Tiktok fringe is cringe

mog

  • Top

    Votes: 6 28.6%
  • Bottom

    Votes: 15 71.4%

  • Total voters
    21
๕ඞChick3ncu1ry

๕ඞChick3ncu1ry

Gymceling everyday
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Posts
24,341
Reputation
20,695
1689447346471

It makes you look like pubescent good for primary school maxxing. Failo for >16 yo





This is high class high status not some ooffy doofy kiddo like the one on top
1689447415034
1689447405717
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane, Deleted member 31953, juste and 2 others
every zoomie has this haircut bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheDragon
every zoomie has this haircut bro
I am having the top haircut with perm. I descended hard for some reason I look much more appealing without covering my forehead.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23239
I am having the top haircut with perm. I descended hard for some reason I look much more appealing without covering my forehead.
0 mm sides 1 cm top thats what man has for a haircut
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 41284, Deleted member 29167 and Debetro
0 mm sides 1 cm top thats what man has for a haircut
that's called ogre haircut nobody find that appealing. I was refering to subtle side part like Chico.
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover, Deleted member 29167 and Debetro
if u have square forehead you should not cover ur forehead imo
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: ๕ඞChick3ncu1ry
it's trendy because subhumans discovered they can hide half of their skull with it. you need to be able to rock both this and a buzzcut to be real gl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane, DrKlinefelterPhdMd, TheDragon and 4 others
This broccoli haircut is only here to hide their recessed hairline and jbs likes that shit so idkn.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 31497, Xangsane, It'snotover and 2 others
Every aesthetic we go gym teenager has a fringe/wavy haircut
 
it's trendy because subhumans discovered they can hide half of their skull with it. you need to be able to rock both this and a buzzcut to be real gl.
9cd22483c474cd319bfc84700377cf6e974c440d9882fe8a4291751976d0294c 1
same with hoodies
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 31497, Deleted member 32486, DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 2 others
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd, It'snotover and Deleted member 29167
i remember when i was a wimp skulled kid with no jaw, i LOVED hoodies. i thought they made me mysterious and charming, in reality they were covering my subhumanity so i could actually see myself as human lo
Same for me but then i found buzzcuts:feelsgood:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the BULL

 
  • JFL
Reactions: It'snotover
Same for me but then i found buzzcuts:feelsgood:
buzzcut is 0 or 100
it either exposes your subhumanity, or you mog everyone with giga masc skull. i cannot try it, if i fail i lose a good month of even thinking about girls.
 
buzzcut is 0 or 100
it either exposes your subhumanity, or you mog everyone with giga masc skull. i cannot try it, if i fail i lose a good month of even thinking about girls.
I had it when i was younger cause i have a good skull, But now im growing my hair out im in the awkward stage of hair growth
 
  • +1
Reactions: the BULL
  • JFL
Reactions: the BULL
Unfortunately they do good with prime women
they do good with some 17 yo jb, until they reach college and meet muscular high t chad for the first time, then they become the gay friends.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and Debetro
they do good with some 17 yo jb, until they reach college and meet muscular high t chad for the first time, then they become the gay friends.
Jbs are everything in life. But I agree, although they can become high t lookimg if they cut their hair, but most of the time it's not the case
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the BULL
Jbs are everything in life. But I agree, although they can become high t lookimg if they cut their hair, but most of the time it's not the case
c'mon jbs are a cope. jbs almost never fog 21-25 yo girls.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 41284 and Xangsane
c'mon jbs are a cope. jbs almost never fog 21-25 yo girls.
25 is too much, always permafrauding with makeup cuz already look bad. 18-23 are good
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the BULL
25 is too much, always permafrauding with makeup cuz already look bad. 18-23 are good
it doesn't matter if it's frauded. plus they compensate with bigger asses and boobs, so they're hotter overall.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 41284, It'snotover and Debetro
it doesn't matter if it's frauded. plus they compensate with bigger asses and boobs, so they're hotter overall.
Jfl


All the jbs crying in comments. This is why tiktokfags are nowhere near close real chads and PSL gods. Only a few are genuinely good looking and don't need to hide half of their face with hair.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 41284, Xangsane, DrKlinefelterPhdMd and 2 others
Jfl
View attachment 2321784

All the jbs crying in comments. This is why tiktokfags are nowhere near close real chads and PSL gods. Only a few are genuinely good looking and don't need to hide half of their face with hair.
Exposed all of his normie face. Jbs are still not good at detecting chad, they Just go for dudes Who are more developed, or fraud their genetics Better.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane, DrKlinefelterPhdMd, Debetro and 1 other person
"guys who mogs? strong MTN with tiktok hair or chico with boomer hair?"

