Totally rational reason why looks theory is declining

[Deleted member 4044]

Law of demand and supply.

Every motherfucker is looksmaxxing today.

Every western male is putting themselves through hell (roids, fillers, obsessing about keeping hair, tattoos, height) like lambs to the slaughter.

So much supply (tiktok, tinder etc), the demand naturally lowers.

A byproduct of looksmaxxing is weak, insecure men who can't even hold a conversation without wondering if they're good looking enough.

The opposite of that...may become more in demand in the future.

Of course, you still need to max out your looks.

 

[SharkTales]

Wdym declining?

 

[Deleted member 11748]

 

[Chadeep]

Indians still have the lowest SMV

 

[Deleted member 4044]

Wdym declining?

Go read Amnesia's recent threads

 

[mosolmaxxx]

Law of demand and supply.

Every motherfucker is looksmaxxing today.

Every western male is putting themselves through hell (roids, fillers, obsessing about keeping hair, tattoos, height) like lambs to the slaughter.

So much supply (tiktok, tinder etc), the demand naturally lowers.

A byproduct of looksmaxxing is weak, insecure men who can't even hold a conversation without wondering if they're good looking enough.

The opposite of that...may become more in demand in the future.

Of course, you still need to max out your looks.

That's not how supply and demand works jfl

Supply increase means the demand stays the same, but there's just more output and at a lower price

 

[thickdickdaddy27]

looks theory will never decline. at this point the blackpill is irreversible and it's heading in a scary direction

 

[Wallenberg]

That's not how supply and demand works jfl

Supply increase means the demand stays the same, but there's just more output and at a lower price

Econ 101

 

[SharkTales]

Go read Amnesia's recent threads

Who?

 

[Deleted member 4430]

Every western male is putting themselves through hell (roids, fillers, obsessing about keeping hair, tattoos, height) like lambs to the slaughter.

doesn't matter, there are so many things that are genetically encoded in your face or body that you cant change with anything we now have for technology. the situation, as is constantly quoted here: if everyone were GL, there would be no one GL. It will never happen.

 

[Deleted member 4044]

looks theory will never decline. at this point the blackpill is irreversible and it's heading in a scary direction

Cope

U will see 5'8 Indian janitors dating the finest stacy specimens in a few years if they've got the confidence

Bookmark this

 

[thickdickdaddy27]

Cope

U will see 5'8 Indian janitors dating the finest stacy specimens in a few years if they've got the confidence

Bookmark this

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Nah brother every human on earth knows looks are everything just a lot of low IQ people in society buy into dumb shit like virtue signaling. Everyone is looksmaxxing EVERYONE to the best of their knowledge and ability. Some people just suck at it or are lazy.

 

[eyebagcel]

height and low inhib matters more now

 

[Beetlejuice]

 

[OOGABOOGA]

That's not how supply and demand works jfl

Supply increase means the demand stays the same, but there's just more output and at a lower price

More supply(more gl guys) -> more output(more sex with gl guys) -> lower price(women don’t care as much, have to work as hard, have to look as good, aka hypergamy)

While the demand is not exactly lowered, the return you get on your looks is, so therefore looks are less valuable.

Also for what he said about men turning weak and feminine due to superficial obsessions on things like looks:
Assuming a constant demand for strong and masculine personality(maybe not an accurate assumption but whatever)
Less supply(fewer masc alpha men) -> less output(fewer sexual encounters/relationships with masc alpha men) -> increased price(women have to work harder and provide more value to “afford” these men)
thus that masc alpha personality has increased in value

He may be misusing the word demand to mean value if we’re being strict about it, but he’s absolutely right(based on his assumptions about constant demand for looks/personality with opposite trends in supply)