This implant from Eppley is Next-Fucking-Level

[JohnRea]

I wonder how much it costs

 

[ChaddeusPeuterschmit]

I wonder how much it costs

I wonder what would happen if I punched him in the face?

 

[DianabolDownie]

I wonder what would happen if I punched him in the face?

instant death

 

[JohnRea]

Wo

I wonder what would happen if I punched him in the face?

Depens on what the implant is made of, I think.
If it's something durable and is fixed into the bones pretty good, then if anything the implant should give bigger resistence to something like a punch for example.

But of course, I'm making an assumption on a limited amount knowledge that I posses.

 

[OCDMaxxing]

lol, imagine all the bone erosion over time, shifting and general risks...insane
How the fuck can you function normally with so much foreign shit in your face

 

[Amnesia]

Lol is it purely cosmetic of did this nikka get in some severe car accident and needs reconstructive shit done

INSANE

 

[Norwooder]

I wonder how much it costs

That man eppley has severe physchological issues. You have got to be genuinely retarded to consider this or lefort 3, to think ud even look better after this is absurd. You facial muscles cannot adapt to that much change, people can see uve had surgery and looks unnatural.

 

[.👽.]

Jaw and under eye are legit. Never heard of skull implant

 

[Gosick]

@facemaxxed

thls you ? lol

 

[Vidyacoper]

face implant wtf

 

[chadpreetinthemaking]

Lol is it purely cosmetic of did this nikka get in some severe car accident and needs reconstructive shit done

INSANE

Im 100% certain some PSL autist got this done, im sure of it, its augmenting his brow ridge, jawline zygos and undereyes, no bluepill niggas decide to augment brow ridge

 

[zq336]

That man eppley has severe physchological issues. You have got to be genuinely retarded to consider this or lefort 3, to think ud even look better after this is absurd. You facial muscles cannot adapt to that much change, people can see uve had surgery and looks unnatural.

If the overall thicknesses are small it's fine... The biggest risk with this is trying to predict whether these shape changes will look good or not, which is hard when you're doing so many changes at once.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

lol, imagine all the bone erosion over time, shifting and general risks...insane
How the fuck can you function normally with so much foreign shit in your face

Bone erosion is caused by silicone implants only.

 

[Gosick]

lol, imagine all the bone erosion over time, shifting and general risks...insane
How the fuck can you function normally with so much foreign shit in your face

lmaglne what would happen lf he got punched ln the face really hard

 

[zq336]

Bone erosion is caused by silicone implants only.

Bone erosion happens for 0-2 mm in the chin only, implant material doesn't matter.

 

[Deleted member 4054]

Bone erosion happens for 0-2 mm in the chin only, implant material doesn't matter.

I had about 6mm and 3mm of erosion at my right and left jaw angle respectively after just 1 year of off the shelf silicon jaw angle implants. I've also seen CT scans of people with silicon cheek implants where the implant eroded all the way into the maxillary sinus. It's a phenomenon pretty much exclusive to non fixated off the shelf implants

 

[Deleted member 2846]

gotta be an asian bc of the nose bridge implant

 

[Deleted member 2012]

Bone erosion happens for 0-2 mm in the chin only, implant material doesn't matter.

Why would it only happen in the chin? It’s not like the chin bone is made of a different type of bone than the zygos for example.
Either implants cause erosion on all bones, or none.

 

[Golden Glass]

If only we had the photo before and afters

 

[Deleted member 2933]

I had about 6mm and 3mm of erosion at my right and left jaw angle respectively after just 1 year of off the shelf silicon jaw angle implants. I've also seen CT scans of people with silicon cheek implants where the implant eroded all the way into the maxillary sinus. It's a phenomenon pretty much exclusive to non fixated off the shelf implants

Insane bro, 6mm erosion is looksmining. Implants must be rigid and fixed on the bones, silicone is a meme, eppley is a meme.

 

[Deleted member 4054]

Insane bro, 6mm erosion is looksmining. Implants must be rigid and fixed on the bones, silicone is a meme, eppley is a meme.

