UNDERRATED CAUSE OF INCELDOM: MIXED SCHOOLS. [HIGH IQ, GTFIH]

[Volksstaffel]

Underrated cause of inceldom:
Mixed gender schools


Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."

Schools in the early 20th century:

​

Why is this a reason for inceldom?


Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.

Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.

Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.

And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.


Connection to schools:

If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.

Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.


And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

 

[Mess]

My school of 1k+ people has exactly 2 black people in it.

Edit: Ahh nigga I thought you meant mixed-race schools.

 

[Volksstaffel]

My school of 1k+ people has exactly 2 black people in it.

Edit: Ahh nigga I thought you meant mixed-race schools.

Lol

 

[shia.jihadist]

 

[kazama]

My school of 1k+ people has exactly 2 black people in it.

It is possible to enslave

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

This is the most rational thing I've ever seen u post

 

[Neucher]

mirin effort and IQ

 

[Mess]

It is possible to enslave

Well who do you think does my homework bud?

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Underrated cause of inceldom:
Mixed gender schools


Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."

Schools in the early 20th century:

View attachment 3633093View attachment 3633094​

Why is this a reason for inceldom?


Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.

Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.

Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.

And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.


Connection to schools:

If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.

Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.


And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
View attachment 3633205

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

A bit inaccurate but good premise. You are talking about competition basically increasing and this improves women's chance because men are hornier than women. But most teens dont really have sex regardless of schooling so the effect is not as great. Well presented by the way. I think you should include mixed colleges too since that would give your hypithesis a good leg up

 

[Aviddegree40571]

Underrated cause of inceldom:
Mixed gender schools


Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."

Schools in the early 20th century:

View attachment 3633093View attachment 3633094​

Why is this a reason for inceldom?


Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.

Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.

Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.

And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.


Connection to schools:

If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.

Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.


And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
View attachment 3633205

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

Tlrd: the jews

 

[kazama]

Well who do you think does my homework bud?

this guy understands me

 

[FiendFiend]

Underrated cause of inceldom:
Mixed gender schools


Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."

Schools in the early 20th century:

View attachment 3633093View attachment 3633094​

Why is this a reason for inceldom?


Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.

Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.

Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.

And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.


Connection to schools:

If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.

Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.


And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
View attachment 3633205

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

Maybe. Literally like almost all my teachers were females who would tell us off and mentally castrate us. Fucking faggots.

 

[Volksstaffel]

A bit inaccurate but good premise. You are talking about competition basically increasing and this improves women's chance because men are hornier than women. But most teens dont really have sex regardless of schooling so the effect is not as great. Well presented by the way. I think you should mixed colleges too since that would give your hypithesis a good leg up

This interlinks with the problem of people getting married later.
The natural thing is to form families at the age of students, atleast finding a partner at said age.

Therefore my argument is accurate again.

But you're right, multiple factors are working together here

 

[kazama]

Therefore my argument is accurate again.

u think bullying is related to this? they usually do this to get women attention. (obv it would happen without them, but I think it would be different)

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

This interlinks with the problem of people getting married later.
The natural thing is to form families at the age of students, atleast finding a partner at said age.

Therefore my argument is accurate again.

But you're right, multiple factors are working together here

True, families happen later. But it can be attributed to the introduction of sex education, women's liberation, introduction of contraceptives and overall giving women choice. If you then allow women to study with men basically you get polygamy because women are free to do what they want without any burden from biology or society. Thus they go for the top of top and delay marriage until later

 

[Volksstaffel]

u think bullying is related to this? they usually do this to get women attention. (obv it would happen without them, but I think it would be different)

I don't really think so.
I think boys would form a hierarchy between each other with or without girls being present

 

[Volksstaffel]

True, families happen later. But it can be attributed to the introduction of sex education, women's liberation, introduction of contraceptives and overall giving women choice. If you then allow women to study with men basically you get polygamy because women are free to do what they want without any burden from biology or society. Thus they go for the top of top and delay marriage until later

Yup. Pretty accurate

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

I don't really think so.
I think boys would form a hierarchy between each other with or without girls being present

Intrasexual and intersexual competition. Brutal

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Yup. Pretty accurate

You can edit and add studies too. I have read some on the topic. Will make the post highest IQ tier

 

[Volksstaffel]

You can edit and add studies too. I have read some on the topic. Will make the post highest IQ tier

Does it make me high IQ since I figured this out without any studies?

I may add some

 

[sigmamogger]

Would you still say this if you were Sigmamogger?

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Does it make me high IQ since I figured this out without any studies?

