This is the type of man average woman eventually have to settle with

vinn98

vinn98

The Apex Predator
Joined
Dec 7, 2021
Posts
5,804
Reputation
11,181
Fkn gross lmao. They eventually learn in reality that there's not enough chads to go around for each of them to get one 😄

 
  • JFL
Reactions: Banasura
Just as most men who have to settle for a LTB or die alone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: zeshama, MaxillaMaxing, Deleted member 27472 and 7 others
he's better looking than her
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sub0, VenatorLuparius, rg1235 and 5 others
Average cuck pure breed. Disgusting in every way.
 
Skinny fat, balding, beard, not tall and soy. Yep typical below average ugly normie joe
 
Polish Janusz- husband
 

Attachments

  • Roman Kurski.png
    Roman Kurski.png
    459.3 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: poopoohead
Just as most men who have to settle for a LTB or die alone.
Yes but a LTB is still decently physically attractive to men. The black pill is most married women aren't even attracted to their husbands, I'd bet many are actually repulsed by them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: VenatorLuparius
Ugly old roastie :sick:
 
Yes but a LTB is still decently physically attractive to men. The black pill is most married women aren't even attracted to their husbands, I'd bet many are actually repulsed by them.
men and female looks should be valued the same if both provided the same things

women ARE their looks, men aren't

and btw the guy is an hair transplant away from mogging her
 
Last edited:
? how so, lol
women success in life highly depends on their looks, because it's the thing that they have to offer

just the first result of a quick search

even in a field were you should be valued on your skills. their beauty gives the a greater boost compared to men

imagine in a field where you valued can't be measured by any metrics, how much their looks are an advantage
1689707605591

 
Last edited:
women success in life highly depends on their looks, because it's the thing that they have to offer

just the first result of a quick search
View attachment 2327424
My bad I misread. "Highly dependends", yes that's true.

But to a certain degree this is also the same with men.
 
Last edited:
I'm not feminist or anything but this is an extremely dumb take. If you are smart / have some nice skills, you will get jobs/positions that make you money (because you will make money for your boss).

But in case, yes, attractiveness will influence one's success in life (but this is true for both men and women).
its surely true for both men and women, but if you read properly the bias is skewed more towards women, and this is a job where you are evaluated on your hard skills, imagine in common jobs how easier they have it

Cmon how many men are stay at home dad? Even a LTB can decide she doesn't want to work from tomorrow and she'll still find someone who will provide for the rest of her life....
 
Poly marriage
 
Both are subhuman, plus she is slav. They have the same smv
 
I know a huge ex slut who eventually settled with this type of guy . Just mind boggling
 
Fkn gross lmao. They eventually learn in reality that there's not enough chads to go around for each of them to get one 😄


They are looksmatched imho
 
Purebred soy cuck, only the finest purity of breed

Can't even begin to imagine the sheer amount of cope they have to be on to still be alive.
 
its surely true for both men and women, but if you read properly the bias is skewed more towards women, and this is a job where you are evaluated on your hard skills, imagine in common jobs how easier they have it

Cmon how many men are stay at home dad? Even a LTB can decide she doesn't want to work from tomorrow and she'll still find someone who will provide for the rest of her life....
Ltb no. Even for girls, if they are not htn and above, they have very little guarantee to find someone who would set them up for life in a betabux arrangement. (at least not a wealthy guy).
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 31445
Both look like shit
 
Ltb no. Even for girls, if they are not htn and above, they have very little guarantee to find someone who would set them up for life in a betabux arrangement. (at least not a wealthy guy).
if a guy isn't willing to betabux a divorce and government tampons will do the job
 
Are they really looksmatched? I can't even tell with women now since I spend so much time looking at guys (no homo)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18582
This is why there is no punishment/consequences for women. No matter what they do, at any point in life they can pull some beta cuck like this
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead
Are they really looksmatched? I can't even tell with women now since I spend so much time looking at guys (no homo)
After doing some more research this is her twin brother, so this is her male genetic equivalent. Not ugly but not dimorphic either.