Here's the ct. Anyone who says it's only a mm or two and just in the chin is either lying or doesn't know better.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

Here's the ct. Anyone who says it's only a mm or two and just in the chin is either lying or doesn't know better.

View attachment 264329

Thats what i say, only real life experience matters, since 99,9% of the forum never had any surgery its pointless to argue with anyone. My Dr is also against silicone

 

[curryslayerordeath]

Thats what i say, only real life experience matters, since 99,9% of the forum never had any surgery its pointless to argue with anyone. My Dr is also against silicone

Why does silicon cause bone erosion but other materials don't? Is it some intrinsic material quality thing or just the method that its screwed in by?

 

[Deleted member 1751]

Implan version of the lefort 100

 

[Casadonis]

Why would it only happen in the chin? It’s not like the chin bone is made of a different type of bone than the zygos for example.
Either implants cause erosion on all bones, or none.

If I remember correctly it is because the muscles around the chin have stronger pulling forces in regards to an implant than say cheek muscles and zygo implants


Eppley should call this the T-800 of facial implants

 

[Deleted member 2012]

If I remember correctly it is because the muscles around the chin have stronger pulling forces in regards to an implant than say cheek muscles and zygo implants

That actually makes sense.

 

[kota]

I had about 6mm and 3mm of erosion at my right and left jaw angle respectively after just 1 year of off the shelf silicon jaw angle implants. I've also seen CT scans of people with silicon cheek implants where the implant eroded all the way into the maxillary sinus. It's a phenomenon pretty much exclusive to non fixated off the shelf implants

Do you think screw fixated infraorbital / cheek implants would be safe in terms of bone erosion?

 

[Deleted member 4054]

Do you think screw fixated infraorbital / cheek implants would be safe in terms of bone erosion?

I would think it would be very minimal, yeah

 

[Deleted member 4466]

Why would it only happen in the chin? It’s not like the chin bone is made of a different type of bone than the zygos for example.
Either implants cause erosion on all bones, or none.

It’s because of the force the surrounding muscles exert on the implant against the bone (and even then, this only happens when the implant isn’t fixated to the bone.) Muscles contract every time you chew food, yawn, and every time you speak. This movement is what creates the friction and thus erosion of bone with a chin implant vs malar/orbital implant. Also AFAIK all cases of bone erosion were involving implants that had not been fixated to the underlying bone structure. The movement is what causes friction which causes erosion

Insane bro, 6mm erosion is looksmining. Implants must be rigid and fixed on the bones, silicone is a meme, eppley is a meme.

Bro, do you realize that Eppley’s implants are both rigid AND fixed to the bone with screws? No offense but you seem to be contradicting your own thoughts

 

[zq336]

I had about 6mm and 3mm of erosion at my right and left jaw angle respectively after just 1 year of off the shelf silicon jaw angle implants. I've also seen CT scans of people with silicon cheek implants where the implant eroded all the way into the maxillary sinus. It's a phenomenon pretty much exclusive to non fixated off the shelf implants

Yeah you're right, I should have been more specific.

Off the shelf implants are more likely to cause erosion due to the uneven pressures they exert on the bone, and unscrewed implants can also cause erosion due to micro-movements of the implant.

Custom implants fit to the bone and are usually screwed in, so erosion is mostly a non issue. Over the chin however, the tissue pad is a bit tighter so there's more pressure compared to other implants. But I've seen studies that most people only get 0-1 mm erosion in the chin, and at most it's 2 mm.

I don't think material of the implant matters, it's more about the pressure applied to the bone. I've seen my CT scans after my lefort 1, and the titanium plates they used also caused imprints.

I don't think it's a continuous process though, the erosion happens as the implant settles in and then stops.

