![staxk](/data/avatars/l/85/85960.jpg?1724014206)
staxk
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
- Posts
- 190
- Reputation
- 102
be honest I’m Atleast htn, and any advice on how to fix recessed chin (dont mind the autist stare)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Mtn, get rid of your pizza face. I’m fat and eat Cheetos everyday yet I don’t have as much as you buddy. You’re talking to a future actual htn rn unlike you delusional ass. Chad lite w surgery, I’ll get a nose job and a jaw implant. Mmm- yeah that sounds great height doesn’t matter bt
LMAO, we kinda look similar broMtn, get rid of your pizza face. I’m fat and Cheetos everyday yet I don’t as much as you buddy. You’re talking to a future actual htn rn unlike you delusional ass. Chad lite w surgery, I’ll get a nose job and a jaw implant. Mmm- yeah that sounds great height doesn’t matter btw
Ill mog one dayHtn ?
How are u Htn ?
Id say low mtn in this pic
Htn ?
How are u Htn ?
Id say low mtn in this
also I meant am I almost not that I amHtn ?
How are u Htn ?
Id say low mtn in this pic
No way acne takes off that many pointsLtn without acne high mtn
high Ltnbe honest I’m Atleast htn, and any advice on how to fix recessed chin (dont mind the autist stare)View attachment 3099217
Fuck it imma round uphigh Ltn
Nah bru if I knew someone was bouta measure my harmony I woulda used a better picMe and my friend measured all of your ratios by hand and calculated your facial harmony score, which came out to be 48%, placing you in the high LTN category.
Key Features:
Conclusion: While features like your canthal tilt, cheekbone high setness, and eyebrow tilt contribute positively, deviations in areas such as the chin to philtrum ratio, bigonial width, and neck width impact your overall facial harmony. These discrepancies make you a LTN bhai.
- Eye Separation Ratio (46.5): Slightly deviates from the ideal range (45-48), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Facial Thirds (37%, 30%, 33%): The upper third is slightly longer than the ideal ratio (31%, 33%, 36%), leading to a significant point deduction.
- Canthal Tilt (7.4°): Falls within the ideal range (4-8.5°), positively contributing to the score.
- FWHR (1.72): Deviates from the ideal range (1.9-2.1), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Jaw Frontal Angle (87°): Within the ideal range (84-95°), supporting facial harmony.
- Cheekbone High Setness (88%): Aligns well with the ideal range (81-100%), adding positively to the profile.
- Total FWHR (1.54): Outside the ideal range (1.33-1.38), leading to a noticeable point deduction.
- Bigonial Width (84%): Slightly below the ideal range (85-95%), impacting the overall score.
- Chin to Philtrum Ratio (1.57): Significantly below the ideal range (2-2.55), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Neck Width (79%): Considerably below the ideal range (90-100%), contributing to a lower score.
- Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio (1.25): Outside the ideal range (1.38-1.55), resulting in a noticeable point deduction.
- Midface Ratio (0.88): Below the ideal range (0.93-1.05), leading to a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Setness (0.22): Aligns well with the ideal range (0-0.65%), positively contributing to the profile.
- Eye Spacing (1.35): Deviates significantly from the ideal range (0.93-1.04), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Eye Aspect Ratio (3.2): Falls within the ideal range (3-4), supporting the overall score.
- Lower Lip to Upper Lip Ratio (1.33): Slightly below the ideal range (1.4-2), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Tilt (10°): Aligns well with the ideal range (5-13°), positively contributing to the score.
- Bitemporal Width (97%): Slightly above the ideal range (84-95%), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Lower Third Proportion (31.5%): Aligns well with the ideal range (30.6-34%), supporting facial harmony.
- Lip Vermillion Border Fullness (Overly Full): Considered unideal, resulting in a full point deduction.
Some pictures of your measurements:
View attachment 3099384View attachment 3099385View attachment 3099386View attachment 3099387View attachment 3099388
Yo coreschizo I just made a new post with better pics u think you can rate them for me please ?Me and my friend measured all of your ratios by hand and calculated your facial harmony score, which came out to be 48%, placing you in the high LTN category.