I may add some

Obviously this is high IQ. If you add more it has the potential to be an extremely worthy post. Your reputation will be changed overnight. People will expect more posts like this from you

 

[kazama]

Does it make me high IQ since I figured this out without any studies?

Have u finally learned to use ur schizophrenia for something???

 

[Volksstaffel]

@Greypiller
@tuberculosisinmybal
@highinhibcel
@vitaminD
@alurmo

 

[chadintraining]

Interesting theory

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

the jews did all of this to us

 

[6ft4]

Legit thread
Good to see some users here are still using their brains

 

[Volksstaffel]

Legit thread
Good to see some users here are still using their brains

Thank you

the jews did all of this to us

Yes (((they))) did

 

[Volksstaffel]

@marshadow

@Nikaa

@R1PPer

@vrilmaxxer

@Jonas2k7

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Underrated cause of inceldom:
Mixed gender schools


Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."

Schools in the early 20th century:

View attachment 3633093View attachment 3633094​

Why is this a reason for inceldom?


Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.

Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.

Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.

And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.


Connection to schools:

If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.

Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.


And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
View attachment 3633205

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

Some of the muh jews shit is just natural progression of western society without religion tbh

Like 10% is legit and it's the part we can never prove (owari da)

 

[klip11]

Underrated cause of inceldom:
Mixed gender schools


Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."

Schools in the early 20th century:

View attachment 3633093View attachment 3633094​

Why is this a reason for inceldom?


Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.

Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.

Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.

And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.


Connection to schools:

If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.

Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.


And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
View attachment 3633205

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

When you said mixed schools, I thought you meant schools with different races

 

[Volksstaffel]

Bump @vevcred2_0

 

[Volksstaffel]

Fucking bump @BimaxLaser

 

[Volksstaffel]

Gtfih

@Klasik616
@The Homelander
@VV62
@warmth

 

[Bugmaxxed]

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

I could tell, because I did not read this

 

[The Homelander]

also humans didn’t used to be as subhuman before
even in the 20th century, most humans had proper development
so basically less choices in mates and less subhumanity in mates

 

[Volksstaffel]

I could tell, because I did not read this

Aren't we buddies

 

[Bugmaxxed]

Aren't we buddies

Oh definitely we are best buds I just don't want to read anything more than 3 sentences right now

 

[Volksstaffel]

Oh definitely we are best buds I just don't want to read anything more than 3 sentences right now

It's fine then

 

[rrm_ss2]

Underrated cause of inceldom:
Mixed gender schools


Up until the mid to late 20th century schools with male and female students were very rare in the western world.
"By the 1970s–1980s, coeducation became the standard in most of the developed world, at least at the primary and secondary levels."

Schools in the early 20th century:

View attachment 3633093View attachment 3633094​

Why is this a reason for inceldom?


Natural options:
A man and a woman at the same age meeting should always be connected with the intention of reproduction, at least to some degree.
We are supposed to have very limited options when it comes to a partner for reproduction.
In smaller towns/villages, the type of community humans are supposed to live in, the options for partners are very limited, "forcing" (not in a bad way, since it's natural) young people to find a partner amongst this small amount of contenders.

Conclusion "natural options":
Humans are supposed to have a limited range of possible partners to choose from, making inceldom rare.

Hypothetical:
Imagine you're a farmers boy living in a village, going to an all boys school, as it is intended.
Besides your sisters and maybe the daughters of a neighbouring farmer, you don't meet any girls.

And then someday, you stroll around the village further as usual, when you meet a new girl your age.
The immediate reaction of yours would be thinking of her as a possible wife.
And since the same situation applies to her, there's a natural intention of forming a family between you two.
I'm not saying you will actually form a family, but we can see the interaction has a deeper value and maybe the next girl you meet after her will actually become your wife.


Connection to schools:

If we connect the mentioned conclusion with the structure of the modern school system, we realise that mixed schools are working against the natural idea of having to find a partner amongst a small amount of possible partners.

Because in modern schools, women see 500+ different guys their age every day, interacting with them on a daily basis with no sexual intentions whatsoever.
Therefore the sacred bond between a man and a woman at the same age meeting each other is losing all it's value.


And I'm sure if I kept digging and tried to figure out what kind of people were pushing for the agenda of mixed schools, we all know who was responsible for it.
View attachment 3633205

(I came up with this all by myself btw)

High IQ

 

[Volksstaffel]

Bumo tbh

@itzyaboyJJ

 

[rrm_ss2]

dang I thought you posted a new thread

 

[itzyaboyJJ]

Hello

 

[Volksstaffel]

Hello

Hi repgod love U

Actually read it btw, high IQ