Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Leo DiCaprio, but no one mentions Richard Gere in the covo of slayers

[Jagged0]

Mogged hard in his prime

aged like wine as well

 

[Bashan]

Good actor. Not even close to their league tho.

 

[OldRooster]

Gere pissed off the Elites in Hollywood, something to do with his Buddhist beliefs and his support of Tibet, not sure on the details, And thus he got Grey listed for all large movie and media projects. I am surprised anyone under 30 knows who he is.
And he was only about 5'8" in his prime. I suspect he wore lift sometimes, because in some photos he is getting height mogged b Cindy Crawford, but in others he is taller than her. And the fact that he was married to Cindy Crawford for 4 years and did not impregnate her must be considered a failure.

 

[Adriana Lima]

very handsome man love from India <3

 

[looksmaxxed]

long midface chink eyes grey hair

 

[Deleted member 17531]

not a clue in hell who this cumskin is

 

[Brus Wane]

Gere pissed off the Elites in Hollywood, something to do with his Buddhist beliefs and his support of Tibet, not sure on the details, And thus he got Grey listed for all large movie and media projects. I am surprised anyone under 30 knows who he is.
And he was only about 5'8" in his prime. I suspect he wore lift sometimes, because in some photos he is getting height mogged b Cindy Crawford, but in others he is taller than her. And the fact that he was married to Cindy Crawford for 4 years and did not impregnate her must be considered a failure.

It's not so much pissing off Hollywood elites but more that they can't have him involved if they wanna sell a movie in China which let's be real is where most big blockbusters are targeted at anyway.
I watched American Gigolo the other day and he facially and physique mogs frfr no homo.
I stg that era no one gave a shit about height unless you were below 5'10 and even then lifts weren't really called out.
That was the era when it was truly face > anything else

 

[Beetlejuice]

Most here are 2005 born zoomers,they don't even know who is Richard Gere.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Good actor. Not even close to their league tho.

Not as goodlooking as Cruise or Pitt but he is as goodlooking as DiCaprio.

 

[Bashan]

Not as goodlooking as Cruise or Pitt but he is as goodlooking as DiCaprio.

Overall, yes. However, Dicaprio in his absolute prime moged him and it's not close.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Overall, yes. However, Dicaprio in his absolute prime moged him and it's not close.

nah. Dicaprio was too undimorphic to mog him. They were on similar level just different appeal.

 

[Bashan]

nah. Dicaprio was too undimorphic to mog him. They were on similar level just different appeal.

 

[Deleted member 21735]

he is subhumam

 

[Leo69]

Overall, yes. However, Dicaprio in his absolute prime moged him and it's not close.

DiCaprio wasn't that good looking from a PSL and objective standpoint, but obviously that doesn't matter as what matters he had very high appeal. Someone can be objectively better looking like Chalamet, but it does not matter as we know DiCaprio has much higher appeal compared to Chalamet.

Appeal>PSL

The reason why people overrate DiCaprio to oblivion despite him not being objectively that good looking from a PSL or TRM standpoint is due to his appeal and phenotype.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Someone can be objectively better looking like Chalamet

Chalamet is like 5 PSL while Dicaprio is like 5.75 PSL.

DiCaprio is way better than Chalamet

 

[Leo69]

Chalamet is like 5 PSL while Dicaprio is like 5.75 PSL.

DiCaprio is way better than Chalamet

Look at the two photos provided and what I said. You overrated DiCaprio due to his appeal especially his eyes. I know my rating skills. I am probably one of the best raters in the entire forum objectively lol. They are not the same level. Look at the level of bone structure Chalamet over DiCaprio. It's much stronger. Come on man. Both of these are fair comparisons as it's both candid from a movie premiere of theirs.

 

[looksmaxxed]

DiCaprio wasn't that good looking from a PSL and objective standpoint, but obviously that doesn't matter as what matters he had very high appeal. Someone can be objectively better looking like Chalamet, but it does not matter as we know DiCaprio has much higher appeal compared to Chalamet.

Appeal>PSL

The reason why people overrate DiCaprio to oblivion despite him not being objectively that good looking from a PSL or TRM standpoint is due to his appeal and phenotype.

both of these guy are just normies. they are not good looking. their appeal comes from mere exposure and jew promotion plus status and wealth.

 

[Leo69]

both of these guy are just normies. they are not good looking. their appeal comes from mere exposure and jew promotion plus status and wealth.