Key Features:
Conclusion: While features like your canthal tilt, cheekbone high setness, and eyebrow tilt contribute positively, deviations in areas such as the chin to philtrum ratio, bigonial width, and neck width impact your overall facial harmony. These discrepancies make you a LTN bhai.
- Eye Separation Ratio (46.5): Slightly deviates from the ideal range (45-48), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Facial Thirds (37%, 30%, 33%): The upper third is slightly longer than the ideal ratio (31%, 33%, 36%), leading to a significant point deduction.
- Canthal Tilt (7.4°): Falls within the ideal range (4-8.5°), positively contributing to the score.
- FWHR (1.72): Deviates from the ideal range (1.9-2.1), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Jaw Frontal Angle (87°): Within the ideal range (84-95°), supporting facial harmony.
- Cheekbone High Setness (88%): Aligns well with the ideal range (81-100%), adding positively to the profile.
- Total FWHR (1.54): Outside the ideal range (1.33-1.38), leading to a noticeable point deduction.
- Bigonial Width (84%): Slightly below the ideal range (85-95%), impacting the overall score.
- Chin to Philtrum Ratio (1.57): Significantly below the ideal range (2-2.55), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Neck Width (79%): Considerably below the ideal range (90-100%), contributing to a lower score.
- Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio (1.25): Outside the ideal range (1.38-1.55), resulting in a noticeable point deduction.
- Midface Ratio (0.88): Below the ideal range (0.93-1.05), leading to a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Setness (0.22): Aligns well with the ideal range (0-0.65%), positively contributing to the profile.
- Eye Spacing (1.35): Deviates significantly from the ideal range (0.93-1.04), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Eye Aspect Ratio (3.2): Falls within the ideal range (3-4), supporting the overall score.
- Lower Lip to Upper Lip Ratio (1.33): Slightly below the ideal range (1.4-2), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Tilt (10°): Aligns well with the ideal range (5-13°), positively contributing to the score.
- Bitemporal Width (97%): Slightly above the ideal range (84-95%), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Lower Third Proportion (31.5%): Aligns well with the ideal range (30.6-34%), supporting facial harmony.
- Lip Vermillion Border Fullness (Overly Full): Considered unideal, resulting in a full point deduction.
Some pictures of your measurements:
View attachment 3099384View attachment 3099385View attachment 3099386View attachment 3099387View attachment 3099388
Nah this took me and my friend 30 minutesYo coreschizo I just made a new post with better pics u think you can rate them for me please ?![]()
Your fwhr is too longNah bru if I knew someone was bouta measure my harmony I woulda used a better picalso how I get point reduction for 46.5 esr also is my fwhr long or compact
Broooo that’s crazy work , popped a hot dookie on my plate and leftNah this took me and my friend 30 minutes
Ojhhh okayYour fwhr is too long
so My fwhr is long like my mid face but my total fwhr is wide?Your fwhr is too long
@GabachoCopium @darktriadprinceMe and my friend measured all of your ratios by hand and calculated your facial harmony score, which came out to be 48%, placing you in the high LTN category.
Key Features:
Conclusion: While features like your canthal tilt, cheekbone high setness, and eyebrow tilt contribute positively, deviations in areas such as the chin to philtrum ratio, bigonial width, and neck width impact your overall facial harmony. These discrepancies make you a LTN bhai.
- Eye Separation Ratio (46.5): Slightly deviates from the ideal range (45-48), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Facial Thirds (37%, 30%, 33%): The upper third is slightly longer than the ideal ratio (31%, 33%, 36%), leading to a significant point deduction.
- Canthal Tilt (7.4°): Falls within the ideal range (4-8.5°), positively contributing to the score.
- FWHR (1.72): Deviates from the ideal range (1.9-2.1), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Jaw Frontal Angle (87°): Within the ideal range (84-95°), supporting facial harmony.
- Cheekbone High Setness (88%): Aligns well with the ideal range (81-100%), adding positively to the profile.
