TOP TIER FACES OF ALL RACES

[aestheticallypleasin]

Top tier white face:

Top Tier black face:


Top Tier Middle Eastern face:

Top Tier South Asian face:


Top Tier East Asian faces:


Fuck, shouldn't have included half - white Meeks, this guy is better replacement

 

[Deleted member 6538]

 

[Danish_Retard]

r/truerateme has a similar thing in their list.

 

[aestheticallypleasin]

r/truerateme has a similar thing in their list.

Idk i think a lot of their list is shit,

 

[Deleted member 5052]

Just notice the similarities between them. People here still cope with "mah race mah phenotype"

 

[Danish_Retard]

Idk i think a lot of their list is shit,

True, but they have attractive faces for different races.

 

[moggingmachine]

will make a better version of this thread some day

 

[aestheticallypleasin]

Just notice the similarities between them. People here still cope with "mah race mah phenotype"

The only thing is that there are generally more GL whites than Indians or chinese etc, but if theres a GL indian or chink nobody will give a shit tbh about where you or your parents are from.

 

[Vidyacoper]

shoulda chosen these for top tier black faces tbh

 

[Mr.cope]

They all have the same side profiles
Same orbitals
Same bone structure as a whole
Good looking people are it’s own race

 

[reptiles]

They all have the same side profiles
Same orbitals
Same bone structure as a whole
Good looking people are it’s own race

Indeed except that race of its own has probabilistic odds and it heavily favours certain races

 

[Chadelite]

race is cope

"chad is his own race"

 

[Deleted member 5656]

broderic hunter and my AVI are two of the best looking black guys...i also think shemar Moore and Michael ealy but those two clearly have white ancestry so Idk if I would include them.

 

[Deleted member 5632]

Reece King should be here with Meeks not the other guy

Reece King should be here with Meeks not the other guy

@wanderingandcoping @Chadelite

 

[UrGirlsMcm]

Nigger where is my morph u fools is tripping

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

r/truerateme has a similar thing in their list.

yeah. a lot of overlap with this guide

https://i.ibb.co/M9DhR6n/Mens-guide.jpg

 

[aestheticallypleasin]

yeah. a lot of overlap with this guide

https://i.ibb.co/M9DhR6n/Mens-guide.jpg

the guide is so shit

some people could literally be moved 3 points up or down and nobody would notice

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

the guide is so shit

some people could literally be moved 3 points up or down and nobody would notice

nope u just have a bad eye

 

[Deleted member 6427]

View attachment 442125
broderic hunter and my AVI are two of the best looking black guys...i also think shemar Moore and Michael ealy but those two clearly have white ancestry so Idk if I would include them.

i always end up looking at the dude in your a i for a good 2 minutes

 

[aestheticallypleasin]

nope u just have a bad eye

they literally look like shit most of them, and ive posted some of them on here and other people echo my sentiments stop coping.

they literally have FUCKING drake in the arab section and an arab guy as the indian 9.5 and a shitskin indian as the other 9.5, i can go on but its pointless cos YOU made the list JFL.

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

yeah man drake as "arab guy" is a joke. some other jokes in the list particularly in the lower lvls. i'd say about 80% of examples are fine, which is fine given there's about 200 examples, so improving it further would eat up a lot of time. "shitskin" is not an objective metric; sendhil's bone structure is top tier. you're too try hard sometimes w your comments

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

Fuck, shouldn't have included half - white Meeks, this guy is better replacement
View attachment 406525

This guy is the best looking black guy ever, IMO.

 

[aestheticallypleasin]

yeah man drake as "arab guy" is a joke. some other jokes in the list particularly in the lower lvls. i'd say about 80% of examples are fine, which is fine given there's about 200 examples, so improving it further would eat up a lot of time. "shitskin" is not an objective metric; sendhil's bone structure is top tier. you're too try hard sometimes w your comments

