Turkic pheno compared to Mongolic in short

Bars

Bars

DNR.
Joined
Jul 1, 2024
Posts
1,765
Reputation
2,725
Turkic tribes are a mix of Scythian and Siberian hunter-gatherer ancestries, while Mongolics descend from the Tungus-Manchu forests. This already raises questions about the supposed close linguistic connection between their languages. Yes they interacted throughout history, but their languages aren’t related at all—coincidental influence from living near each other.

When it comes to physical traits, Turkics tend to have narrower faces, longer limbs, lighter eye colors (usually shades of green, but blue isn’t rare), and lighter hair colors. This is the classic Turanid pheno.

Mongolics, on the other hand, have broader faces, shorter limbs, darker hair and eyes, flatter facial features, and swarthier skin. They’re stocky and strong af, with huge muscle mass, but no definition.

As a result, Mongols are generally shorter because of their compact build, while Turks are taller and leaner. The Turk will look slimmer, but the Mongol will look broader and more massive overall.

Unfortunately, the Turanid phenotype has pretty much disappeared. Over the centuries, Turks mixed with Mongolics, Persians, Iranids of CA (Bactrians, Sogdians), Slavs, Chinese, Samoyeds, Jews, Rhomaioi (Byzantines), Greeks, Tocharians, Rus, etc. This mix blurred the original pheno, and now it’s almost impossible to find a purely Turkic-looking person.
 
  • +1
Reactions: porn, ElySioNs and Whatever
Mixing with Mongols really ruined the looks of Central Asian Turks the most
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars
Turkic tribes are a mix of Scythian and Siberian hunter-gatherer ancestries, while Mongolics descend from the Tungus-Manchu forests. This already raises questions about the supposed close linguistic connection between their languages. Yes they interacted throughout history, but their languages aren’t related at all—coincidental influence from living near each other.

When it comes to physical traits, Turkics tend to have narrower faces, longer limbs, lighter eye colors (usually shades of green, but blue isn’t rare), and lighter hair colors. This is the classic Turanid pheno.

Mongolics, on the other hand, have broader faces, shorter limbs, darker hair and eyes, flatter facial features, and swarthier skin. They’re stocky and strong af, with huge muscle mass, but no definition.

As a result, Mongols are generally shorter because of their compact build, while Turks are taller and leaner. The Turk will look slimmer, but the Mongol will look broader and more massive overall.

Unfortunately, the Turanid phenotype has pretty much disappeared. Over the centuries, Turks mixed with Mongolics, Persians, Iranids of CA (Bactrians, Sogdians), Slavs, Chinese, Samoyeds, Jews, Rhomaioi (Byzantines), Greeks, Tocharians, Rus, etc. This mix blurred the original pheno, and now it’s almost impossible to find a purely Turkic-looking person.
Real turk
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Donquixote, Baban, Bomber517 and 1 other person
Source for this? :forcedsmile:
Chinese sources have written about Muqhan Khagan having blue eyes and the Yenisei Kyrgyz having red hair blue eyes etc. This isn't a surprise considering the dark haired Asiatic Turks have conquered and assimiliated Indo-Europeans, forming an ethnogenesis eventually. Today you can still see Uyghurs exhibiting a lot of these features and they have mixed heavily with Tocharians and other IE. These features most likely does not come from Turkic genes
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars
My dad is turanid I think
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars
Original Turks were 100% Mongoloid. What the fuck are you talking about
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: porn and Shahnameh
Original Turks were 100% Mongoloid. What the fuck are you talking about

Im close to putting these Anatolians on ignore for spreading misinformation

They dont realise Xiongnu and early Turkic Graves show 100% ANCIENT NORTH EAST ASIAN

These idiots claiming Thrks were mixed with Scythian and posting no source nonsese about Gokturks having blue eyes qhen Chinese sources talk about Turks being identical to them.

Arab sources literally say turks looked the same as tibetans and they could not tell them apart
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Bars
Original Turks were 100% Mongoloid. What the fuck are you talking about
Where did I say they didn't look mongoloid?
Arab sources literally say turks looked the same as tibetans and they could not tell them apart
What?
Im close to putting these Anatolians on ignore for spreading misinformation

They dont realise Xiongnu and early Turkic Graves show 100% ANCIENT NORTH EAST ASIAN

These idiots claiming Thrks were mixed with Scythian and posting no source nonsese about Gokturks having blue eyes qhen Chinese sources talk about Turks being identical to them.

Arab sources literally say turks looked the same as tibetans and they could not tell them apart
Oh just put me on ignore me you retarded nigger.
 
@Seba
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Seba

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top