I don't think It works like that. Everyone in that video Is different, some are chads some are lites, but in the end they're all beatiful in their different ways. We're Just hardwired to recognize good ratios, good Development, It doesn't really matter Who Is the most beatiful at that point if everyone reaches a certain threshold for which he's pleasant to the eyes
Yea but you’re assuming everyone is of the same height, no racism is present and still there are socioeconomics factors.
Yeah ofc a perfect society has a minimum height of 1.80. racism Is Just lookism, no handsome indian or black Is getting disrespected. Socioeconomic factors may be a thing, but they're not so relevant when looks are present either way, people respect good looks regardless of their position.
Yea I get ur point but with a minimum height of 1.80 the standard is going to rise to “2 meters minimum to be considered Chad” etc
I don't think It works that way. Height Is required for good body proportions, the taller isn't the Better, 2.10+ meters men are considered freaks. It's all about having a good Harmony, good proportions, then there are different ways of being beatiful, not everyone needs to look the same, but everyone ideally would Need to have those facial ratios and Development that signals good genetics.
She's Stacy, sweaty
There are bro, it’s the reason nordics are so damn tall. Hyper uncontrolled hypergamy
Sweaty
There Is 1 black and 1 cinese guy. Racism Is Just lookism.
They're not that tall. Average height Is North Italy Is 180 cm, in Scandinavia Is basically the same, only the Netherlands Is merely 3 cms taller. A 2.10 meters man Is considered a freak everywhere
Yeah i didn't make the video and It wasn't my point. Looks trascend race, they're an universal language.