it is what it is. ill just observe the blacks and indians and point out why its inaccurate
> 0.5 blacks have the same guy TWICE with two different expressions. JFL.
> wouldnt be surprised if left guy on blacks for 3.0 was rated 5. he mogs the guy next to him hard
> the indian 5.0 on the right mogs the guy next to him, the 5.5 L, the two 6.0's TO death. harmony + colouring clearly isn't considered
> the indian 6.0's are bloatlords and look like shit and would be flamed if they posted on here.
> 5.5 L Indian mogs the 5.5 R indian to gandy heaven.
> wouldnt surprised if black 6.5 L was used as a 3.5.
> 6.5 R indian mogs the 6.5 L indian to marianas trench.
> 7.0 L indian mogs the 7.0 R indian to depths of the black hole at the centre of our galaxy. also wouldnt be surprised if 7.0 R indian was used as 6.0. the eye area is so horrible. top 6% . Really?
> 7.5 Indians look good and are looksmatched. 7.5 L black mogs 7.5 R black easily and even 7.5 L black could be used as 6.0. looks like a gay.
> 8.0 blacks look good. 8.0 indians look good but the pic of 8.0 R indian is horrible, he looks much better in other photos.
> 8.5 R indian is half-white. why has he been used, jfl? 8.5 R black mogs the guy next to him easy. the dude has thinning hair jfl.
> 9.0 L indian MOGS the guy next to him SO hard that he should rope from even having his photo net to him. top 0.1%? JFL what a joke. If you want to put it to the test i can find a selfie of him and larp on that reddit and post it and he wont be rated more than 7 probably. the blacks are looksmatched but meeks isnt even full black, hes also half white
> 9.5 blacks i agree. 9.5 L isnt even south asian. 9.5 R guy has terrible colouring. cavill-like bone structure wont matter w/ that colouring.

can go on about why the list is inaccurate but it will take too long. yes its roughly accurate across broader ranges but even as a PSL aspie i wouldnt even notice if some people are moved up or down 2 points jfl.

sendhil has cavill tier bone structure yet girls dont find him hot, you can ask @Sikkunt23 and @ArabIncel ,theyve done experiments to confirm it.

here are just a couple of indians not on the list who mog him to death without even trying:

jfl it took like 10 people 4 months to come up with that , srsly...

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

@Vidyacoper @wanderingandcoping

The GOAT black:

 

[elfmaxx]

Meeks is more than half white.

 

[aestheticallypleasin]

Meeks is more than half white.

Fuck, shouldn't have included half - white Meeks, this guy is better replacement
View attachment 406525

 

[Deleted member 1680]

TOP TIER INDIAN GUY????????
Mb im blind

 

[Chadelite]

TOP TIER INDIAN GUY????????
Mb im blind

high smv chadpreet doctor

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

you have the names aestheticallypleasing so u can look them up. mikaal zulfiqar for example is generally not as bloated, manish dayal is solidly gl despite eye asymmetry, and is better than sushant singh due to the latter's short chin. you would have a hard time arguing lakeith stanfeid as a 3.5. comparing trevante and shameik, i think trevante looks slightly better due to his eye shape. beetlejuice was intentional since hes a strong example.

i don't consider coloring as highly as u do bc that is not as objective as say midface length or fwhr; rahul kohli looks like your average bearded guy. but i understand indians self-hate on dark skins. since im black and u arent presumably, i don't take your comments on the black section as seriously. just consider i have looked at way more pictures for most examples, and having minor disagreements (the larger disagreements u had are easily discredited with an image search) is not enough to discredit this large-scale guide. and please tone down your spam-tier font

 

[Deleted member 5656]

@Vidyacoper @wanderingandcoping

The GOAT black:

Giga chad but Broderick hunter and my avi look better imo

@Vidyacoper @wanderingandcoping

The GOAT black:

imo hunter is number 1 but this guy could easily be top 10

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

Giga chad but Broderick hunter and my avi look better imo

imo hunter is number 1 but this guy could easily be top 10

He's slightly above Hunter IMO (I would rank them #1 and #2), and significantly better looking than the Ethiopian guy in your avi.

 

[Deleted member 5656]

He's slightly above Hunter IMO (I would rank them #1 and #2), and significantly better looking than the Ethiopian guy in your avi.

Idk I feel like Broderick hunter is both more robust and prettier than that guy and the Ethiopian guy just Has a better proportioned face

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

oh forgot to add that trm men's guide was made w 2 ppl and the women's guide was 10 or 11 ppl i think

Idk I feel like Broderick hunter is both more robust and prettier than that guy and the Ethiopian guy just Has a better proportioned face

broderick is not rlly robust for his tier due to chin imo. comparing hunter, ethiopian guy and remi, he's the least robust but maybe the prettiest. remi is the most robust and similarly as pretty so i pick him

 

