This forum has a SERIOUS UNDERRATING + OVERRATING PROBLEM

CookieGuy

CookieGuy

GOTTA GET A GRIP GOTTA GET A GRIP GOTTA GET A GRIP
Joined
Sep 5, 2024
Posts
7,078
Reputation
7,005
Every day, I see HTN’s called chadlites. But also MTNS called LTNS. Here‘a why this is a problem.

Let’s start with LTN. To be an LTN you need to look very unnapealing, not appealing to many, and have some major flaws. Not just some 14 year old who is a cutecel or prettyboy. A real LTN is someone like Michael cera. Just because someone has some bloat, or lack of bones (mostly due to bloat or age) it doesn’t automatically make them LTN. If we used this logic Zayn Malik would be LTN. An LTN is a look that would turn heads away, while not being hideous, it’s below the average and not good. Most people rated LTN in here are MTN, or atleast lower end MTN. Just average. Some acne here and there, some small flaws or recession, and some bloat. Be careful when eating a MTN a LTN. Could absolutely DESTORY their mentality.

Moving on to Overrating HTNs to chad or Chadlite. This is very bad because it may get people to think they have mental issues because they aren’t getting all the girls they were promised. I see guys rated on here that are in reality MTN/HTN “Chadlite” simply because they HAVE BONES.

I will say this, and don’t take it lightly, BONES ARE GREAT, but you can be average or good looking without a ton! And you could also be bad looking WITH BONES, if you have lack of harmony or other bad features.

The point is neither of these are helpful, rate appropriately, and be realistic with rates, not autistic
 
  • +1
Reactions: greywind, 7"L×6"G currymaxxer, qtchess and 6 others
It doesnt.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: castizo_ascender
Have you seen .is? Those retards will rate anything a Chad or Tyrone. But yeah women here get overrated hard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greywind, castizo_ascender, FascisstChad and 6 others
Looks and social circle or nothing at all
 
People are also very bad wirh rating non-whites on this forum especially blacks and chinks. Both are by default get told they lllk deformed when asking for ratings u less they are 7+/10
 
  • +1
Reactions: greywind, castizo_ascender and h111
People are also very bad wirh rating non-whites on this forum especially blacks and chinks. Both are by default get told they lllk deformed when asking for ratings u less they are 7+/10
then is there hope for me that people are just very bad at rating because i am asian
 
then is there hope for me that people are just very bad at rating because i am asian
Ur a hmtn bro genuinely attractive will fuck u (no homo)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: h111
Nobody cares kys nigger hang urself
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: just coping and vrilmaxxer
org overrates young white men and underrates everything else.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: greywind, 7"L×6"G currymaxxer, Snoofy and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: castizo_ascender
cant even argue this is true
just have medium length hair, don't be fat, and have the most basal normal bone development.

1734221660200
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: greywind, alriodai and whitebitchslayer
yea im good on all this j need to debloat a lil and stop getting fucked by my uneven jaw
I currently have a frog tier underchin from injecting dissolvers for submental leanness.
 
  • +1
Reactions: just coping
Every day, I see HTN’s called chadlites. But also MTNS called LTNS. Here‘a why this is a problem.

Let’s start with LTN. To be an LTN you need to look very unnapealing, not appealing to many, and have some major flaws. Not just some 14 year old who is a cutecel or prettyboy. A real LTN is someone like Michael cera. Just because someone has some bloat, or lack of bones (mostly due to bloat or age) it doesn’t automatically make them LTN. If we used this logic Zayn Malik would be LTN. An LTN is a look that would turn heads away, while not being hideous, it’s below the average and not good. Most people rated LTN in here are MTN, or atleast lower end MTN. Just average. Some acne here and there, some small flaws or recession, and some bloat. Be careful when eating a MTN a LTN. Could absolutely DESTORY their mentality.

Moving on to Overrating HTNs to chad or Chadlite. This is very bad because it may get people to think they have mental issues because they aren’t getting all the girls they were promised. I see guys rated on here that are in reality MTN/HTN “Chadlite” simply because they HAVE BONES.

I will say this, and don’t take it lightly, BONES ARE GREAT, but you can be average or good looking without a ton! And you could also be bad looking WITH BONES, if you have lack of harmony or other bad features.

The point is neither of these are helpful, rate appropriately, and be realistic with rates, not autistic
yh i've had people rate me chadlite simply bc "muh good bones" when in actually high mtn-low htn at best
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
the reality is that ratings are austistic, esp from autists on this
your real life rating = how women treat you
you don't go outside? = take pictures of u, post them on tinder or dating apps and thats ur rating
you're a locationcel? make a tinder acc in other countries and check reactions

that's your rating, unless ur here to get homoerotic validation from other men online
 
  • +1
Reactions: greywind
the reality is that ratings are austistic, esp from autists on this
your real life rating = how women treat you
you don't go outside? = take pictures of u, post them on tinder or dating apps and thats ur rating
you're a locationcel? make a tinder acc in other countries and check reactions

that's your rating, unless ur here to get homoerotic validation from other men online
Pictures aren’t reliable because most people will filter fraud or angle max. And a straight forward picture of yourself with no filter is very unnapealing even for a chadlite.