- Total FWHR (1.54): Outside the ideal range (1.33-1.38), leading to a noticeable point deduction.
- Bigonial Width (84%): Slightly below the ideal range (85-95%), impacting the overall score.
- Chin to Philtrum Ratio (1.57): Significantly below the ideal range (2-2.55), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Neck Width (79%): Considerably below the ideal range (90-100%), contributing to a lower score.
- Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio (1.25): Outside the ideal range (1.38-1.55), resulting in a noticeable point deduction.
- Midface Ratio (0.88): Below the ideal range (0.93-1.05), leading to a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Setness (0.22): Aligns well with the ideal range (0-0.65%), positively contributing to the profile.
- Eye Spacing (1.35): Deviates significantly from the ideal range (0.93-1.04), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Eye Aspect Ratio (3.2): Falls within the ideal range (3-4), supporting the overall score.
- Lower Lip to Upper Lip Ratio (1.33): Slightly below the ideal range (1.4-2), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Tilt (10°): Aligns well with the ideal range (5-13°), positively contributing to the score.
- Bitemporal Width (97%): Slightly above the ideal range (84-95%), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Lower Third Proportion (31.5%): Aligns well with the ideal range (30.6-34%), supporting facial harmony.
- Lip Vermillion Border Fullness (Overly Full): Considered unideal, resulting in a full point deduction.
Some pictures of your measurements:
View attachment 3099384View attachment 3099385View attachment 3099386View attachment 3099387View attachment 3099388
Not detailed enough bro@GabachoCopium @darktriadprince
@GabachoCopium @darktriadprince
Fr bro should like redo that shit with a different pictureNot detailed enough bro![]()
must’ve taken a while to measure it all@GabachoCopium @darktriadprince
You ungrateful son of a bitch people charge $40 to do that on tiktokFr bro should like redo that shit with a different picture
You ungrateful son of a bitch people charge $40 to do that on tikt
Yeah and u did it for free so imma ask again plus u seemed like a nice dude I just want a true rating with a pic that doesn’t got lens distortionYou ungrateful son of a bitch people charge $40 to do that on tiktok
Yeah, it took me 30 minutes with my friend. We used a math AI, gave it every single facial ratio along with the ideal ratio, and set a deviation of 7 for every 0.1 difference from the ideal. For example, 48.1 instead of 48 would be 28/35. Then, we fed it the PSL scale and instructed it to convert the calculations into harmony percentages. After that, we input his ratios into the AI.must’ve taken a while to measure it all
I checked the other pics still a high LTN bhaiYeah and u did it for free so imma ask again plus u seemed like a nice dude I just want a true rating with a pic that doesn’t got lens distortion
Yeah, it took me 30 minutes with my friend. We used a math AI, gave it every single facial ratio along with the ideal ratio, and set a deviation of 7 for every 0.1 difference from the ideal. For example, 48.1 instead of 48 would be 28/35. Then, we fed it the PSL scale and instructed it to convert the calculations into harmony percentages. After that, we input his ratios into the AI
Why do something just to complainYeah, it took me 30 minutes with my friend. We used a math AI, gave it every single facial ratio along with the ideal ratio, and set a deviation of 7 for every 0.1 difference from the ideal. For example, 48.1 instead of 48 would be 28/35. Then, we fed it the PSL scale and instructed it to convert the calculations into harmony percentages. After that, we input his ratios into the AI.
Fuck it I’ll round up to mtn plus im 188 so that’s basically chad in mumbaiI checked the other pics still a high LTN bhai
Nigga got ltnMe and my friend measured all of your ratios by hand and calculated your facial harmony score, which came out to be 48%, placing you in the high LTN category.
Key Features:
Conclusion: While features like your canthal tilt, cheekbone high setness, and eyebrow tilt contribute positively, deviations in areas such as the chin to philtrum ratio, bigonial width, and neck width impact your overall facial harmony. These discrepancies make you a LTN bhai.