 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead
women success in life highly depends on their looks, because it's the thing that they have to offer

just the first result of a quick search

even in a field were you should be valued on your skills. their beauty gives the a greater boost compared to men

imagine in a field where you valued can't be measured by any metrics, how much their looks are an advantage
View attachment 2327424
Most studies say the opposite, mens looks have a greater impact on their earning potential than women's looks do.



Eva Sierminska said, ā€œOur societies reward investments in physical appearance. Contrary to some expectations, men benefit more in the labor market from investing in good looks than women.ā€

Research shows that:

  • Physically attractive workers earn up to 15% more than those considered less or unattractive
  • The beauty pay gap is larger for men than for women
  • Good looking employees benefit their employer, especially if their job demands interaction with customers or clients, because people prefer to interact with attractive people
  • The beauty gap starts in childhood with beautiful children attracting more attention and developing more confidence than their "plainer" peers
  • Good-looking people are paid higher wages to do the same jobs as less attractive peers
  • Attractive people receive far more call-backs for interviews, indicating employers judge that plainer applicants will be less capable in their jobs
The report states that conventionally attractive people receive between 10 and 15% more money to do their jobs that those considered ā€œhomely.ā€ Less attractive people must work harder and be more productive in order to achieve the same wage.

Empirical results support the existence of a ā€œbeauty premiumā€ in society: One study shows that attractive workers increase a firm’s revenue by more than the money it takes to cover their higher wages, so their good looks do enhance the profitability and success of the firm.

The report states that the effects of appearance on wages are stronger for men than for women. Good looking men receive higher salaries right from the beginning of their careers but women’s salaries do not show a ā€œbeauty effectā€ at the start of their careers. The better-looking women earn more as their career develops. The effect of beauty also differs between the genders with age: good looking older men continue to earn more, whereas the beauty wage gap decreases for older women.


Studies in the US and Canada report that less-attractive men incur a 9% penalty in hourly earnings, while those who are deemed as having above-average attractiveness receive an earnings premium of 5%. Women, on the other hand, receive a lower beauty premium than men of around 4%, and a similar plainness penalty as men of about 5% in hourly earnings. Other research that captures information about good looks at younger ages indicates that men who are rated as ā€œhomelyā€ at both age seven and 11 incur a large and significant pay penalty of 15% later in life. This pattern also applies to their female counterparts, with a lower penalty for plain looks of about 11% [1]. In contrast, 30 to 50-year-old attractive women are likely to receive a high beauty premium (15%) in the Czech Republic, whereas similar men receive no premium [12]. Trends for wage penalties are similar, with men continuing to receive higher penalties than women for being less attractive.

Within occupations, effects for men are also stronger than for women. One study shows that good-looking men receive higher salaries at the beginning of their careers and continue to earn more over time. Women's starting salaries, however, do not exhibit a beauty effect; but better-looking women do earn more with experience than their average-looking counterparts. A study examining payoffs of law school graduates from the 1970s and 1980s finds that even five years after graduation there is still a statistically significant effect of physical appearance on male, but not on female wages [1].

Besides earnings and labor force participation, other economic outcomes have been studied to examine the effect of physical appearance and to compare the differences between women and men. In universities, for example, evaluations by students are used as an indicator of teaching performance. Since teachers’ salaries are partly conditional on positive teaching evaluations and because physical attractiveness may affect students’ class ratings of their teachers, beauty may have an indirect impact on teachers’ salaries. Here again, there is a differential effect for women and men. Studies find that the effect of physical appearance on class ratings for female teachers is less than half that of male teachers.



https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780080970868940157?via=ihub

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261420/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268580918760431
 
Most studies say the opposite, mens looks have a greater impact on their earning potential than women's looks do.



