h111
Kraken
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2024
- Posts
- 3,935
- Reputation
- 6,672
Some people say mid mtn means average, some say low ltn means average. Why cant we create a universal system where we know what average is supposed to be?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Way more simple1-10 honestly mogs
With 5 being average
3.5 PSL and 5 on normal scaleSome people say mid mtn means average, some say low ltn means average. Why cant we create a universal system where we know what average is supposed to be?
So much better
This should be rating system but PSL autists beg to differ
I get rated 4 to 6 depending irlWay more simple
High LTN - Low MTN is technically equivalent to 5/10This should be rating system but PSL autists beg to differ
Pm me ill rateI get rated 4 to 6 depending irl
in a 1-10 scale you're being compared to where you stand against the 10's and the 1's, 5 isn't the actual average.1-10 honestly mogs
With 5 being average
No, 5 just means the average looking guy. And the average looking guy doesnt look too great, but thats still a 5in a 1-10 scale you're being compared to where you stand against the 10's and the 1's, 5 isn't the actual average.
it's not on a population level and human appearance isn't a bell curve, on a 1-10 scale most people are around 2-3, they're closer to 1 by far than they are to 10.
5 means neutral, it means you're neither attractive nor repulsive, the average person is not neutral, models are neutral.
if 1 is ugly and 10 is pretty then 5 assumes neither.No, 5 just means the average looking guy. And the average looking guy doesnt look too great, but thats still a 5
nigga stop trying to over complicate stuffif 1 is ugly and 10 is pretty then 5 assumes neither.
5 has never meant average, it means neutral, and average people are not neutral in their appearance, the average person is ugly.