- Eye Separation Ratio (46.5): Slightly deviates from the ideal range (45-48), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Facial Thirds (37%, 30%, 33%): The upper third is slightly longer than the ideal ratio (31%, 33%, 36%), leading to a significant point deduction.
- Canthal Tilt (7.4°): Falls within the ideal range (4-8.5°), positively contributing to the score.
- FWHR (1.72): Deviates from the ideal range (1.9-2.1), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Jaw Frontal Angle (87°): Within the ideal range (84-95°), supporting facial harmony.
- Cheekbone High Setness (88%): Aligns well with the ideal range (81-100%), adding positively to the profile.
- Total FWHR (1.54): Outside the ideal range (1.33-1.38), leading to a noticeable point deduction.
- Bigonial Width (84%): Slightly below the ideal range (85-95%), impacting the overall score.
- Chin to Philtrum Ratio (1.57): Significantly below the ideal range (2-2.55), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Neck Width (79%): Considerably below the ideal range (90-100%), contributing to a lower score.
- Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio (1.25): Outside the ideal range (1.38-1.55), resulting in a noticeable point deduction.
- Midface Ratio (0.88): Below the ideal range (0.93-1.05), leading to a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Setness (0.22): Aligns well with the ideal range (0-0.65%), positively contributing to the profile.
- Eye Spacing (1.35): Deviates significantly from the ideal range (0.93-1.04), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Eye Aspect Ratio (3.2): Falls within the ideal range (3-4), supporting the overall score.
- Lower Lip to Upper Lip Ratio (1.33): Slightly below the ideal range (1.4-2), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Tilt (10°): Aligns well with the ideal range (5-13°), positively contributing to the score.
- Bitemporal Width (97%): Slightly above the ideal range (84-95%), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Lower Third Proportion (31.5%): Aligns well with the ideal range (30.6-34%), supporting facial harmony.
- Lip Vermillion Border Fullness (Overly Full): Considered unideal, resulting in a full point deduction.
Some pictures of your measurements:
View attachment 3099384View attachment 3099385View attachment 3099386View attachment 3099387View attachment 3099388
I’m not complainingWhy do something just to complain
I’m not complaining
It’s jover for me huhNigga got ltncruel.. so cruel..
Yeah npcan you rate me
can you rate me
Omfg this site sucks but you got no pictures bruh
I’m not complaining
Born and breed that wayretard
get the fuck off the forumBorn and breed that way
“Get the fuck off the forum it’s only for real ogs like me heheheheh” sounding assget the fuck off the forum
^joined 8 days ago“Get the fuck off the forum it’s only for real ogs like me heheheheh” sounding ass
mirin. what program did you use?Me and my friend measured all of your ratios by hand and calculated your facial harmony score, which came out to be 48%, placing you in the high LTN category.
Key Features:
Conclusion: While features like your canthal tilt, cheekbone high setness, and eyebrow tilt contribute positively, deviations in areas such as the chin to philtrum ratio, bigonial width, and neck width impact your overall facial harmony. These discrepancies make you a LTN bhai.
- Eye Separation Ratio (46.5): Slightly deviates from the ideal range (45-48), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Facial Thirds (37%, 30%, 33%): The upper third is slightly longer than the ideal ratio (31%, 33%, 36%), leading to a significant point deduction.
- Canthal Tilt (7.4°): Falls within the ideal range (4-8.5°), positively contributing to the score.
- FWHR (1.72): Deviates from the ideal range (1.9-2.1), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Jaw Frontal Angle (87°): Within the ideal range (84-95°), supporting facial harmony.
- Cheekbone High Setness (88%): Aligns well with the ideal range (81-100%), adding positively to the profile.
- Total FWHR (1.54): Outside the ideal range (1.33-1.38), leading to a noticeable point deduction.
- Bigonial Width (84%): Slightly below the ideal range (85-95%), impacting the overall score.
- Chin to Philtrum Ratio (1.57): Significantly below the ideal range (2-2.55), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Neck Width (79%): Considerably below the ideal range (90-100%), contributing to a lower score.
- Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio (1.25): Outside the ideal range (1.38-1.55), resulting in a noticeable point deduction.
