @enchanted_elixir @whatever it takes @assymetricel @MaestheticMaso @bradpittshairline @Ai Impact @NarrowBones @Copeful @BrahminBoss
Last edited:
