ugly sibling's genetic theory

C

Chrismoggsss

Iron
Joined
Aug 29, 2023
Posts
212
Reputation
177
if one sibling wins the genetic lottery but the other is ugly as shit, they should still have the majority of the same genetics, so if you just put a kid in the ugly one because you cant get the attractive one, you should have the same quality offspring right???

Idea might be a lil retarded but lmk
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: xnj, elemanzelvadre, mirrormogger and 1 other person
if one sibling wins the genetic lottery but the other is ugly as shit, they should still have the majority of the same genetics, so if you just put a kid in the ugly one because you cant get the attractive one, you should have the same quality offspring right???

Idea might be a lil retarded but lmk
If the ugly 1 still had the majority of same genetics then they won't be ugly.
R u talking about recessive and dominant traits inheritance?
 
They wouldn’t have majority of the same genetics
 
  • +1
Reactions: mxrbled and Chrismoggsss
if one sibling wins the genetic lottery but the other is ugly as shit, they should still have the majority of the same genetics, so if you just put a kid in the ugly one because you cant get the attractive one, you should have the same quality offspring right???

Idea might be a lil retarded but lmk
jfl this is chicos sister
Screenshot 20241030 120742 Facebook


winning the genetic lottery as the better looking sibling is literally luck, that's how you win a lottery. Lucky mutations.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gods lonely man
If the ugly 1 still had the majority of same genetics then they won't be ugly.
R u talking about recessive and dominant traits inheritance?
yea thats the idea is that one is simplily displaying more of the same traits
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier
yea thats the idea is that one is simplily displaying more of the same traits
That's pure luck then ngl
Sure the ugly 1 will have the same genes but they all would be recessive fucked genes
 
if one sibling wins the genetic lottery but the other is ugly as shit, they should still have the majority of the same genetics, so if you just put a kid in the ugly one because you cant get the attractive one, you should have the same quality offspring right???

Idea might be a lil retarded but lmk
No
 
if one sibling wins the genetic lottery but the other is ugly as shit, they should still have the majority of the same genetics, so if you just put a kid in the ugly one because you cant get the attractive one, you should have the same quality offspring right???

Idea might be a lil retarded but lmk
ngl my head hurts some elab in simple terms.
 
That's pure luck then ngl
Sure the ugly 1 will have the same genes but they all would be recessive fucked genes
recessive or dominant genes has nothing to do with attractiveness, colored eyes are a recessive gene they still mog
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier
recessive or dominant genes has nothing to do with attractiveness, colored eyes are a recessive gene they still mog
I'm talking about features and other things not only eye color
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: mirrormogger
I'm talking about features and other things not only eye color
even so, recessive genes are not inferior to dominant genes it’s pretty random. Light hair is recessive, freckles are recessive etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier
even so, recessive genes are not inferior to dominant genes it’s pretty random. Light hair is recessive, freckles are recessive etc.
Ik but darker hair r more desired, u can call this ethnic cope or whatever
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: mirrormogger
Ik but darker hair r more desired, u can call this ethnic cope or whatever
it comes down to preference, the point being that there is no hard line as far as attractiveness is concerned for dominant or recessive genes
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier

Similar threads

WhoTookVendetta
Replies
5
Views
268
Deleted member 81734
D
Shahnameh
Replies
42
Views
453
rory4579
rory4579
larox.psl
Replies
15
Views
603
Ihateskob
Ihateskob

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top