[ArabIncel]

it is what it is. ill just observe the blacks and indians and point out why its inaccurate
> 0.5 blacks have the same guy TWICE with two different expressions. JFL.
> wouldnt be surprised if left guy on blacks for 3.0 was rated 5. he mogs the guy next to him hard
> the indian 5.0 on the right mogs the guy next to him, the 5.5 L, the two 6.0's TO death. harmony + colouring clearly isn't considered
> the indian 6.0's are bloatlords and look like shit and would be flamed if they posted on here.
> 5.5 L Indian mogs the 5.5 R indian to gandy heaven.
> wouldnt surprised if black 6.5 L was used as a 3.5.
> 6.5 R indian mogs the 6.5 L indian to marianas trench.
> 7.0 L indian mogs the 7.0 R indian to depths of the black hole at the centre of our galaxy. also wouldnt be surprised if 7.0 R indian was used as 6.0. the eye area is so horrible. top 6% . Really?
> 7.5 Indians look good and are looksmatched. 7.5 L black mogs 7.5 R black easily and even 7.5 L black could be used as 6.0. looks like a gay.
> 8.0 blacks look good. 8.0 indians look good but the pic of 8.0 R indian is horrible, he looks much better in other photos.
> 8.5 R indian is half-white. why has he been used, jfl? 8.5 R black mogs the guy next to him easy. the dude has thinning hair jfl.
> 9.0 L indian MOGS the guy next to him SO hard that he should rope from even having his photo net to him. top 0.1%? JFL what a joke. If you want to put it to the test i can find a selfie of him and larp on that reddit and post it and he wont be rated more than 7 probably. the blacks are looksmatched but meeks isnt even full black, hes also half white
> 9.5 blacks i agree. 9.5 L isnt even south asian. 9.5 R guy has terrible colouring. cavill-like bone structure wont matter w/ that colouring.

can go on about why the list is inaccurate but it will take too long. yes its roughly accurate across broader ranges but even as a PSL aspie i wouldnt even notice if some people are moved up or down 2 points jfl.

sendhil has cavill tier bone structure yet girls dont find him hot, you can ask @Sikkunt23 and @ArabIncel ,theyve done experiments to confirm it.

here are just a couple of indians not on the list who mog him to death without even trying:
View attachment 442547View attachment 442548View attachment 442549View attachment 442550View attachment 442552

jfl it took like 10 people 4 months to come up with that , srsly...

The Indian on the left side under "7" (Tiger Shroff) isn't facially 94th percentile. He's more like 75-80th percentile facially. He has a huge amount of facial flaws. The ONLY thing that is good about him, when he was in his prime, is his lower third (and somewhat hollow cheeks). Everything else is shit-to-average. His eye area is bad. Low IPD. Low PFL. Low-ish ES ratio. Bad UEE. Average UES. His nose is bad too (it's very hooked from side profile and even from the front it looks weird). His midface ratio is also bad (it's too low). His FWHR is also bad (it's too low). In short: his eye area is bad, his nose is bad, and his facial harmony is bad (due to bad ratios). This (the two videos below) is what he looked like in his prime in motion. He's a 6/10 max on the truerateme scale in these yet they have him listed under a 7/10.

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

Idk I feel like Broderick hunter is both more robust and prettier than that guy and the Ethiopian guy just Has a better proportioned face

I feel the opposite. I think that Remi (the guy's name) is prettier than Broderick and comparably robust. I also find him prettier than the Ethiopian guy and significantly more robust.

 

[Deleted member 5656]

I feel the opposite. I think that Remi (the guy's name) is prettier than Broderick and comparably robust. I also find him prettier than the Ethiopian guy and significantly more robust.

How dare you disagree with me.

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

The Indian on the left side under "7" (Tiger Shroff) isn't facially 94th percentile. He's more like 75-80th percentile facially. He has a huge amount of facial flaws. The ONLY thing that is good about him, when he was in his prime, is his lower third (and somewhat hollow cheeks). Everything else is shit-to-average. His eye area is bad. Low IPD. Low PFL. Low-ish ES ratio. Bad UEE. Average UES. His nose is bad too (it's very hooked from side profile and even from the front it looks weird). His midface ratio is also bad (it's too low). His FWHR is also bad (it's too low). In short: his eye area is bad, his nose is bad, and his facial harmony is bad (due to bad ratios). This (the two videos below) is what he looked like in his prime in motion. He's a 6/10 max on the truerateme scale in these yet they have him listed under a 7/10.

the thing is nobody can accurately guess percentiles without real data. the percentiles are an afterthought; the examples are more important. if shroff is better looking than the examples below him, and i think he is, since he isn't as bloated and doesn't have a short chin like sushant, then the example is decent enough.
very good argument though i agree with all points except fwhr
also disagree with nose: his nasal width is less than his mouth and his nose doesn't overproject from the side profile. it's problematic but decent. jacob artist and engin akyurek in 7 have similarly problematic noses.