- Midface Ratio (0.88): Below the ideal range (0.93-1.05), leading to a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Setness (0.22): Aligns well with the ideal range (0-0.65%), positively contributing to the profile.
- Eye Spacing (1.35): Deviates significantly from the ideal range (0.93-1.04), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Eye Aspect Ratio (3.2): Falls within the ideal range (3-4), supporting the overall score.
- Lower Lip to Upper Lip Ratio (1.33): Slightly below the ideal range (1.4-2), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Tilt (10°): Aligns well with the ideal range (5-13°), positively contributing to the score.
- Bitemporal Width (97%): Slightly above the ideal range (84-95%), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Lower Third Proportion (31.5%): Aligns well with the ideal range (30.6-34%), supporting facial harmony.
- Lip Vermillion Border Fullness (Overly Full): Considered unideal, resulting in a full point deduction.
Some pictures of your measurements:
View attachment 3099384View attachment 3099385View attachment 3099386View attachment 3099387View attachment 3099388
Measure pixels to measure the ratiosmirin. what program did you use?
Htn in slums of the mumbaibe honest I’m Atleast htn, and any advice on how to fix recessed chin (dont mind the autist stare)View attachment 3099217
Lens distortion probably ruined all ratiosMe and my friend measured all of your ratios by hand and calculated your facial harmony score, which came out to be 48%, placing you in the high LTN category.
Key Features:
Conclusion: While features like your canthal tilt, cheekbone high setness, and eyebrow tilt contribute positively, deviations in areas such as the chin to philtrum ratio, bigonial width, and neck width impact your overall facial harmony. These discrepancies make you a LTN bhai.
- Eye Separation Ratio (46.5): Slightly deviates from the ideal range (45-48), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Facial Thirds (37%, 30%, 33%): The upper third is slightly longer than the ideal ratio (31%, 33%, 36%), leading to a significant point deduction.
- Canthal Tilt (7.4°): Falls within the ideal range (4-8.5°), positively contributing to the score.
- FWHR (1.72): Deviates from the ideal range (1.9-2.1), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Jaw Frontal Angle (87°): Within the ideal range (84-95°), supporting facial harmony.
- Cheekbone High Setness (88%): Aligns well with the ideal range (81-100%), adding positively to the profile.
- Total FWHR (1.54): Outside the ideal range (1.33-1.38), leading to a noticeable point deduction.
- Bigonial Width (84%): Slightly below the ideal range (85-95%), impacting the overall score.
- Chin to Philtrum Ratio (1.57): Significantly below the ideal range (2-2.55), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Neck Width (79%): Considerably below the ideal range (90-100%), contributing to a lower score.
- Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio (1.25): Outside the ideal range (1.38-1.55), resulting in a noticeable point deduction.
- Midface Ratio (0.88): Below the ideal range (0.93-1.05), leading to a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Setness (0.22): Aligns well with the ideal range (0-0.65%), positively contributing to the profile.
- Eye Spacing (1.35): Deviates significantly from the ideal range (0.93-1.04), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Eye Aspect Ratio (3.2): Falls within the ideal range (3-4), supporting the overall score.
- Lower Lip to Upper Lip Ratio (1.33): Slightly below the ideal range (1.4-2), resulting in a moderate point deduction.
- Eyebrow Tilt (10°): Aligns well with the ideal range (5-13°), positively contributing to the score.
- Bitemporal Width (97%): Slightly above the ideal range (84-95%), resulting in a full point deduction.
- Lower Third Proportion (31.5%): Aligns well with the ideal range (30.6-34%), supporting facial harmony.
- Lip Vermillion Border Fullness (Overly Full): Considered unideal, resulting in a full point deduction.
Some pictures of your measurements:
View attachment 3099384View attachment 3099385View attachment 3099386View attachment 3099387View attachment 3099388
I doubt itLens distortion probably ruined all ratios
i’ve never seen someone cope so hardFuck it I’ll round up to mtn plus im 188 so that’s basically chad in mumbai
I meant almost htnHtn in slums of the mumbai