"chico looks better right? so basically, tiktok fringe is cope guys"
 
"guys who mogs? strong MTN with tiktok hair or chico with boomer hair?"

"chico looks better right? so basically, tiktok fringe is cope guys"
that mtn would look better with chico hairstyle. Unless you are rocking this cringe zoomer fringe urself.
 
Exposed all of his normie face. Jbs are still not good at detecting chad, they Just go for dudes Who are more developed, or fraud their genetics Better.
It's not only that they already look bad if all face exposed, they will also age like shit
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404279/

The whole article is interesting and useful


"Some people inherently “age better” than others. These individuals can be recognized in youth because they have a more attractive face with a strong skeletal structure, as evidenced by the presence of youthful bony features that provide good support to the overlying soft tissues. These features include a prominent supraorbital bar, a strong cheekbone, and a prominent jaw line [36, 38, 39]. Because these individuals innately have youthful bony contours, they start off “high on the curve” of bony support so that it takes longer for the bone loss of aging to manifest clinically.

Conversely, people with poor facial skeletal support never have the ideal contours of youth and start off lower down the curve, and many appear old for their age, even in their 20’s. They are effectively predisposed to manifest aging changes prematurely.

Features that portend poor support include a retrusive supraorbital bar, midface hypoplasia, poor zygomatic development (the extreme seen in Treacher Collins syndrome), and microgenia. Regardless of age, once these soft tissue changes are manifest, a significant degree of bony deficiency exists. Correction of the bony element has the potential to deliver a more harmonious facial rejuvenation.

Those individuals who started low down the curve should be considered for a skeletal augmentation, not only to reverse the aging changes but also to bring their natural state higher up the curve so that the soft tissues are better supported for a more attractive look. With more youth, these individuals have more in reserve against future aging. Facial bone structures also explain the observation that we tend to age like our parents, a familial trait that we inherit from them.

In recent years, augmentation for selected areas of the facial skeleton has become a powerful adjunct in our approach to facial rejuvenation. Although many materials can be used, we generally prefer the use of porous hydroxyapatite granules (Interpore International, Irvine, CA, USA) for their versatility and due to proven clinical experience. Hydroxyapatite is biocompatible, having the same mineral composition as bone, and in its porous form, hydroxyapatite is not prone to resorption because it supports fibrovascular ingrowth [4045], contributing to long-term stability [46]. The granular form provides surgical flexibility, enabling small volume enhancements if need be, yet with minimal subperiosteal dissection. We have found this approach of directly addressing the underlying deficiency to be preferable to techniques that attempt to camouflage these changes such as extensive tissue redraping alone or the use of supraperiosteal soft tissue fillers.

Certain bony features are subjectively perceived as masculine or feminine. In surgical enhancement of the skeleton, it is important to recognize this as a foremost consideration in rejuvenative procedures for either gender. Exaggeration of masculine features is not necessarily attractive in males. Perrett et al. [47] noted that a more feminized face on a male was deemed more attractive than a more masculinized face. This was true for both male and female observers and across different cultures. Moreover, these findings have been confirmed by others [15, 48]. The implication of this is that for both male and female patients, augmentation of the facial skeleton should be done conservatively, with just sufficient volume to restore the contours of youth. Exaggerated augmentations should be avoided."
 
  • Woah
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and the BULL
It's not only that they already look bad if all face exposed, they will also age like shit
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404279/

The whole article is interesting and useful


"Some people inherently “age better” than others. These individuals can be recognized in youth because they have a more attractive face with a strong skeletal structure, as evidenced by the presence of youthful bony features that provide good support to the overlying soft tissues. These features include a prominent supraorbital bar, a strong cheekbone, and a prominent jaw line [36, 38, 39]. Because these individuals innately have youthful bony contours, they start off “high on the curve” of bony support so that it takes longer for the bone loss of aging to manifest clinically.

Conversely, people with poor facial skeletal support never have the ideal contours of youth and start off lower down the curve, and many appear old for their age, even in their 20’s. They are effectively predisposed to manifest aging changes prematurely.

Features that portend poor support include a retrusive supraorbital bar, midface hypoplasia, poor zygomatic development (the extreme seen in Treacher Collins syndrome), and microgenia. Regardless of age, once these soft tissue changes are manifest, a significant degree of bony deficiency exists. Correction of the bony element has the potential to deliver a more harmonious facial rejuvenation.