 

[Deleted member 6191]

nope u just have a bad eye

LMAO wtf isnt it supposed to be mena massoud btw Drake isnt a 6

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

thats an updated version. and i agree drakes a weak example. but its better than massoud there who many i talked to complained about

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

How dare you disagree with me.

I agreed with Broderick being among the best. To me he is #2, behind Remi.

The Ethiopian guy is good looking, but doesn't even compare to Broderick or Remi. Their bones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His.

 

[ArabIncel]

the thing is nobody can accurately guess percentiles without real data. the percentiles are an afterthought; the examples are more important. if shroff is better looking than the examples below him, and i think he is, since he isn't as bloated and doesn't have a short chin like sushant, then the example is decent enough.

The examples are messed up though. So many people are put into categories where they don't belong so the entire thing is fucked up. For example, Sendhil Ramamurthy at 9.5/10? JFL at that. He's a good looking guy for sure but he's no where near 9.5/10. 9.5/10 is prime O'Pry-tier. He's no where near O'Pry's level. Even if I were to ignore his shit coloring he's an 8/10 max. Including his coloring he's like a 7/10 max. Hitesh Bisht at 9/10? Again JFL at that. Good looking but obviously not a 9/10 (which is like prime Chico-tier). Sid Malhotra and Shahid Kapoor both at 7.5/10? That's retarded too when Sid clearly mogs Shahid (because Sid has a significantly better lower third than Shahid -- Sid is basically Shahid with a taller lower third, so you can't have them in the same category). Now in the 7/10 category we have Tiger Shroff and Manish Dayal. Neither are a 7/10. Both are a 6/10 max. Also JFL at the two indians in the 6/10 category. Does Tanuj Roy look like a 6/10? You see where I'm going with this? The entire guide is fucked up.

Now with regard to Sushant and Tiger, I agree that Sushant has a much worse lower third than Tiger BUT then Tiger has a much worse eye area than Sushant. Lower third and eye area are nearly equally important. Anyways, both Tiger and Sushant have a shit midface region. Sushant is also like a 6/10 max. 6.5/10 is an overrate for him.

 

[Deleted member 6939]

Top tier white face:
View attachment 406498View attachment 406515

Top Tier black face:
View attachment 406493View attachment 406509

Top Tier Middle Eastern face:
View attachment 406497View attachment 406516

Top Tier South Asian face:
View attachment 406508View attachment 406523

Top Tier East Asian faces:

View attachment 406520View attachment 406522
Fuck, shouldn't have included half - white Meeks, this guy is better replacement
View attachment 406525

Just have blue eyes chised Chad jaw straight nose theory

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

The examples are messed up though. So many people are put into categories where they don't belong so the entire thing is fucked up. For example, Sendhil Ramamurthy at 9.5/10? JFL at that. He's a good looking guy for sure but he's no where near 9.5/10. 9.5/10 is prime O'Pry-tier. He's no where near O'Pry's level. Even if I were to ignore his shit coloring he's an 8/10 max. Including his coloring he's like a 7/10 max. Hitesh Bisht at 9/10? Again JFL at that. Good looking but obviously not a 9/10 (which is like prime Chico-tier). Sid Malhotra and Shahid Kapoor both at 7.5/10? That's retarded too when Sid clearly mogs Shahid (because Sid has a significantly better lower third than Shahid -- Sid is basically Shahid with a taller lower third, so you can't have them in the same category). Now in the 7/10 category we have Tiger Shroff and Manish Dayal. Neither are a 7/10. Both are a 6/10 max. Also JFL at the two indians in the 6/10 category. Does Tanuj Roy look like a 6/10? You see where I'm going with this? The entire guide is fucked up.

Now with regard to Sushant and Tiger, I agree that Sushant has a much worse lower third than Tiger BUT then Tiger has a much worse eye area than Sushant. Lower third and eye area are nearly equally important. Anyways, both Tiger and Sushant have a shit midface region. Sushant is also like a 6/10 max. 6.5/10 is an overrate for him.