Eva Sierminska said, ā€œOur societies reward investments in physical appearance. Contrary to some expectations, men benefit more in the labor market from investing in good looks than women.ā€

Research shows that:

  • Physically attractive workers earn up to 15% more than those considered less or unattractive
  • The beauty pay gap is larger for men than for women
  • Good looking employees benefit their employer, especially if their job demands interaction with customers or clients, because people prefer to interact with attractive people
  • The beauty gap starts in childhood with beautiful children attracting more attention and developing more confidence than their "plainer" peers
  • Good-looking people are paid higher wages to do the same jobs as less attractive peers
  • Attractive people receive far more call-backs for interviews, indicating employers judge that plainer applicants will be less capable in their jobs
The report states that conventionally attractive people receive between 10 and 15% more money to do their jobs that those considered ā€œhomely.ā€ Less attractive people must work harder and be more productive in order to achieve the same wage.

Empirical results support the existence of a ā€œbeauty premiumā€ in society: One study shows that attractive workers increase a firm’s revenue by more than the money it takes to cover their higher wages, so their good looks do enhance the profitability and success of the firm.

The report states that the effects of appearance on wages are stronger for men than for women. Good looking men receive higher salaries right from the beginning of their careers but women’s salaries do not show a ā€œbeauty effectā€ at the start of their careers. The better-looking women earn more as their career develops. The effect of beauty also differs between the genders with age: good looking older men continue to earn more, whereas the beauty wage gap decreases for older women.


Studies in the US and Canada report that less-attractive men incur a 9% penalty in hourly earnings, while those who are deemed as having above-average attractiveness receive an earnings premium of 5%. Women, on the other hand, receive a lower beauty premium than men of around 4%, and a similar plainness penalty as men of about 5% in hourly earnings. Other research that captures information about good looks at younger ages indicates that men who are rated as ā€œhomelyā€ at both age seven and 11 incur a large and significant pay penalty of 15% later in life. This pattern also applies to their female counterparts, with a lower penalty for plain looks of about 11% [1]. In contrast, 30 to 50-year-old attractive women are likely to receive a high beauty premium (15%) in the Czech Republic, whereas similar men receive no premium [12]. Trends for wage penalties are similar, with men continuing to receive higher penalties than women for being less attractive.

Within occupations, effects for men are also stronger than for women. One study shows that good-looking men receive higher salaries at the beginning of their careers and continue to earn more over time. Women's starting salaries, however, do not exhibit a beauty effect; but better-looking women do earn more with experience than their average-looking counterparts. A study examining payoffs of law school graduates from the 1970s and 1980s finds that even five years after graduation there is still a statistically significant effect of physical appearance on male, but not on female wages [1].

Besides earnings and labor force participation, other economic outcomes have been studied to examine the effect of physical appearance and to compare the differences between women and men. In universities, for example, evaluations by students are used as an indicator of teaching performance. Since teachers’ salaries are partly conditional on positive teaching evaluations and because physical attractiveness may affect students’ class ratings of their teachers, beauty may have an indirect impact on teachers’ salaries. Here again, there is a differential effect for women and men. Studies find that the effect of physical appearance on class ratings for female teachers is less than half that of male teachers.



https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780080970868940157?via=ihub

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261420/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268580918760431
as for everything there are going to be different outcomes depending on the study

study n1 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780080970868940157?via=ihub you linked says


1689715826053

jfl at believeng a study that says "it's gender role fault" for obesity in women ahahah

------------------------------------------------------
study n2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261420/ you linked says


1689715609964

without even trying to explain how are they more complicated (aka they have higher standards but it wasn't serving their interests so they didn't include it)
------------------------------------------
study n3 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268580918760431 you linked says says that good looking women recieve higher salary compared good looking men ahahah

1689715330366
 

Attachments

  • 1689714974148.png
    1689714974148.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 0
  • 1689715552198.png
    1689715552198.png
    105.1 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
since when being slav is bad? much better than being western....
Slavs have round faces and asian admixture. Westerners have sharper chad type features. Its a halo for men and s falio for women. Its like a more advanced form of being asian.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31445
Fkn gross lmao. They eventually learn in reality that there's not enough chads to go around for each of them to get one 😄


He’s tall prolly which is ideal for most women, medium-ugly tall pill
 
  • +1
Reactions: CuriousGuy

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top