This site cannot rate women for shit

[TheVoidInside]

Women's attractiveness is determined by how easily she can make a guy cum. A woman can get away with certain features that a man couldn't get away with such as big eyes, low set cheekbones, lack of forward growth etc.

Because for women, there is so much more flunctuation when it comes to their attractiveness than there is for men. We know very well what features make a guy attractive and the more of these features he has, the more attractive he is considered.

But in the case of women, this isn't so simple since they can pull features that men cannot pull. You can see it with siblings for example where the sister is an HTB while the brother is an ltn simply because their features dont work on both genders.

Also, this forum heavily underrates girls and overrates guys. Women are mostly capped at MTB for some reason while htn ratings are give away like nothing. And even if a girl fits the forum's " female beauty standards", people will still rate her low out of spite ig?

 

[romanstock]

Yeah, like you trying to call Goddess Sophia a basic bitch.

 

[Clqs]

My ratings are the only ones that count

 

[Meteor21]

Simp ass thread, they wear make-up and men still mog them.

 

[CelestialEmpire]

if theyre not 6'7 25" bidelt north atlantid jawfogger WASP, theyre not stacy

 

[TheVoidInside]

Simp ass thread, they wear make-up and men still mog them

cope

 

[TheVoidInside]

if theyre not 6'7 25" bidelt north atlantid jawfogger WASP, theyre not stacy

and even if they are, the forum will still find a way to underrate them

 

[Meteor21]

cope

No

 

[HostSamurai]

if theyre not 6'7 25" bidelt north atlantid jawfogger WASP, theyre not stacy

Where can I find such women

 

[CelestialEmpire]

Where can I find such women

london