 

[Deleted member 2933]

It’s because of the force the surrounding muscles exert on the implant against the bone (and even then, this only happens when the implant isn’t fixated to the bone.) Muscles contract every time you chew food, yawn, and every time you speak. This movement is what creates the friction and thus erosion of bone with a chin implant vs malar/orbital implant. Also AFAIK all cases of bone erosion were involving implants that had not been fixated to the underlying bone structure. The movement is what causes friction which causes erosion

Bro, do you realize that Eppley’s implants are both rigid AND fixed to the bone with screws? No offense but you seem to be contradicting your own thoughts

Silicone is not a rigid material, its flexibe.
Have u had any cosmetic surgery?

Why does silicon cause bone erosion but other materials don't? Is it some intrinsic material quality thing or just the method that its screwed in by?

My Dr said its because of the pressure which the silicone makes on the bone. A 100% rigid material with screw will only touch the bone.

 

[Boneisdestiny]

That’s gonna have tons of issues sheesh

Yeah you're right, I should have been more specific.

Off the shelf implants are more likely to cause erosion due to the uneven pressures they exert on the bone, and unscrewed implants can also cause erosion due to micro-movements of the implant.

Custom implants fit to the bone and are usually screwed in, so erosion is mostly a non issue. Over the chin however, the tissue pad is a bit tighter so there's more pressure compared to other implants. But I've seen studies that most people only get 0-1 mm erosion in the chin, and at most it's 2 mm.

I don't think material of the implant matters, it's more about the pressure applied to the bone. I've seen my CT scans after my lefort 1, and the titanium plates they used also caused imprints.

I don't think it's a continuous process though, the erosion happens as the implant settles in and then stops.

Did Lefort get you to ascend?

 

[Deleted member 4466]

Silicone is not a rigid material, its flexibe.
Have u had any cosmetic surgery?



My Dr said its because of the pressure which the silicone makes on the bone. A 100% rigid material with screw will only touch the bone.

By my understanding, it is flexible enough to bend slightly, which is helpful during surgery because it allows smaller incisions to be sufficient, but once it is fixated to the bone, it feels hard to the touch in a way that feels identical to actual bone. I haven’t had any implants myself, but I’ve had bimax. Implants are still something I’m interested in, particularly the infraorbital/malar region. I am curious about how a different material would make any difference to the issue of erosion (which is caused by friction of the implant moving around, we agree on this? and it can thus be prevented by screw fixation regardless of material type?) Also curious how would a different material type affect pressure being placed on the bone?

 

[Nosecel]

Salvation

 

[Deleted member 2933]

By my understanding, it is flexible enough to bend slightly, which is helpful during surgery because it allows smaller incisions to be sufficient, but once it is fixated to the bone, it feels hard to the touch in a way that feels identical to actual bone. I haven’t had any implants myself, but I’ve had bimax. Implants are still something I’m interested in, particularly the infraorbital/malar region. I am curious about how a different material would make any difference to the issue of erosion (which is caused by friction of the implant moving around, we agree on this? and it can thus be prevented by screw fixation regardless of material type?) Also curious how would a different material type affect pressure being placed on the bone?

Whoah u looksmax then, greycels are the real looksmaxers tho. Well, its pure logic the silicone implant is flexible, so the muscle force press it on the bone. An 100% rigid implant(u have 6 plus rigid kinds of materials avalaible) will be screwed to the bone but since its rigid it cannot the muscle pressure ends at the implant.

 

[Brandon10]

Wtf is wrong with some people seriously

 

[Dogs]

All yall laughing right now but this guy is a true looksmaxxer

 

[Linoob]

Imagine the silicone eroding your entire skull / face

Silicone is not a rigid material, its flexibe.
Have u had any cosmetic surgery?



My Dr said its because of the pressure which the silicone makes on the bone. A 100% rigid material with screw will only touch the bone.

It's due to micromovements caused by implants that are not fixated.

Fixating an implant to your skull if anything would only cause more pressure
imagine getting an infection and being told 75% needs to come out

@Adrenochrome

 

[draco]

imagine getting an infection and being told 75% needs to come out

Tbh the risk of infection is in every type of surgery...

Fixating an implant to your skull if anything would only cause more pressure

It's the non fixated implants doing the erosion.