How women treat you could vary so much.

I think a normie would experience interest from some, tolerance from some, and disgust from some

While a sub 5 would experience hate from them all

And a chad would receive appreciation from them all.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: alriodai
Pictures aren’t reliable because most people will filter fraud or angle max. And a straight forward picture of yourself with no filter is very unnapealing even for a chadlite.

How women treat you could vary so much.

I think a normie would experience interest from some, tolerance from some, and disgust from some

While a sub 5 would experience hate from them all

And a chad would receive appreciation from them all.
You don't know shit about what you're talking about, pictures are reliable, you guys just choose to cope and say "mirror mirror" instead, pictures are how life works, people in social settings will take pictures of you and post them, why wouldn't they be reliable
"but but filter and angles" then we will call them out on it, easy as fuck

And no women will treat you good if you're just fuckable, the moment a fuckable woman find interest in you, that means you're not ugly or at the minimum MTN
and Chad doesn't need to get called Chad by you online to know he's a chad, unless he lived in a monk Indian village with no woman around, chad knows he's chad because bitches get on his dick on tinder and IRL experiences
Sub5 will know he's sub5 too

Stop the cope G
 
  • JFL
Reactions: CookieGuy
You don't know shit about what you're talking about, pictures are reliable, you guys just choose to cope and say "mirror mirror" instead, pictures are how life works, people in social settings will take pictures of you and post them, why wouldn't they be reliable
"but but filter and angles" then we will call them out on it, easy as fuck

And no women will treat you good if you're just fuckable, the moment a fuckable woman find interest in you, that means you're not ugly or at the minimum MTN
and Chad doesn't need to get called Chad by you online to know he's a chad, unless he lived in a monk Indian village with no woman around, chad knows he's chad because bitches get on his dick on tinder and IRL experiences
Sub5 will know he's sub5 too

Stop the cope G
You could still be MTN and treated like trash if ur a shy autistic nerd. I’m not talking about how girls treat you, I’m saying objective rates. And when I see photos I mean selfies and shit. Also everyone I know in photos looks 12 times worse in group setting photos, it’s not reliable.

You’re tweaking out bro. Did you ever read what Jason and I said?
 
An
You don't know shit about what you're talking about, pictures are reliable, you guys just choose to cope and say "mirror mirror" instead, pictures are how life works, people in social settings will take pictures of you and post them, why wouldn't they be reliable
"but but filter and angles" then we will call them out on it, easy as fuck

And no women will treat you good if you're just fuckable, the moment a fuckable woman find interest in you, that means you're not ugly or at the minimum MTN
and Chad doesn't need to get called Chad by you online to know he's a chad, unless he lived in a monk Indian village with no woman around, chad knows he's chad because bitches get on his dick on tinder and IRL experiences
Sub5 will know he's sub5 too

Stop the cope G
Angles can really make people look ugly. Angles and lighting, im not coping. Just look at this picture of Matt Bomer
IMG 6469



Group photos are not a reliable way to tell if someone is attractive or MTN. Maybe a group photos taken by a far away selfie in a normally lit room would be accurate. But they simply aren’t. Girls look at the selfies and shit, not far away group photos
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
You could still be MTN and treated like trash if ur a shy autistic nerd. I’m not talking about how girls treat you, I’m saying objective rates. And when I see photos I mean selfies and shit. Also everyone I know in photos looks 12 times worse in group setting photos, it’s not reliable.

You’re tweaking out bro. Did you ever read what Jason and I said?
An

Angles can really make people look ugly. Angles and lighting, im not coping. Just look at this picture of Matt Bomer View attachment 3358859


Group photos are not a reliable way to tell if someone is attractive or MTN. Maybe a group photos taken by a far away selfie in a normally lit room would be accurate. But they simply aren’t. Girls look at the selfies and shit, not far away group photos
So according to you, pictures aren't reliable, and how women treat you isn't reliable too?
So what's reliable? You're contradicting yourself
 
So according to you, pictures aren't reliable, and how women treat you isn't reliable too?
So what's reliable? You're contradicting yourself
I never said women treatment isn’t reliable. I simply said it doesn’t determine looks entirely. Other factors play into that. I’ve seen LTN’s (objective) with attention from girls.

I think forum ratings are the most reliable for facial attractiveness, but overall attractiveness is more measured by girls and stuff depending on your status, money, face; height, frame, etc. but in terms of facial rating forum rates are most reliable yeH
 
so agree, literally saw someone saying they were gonna kill themselves over a private rating today, felt bad genuinely
 
  • +1
Reactions: castizo_ascender

Similar threads

CookieGuy
Replies
41
Views
306
charliewillascend
charliewillascend
forevergymcelling
Replies
24
Views
745
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
castizo_ascender
Replies
26
Views
461
yyamann
yyamann
keanisSub3
Replies
29
Views
797
keanisSub3
keanisSub3

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top