Those individuals who started low down the curve should be considered for a skeletal augmentation, not only to reverse the aging changes but also to bring their natural state higher up the curve so that the soft tissues are better supported for a more attractive look. With more youth, these individuals have more in reserve against future aging. Facial bone structures also explain the observation that we tend to age like our parents, a familial trait that we inherit from them.

In recent years, augmentation for selected areas of the facial skeleton has become a powerful adjunct in our approach to facial rejuvenation. Although many materials can be used, we generally prefer the use of porous hydroxyapatite granules (Interpore International, Irvine, CA, USA) for their versatility and due to proven clinical experience. Hydroxyapatite is biocompatible, having the same mineral composition as bone, and in its porous form, hydroxyapatite is not prone to resorption because it supports fibrovascular ingrowth [4045], contributing to long-term stability [46]. The granular form provides surgical flexibility, enabling small volume enhancements if need be, yet with minimal subperiosteal dissection. We have found this approach of directly addressing the underlying deficiency to be preferable to techniques that attempt to camouflage these changes such as extensive tissue redraping alone or the use of supraperiosteal soft tissue fillers.

Certain bony features are subjectively perceived as masculine or feminine. In surgical enhancement of the skeleton, it is important to recognize this as a foremost consideration in rejuvenative procedures for either gender. Exaggeration of masculine features is not necessarily attractive in males. Perrett et al. [47] noted that a more feminized face on a male was deemed more attractive than a more masculinized face. This was true for both male and female observers and across different cultures. Moreover, these findings have been confirmed by others [15, 48]. The implication of this is that for both male and female patients, augmentation of the facial skeleton should be done conservatively, with just sufficient volume to restore the contours of youth. Exaggerated augmentations should be avoided."
Those individuals who started low down the curve should be considered for a skeletal augmentation, not only to reverse the aging changes but also to bring their natural state higher up the curve so that the soft tissues are better supported for a more attractive look. With more youth, these individuals have more in reserve against future aging. Facial bone structures also explain the observation that we tend to age like our parents, a familial trait that we inherit from them.

What's this? Why this has never been discussed here? Seems way more effective than cope surgeries
 
  • +1
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and Debetro
Those individuals who started low down the curve should be considered for a skeletal augmentation, not only to reverse the aging changes but also to bring their natural state higher up the curve so that the soft tissues are better supported for a more attractive look. With more youth, these individuals have more in reserve against future aging. Facial bone structures also explain the observation that we tend to age like our parents, a familial trait that we inherit from them.

What's this? Why this has never been discussed here? Seems way more effective than cope surgeries
No idea, will research later
 
Downloadfile1

This haircut mogs.
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DrKlinefelterPhdMd and NordicLeonhard
@LiterallyNightwing good contents?
 
Exposed all of his normie face. Jbs are still not good at detecting chad, they Just go for dudes Who are more developed, or fraud their genetics Better.
They go for white men with certain "fluffy hair tee hee" hairstyles @Debetro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
I like how right before covid everyone had the undercut with hair slicked to the side g easy millennial haircut, and then out of nowhere everyone has either the tik tok fringe or 90s parted haircut. That millennial phase was cringe lol. Now is so much better due to looksmaxxing. Now everyone can cover up their ugly ass foreheads.
 
  • +1
Reactions: T50 Demon
I like how right before covid everyone had the undercut with hair slicked to the side g easy millennial haircut, and then out of nowhere everyone has either the tik tok fringe or 90s parted haircut. That millennial phase was cringe lol. Now is so much better due to looksmaxxing. Now everyone can cover up their ugly ass foreheads.
IMG 7625
IMG 7626



So you are saying Tiktok hair mogs this side part?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ๕ඞChick3ncu1ry
You need perfect facial features to pull that off. Most people have big foreheads and long midfaces, so they look like oofy doofies in their 40s. The fringe covers up their forehead and gives the illusion of better facial symmetry.
Yeah but if you don't have big forehead then ofc side part mogs mesy fringe??
 

Similar threads

Shahnameh
Replies
42
Views
521
rory4579
rory4579
spirili
Replies
21
Views
503
abcd
A
WhoTookVendetta
Replies
5
Views
207
iblamepheno1
iblamepheno1
God-himself
2
Replies
85
Views
1K
God-himself
God-himself

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top