Yeah, they are typical good looking guys for the most part which can be found in real life. Both guys aren't even close to 6 PSL lol.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Look at the two photos provided and what I said. You overrated DiCaprio due to his appeal especially his eyes. I know my rating skills.

Eyes are the most important things.

I am probably one of the best raters in the entire forum objectively lol.

No

They are not the same level.

That's what I'm saying

Look at the level of bone structure Chalamet over DiCaprio. It's much stronger. Come on man. Both of these are fair comparisons as it's both candid from a movie premiere of theirs.

View attachment 2079817

Cherrypick. Plus DiCaprio has objectively better bones.

 

[Leo69]

Eyes are the most important things.

No

That's what I'm saying

Cherrypick. Plus DiCaprio has objectively better bones.

View attachment 2079828View attachment 2079831

Agreed, eyes are the most important, but you fail to see that Chalamet is objectively better looking and that was a cherry picked photo. When I look at them in motion. They are clearly not the same level. Chalamet is 6.5 TRM, while DiCaprio is 6 TRM with just high appeal. I know my stuff. Motion doesn't lie.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Agreed, eyes are the most important, but you fail to see that Chalamet is objectively better looking and that was a cherry picked photo. When I look at them in motion. They are clearly not the same level. Chalamet is 6.5 TRM, while DiCaprio is 6 TRM with just high appeal. I know my stuff. Motion doesn't lie.

You just keep cherrypicking where he looks bloated.

 

[Leo69]

You just keep cherrypicking where he looks bloated.

Lol, he is 6 TRM in that video. Same thing as the gif for the most part. Whatever you wanna cope, but it's so easy when you look in motion.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Lol, he is 6 TRM in that video. Same thing as the gif for the most part. Whatever you wanna cope, but it's so easy when you look in motion.

Jfl at the coping. Chalamet gets mogged hard here.

 

[Leo69]

Jfl at the coping. Chalamet gets mogged hard here.

I'm not coping. I'm rating objectively in PSL. Yes, DiCaprio gets overrated due to celebrity bias and him having appeal. I see that from you and multiple people. I thought the same till I rated objectively and looked at candid photos especially in motion. You don't seem to have the intelligence enough to see through it, which makes sense. Nothing to argue here. Agree to disagree.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

I'm not coping. I'm rating objectively in PSL. Yes, DiCaprio gets overrated due to celebrity bias and him having appeal. I see that from you and multiple people. I thought the same till I rated objectively and looked at candid photos especially in motion. You don't seem to have the intelligence enough to see through it, which makes sense. Nothing to argue here. Agree to disagree.

Muh celebrity bias. Jfl they both are celebrities. Actually if there's any bias that's towards Chalamet because of recency bias.

 

[Leo69]

Muh celebrity bias. Jfl they both are celebrities. Actually if there's any bias that's towards Chalamet because of recency bias.

Celebrity bias as in DiCaprio is much more popular than Chalamet and been known around for a longer time combine with him of being the biggest romantic film of all time, which is Titanic. Nothing to argue here like I said as it won't change your decision due to your lack of intelligence, which is common here as expected.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Celebrity bias as in DiCaprio is much more popular than Chalamet and been known around for a longer time combine with him of being the biggest romantic film of all time, which is Titanic. Nothing to argue here like I said as it won't change your decision due to your lack of intelligence, which is common here as expected.

I take it as admission of defeat since you can't do anything other than use ad hominems.

 

[Leo69]

I take it as admission of defeat since you can't do anything other than use ad hominems.

I already provided my reasoning why he is better looking. I can go deeper, but you won't understand like me saying DiCaprio midface is to compact, lips small, and his bone structure is nowhere near model tier. His eyes are his standout feature which is the biggest reason why people overrate to oblivion despite Chalamet having stronger features and bones everywhere else. Just cover Chalamet and DiCaprio eyes if you can't see the difference of how much of a mog it is. Just brutal.

 

[New Poster]

Because he only appeals to 30+ women

 

[volcelfatcel]

@Marsik @Makhachev

 

[Marsik]

@Marsik @Makhachev
View attachment 2079882

175-188 cm is ideal range ngl. 189-195 is last acceptable, above this is ogre

 

[volcelfatcel]

175-188 cm is ideal range ngl. 189-195 is last acceptable, above this is ogre

Stepanov was 190cm and he was very low iq, Delon on the other hand is 177cm a practical size in bed and high iq @Makhachev

 

[LiteralCaucasian]

I am surprised anyone under 30 knows who he is.

Touché.