Thoughts on genetic editing? Is it a viable as a moral alternative to eugenics?

[IHATEINDIANS]

for those who don't know genetic editing is basically exactly that, synthetically altering the structure of your genes to make you tall, specific features, etc. currently I believe it is still 99% in development but has been used to treat expdcted genetic diseases / defects if i recall correctly


IMO, genetic editing (or eugenics for that matter) won't do shit, because even if everyone looks good, women date off percentile. Indian foids will date the top 15% in India which is probably like bottom 10% in Sweden for example (the women will prefer the top 15% there). Not sure if it will do much good unless everyone looks absolutely perfect, but again I'm not sure if that's a legit capability

But if it really does work like that maybe it'd be for the better, even if it'll make the older generations life suck like shit getting mogged by a 6'3 Chad around every corner.

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

I'd say gene editing is the lesser evil. It's more cruel to kill off a failed experiment than it is to attempt perfection.

 

[batman1997]

Gene editing isnt safe

 

[Deleted member 153834]

you think it'll only be 6'3" chads? lmfao dude, in 2070 the average is going to be 7'5" PSL GOD, literally having a single pimple will ruin your life forever in the future, people will look like gods

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

I'd say gene editing is the lesser evil. It's more cruel to kill off a failed experiment than it is to attempt perfection.

I guess my title is kind of stupid since it obviously is more moral. I meant to phrase it as if it is a viable solution to inceldom due to it being more moral to eugenics