TIGERMOGGERLOL DIMO EDIT

registerfasterusing

registerfasterusing

Guccifer
Joined
Oct 12, 2024
Posts
19,172
Reputation
31,726


@Tigermoggerlol YES we FAILED NNN again to this
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: browncurrycel, iblamexyz, Tigermoggerlol and 2 others
  • JFL
Reactions: qxdr, iblamexyz, registerfasterusing and 1 other person
Overrated.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing and iblamexyz
registerfasterusing said:


@Tigermoggerlol YES we FAILED NNN again to this
Click to expand...

This the dimo formula
IMG 9613
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: pfl, qxdr, browncurrycel and 3 others
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: qxdr, registerfasterusing, Mogs Me and 1 other person
Klasik616 said:
Is this formula the same for both genders? Where's the foid one.
Click to expand...
Nah this for men I don’t have the women one on me currently
 
  • +1
Reactions: qxdr and registerfasterusing
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Klasik616, Tigermoggerlol and Mogs Me
registerfasterusing said:
For women its js how big are ur tits how small ur waist how wide ur hips and how fat ur ass @Mogsgymmaxx
Click to expand...
Nah it’s there midface, lip fullness, philtrum curve, brow tilt, neck width, cheek bone setness, eye tilt and 2 more things I don’t remember
 
  • JFL
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Tigermoggerlol said:
Nah it’s there midface, lip fullness, philtrum curve, brow tilt, neck width, cheek bone setness, eye tilt and 2 more things I don’t remember
Click to expand...
Face fat, eye size.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Dimorphism is almost certainly a great predictor for men's attractiveness to women, but for men it's not. Women show a very high prevalence of being attracted to women, i.e., feminine traits probably because it allows them to bond with other women which is necessary for them. So for women attraction is multidimensional. We all intuitively know this, a woman who looks very masculine has much less reproductive success than men who look very feminine. In fact, very feminine man can have high appeal.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Tenres said:
Dimorphism is almost certainly a great predictor for men's attractiveness to women, but for men it's not. Women show a very high prevalence of being attracted to women, i.e., feminine traits probably because it allows them to bond with other women which is necessary for them. So for women attraction is multidimensional. We all intuitively know this, a woman who looks very masculine has much less reproductive success than men who look very feminine. In fact, very feminine man can have high appeal.
Click to expand...
Wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
registerfasterusing said:
Wrong
Click to expand...
Another problem is what's functional won't always be attractive. For example, if the stronger man overpowers and rapes a woman, and she bears his child, then no where in that does evolution select for the attraction to that trait because its irrelevant. So if a higher dimorphism and high fighting success traits could just lead men to conquering and pillaging other tribes, then no where is that being evolutionarily selected for attraction. When attraction is selected for is when there is free choice, and the women who choose a certain man (this applies vice versa as well, of course), and therefore have genetic disposition to be attracted to that man, that pass on those genetics with greater reproductive success. Without choice, attraction is irrelevant and is therefore not being selected for.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Klasik616 and registerfasterusing
Klasik616 said:
Prettyboys are cope, only JBs want to breed with prettyboys. High dimo Chad gets pussy faster.
Click to expand...
JBs are all that matter. They are the healthiest and prettiest.

"Only the youngest and most fertile want to breed with pretty boys. Ugly old hags want high dimo"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Tenres said:
Another problem is what's functional won't always be attractive. For example, if the stronger man overpowers and rapes a woman, and she bears his child, then no where in that does evolution select for the attraction to that trait because it’s irrelevant. So if a higher dimorphism and high fighting success traits could just lead men to conquering and pillaging other tribes, then no where is that being evolutionarily selected for attraction. When attraction is selected for is when there is free choice, and the women who choose a certain man (this applies vice versa as well, of course), and therefore have genetic disposition to be attracted to that man, that pass on those genetics with greater reproductive success. Without choice, attraction is irrelevant and is therefore not being selected for.
Click to expand...
Another black victory
 
Tenres said:
Another problem is what's functional won't always be attractive. For example, if the stronger man overpowers and rapes a woman, and she bears his child, then no where in that does evolution select for the attraction to that trait because its irrelevant. So if a higher dimorphism and high fighting success traits could just lead men to conquering and pillaging other tribes, then no where is that being evolutionarily selected for attraction. When attraction is selected for is when there is free choice, and the women who choose a certain man (this applies vice versa as well, of course), and therefore have genetic disposition to be attracted to that man, that pass on those genetics with greater reproductive success. Without choice, attraction is irrelevant and is therefore not being selected for.
Click to expand...
Typing Keyboard GIF
 
  • JFL
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Klasik616 said:
Typing Keyboard GIF
Click to expand...
I'm just throwing theories out and hoping someone intelligent picks up and gives their own commentary.

The point about women being attracted to other women is very true though, that is just evident.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: registerfasterusing
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol
Tenres said:
I'm just throwing theories out and hoping someone intelligent picks up and gives their own commentary.

The point about women being attracted to other women is very true though, that is just evident.
Click to expand...
Chatgpt
 
registerfasterusing said:
Ok what did u do for ur first appointment
Click to expand...
My first time it was just contouring barely did anything to my harmony or dimo just made my jaw look sharper. I didn’t acc start injecting to fit certain ratios and dimo requirements till later on
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Tigermoggerlol said:
My first time it was just contouring barely did anything to my harmony or dimo just made my jaw look sharper. I didn’t acc start injecting to fit certain ratios and dimo requirements till later on
Click to expand...
How many ml did u get in chin and ramus and how much did it cost is what im wondering
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol
pfl said:
Give examples of tier 1 for each one
Click to expand...
Im lazy nigga☠️ but to make it short and sweet drago is a nigga who has all tier 1s
IMG 9618
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: registerfasterusing and pfl
registerfasterusing said:
How many ml did u get in chin and ramus and how much did it cost is what im wondering
Click to expand...
It’s $690 per ml and $22 if u do it yourself. Ideally if you 1-2 ml on your chin depending on the recession
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: registerfasterusing and pfl
pfl said:
Looks too long
Imo hexum has perfect ramus length
Or chace crawford
Click to expand...
It’s still good just on the longer end of ideal. Hexum is good tho yeah but idk abt chase Crawford
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl and registerfasterusing
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top