Login • Instagram

Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.

www.instagram.com

still don't understand the sendhil hate but i'll concede. the indian tier is the worst due to lack of examples with good picture quality. hitesh bisht's photo was colorized for example, but looking at his insta is more representative. u can probably make a better version, but most of the flaws u mention are consistent with those in other columns, such as w tanuj roy.

 

[Deleted member 6191]

thats an updated version. and i agree drakes a weak example. but its better than massoud there who many i talked to complained about

Mena Massoud mogs drake hard wtf. And also he's adored by the girls alike too. Sooo

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

Mena Massoud mogs drake hard wtf. And also he's adored by the girls alike too. Sooo

yh i was told hes higher than 6

 

[Deleted member 1751]

it is what it is. ill just observe the blacks and indians and point out why its inaccurate
> 0.5 blacks have the same guy TWICE with two different expressions. JFL.
> wouldnt be surprised if left guy on blacks for 3.0 was rated 5. he mogs the guy next to him hard
> the indian 5.0 on the right mogs the guy next to him, the 5.5 L, the two 6.0's TO death. harmony + colouring clearly isn't considered
> the indian 6.0's are bloatlords and look like shit and would be flamed if they posted on here.
> 5.5 L Indian mogs the 5.5 R indian to gandy heaven.
> wouldnt surprised if black 6.5 L was used as a 3.5.
> 6.5 R indian mogs the 6.5 L indian to marianas trench.
> 7.0 L indian mogs the 7.0 R indian to depths of the black hole at the centre of our galaxy. also wouldnt be surprised if 7.0 R indian was used as 6.0. the eye area is so horrible. top 6% . Really?
> 7.5 Indians look good and are looksmatched. 7.5 L black mogs 7.5 R black easily and even 7.5 L black could be used as 6.0. looks like a gay.
> 8.0 blacks look good. 8.0 indians look good but the pic of 8.0 R indian is horrible, he looks much better in other photos.
> 8.5 R indian is half-white. why has he been used, jfl? 8.5 R black mogs the guy next to him easy. the dude has thinning hair jfl.
> 9.0 L indian MOGS the guy next to him SO hard that he should rope from even having his photo net to him. top 0.1%? JFL what a joke. If you want to put it to the test i can find a selfie of him and larp on that reddit and post it and he wont be rated more than 7 probably. the blacks are looksmatched but meeks isnt even full black, hes also half white
> 9.5 blacks i agree. 9.5 L isnt even south asian. 9.5 R guy has terrible colouring. cavill-like bone structure wont matter w/ that colouring.

can go on about why the list is inaccurate but it will take too long. yes its roughly accurate across broader ranges but even as a PSL aspie i wouldnt even notice if some people are moved up or down 2 points jfl.

sendhil has cavill tier bone structure yet girls dont find him hot, you can ask @Sikkunt23 and @ArabIncel ,theyve done experiments to confirm it.

here are just a couple of indians not on the list who mog him to death without even trying:
View attachment 442547View attachment 442548View attachment 442549View attachment 442550View attachment 442552

jfl it took like 10 people 4 months to come up with that , srsly...

Whose that guy with blue eyes , curly hair and square Jaw?

 

[no_coat_no_soap]

and i don't understand saying example x is an overrate, even when example x is better looking than the examples below. like i said, the percentiles are an afterthought.

 

[Deleted member 5656]

T

I agreed with Broderick being among the best. To me he is #2, behind Remi.

The Ethiopian guy is good looking, but doesn't even compare to Broderick or Remi. Their bones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His.

That is true that the guy in the avi has less robust bones than the other two, but his bone structure is still very defined, imo at that point it’s more about ratios rather than being even more robust. But at the end of the day all the guys look good And will slay so it’s just a matter of opinion Who looks better

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

T

That is true that the guy in the avi has less robust bones than the other two, but his bone structure is still very defined, imo at that point it’s more about ratios rather than being even more robust. But at the end of the day all the guys look good And will slay so it’s just a matter of opinion Who looks better

What are your thoughts on Hunter vs Beckford?

 

[Deleted member 5656]

What are your thoughts on Hunter vs Beckford?

IMO hunter is better looking because beckford’s eyes are too asian looking, weak brow ridge so all the Narrowness and hooding is due to excess skin and fat over the eye which gives an asian look whereas Broderick has a strong and low brow ridge with compact orbitals which gives him deep set hunter eyes that don’t look asian at all. Also, I prefer Broderick hunter’s more square jaw